1,960
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The effect of environmental citizenship and spiritual norms as mediators on students’ environmental behaviour

, , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2231511 | Received 05 Jan 2023, Accepted 25 Jun 2023, Published online: 17 Jul 2023

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to determine the relationship between environmental citizenship and behaviour with spiritual norms serving as mediator among students at Syiah Kuala University (USK), Indonesia. A quantitative method employing a cross-sectional approach was used, with a sample of 200 students randomly selected from diverse majors. The results showed the existence of gender differences, with women displaying more consistent environmental behaviour. The inferential statistics indicated an influence of environmental citizenship on behaviour without and with spiritual norms as mediator variables at (β = 0.606, p = 0.00) and (β = 0.199, p = 0.00), respectively. Therefore, this study underscored the importance of spiritual norms as mediator variable for the relationship between environmental citizenship and students’ behaviour.

Introduction

The impact of religion on the lives of individuals is extensive, influencing their attitudes and behaviour in solving social issues, such as environmental problems. Despite previous results indicating no correlation between religiosity and environmentally friendly behaviour (Pearson et al., Citation2018), recent study showed that individuals sharing the same belief may still differ in their approach to addressing various environmental problems (Eom et al., Citation2021). Therefore, some religions can become a tradition in prioritizing the environmental preservation of a particular community. Several studies demonstrated that religion and its values positively correlate with individuals’ behavioural tendencies, including environmental responsibility (Koehrsen, Citation2021). This is consistent with the Qur’an’s teachings on humans as caliphs or successors tasked with preserving the Earth created by Allah SWT (Saniotis, Citation2012). In this situation, the Qur’an refers to humans as caliphs on earth, with a responsibility to protect and care for the environment:

Remember when your Lord said to the angels: ‘Indeed I want to make caliphs on earth’. They said: ‘Why do you want to make (the caliph) on earth someone who will damage it and shed blood, even though we always glorify You by praising You and purifying You?’ Allah SWT said: ‘Indeed I know what you do not know’.

(Q.S. Al-Baqarah: 30)

In contemporary society, maintaining, and preserving the environment has become a critical responsibility of all citizens. This responsibility is encapsulated in the concept of environmental citizenship, which has gained recognition in various disciplines, including economics, sustainable development, philosophy, science education, and environmental education (Hadjichambis & Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, Citation2020). The concept has been recognized as a crucial factor in addressing environmental challenges, such as climate change (Ockwell et al., Citation2009; Wolske & Stern, Citation2018). Citizen participation is a fundamental aspect of environmental citizenship, and it is essential in overcoming a wide range of problems. Community training, environmental education, and participation in volunteer organizations are some of the ways citizens can become involved in environmental protection (Jain & Pant, Citation2010). Based on these findings, environmental citizenship is vital for the sustainability of society in the future.

The concept of environmental citizenship addresses the gap in the previous literature that explores how individuals can become responsible environmental citizens. Specifically, the study shed light on rights and obligations concerning the environment and how to become virtuous citizens from a spiritual perspective. Environmental citizenship activities include an understanding of issues, the associated rights and responsibilities of citizens, and proactive measures taken to mitigate problems. Furthermore, these activities seek to promote environmentally-friendly human behaviour to foster sustainable living practices (Clarke & Agyeman, Citation2011).

Environmental education

Environmental education is a crucial means of promoting awareness of challenges in daily life. As stated by (Stevenson, Citation1993, Citation2007), it starts with raising awareness about issues and includes efforts to promote environmental values. The history is rooted in the growing awareness of environmental threats in the 1960s, such as air, water, and soil pollution, as well as the increasing scarcity of land and natural resources (Meyers, Citation2006). This led to widespread concern among scientists and experts about the need to address environmental problems (Ader, Citation1995; Lyytimäki, Citation2013).

Since the United Nations Declaration on the environment and humans, many experts, groups, and world organizations have emphasized the importance of environmental education, and the concepts must be clearly defined and taught at every level of existing education (Venkataraman, Citation2008). It develops citizens capable of making informed decisions and taking action in support of sustainable development (Heimlich & Ardoin, Citation2008). Given the importance of protecting the environment, various have made efforts to incorporate environmental education into their educational systems, workplaces, and communities to foster sensitivity among all citizens (Herman et al., Citation2013). However, the success of such initiatives varies across countries, due to different levels of implementation. In several studies, the principle of enhancing the scope includes the development of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviour towards the environment.

As an essential study, environmental education is vital in educating and guiding students to have knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviour about a good environment. Since the concept has been accepted in pedagogic studies, it needs to adapt to the needs of educational institutions. In Indonesia, several educational institutions have implemented policies on environmental education in school and the wider community (Acciaioli & Afiff, Citation2018; Nomura, Citation2009; Nurwidodo et al., Citation2020; Prabawa-Sear, Citation2018; Tanu & Parker, Citation2018). At the tertiary level, education becomes an even more critical need as it allows for a more profound scientific study and a comprehensive analysis of the environment to reinforce knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviour (Ikhsan et al., Citation2019). In various cases, experiences have a positive role in knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviour to act and be responsible for the environment. These experiences are crucial in the community (Corral-Verdugo, Citation1993; Rickinson, Citation2001), school (Ravindranath, Citation2007; Tsevreni, Citation2011; Witkowska & Menckel, Citation2005), and among students and teachers.

Environmental citizenship

Citizenship Science, with its potential and opportunities for innovation, has emerged as a significant contributor to science, policy, and society. The pressing need for conservation demands a paradigm shift towards a new environment, which can only be achieved by citizen involvement. The global environmental crisis necessitates the active participation of citizens to address various environmental problems. Citizens participation has proven to be instrumental in the development and implementation of green policies, such as green city activities and social transformations (Buijs et al., Citation2016). Therefore, promoting individuals to become environmentally conscious citizens is a crucial step towards overcoming various environmental problems.

Citizenship, as a scientific concept, studies the relationship between citizens and the state. Furthermore, it evolves to accommodate changing needs in examining the relationship between individuals and the surrounding environment (Hadjichambis & Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, Citation2020). This concept has been integrated into curriculums in various countries to instil environmental consciousness. In Europe, for example, 42 national education systems have included environmental preservation in the context of citizenship, which is taught at all levels of education (Cheah & Huang, Citation2019). Environmental citizenship is used as a crucial educational goal, shaping the competence and character of students involved in the participation framework as citizens who care about the environment (Schindel Dimick, Citation2015). It encompasses the practice of rights and obligations of citizens towards the environment in identifying and solving environmental problems.

