1,779
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Characteristics analysis of Early Responsive to Dehydration genes in Arabidopsis thaliana (AtERD)

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Article: 2105021 | Received 31 May 2022, Accepted 18 Jul 2022, Published online: 02 Aug 2022

ABSTRACT

Early Responsive to Dehydration (ERD) genes are rapidly induced in response to various biotic and abiotic stresses, such as bacteria, drought, light, temperature and high salt in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sixteen ERD of Arabidopsis thaliana (AtERD) genes have been previously identified. The lengths of the coding region of the genes are 504–2838 bp. They encode 137–745 amino acids. In this study, the AtERD genes structure and promoter are analyzed through bioinformatics, and a overall function is summarized and a systematic signal pathway involving AtERD genes is mapped. AtERD9, AtERD11 and AtERD13 have the GST domain. AtERD10 and AtERD14 have the Dehyd domain. The promoters regions contain 32 light responsive elements, 23 ABA responsive elements, 5 drought responsive elements, 5 meristem expression related elements and 132 core promoter elements. The study provides a theoretical guidance for subsequent studies of AtERD genes.

1 Introduction

Plants can’t avoid stresses as effectively as animals due to their inherent growth characteristics. However, the plants develop some adaptive mechanisms to minimize the damage caused by the stresses, from stress perception to stress response.Citation1

Among all kinds of stresses, the proportion caused by water shortage is the highestCitation2,Citation3 and the water shortage caused by drought is most serious. To overcome drought stress, plants have evolved three major adaptive mechanisms including drought escape, drought avoidance and drought tolerance.Citation4 A large scale of strategies are to prevent water loss under drought conditions, and thus to balance the optimal water supply of important organs for plants resisting drought.Citation5,Citation6 Firstly, the root responds to the change of soil water content on the scale of cells and the whole root systems. The niche of root stem cells, meristems and vascular systems are coordinated under drought stress.Citation7,Citation8 Secondly, at the cellular level, drought signal would promote the production of proline, trehalose and other metabolites, which would, inturn, stimulate the antioxidant system to maintain redox balance and prevent cell damage and membrane integrity damage caused by oxidase.Citation7 In addition, drought signal also stimulates the response of plant hormone pathways, such as abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA) and JA. All these strategies are complex and controlled by multiple genes and ways.Citation9–11 The Early Responsive to Dehydration (ERD) genes are defined due to plants fast respond to drought stressCitation12 and activated in the early stage of drought stress.Citation13

To date, a total of 16 ERD genes of Arabidopsis thaliana (AtERD) named AtERD1-AtERD16 are annotated. They come from different subfamilies with various functionsCitation14 including chloroplast ATP protein dependent enzyme, heat shock proteins (HSP), proline dehydrogenase, glycocarrier protein, Glutathione S-transferase family proteins, allene oxide cyclase, hydrophilic protein lacking cysteine, ubiquitin (UBQ) protein.Citation15 However, less attention has been paid to a comprehensively analyzing about AtERD genes overall function in previous studies. This study summarizes and analyzes the overall function ranging from genes structures, promoter sequences to the whole signal pathways.

2 Gene structures and promoters analysis of AtERD genes

2.1 Gene structures of AtERD genes

The conserved domains and gene structures of AtERD genes are analyze by TBtools according to the information from Arabidopsis thaliana Tair database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/) and SMART (https://smart.embl.de/) (). It has been found that AtERD9, AtERD11 and AtERD13 have the GST domain; AtERD10 and AtERD14 have the Dehyd domain; AtERD3 have Methyltransf_11 domain, and AtERD4 have RSN1_TM5, PHM7_cytand RSN1_7TM domain. AtERD5 have Pro_dh domain, and AtERD16 have a UBQ1 domain. Relatively, in the subgroup from AtERD1 to AtERD8, longer sequence and more exons are contained in each gene, which makes it possible for them to edit more functional proteins, especially in AtERD1, AtERD3 and AtERD6 ().

Figure 1. Conserved domain (left) and structure analysis (right) of 16 AtERD genes. The conserved domain and structure analysis are drawn with TBtools. Motif 3 is Dehyd domain and motif 5 is GST domain. Motif 1, motif 2 and motif 4 do not have consistent domains in the actual analysis.

Figure 1. Conserved domain (left) and structure analysis (right) of 16 AtERD genes. The conserved domain and structure analysis are drawn with TBtools. Motif 3 is Dehyd domain and motif 5 is GST domain. Motif 1, motif 2 and motif 4 do not have consistent domains in the actual analysis.

