186
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The new conservatism and the critique of equity planning

Special Section

Pages 79-93 | Published online: 06 Aug 2006
 

Abstract

This essay examines neoconservative criticisms of equity planning, and the challenges against the right of government to regulate local development and land use. The specific concern of this essay is how, or if, local development administrators (equity planners), should use their discretionary powers to ensure that city officials and private developers promote and protect the interests of urban residents, particularly the poor and disadvantaged. The essay begins by discussing the alleged conflict said to exist between needy urban residents and the more secure urban taxpayers. The contrary views of equity planners are then reviewed, and the tensions within the neoconservative arguments are exposed and critiqued. Finally, the dispute between equity planners and neoconservatives is further explored by examining the dispute over the voucher system to address the problem of equal educational opportunity in urban communities.

Notes

M. B. Teitz, “American Planning in the 1990s: Evolution, Debate and Challenge,” Urban Studies, 33 (1996): 649–71.

F. Fischer and J. Forester, Confronting Values in Policy Analysis (New Bury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1987).

P. Steinfels, The Neoconservatives (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1979).

Fischer and Forester, Confronting Values in Policy Analysis, 101–06.

W. J. Wilson, The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).

L. Rainwater, Behind Ghetto Walls (Chicago: Aldine, 1970).

B. E. Lawson (ed.), The Underclass Question (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992).

N. Krumholz, Reinventing Cities: Equity Planners Tell Their Stories (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1994).

N. Krumholz and J. Forester, Making Equity Planning Work: Leadership in the Public Sector (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990).

J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971).

Wilson, The Truly Disadvantaged, 54.

P. Gottfried and T. Fleming, The Conservative Movement (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1988), Chapter 4.

Krumholz and Forester, Making Equity Planning Work.

J. Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992).

Teitz, “American Planning in the 1990s,” 650.

John Cobbs, “Egalitarianism: Threat to a Free Market,” Business Week (December 1, 1975): 62–65.

Cobbs, “Egalitarianism,” 62.

E. McKenzie, Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994).

G. C. Hemmens, “At home in the CID,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, 11 (1995): 230–32.

J. Capraro, A. Ditton, and R. Giloth, Neighborhood Economic Development: Working Together for Chicago's Future (Chicago: Department of Economic Development, 1985).

A. Alkalimat and D. Gills, Harold Washington and the Crisis of Black Power in Chicago (Chicago: Twentieth Century, 1989).

R. Mier, Social Justice and Local Development Policy (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1993).

City of Chicago Department of Economic Development, Chicago Works Together: 1984 Development Plan (Chicago: Robert Mier, 1984).

Cleveland Tomorrow Committee, Cleveland Tomorrow: A Strategy for Economic Vitality (Cleveland: Robert Mier, 1981).

Rawls, Political Liberalism, 150–54.

J. C. Smart and B. Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge University Press, 1973).

R. Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).

M. Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).

Mier, Social Justice and Local Development Policy, Chapter 5.

E. F. Paul, F. D. Miller, Jr., J. Paul, and J. Ahrens, Equal Opportunity (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987).

See note 16.

A. Vedlitz, Conservative Mythology and Public Policy in America (Westport: Praeger, 1988), 17.

Vedlitz, Conservative Mythology, Chapter 3.

T. Sowell, Ethnic America (New York: Basic Books, 1981), 187.

Mier, Social Justice and Local Development Policy, 28–29.

Joseph L. Blast, “Why Conservatives and Libertarians Should Support School Vouchers,” The Independent Review, 7, no. 2 (Fall 2002): 265–76.

E. Doer, A. J. Menendez, and J. M. Somley, The Case Against School Vouchers (New York: Prometheus Books, 1996), 12.

Mier, Social Justice and Local Development Policy, Chapters 4, 10, and 11.

Paul, et al., Equal Opportunity.

R. J. Hernstein and C. Murray, The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.