In theory, conceptual environmental citizenship has the same relationship or goal as education taught in schools, such as behaviour, attitudes, environmental knowledge, awareness, and literacy. However, it has an additional emphasis on political, social, and economic dimensions that contribute to the environment (Hadjichambis & Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, Citation2020). Several studies have been carried out, but experts agreed on the main framework of environmental citizenship. For example, environmental citizenship focuses on ecological literacy on understanding socio-ecological issues (Cutter Mackenzie & Smith, Citation2003; Gebbels et al., Citation2011), rights and obligations of citizens in political communities (Clarke & Agyeman, Citation2011; Gilbert & Phillips, Citation2003), as well as awareness of personal values with respect for the environment and abilities to link these values with knowledge and skills (Houser, Citation2009).

Environmental behaviour

Human behaviour and habits can contribute to solving various environmental problems, including solutions to climate change, environmental pollution, and loss of biodiversity (Swim et al., Citation2011; Wynes & Nicholas, Citation2017). This behaviour positively and negatively impacts the environment, exacerbating the environmental impacts and it is crucial to understand the concept of promoting sustainable living. Environmental behaviour includes actions that benefit nature, eliminating destructive actions, and preservation activities, including saving energy (Lange & Dewitte, Citation2019).

Experts defined environmental behaviour as actions aimed at reducing negative environmental impacts (Kollmuss & Agyeman, Citation2002; Stern, Citation2000), encompassing a range of activities. These included recycling (Byrne & O’Regan, Citation2014; Fu et al., Citation2017; Hansmann et al., Citation2006; Klöckner & Oppedal, Citation2011; Zhang et al., Citation2016), use of energy-efficient transportation (Eriksson et al., Citation2008), purchase of environmentally friendly products (Ramayah et al., Citation2010), waste management (Liu et al., Citation2017; Lobato et al., Citation2015; Põldnurk, Citation2015; Rigamonti et al., Citation2014; Sasaki et al., Citation2014), and environmentally friendly energy consumption (Lai et al., Citation2019; Paço & Lavrador, Citation2017). In the last section, scholars agreed to describe the concept from the views compiled and then classified, such as basic environmental behaviour activities, and decision-making behaviour (Chen et al., Citation2017; Lu et al., Citation2017). Environmental protection activities can be carried out by the community indirectly through public space activities such as citizenship and support for policies that endorse preservation. Furthermore, the protection can also be carried out privately by every member of the public through their efforts, such as spending time with energy-efficient activities and protecting the environment in daily life. Another classification includes citizenship, financial, persuasion, and ecological management behaviour (Hansmann et al., Citation2020).

Based on the explanation of the significance of environmental behaviour, which is expected from every citizen in society, there are a variety of behaviours to be possessed. Despite the comprehension of various environmental behaviours, there exist determining factors that are not fully appreciated. Therefore, other experts attempted to provide an overview of these factors by classifying environmental behaviour into values embraced by society, situational, and psychological variables. Situational variables are more concerned with facilities related to the environment, population demographics, community knowledge, and the skills or experience related to motivation, self-confidence, and satisfaction (López-Mosquera et al., Citation2015). Based on this consideration, environmental behaviour was analysed from the perspective of knowledge, skills, and values.

Spiritual norms

The concern for the environment and climate change among people in various countries has a remarkable impact on sustainability. This arises from several primary factors believed to be habitual among people worldwide. Religious belief is the most significant source of beliefs and moral values that strongly influence environmental preservation or concern for damage (Skalski et al., Citation2022). Several studies have been carried out as an important component of activities in the broader field of social and environmental studies. In the existing literature, the study is conducted through three approaches, which generally begin with the scriptures of various religions expressing philosophies about the environment. In another approach, ethnographic studies are one of the approaches used in analysing socio-religious and specific cultures related to the environment. The final approach is a socio-political analysis of movements or activities of religious institutions that promote and protect the environment (Mawdsley, Citation2005). Based on these considerations, this study was conducted to analyse the behaviour from various perspectives starting from religious norms and political perspectives about the environment.

Religiosity or religious norms offer guidance to the community regarding lifestyles that align with the values and attitudes of individuals and society as taught by their respective religions. The values and attitudes held by individuals and communities play a pivotal role in shaping their behaviour towards the preservation of the environment to ensure sustainability (Rice, Citation2006). Furthermore, individuals who sincerely, enthusiastically, and diligently adhere to religious teachings are likely to exhibit environmentally sustainable behaviour (Kollmuss & Agyeman, Citation2002). Religiosity plays a significant role in making decisions to purchase environmentally friendly goods. Given the profound impact, the superiority as a variable to be studied in environmental behaviour can be analysed with environmental citizenship. In Muslim communities, religiosity plays a crucial and indispensable role in all aspects of communal life, including environmentally sustainable shopping practices (Alam et al., Citation2011; Ateeq-Ur-Rehman et al., Citation2010).

Environmental education in Aceh

Spiritual norms prevalent in Aceh people play a crucial role in shaping students’ environmental behaviour through formal education. The Islamic teachings, which are predominant in Aceh, impart valuable environmental values such as ecosystem balance, cleanliness, and natural sustainability (Mangunjaya & Praharawati, Citation2019; Oktari et al., Citation2018; Zabidi et al., Citation2021). These spiritual norms also exert a significant influence on Aceh people’s lifestyle, who have a proclivity for respecting nature and maintaining cleanliness. Formal education that incorporate these values in its curriculum can foster students’ environmental behaviour, promoting responsibility and sustainability (Fekih Zguir et al., Citation2021; Kagawa, Citation2007; Parker, Citation2017, Citation2018; Tanu & Parker, Citation2018). Diverse endeavours have been undertaken by the Aceh government, LMS, and the community, to integrate local wisdom-based environmental and disaster education into the curriculum, with the goal of cultivating students’ environmental consciousness and enhancing knowledge of issues and disasters (Kamil et al., Citation2020; Kusumasari & Alam, Citation2012; Yusuf, Yunus, et al., Citation2022).