2.2 Promoters analysis of AtERD genes

In order to get insight into the response factors of AtERD genes, the promoter sequences from the Tair database (https://www.arabidopsis.org/) are analyzed by PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html) (). It is showed that the AtERD genes generally respond to ABA, light and drought. There are 32 light responsive elements except AtERD9 and AtERD12, 23 ABA responsive elements except AtERD2, AtERD3, AtERD6, AtERD8 and AtERD12, 5 drought responsive elements in AtERD4, AtERD5, AtERD7 and AtERD16 and 5 meristem expression related elements in AtERD7, AtERD8, AtERD13, AtERD15 and AtERD16. The core promoter element TATA-box is found in all promoters, and a total of 132 TATA-boxes are distributed in different promoters. However, conclusion cannot be drawn that ERD gene without response element means it cannot play a role in ABA, light or drought. It maybe responds to the corresponding stresses through the indirect process of other unknown pathways.

Figure 2. Cis-elements in promoter regions of 16 AtERD genes. The elements are analyzed from 2000 bp upstream promoter regions and draw them with TBtools. ABA responsive element: ABRE; Light responsive element: GATA-motif, G-box, GA-motif, GT1-motif, AE-box, TCT-motif, I-box; Drought responsive element: MBS; Common cis-acting element: CAAT-box; Core promoter element: TATA-box. Meristem expression related element: CAT-box.

Figure 2. Cis-elements in promoter regions of 16 AtERD genes. The elements are analyzed from 2000 bp upstream promoter regions and draw them with TBtools. ABA responsive element: ABRE; Light responsive element: GATA-motif, G-box, GA-motif, GT1-motif, AE-box, TCT-motif, I-box; Drought responsive element: MBS; Common cis-acting element: CAAT-box; Core promoter element: TATA-box. Meristem expression related element: CAT-box.

3 Associated functions of AtERD genes

The overall information of AtERD genes is summarized and shown in . The subcellular localizations of the AtERD genes show that the majority localizations are in the nuclear, cytoplasm and membrane. Their main functions include transcription factors (TFs), HSP, GST and others. Based on the functions and existing research, signal pathways revealing the functions of AtERD genes are illustrated by Scienceslide (). The detailed functions of AtERD genes are as follows.

Figure 3. The expression pathway pattern of AtERD genes. The Lines represent interactions between proteins, and the arrows represent downstream regulation. The solid line represents direct action and the dotted line represents indirect action. The question mark indicates that it is not clear whether it has a direct effect on the way. Abbreviations used for genes: DREB, dehydration-responsive element binding protein; RD29A, responsive to desiccation 29A; HD-ZIP, homeodomain leucine zipper; ANAC72, Arabidopsis NAC domain containing protein 72; PR genes, suppressor of auxin resistance 1; CAS, calcium sensing receptor; WRKY65, WRKY DNA-binding protein 65.

Figure 3. The expression pathway pattern of AtERD genes. The Lines represent interactions between proteins, and the arrows represent downstream regulation. The solid line represents direct action and the dotted line represents indirect action. The question mark indicates that it is not clear whether it has a direct effect on the way. Abbreviations used for genes: DREB, dehydration-responsive element binding protein; RD29A, responsive to desiccation 29A; HD-ZIP, homeodomain leucine zipper; ANAC72, Arabidopsis NAC domain containing protein 72; PR genes, suppressor of auxin resistance 1; CAS, calcium sensing receptor; WRKY65, WRKY DNA-binding protein 65.

Table 1. Characterization of 16 AtERD genes.

3.1 Transcription factors: AtERD1, AtERD15

AtERD1Citation23,Citation42 and AtERD15Citation12,Citation43 are located in the nucleus as transcription factors, AtERD1 contains a putative chloroplast-targeting signal at the N-terminus.Citation16,Citation44 Studies have shown that the expression of AtERD1 gene is not only induced by dehydration and high salt,Citation16 it is also influenced by natural aging, dark-induced differentiation and chlorosis.Citation42 When induced by drought, the expression of AtERD1 is independent of ABA pathwayCitation42 (, green lines). AtERD1 is also identified as a typical stress response marker gene under drought stress. Other genes that act as the marker same as AtERD1 include ABI1, DREB, KIN2, RAB18, RD20, RD29A (Responsive to desiccation 29A) and RD29B.Citation45 Among them, AtERD1 and RD29A are not affected by ARR8,Citation46 however, they indirectly respond to stress through other genes like NAC72Citation47 to activate downstream drought resistance genes.Citation47

AtERD15 is a member of dehydration-stress-induced genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. It encodes a small acidic protein rapidly responding various biotic and abiotic stresses,Citation13,Citation31 such as dehydration, salt and low temperature, external damage, ABA, SA, plant pathogens.

