Effects of Positive versus Negative Framing on Stigma toward Individuals Recovering from Methamphetamine Use Disorder during Randomized Brief Video Exposure

ABSTRACT

Eighty-two Australians (mean age = 30.07; 61% female) were blindly randomized to view either a video edited to depict a positive or negative presentation of individuals in recovery from methamphetamine use disorder. Participants completed the Social Distance Scale for Substance Users, Dangerousness Scale for Substance Users and Affect Scale for Substance Users before and after video exposure. Following video exposure, those exposed to the positive video portrayal reported lower desire for social distance (p < .001), lower perceptions of dangerousness (p = .011), and more favorable affective reactions (p < .001). Participants’ previous level of contact with the target group did not predict baseline stigma or moderate the experimental effect. Participants’ qualitative responses to the experiment were assessed via content analysis and indicated mainly positive or ambivalent attitudes, unchanged by the video; however, 18% of those receiving the positive video reported attitudes becoming more sympathetic/favorable. Findings suggest that media depictions which include people with methamphetamine use disorder displaying friendliness and recovery narratives may improve community perceptions of people recovering from methamphetamine use disorder, and conversely, unsmiling portrayals focusing on harm done to others increases desire for social distance and perceived dangerousness.

KEYWORDS:

• Methamphetamine use disorder
• stigma
• contact
• intervention
• positive framing

Acknowledgments

This study was not funded.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. An item (related to hunting licenses) was omitted because it was not applicable to Australians.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.