Based on several studies, it is widely acknowledged that environmental education and disaster education are crucial to be taught and disseminated to Aceh people, particularly among the youth. This is due to the historical experience of a catastrophic earthquake in 2004, and the geographical conditions that accentuate the importance of imparting knowledge on disaster mitigation and environmental management in schools, with the aim of enhancing the students’ attitudes, behaviour, and knowledge on these critical matters (Kusumastuti et al., Citation2021; Oktari et al., Citation2020; Sakurai et al., Citation2018; Yusuf & Fajri, Citation2022; Yusuf, Razali, et al., Citation2022). To support environmental management and increase disaster knowledge, Syiah Kuala University (USK) has implemented several programs and policies. USK collaborates with the State Electricity Company (PLN) to create a comfortable campus environment through a tree-planting program (Puspa et al., Citation2020). In addition, the university has introduced a mandatory course on Disaster and Environmental Knowledge (PKL) (Atmaja et al., Citation2021; Yusuf & Fajri, Citation2022), as well as established a Waste Bank as an environmental care program (Putriyanti, Citation2021). The Tsunami and Disaster Mitigation Research Center under the Syiah Kuala University Disaster Mitigation Unit (Bisri & Sakurai, Citation2017; Oktari et al., Citation2015), has been established as an effort to reduce the risk of disasters.

Teaching and instilling spiritual values, promoting citizenship, and cultivating good behaviour can aid in the growth and development of students’ personalities towards environmental conservation in society. Furthermore, personal development based on spiritual values creates strong behaviour in preserving the environment. According to Mujan et al., behaviour is essential and determines the quality of the environment produced in the vicinity (Mujan et al., Citation2019). The challenges faced (Argôlo-Filho & Loguercio, Citation2014) can reduce environmental problems by educating and implementing good behaviour (Akintunde, Citation2017). Therefore, environmental citizenship and spiritual norms can be instrumental in developing good environmental behaviour. In addressing the study problems identified, the objectives have been formulated based on the hypothesis, as follows:

Hypothesis (H1): There are differences in students’ environmental behaviour based on gender

Hypothesis (H2): There is an effect of environmental citizenship on students’ environmental behaviour with spiritual norms as mediator

Study methodology

This study employed a quantitative method by implementing a cross-sectional approach to obtain data from a sample participants during the odd semester of the 2021/2022 academic year at UKS. The approach involved an in-depth analysis of an entity within a particular group to uncover issues and problems related to students’ environmental behaviour (Huang et al., Citation2020). Furthermore, the sample consisted of 200 students randomly selected from various majors, as shown in . Data collection was conducted through questionnaires distributed through Google Forms to measure aspects related to environmental behaviour, citizenship, and spiritual norms. The questionnaires were disseminated to students attending lectures in the odd semester of 2021/2022 through a WhatsApp group.

Table 1. Research sample demographics.

The instruments used included environmental citizenship adapted from Hadjichambis (Hadjichambis & Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, Citation2020), environmental behaviour developed by Meyer (Meyer, Citation2016), and spiritual norms instrument from Yusoff (Mohd Yusoff et al., Citation2022). Questionnaires were used to measure environmental citizenship, environmental behaviour, and spiritual norms, comprising 15,16, and 11 items with reliability values of .88, .87, and 89, respectively. The data collected were further processed using the Statistics for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 application. Regression analysis was performed to determine the mediating relationship, and the first stage analysed the differences in students’ environmental behaviour based on gender. Subsequently, it was performed on the dependent and the independent variables with spiritual norms as mediator.

Study findings

This study began by analysing the differences in students’ environmental behaviour based on gender and then proceeds with regression analysis of the dependent on the independent variable with spiritual norms as mediator.

Differences in environmental behaviour based on gender

Proof of the differences in students’ environmental behaviour based on gender is described in , using the SPSS program.

Table 2. Differences in environmental behaviour based on gender.

shows that the environmental behaviour of female students is higher than males (t = 2.56; p = 0.00 < 0.05). Therefore, the hypothesis, which states a significant difference in students’ environmental behaviour based on gender, is accepted.

The effect of spiritual norms as mediator variable towards the relationship between environmental citizenship and environmental behaviour

In the second stage, regression analysis was conducted to examine the effect of mediator on the relationship between environmental citizenship and students’ behaviour. After conducting an analysis using the SPSS program, it has been determined that environmental citizenship significantly impacts environmental behaviour. The results, as illustrated in , indicated that mediator variables had a significant influence on environmental behaviour, with and without citizenship as a predictor (β = 0.589, p = 0.02) and (β = 0.185, p = 0.00), respectively.

Figure 1. Mediation model framework spiritual norms.

Figure 1. Mediation model framework spiritual norms.

The analysis results also showed a decrease in the β value, where spiritual norms are the relationship between environmental citizenship and students’ behaviour due to direct influence. Therefore, the hypothesis is accepted, as shown in .

Table 3. The relationship between environmental citizenship and student environmental behaviour with spiritual norms variables as mediator.

Discussion

Several studies have been conducted in relation to environmental behaviour, and the results showed that women exhibit higher levels of environmental behaviour than men (Hansmann et al., Citation2020; Vicente-Molina et al., Citation2018; Wang & Mangmeechai, Citation2021). Other studies also mentioned that their sensitivity to the environment is higher than men (Miao & Cagle, Citation2020; Treat et al., Citation2016; Varela-Candamio et al., Citation2018). Furthermore, gender may impact individuals’ environmental literacy and behaviour (Hunter et al., Citation2004; Tuncer et al., Citation2009). Asteria illustrated that women are more proactive in protecting and empowering the environment (Asteria, Citation2019; Asteria et al., Citation2016).

The presence of spiritual norms as mediator variable acts to strengthen the relationship between environmental citizenship and students’ behaviour at UKS. Based on the findings, it can be inferred that citizenship exerts a substantial impact on the conduct of students, as determined by their spiritual norms. This is reinforced by several relevant results, where the value orientation of spiritual norms affects the attitudes and behaviour of the community (Eom et al., Citation2021; Ihemezie et al., Citation2021; Yusuf, Yunus, et al., Citation2022). According to Taylor, several experts argued since the 1990s that religious teachings promote environmentally friendly habits, leading to the green religion hypothesis (Taylor, Citation2016, Citation2020).

This study indicated that the incorporation of spiritual norms into formal education within school can have a considerable impact on enhancing students’ environmental conduct. This is because spiritual norms provide a foundation for ethical decision-making and foster a sense of responsibility towards the natural environment. The potential for increased environmental awareness among students, as well as motivation to act in protecting the environment, can be created by integrating Islamic values and teachings into the formal education system in Aceh (Begum et al., Citation2021; Karim, Citation2022; Yusuf, Fajri, et al., Citation2020). Implementation of an Islamic-based environmental education program has proven to have a positive impact on students’ attitudes and behaviour towards the environment, providing a moral framework for management. A sense of responsibility for the environment can effectively be instilled among students and pave the way for a more sustainable future by emphasizing the importance of environmental preservation and management in Islamic spiritual teachings.

Environmental and disaster education should be provided to minimize casualties and damage caused by disasters such as earthquakes and tsunamis (Pascapurnama et al., Citation2018; Srinivas & Nakagawa, Citation2008). This study showed that the application of spiritual norms can improve students’ environmental behaviour and build a more sustainable future (Altmeyer, Citation2021; Lu et al., Citation2020; Robina-Ramírez et al., Citation2020). Furthermore, the cultivation of public awareness has been demonstrated to minimize the impact of disasters and increase skills, knowledge, and attitudes in dealing with disasters and protecting the environment (Khatibi et al., Citation2021; Wiwik Astuti et al., Citation2021; Yusuf, Yunus, et al., Citation2022).

Several studies showed that reverence for the divine entity responsible for the creation of nature and all its constituents is a potent emotional state possible of augmenting pro-environmental conduct (Yang et al., Citation2018; Zhao et al., Citation2018). Religious people strongly support spiritual norms, which always have implications for extensive environmental behavioural engagement. The realm of religion is a multifaceted system in which practices and belief traditions mutually reinforce and safeguard the environment, thereby ensuring its preservation (Eom et al., Citation2021; Koburtay & Syed, Citation2021; Zeng et al., Citation2020). In addition, environmental citizenship also contributes to students’ behaviour, as seen in Yusuf’s study behaviour at Adiwiyata schools (Yusuf, Yunus, et al., Citation2022). Environmental behaviour is also determined by the level of knowledge, involvement, and awareness possessed by the community (Yusuf & Fajri, Citation2022).

Environmental management programs and policies implemented by USK and the Aceh government result in a positive impact on the physical and spiritual aspects of the people. The program includes waste management (Yusuf & Fajri, Citation2022), reforestation (Achmad et al., Citation2015), renewable energy development (Mahidin et al., Citation2020), and water management (Rahman et al., Citation2019; Yusuf, Saputra, et al., Citation2020). According to empirical evidence, the policies and programs in question have been successful in enhancing people’s environmental awareness and influencing their behaviour. These include increasing disaster adaptation capacity, integrating environmental education into the school curriculum, and establishing special institutions for disaster management (Nurdin et al., Citation2017; Torani et al., Citation2019; Yusuf & Fajri, Citation2022). In addition, spiritual values such as caring for nature, a sense of responsibility for the environment, and togetherness in protecting the environment are also reflected in these programs and policies (Afsar et al., Citation2016; Chwialkowska et al., Citation2020; Hanson-Rasmussen & Lauver, Citation2018) to form spiritual aspects in respecting and protecting the environment.

Environmental citizenship has become a concept widely studied in assessing the relationship with practices perceived by the community. The concept is present in various disciplines, including civic education, environmental education, continuing education, and science education. Several studies have been conducted, showing that environmental citizenship contributes to education, behaviour, and public awareness instruments (Hadjichambis & Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, Citation2020; Khan et al., Citation2019; Monte & Reis, Citation2021; Sarid & Goldman, Citation2021). It has been discovered that the community’s possession of knowledge pertaining to the environment is vital. However, it is equally essential to acknowledge that their attitudes and beliefs towards spiritual norms also play a crucial role in safeguarding and conserving the environment. According to Biel & Nilsson, religious people have different approaches and deal with environmental problems (Biel & Nilsson, Citation2005). In Islam, human beings are addressed in the Qur’an as the successor caliphs entrusted with the responsibility of preserving and maintaining the environment on Earth, which has been created by Allah SWT (Saniotis, Citation2012). On the contrary, according to religious teachings, guilt serves as a crucial emotional motivator for environmental behaviour (Rees et al., Citation2015; Tam, Citation2019). The success of environmental conservation behaviour is primarily determined by internalizing literacy through Islamic values in the learning process of academic units (Asiyah & Azis Prasetyo, Citation2017; Farida et al., Citation2017). The Islamic values underlying environmental conservation activities are grounded in the principles of knowledge acquisition, sincerity, and exemplary conduct towards the environment.

Conclusions

This study provided an analysis of students’ behaviour through spiritual norms and environmental citizenship. Previous studies showed that religious students possess immense potential, including a propensity for environmental conservation. Therefore, the incorporation of these variables into education is crucial for cultivating environmentally responsible character. Based on the results, spiritual norms, and environmental citizenship affect students’ behaviour. The process of forming spiritual values and environmental citizenship must be carried out by creating good citizens to protect and preserve the environment. This study was conducted within a limited scope of formal educational institutions, with a finite number of participants and programs. Therefore, further study is necessary to examine a more comprehensive sample, including religious institutions in Aceh and the cultural dynamics of the community in promoting sustainable behaviour.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Nilasari Siagian

Nilasari Siagian, a lecturer at the Islamic Family Law study program at the Faculty of Syari'ah Islamic Institute of Daar al-uluum, focuses on social research and is currently pursuing a Doctoral program in Sociology at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

Ridayani

Ridayani is a Lecturer in the Department of Civic Education, Syiah Kuala University (USK). His research expertise is civics education, law education, social studies education and moral education.

Andrias

Andrias, born in Kendari on September 11, 1974, completed his Bachelor's degree in 1999 at Halu Oleo University History Education Study Program, 2003 Completed Masters Program at State University of Malang majoring in Education Management. In 2019 he completed the Doctoral program in the Department of Education Management at Malang State University. Currently active as a teacher at the Teaching and Education Faculty of Halu Oleo University. Apart from being a teacher, the writer is also active in several non-structural institutions. As he was the Vice Chairman of the Southeast Sulawesi Regional Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPID) in 2005. Several research and community service activities have also been carried out by the author.

Kamsinah

Kamsinah is an associate professor in linguistics in the Department of English Literature Study Program, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia. She holds a bachelor's degree in 1984 and a master's degree in 2003 as well as a doctoral degree in linguistics in 2011 from Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia. She has been a BKD assessor and national level lecturer certification assessor since 2011.

Endang Maryanti

Endang Maryati is a Lecturer at the Department of Public Health Sciences, Helvetia Health Institute, Indonesia. Current research focuses on public health, environmental health and management of natural resources and the environment.

Endang Fatmawati

Endang Fatmawati is a graduate of the study and media doctoral program, teaching in the public relations information study program at the Diponegoro University Vocational School.

Susatyo Adi Pramono

Susatyo Adi Pramono is a lecturer at the Faculty of Engineering, University of Wijayakusuma Purwokerto with a major in Environmental Engineering. Several research results or thoughts have been published, one of which is ”The World Bank-Environment and Social Framework: Expectations and Realities of Implementing Environmental and Social Safeguards in Infrastructure Projects in Indonesia“, which was published in the journal: The International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, in 2022.

Iwan Fajri

Iwan Fajri is a Research Assistant at the Department of Civic Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Syiah Kuala University, Indonesia. His current research focuses on civic education, moral education, youth engagement, digital citizenship, environmental education, and 21st century skills.

References

  • Acciaioli, G., & Afiff, S. (2018). Neoliberal conservation in central Kalimantan, Indonesia: Evaluating the approach to environmental education of the transnational conservation organisation Rare1. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(136), 241–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1531968
  • Achmad, A., Hasyim, S., Dahlan, B., & Aulia, D. N. (2015). Modeling of urban growth in tsunami-prone city using logistic regression: Analysis of Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Applied Geography, 62, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.05.001
  • Ader, C. R. (1995). A longitudinal study of agenda setting for the issue of environmental pollution. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200204
  • Afsar, B., Badir, Y., & Kiani, U. S. (2016). Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: The influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.011
  • Akintunde, E. A. (2017). Theories and concepts for human behavior in environmental preservation. Journal of Environmental Science and Public Health J Environ Sci Public Health, 1(2), 120–133. https://doi.org/10.26502/jesph.96120012
  • Alam, S. S., Mohd, R., & Hisham, B. (2011). Is religiosity an important determinant on Muslim consumer behaviour in Malaysia? Journal of Islamic Marketing, 2(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831111115268
  • Altmeyer, S. (2021). Religious education for ecological sustainability: An initial reality check using the example of everyday decision-making. Journal of Religious Education, 69(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-020-00131-5
  • Argôlo-Filho, R. C., & Loguercio, L. L. (2014). Bacillus thuringiensis is an environmental pathogen and host-specificity has developed as an adaptation to human-generated ecological niches. Insects, 5(1), 62–91. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects5010062
  • Asiyah, U., & Azis Prasetyo, R. (2017). The role of Islamic boarding school as socialization agent of ecological values (a case study in salaf-modern Islamic boarding school). Wacana, 20(4), 9–17. https://wacana.ub.ac.id/index.php/wacana/article/view/535
  • Asteria, D. (2019). Women’s environmental literacy in managing waste for environmental sustainability of the City. Development (Basingstoke), 62(1–4), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-019-00227-y
  • Asteria, D., Herdiansyah, H., & Apriana, I. W. A. (2016). Women’s environmental literacy as social capital in environmental management for environmental security of urban area. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 30(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/30/1/012014
  • Ateeq-Ur-Rehman, Shabbir, M. S., & Rehman, A.-U. (2010). The relationship between religiosity and new product adoption. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 1(1), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831011026231
  • Atmaja, R. T. P., Sulastri, S., & Nazli, N. (2021). Development of students learning module for disaster and environmental knowledge subject for undergraduate students of Universitas Syiah Kuala. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 5(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i1.18979
  • Begum, A., Liu, J., Marwat, I. U. K., Khan, S., Han, H., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2021). Evaluating the impact of environmental education on ecologically friendly behavior of university students in Pakistan: The roles of environmental responsibility and Islamic values. Sustainability, 13(18), 10188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810188
  • Biel, A., & Nilsson, A. (2005). Religious values and environmental concern: harmony and detachmentn. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00297.x
  • Bisri, M. B. F., & Sakurai, A. (2017). Disaster education and school safety governance after the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami in Indonesia: From National Policy to Local Implementation. Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia: Progress, Challenges, and Issues, 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54466-3_7
  • Buijs, A. E., Mattijssen, T. J., van der Jagt, A. P., Ambrose-Oji, B., Andersson, E., Elands, B. H., & Steen Møller, M. (2016). Active citizenship for urban green infrastructure: Fostering the diversity and dynamics of citizen contributions through mosaic governance. In Current opinion in environmental sustainability (Vol. 22, pp. 1–6). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.002
  • Byrne, S., & O’Regan, B. (2014). Attitudes and actions towards recycling behaviours in the Limerick, Ireland region. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 87, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.03.001
  • Cheah, S. L., & Huang, L. (2019). Environmental citizenship in a Nordic civic and citizenship education context. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 3(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3268
  • Chen, H., Chen, F., Huang, X., Long, R., & Li, W. (2017). Are individuals’ environmental behavior always consistent?—An analysis based on spatial difference. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 125, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.05.013
  • Chwialkowska, A., Bhatti, W. A., & Glowik, M. (2020). The influence of cultural values on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122305
  • Clarke, L., & Agyeman, J. (2011). Shifting the balance in environmental governance: ethnicity, environmental citizenship and discourses of responsibility. Antipode, 43(5), 1773–1800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00832.x
  • Corral-Verdugo, V. (1993). The effect of examples and gender on third graders’ ability to distinguish environmental facts from opinions. Journal of Environmental Education, 24(4), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1993.9943506
  • Cutter Mackenzie, A., & Smith, R. (2003). Ecological literacy: The ‘missing paradigm’ in environmental education (part one). Environmental Education Research, 9(4), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462032000126131
  • Eom, K., Tok, T. Q. H., Saad, C. S., & Kim, H. S. (2021). Religion, environmental guilt, and pro-environmental support: The opposing pathways of stewardship belief and belief in a controlling god. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78, 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101717
  • Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2008). Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: The importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 42(8), 1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.006
  • Farida, I., Hadiansah, M., Munandar, A., & Munandar, A. (2017). Project-based teaching and learning design for internalization of environmental literacy with Islamic values. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9452
  • Fekih Zguir, M., Dubis, S., & Koç, M. (2021). Embedding Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) and SDGs values in curriculum: A comparative review on Qatar, Singapore and New Zealand. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 319). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128534
  • Fu, X., Ueland, S. M., & Olivetti, E. (2017). Econometric modeling of recycled copper supply. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 122, 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.012
  • Gebbels, S., Evans, S. M., & Delany, J. E. (2011). Promoting environmental citizenship and corporate social responsibility through a school/industry/university partnership. Journal of Biological Education, 45(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2011.537834
  • Gilbert, L., & Phillips, C. (2003). Practices of urban environmental citizenship: rights to the city and rights to nature in toronto. Citizenship Studies, 7(3), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362102032000098896
  • Hadjichambis, A. C., & Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D. (2020). Environmental citizenship questionnaire (ECQ): The development and validation of an evaluation instrument for secondary school students. Sustainability, 12(3), 821. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12030821
  • Hansmann, R., Bernasconi, P., Smieszek, T., Loukopoulos, P., & Scholz, R. W. (2006). Justifications and self-organization as determinants of recycling behavior: The case of used batteries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 47(2), 133–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.10.006
  • Hansmann, R., Laurenti, R., Mehdi, T., & Binder, C. R. (2020). Determinants of pro-environmental behavior: A comparison of university students and staff from diverse faculties at a Swiss University. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 121864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121864
  • Hanson-Rasmussen, N. J., & Lauver, K. J. (2018). Environmental responsibility: Millennial values and cultural dimensions. Journal of Global Responsibility, 9(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-06-2017-0039
  • Heimlich, J. E., & Ardoin, N. M. (2008). Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802148881
  • Herman, R. A., Garcia-Alonso, M., Layton, R., & Raybould, A. (2013). Bringing policy relevance and scientific discipline to environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops. Trends in Biotechnology, 31(9), 493–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.05.012
  • Houser, N. O. (2009). Ecological democracy: An environmental approach to citizenship education. Theory and Research in Social Education, 37(2), 192–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2009.10473394
  • Huang, L., Wen, Y., & Gao, J. (2020). What ultimately prevents the pro-environmental behavior? An in-depth and extensive study of the behavioral costs. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 158, 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104747
  • Hunter, L. M., Hatch, A., & Johnson, A. (2004). Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviors. Social Science Quarterly, 85(3), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00239.x
  • Ihemezie, E. J., Nawrath, M., Strauß, L., Stringer, L. C., & Dallimer, M. (2021). The influence of human values on attitudes and behaviours towards forest conservation. In Journal of environmental management (Vol. 292). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112857
  • Ikhsan, F. A., Kurnianto, F. A., Apriyanto, B., Nurdin, E. A., & Bachtiar, R. W. (2019). The effectivity of environmental education in scaffolding students’ ecological literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.14522
  • Jain, S., & Pant, P. (2010). Environmental management systems for educational institutions: A case study of TERI University, New Delhi. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(3), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371011058532
  • Kagawa, F. (2007). Dissonance in students’ perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: Implications for curriculum change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370710817174
  • Kamil, P. A., Utaya, S., Sumarmi, & Utomo, D. H. (2020). Improving disaster knowledge within high school students through geographic literacy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 43, 101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101411
  • Karim, A. (2022). Integration of religious awareness in environmental education. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 10(2), 415. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v10i2.14404
  • Khan, M. A. S., Jianguo, D., Ali, M., Saleem, S., & Usman, M. (2019). Interrelations between ethical leadership, green psychological climate, and organizational environmental citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(AUG). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01977
  • Khatibi, F. S., Dedekorkut-Howes, A., Howes, M., & Torabi, E. (2021). Can public awareness, knowledge and engagement improve climate change adaptation policies? Discover Sustainability, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-021-00024-z
  • Klöckner, C. A., & Oppedal, I. O. (2011). General vs. domain specific recycling behaviour - Applying a multilevel comprehensive action determination model to recycling in Norwegian student homes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(4), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.12.009
  • Koburtay, T., & Syed, J. (2021). Do religion and spirituality matter for hotel workers’ well-being and guests’ happiness? An update of the attraction-selection-attrition theory. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95, 102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102951
  • Koehrsen, J. (2021). Muslims and climate change: How Islam, Muslim organizations, and religious leaders influence climate change perceptions and mitigation activities. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, 12(Issue 3). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.702.
  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  • Kusumasari, B., & Alam, Q. (2012). Local wisdom-based disaster recovery model in Indonesia. Disaster Prevention & Management: An International Journal, 21(3), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561211234525
  • Kusumastuti, R. D., Arviansyah, A., Nurmala, N., & Wibowo, S. S. (2021). Knowledge management and natural disaster preparedness: A systematic literature review and a case study of East Lombok, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 58, 102223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102223
  • Lai, Q., Kong, L., Gong, W., Russell, A. G., & Fan, M. (2019). Low-energy-consumption and environmentally friendly CO2 capture via blending alcohols into amine solution. Applied Energy, 254, 113696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113696
  • Lange, F., & Dewitte, S. (2019). Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. In Journal of environmental psychology (Vol. 63, pp. 92–100). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.009
  • Liu, Y., Xing, P., & Liu, J. (2017). Environmental performance evaluation of different municipal solid waste management scenarios in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 125, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.005
  • Lobato, N. C. C., Villegas, E. A., & Mansur, M. B. (2015). Management of solid wastes from steelmaking and galvanizing processes: A brief review. In Resources, conservation and recycling (Vol. 102, pp. 49–57). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.025
  • López-Mosquera, N., Lera-López, F., & Sánchez, M. (2015). Key factors to explain recycling, car use and environmentally responsible purchase behaviors: A comparative perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 99, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.03.007
  • Lu, H., Liu, X., Chen, H., Long, R., & Yue, T. (2017). Who contributed to “corporation green” in China? A view of public- and private-sphere pro-environmental behavior among employees. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.12.008
  • Lu, H., Zou, J., Chen, H., & Long, R. (2020). Promotion or inhibition? Moral norms, anticipated emotion and employee’s pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120858
  • Lyytimäki, J. (2013). Nature’s nocturnal services: Light pollution as a non-recognised challenge for ecosystem services research and management. Ecosystem Services, 3, e44–e48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.12.001
  • Mahidin, S., Erdiwansyah, H., Hisbullah, H. A. P., Fitria, M., Sidiq, M. A., Bindar, A., Zhafran, B., Tarisma, R., Rinaldi, Y., Fitria, B., Tarisma, R., & Bindar, Y. (2020). Analysis of power from palm oil solid waste for biomass power plants: A case study in Aceh Province. Chemosphere, 253, 126714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126714
  • Mangunjaya, F. M., & Praharawati, G. (2019). Fatwas on boosting environmental conservation in Indonesia. Religions, 10(10), 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10100570
  • Mawdsley, E. (2005). “The abuse of religion and ecology: the Vishva Hindu Parishad and Tehri Dam”. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology, 9(Issue 1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568535053628427
  • Meyer, A. (2016). Heterogeneity in the preferences and pro-environmental behavior of college students: The effects of years on campus, demographics, and external factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3451–3463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.133
  • Meyers, R. B. (2006). Environmental learning: Reflections on practice, research and theory. Environmental Education Research, 12(3–4), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620600799216
  • Miao, R. E., & Cagle, N. L. (2020). The role of gender, race, and ethnicity in environmental identity development in undergraduate student narratives. Environmental Education Research, 26(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1717449
  • Mohd Yusoff, M. Z., Hamzah, A., Fajri, I., Za, T., & Yusuf, S. M. (2022). The effect of spiritual and social norm in moral judgement. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 27(1), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2022.2156799
  • Monte, T., & Reis, P. (2021). Design of a pedagogical model of education for environmental citizenship in primary education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11), 6000. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116000
  • Mujan, I., Anđelković, A. S., Munćan, V., Kljajić, M., & Ružić, D. (2019). Influence of indoor environmental quality on human health and productivity - a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 646–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.307
  • Nomura, K. (2009). A perspective on education for sustainable development: Historical development of environmental education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(6), 621–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.12.002
  • Nurdin, N., Rafliana, I., Hidayati, S., Oktari, R. S., & Djalante, R. (2017). Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation into school curricula: from national policy to local implementation. Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia: Progress, Challenges, and Issues, 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54466-3_8
  • Nurwidodo, N., Amin, M., Ibrohim, I., & Sueb, S. (2020). The role of eco-school program (Adiwiyata) towards environmental literacy of high school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.3.1089
  • Ockwell, D., Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2009). Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: Forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement? Science Communication, 30(3), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008328969
  • Oktari, R. S., Munadi, K., Idroes, R., & Sofyan, H. (2020). Knowledge management practices in disaster management: Systematic review. In International journal of disaster risk reduction (Vol. 51). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101881
  • Oktari, R. S., Shiwaku, K., Munadi, K., Syamsidik, S., & Shaw, R. (2015). A conceptual model of a school-community collaborative network in enhancing coastal community resilience in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12, 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.02.006
  • Oktari, R. S., Shiwaku, K., Munadi, K., Syamsidik, S., & Shaw, R. (2018). Enhancing community resilience towards disaster: The contributing factors of school-community collaborative network in the tsunami affected area in Aceh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 29, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.07.009
  • Paço, A., & Lavrador, T. (2017). Environmental knowledge and attitudes and behaviours towards energy consumption. Journal of Environmental Management, 197, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.100
  • Parker, L. (2017). Religious environmental education? The new school curriculum in Indonesia. Environmental Education Research, 23(9), 1249–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1150425
  • Parker, L. (2018). Environmentalism and education for sustainability in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(136), 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1519994
  • Pascapurnama, D. N., Murakami, A., Chagan-Yasutan, H., Hattori, T., Sasaki, H., & Egawa, S. (2018). Integrated health education in disaster risk reduction: Lesson learned from disease outbreak following natural disasters in Indonesia. In International journal of disaster risk reduction (Vol. 29, pp. 94–102). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.07.013
  • Pearson, A. R., Schuldt, J. P., Romero-Canyas, R., Ballew, M. T., & Larson-Konar, D. (2018). Diverse segments of the US public underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(49), 12429–12434. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804698115
  • Põldnurk, J. (2015). Optimisation of the economic, environmental and administrative efficiency of the municipal waste management model in rural areas. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 97, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.02.003
  • Prabawa-Sear, K. (2018). Winning beats learning: Environmental education in Indonesian senior high schools. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(136), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1496631
  • Puspa, V. R., Djufri, H., Hartini, S., & Hartini, S. (2020). The diversity of trees and open green spaces (OGS) at Universitas Syiah Kuala. Journal of Physics, 1460(1), 012078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012078
  • Putriyanti, A. (2021). Keterlibatan Mahasiswa Relawan Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Kampus (Studi Bank Sampah Universitas Syiah Kuala) [ Doctoral dissertation]. UIN Ar-Raniry.
  • Rahman, A., Iwasaki, S., Sutton, S. A., Sakurai, A., & Parmakope, P. (2019). Urban water management issues and challenges after the 2004 indian ocean tsunami recovery: lessons learned from banda Aceh City, Indonesia. Disaster Risk Reduction in Indonesia: Progress, Challenges, and Issues, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8947-3_23
  • Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W. C., & Mohamad, O. (2010). Green product purchase intention: Some insights from a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12), 1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.007
  • Ravindranath, M. J. (2007). Environmental education in teacher education in India: Experiences and challenges in the United Nation’s Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Education for Teaching, 33(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470701259481
  • Rees, J. H., Klug, S., & Bamberg, S. (2015). Guilty conscience: Motivating pro-environmental behavior by inducing negative moral emotions. Climatic Change, 130(3), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1278-x
  • Rice, G. (2006). Is there a role for Islamic environmental ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 65(4), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-0010-9
  • Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620120065230
  • Rigamonti, L., Grosso, M., Møller, J., Martinez Sanchez, V., Magnani, S., & Christensen, T. H. (2014). Environmental evaluation of plastic waste management scenarios. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 85, 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.012
  • Robina-Ramírez, R., Sánchez-Hernández, M. I., Jiménez-Naranjo, H. V., & Díaz-Caro, C. (2020). The challenge of greening religious schools by improving the environmental competencies of teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00520
  • Sakurai, A., Bisri, M. B. F., Oda, T., Oktari, R. S., Murayama, Y., Nizammudin, N., & Affan, M. (2018). Exploring minimum essentials for sustainable school disaster preparedness: A case of elementary schools in Banda Aceh City, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 29, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.08.005
  • Saniotis, A. (2012). Muslims and ecology: Fostering Islamic environmental ethics. Contemporary Islam, 6(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-011-0173-8
  • Sarid, A., & Goldman, D. (2021). A value-based framework connecting environmental citizenship and change agents for sustainability—implications for education for environmental citizenship. Sustainability, 13(8), 4338. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084338
  • Sasaki, S., Araki, T., Tambunan, A. H., & Prasadja, H. (2014). Household income, living and working conditions of dumpsite waste pickers in Bantar Gebang: Toward integrated waste management in Indonesia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 89, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.05.006
  • Schindel Dimick, A. (2015). Supporting youth to develop environmental citizenship within/against a neoliberal context. Environmental Education Research, 21(3), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.994164
  • Skalski, S. B., Loichen, T., Toussaint, L. L., Uram, P., Kwiatkowska, A., & Surzykiewicz, J. (2022). Relationships between spirituality, religious fundamentalism and environmentalism: the mediating role of right-wing authoritarianism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13242. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013242
  • Srinivas, H., & Nakagawa, Y. (2008). Environmental implications for disaster preparedness: Lessons Learnt from the Indian Ocean Tsunami. Journal of Environmental Management, 89(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.054
  • Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. The Journal of Social Issues, 56(Issue 3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
  • Stevenson, R. B. (1993). Becoming compatible: Curriculum and environmental thought. The Journal of Environmental Education, 24(2), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1993.10801968
  • Stevenson, R. B. (2007). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701295726
  • Swim, J. K., Clayton, S., & Howard, G. S. (2011). Human behavioral contributions to climate change: psychological and contextual drivers. American Psychologist, 66(4), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023472
  • Tam, K. P. (2019). Anthropomorphism of nature, environmental guilt, and pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability, 11(19), 5430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195430
  • Tanu, D., & Parker, L. (2018). Fun, ‘family’, and friends: Developing pro-environmental behaviour among high school students in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 46(136), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2018.1518015
  • Taylor, B. (2016). The greening of religion hypothesis (part one): from Lynn White, Jr and claims that religions can promote environmentally destructive attitudes and behaviors to assertions they are becoming environmentally friendly. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture, 10(3), 268–305. https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.v10i3.29010
  • Taylor, B. (2020). Religion and environmental behaviour (part two): Dark-green nature spiritualities and the fate of the Earth. The Ecological Citizen, 3(2), 135–140. www.ecologicalcitizen.net
  • Torani, S., Majd, P., Maroufi, S., Dowlati, M., & Sheikhi, R. (2019). The importance of education on disasters and emergencies: A review article. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_262_18
  • Treat, T. A., Hinkel, H., Smith, J. R., & Viken, R. J. (2016). Men’s perceptions of women’s sexual interest: Effects of environmental context, sexual attitudes, and women’s characteristics. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 1(1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0009-4
  • Tsevreni, I. (2011). Towards an environmental education without scientific knowledge: An attempt to create an action model based on children’s experiences, emotions and perceptions about their environment. Environmental Education Research, 17(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504621003637029
  • Tuncer, G., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H., & Kaplowitz, M. (2009). Assessing pre-service teachers’ environmental literacy in Turkey as a mean to develop teacher education programs. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(4), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.10.003
  • Varela-Candamio, L., Novo-Corti, I., & García-Álvarez, M. T. (2018). The importance of environmental education in the determinants of green behavior: A meta-analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1565–1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.214
  • Venkataraman, B. (2008). Why environmental education? Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(5), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.50.5.8-11
  • Vicente-Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sainz, A., & Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2018). Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079
  • Wang, H., & Mangmeechai, A. (2021). Understanding the gap between environmental intention and pro-environmental behavior towards the waste sorting and management policy of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020757
  • Witkowska, E., & Menckel, E. (2005). Perceptions of sexual harassment in Swedish high schools: Experiences and school-environment problems. European Journal of Public Health, 15(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cki119
  • Wiwik Astuti, N. M., Werdhiana, I. K., & Wahyono, U. (2021). Impacts of direct disaster experience on teachers’ knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of disaster risk reduction curriculum implementation in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 53, 101992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101992
  • Wolske, K. S., & Stern, P. C. (2018). Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. In Psychology and climate change: human perceptions, impacts, and responses (pp. 127–160). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813130-5.00007-2
  • Wynes, S., & Nicholas, K. A. (2017). The climate mitigation gap: Education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environmental Research Letters, 12(7), 074024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541
  • Yang, Y., Hu, J., Jing, F., & Nguyen, B. (2018). From awe to ecological behavior: The mediating role of connectedness to nature. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7), 2477. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072477
  • Yusuf, R., & Fajri, I. (2022). Differences in behavior, engagement and environmental knowledge on waste management for science and social students through the campus program. Heliyon, 8(2), e08912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08912
  • Yusuf, R., Fajri, I., & Saputra, J. (2020). A comparison of student environmental literacy: public and Islamic schools in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation Creativity and Change, 12(9), 222–239. www.ijicc.net
  • Yusuf, R., Razali, S., Maimun, F. I., Gani, S. A., Fajri, I., & Gani, S. A. (2022). Disaster education in disaster-prone schools: A systematic review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1041(1), 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1041/1/012034
  • Yusuf, R., Saputra, J., & Gani, S. A. (2020). Identifying the green supply chain for environmental sanitation management in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. International Journal of Supply, Chain. Mgt, 9(3) http://excelingtech.co.uk/
  • Yusuf, R., Yunus, M., Maimun, M., & Fajri, I. (2022). Environmental education: A correlational study among environmental literacy, disaster knowledge, environmental sensitivity, and clean-living behavior of post tsunami disaster in aceh communities, Indonesia. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 31(1), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/139327
  • Zabidi, F. N. M., Abd Rahman, N., & Halim, L. (2021). Integration of Islamic values for environmental conservation: An analysis of school textbooks. Religions, 12(7), 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070509
  • Zeng, S., Wu, L., & Liu, T. (2020). Religious identity and public pro‐environmental behavior in China: The mediating role of environmental risk perception. Religions, 11(4), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11040165
  • Zhang, S., Zhang, M., Yu, X., & Ren, H. (2016). What keeps Chinese from recycling: Accessibility of recycling facilities and the behavior. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.008
  • Zhao, H., Zhang, H., Xu, Y., Lu, J., & He, W. (2018). Relation between awe and environmentalism: The role of social dominance orientation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(DEC). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02367