In many studies, it has been found that AtERD15 is negatively regulated by ABA signal. It can prevent the rapid response of plants to biological stress, and can be used as a buffer to weaken ABA response, so as to reduce the damage to plants. When plants feel different signal stresses, they will cause the changes of hormones. These changes lead to the corresponding change of AtERD15 gene expression, which inducing in turn the expression of some downstream genes, and finally improving the stress resistance of plants. ABA pathway (, blue lines) and SA mediated injury defense pathway are two opposite pathways. However, AtERD15 is responded to both ABA and SA, which means that AtERD15 may be a transfer station regulated by multiple signals including H2O2 signal.Citation48,Citation49

Biological stresses on plants are mainly caused by various pests and pathogens, such as bacillus subtilis, fungi and oomycetes, bacteria and phytoplasmas and viruses.Citation50 It is usually caused by infection and competition. When plants suffer from biological stresses, some anti-bacteria substances will be induced. The secretion of these substances requires continuous messenger and gene response. AtERD15 is found to be involved in the process of biological stressCitation31,Citation48 (, deep blue lines). AtERD15 may also be involved in the weakening of stomatal response to ABA controlled by the core ABA signal module. It has not reported that whether other AtERD genes have relevant regulation in biological stresses.

Studies on ERD15 genes of other plants found that the SpERD15 of Pansanum Penellii enhances the accumulations of soluble sugar and proline in transgenic plants mainly through enhancing osmotic regulation, and coordinates the expression of stress-related genes to improve the drought resistance.Citation51 Overexpression of VaERD15 gene can improve the cold resistance of transgenic plants.Citation52 Moreover, its interaction genes XTH7, GS, RPS23 and LQY1 jointly regulate the response of black grape to low temperature stress. When VaERD15Citation52 and ZmERD4Citation53 are transformed into Arabidopsis thaliana, the resulting transgenic lines show enhanced tolerance to freezing injury, drought and salt stresses. In addition, MsERD15 gene induced by ABA in alfalfa can respond to the induction of SA, and participate only in the initial response of plant defense caused by MeJA. It is also speculated that MsERD15 gene may participate in the formation of autumn dormancy of alfalfa through the light response process and ABA signal process [Fu Citation54]. Meanwhile, GmERD15 plays a role in cell death. It is the upstream component of NRP mediated signal induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress, which connects endoplasmic reticulum stress with cell death signal induced by osmotic stress.Citation55

3.2 HSP: AtERD2, AtERD8

In fact, plants are dependent on HSPs in adapting to heat stress. HSPs are divided into five subfamilies according to molecular weight, including small HSP (SSP), HSP60, HSP70, HSP90 and HSP110.Citation56,Citation57 HSPs play a role not only in maintaining cell balance, but also stabilizing protein folding and preventing from polymerization. With the help of some HSPs such as HSP60, HSP70 and HSP90,Citation58 non-native proteins keep in a competent state for subsequent refolding. By the medium of Hsp100/Clp, the aggregates formed by the denatured or misfolded proteins are further resolubilized and followed by refolding or degradation by proteases.Citation59 Some HSPs chaperones like Hsp70 and Hsp90 accompanying the signal transduction and activating some specific transcription factors lead to the synthesis of other members of HSPs/chaperones. AtERD2 and AtERD8 are proved to encode two heat shock proteins: HSP70T-1 and HSP81.2 (HSP90.1).Citation60–62 The expression of AtERD2 and AtERD8 can be activated by AtERD1. In this subnet, AtERD16 (Ubiquitin-60S ribosomal protein L40-1) is proved to be involved in as the HSP cognates and its expression is affected by dehydration stress instead of ABACitation31 (, ABA independent stress).

3.3 GST: AtERD9, AtERD11 and AtERD13

Some AtERD genes do not directly respond to hormones. AtERD9 is involved in light signal that mostly consisting of phyA-mediated photomorphogenesis. It is involved in the integration of ABA signals to modulate various aspects of plant development by affecting glutathione pools.Citation36,Citation63 AtERD11 and AtERD13, encoding glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), are not affected by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 6-benzylaminopurine, ABA, or gibberellic acid (GA).Citation36 AtERD13 and GST8 differ in their regulations by auxins, cytokinins, jasmonate and low temperature according to the kinetics of their response to wounding. Although several other functions of GSTs have been postulated,Citation36 the precise physiological roles remain unknown. After drought and salt treatments, ERD11 is up-regulated in NAC72 plants but down-regulated in OEPeNAC034 and AtAF1/PeNAC034 plants.Citation64

3.4 AtERD10 and AtERD14

AtERD10 and AtERD14 have the same dehyd domain and about 70% sequence homology. They are also very similar to ABA induced class II LEA proteins. AtERD10, encoding glutathione transferase under stresses,Citation39 is located in cytoplast.Citation65 ERD10 is a highly hydrophilicCitation32 and inherently disordered protein (IDPs), which is expressed in some very active division tissues of plants and is ubiquitous under drought conditions.Citation39 It is also a typical representative of IDPs.Citation66,Citation67 ERD10, COR47 and RAB18Citation68,Citation69 are interact with AtPIP2B, a membrane protein. Furthermore, AtERD10 and COR6.6 are DRECitation70 regulating genes, and their expressions are induced in response to ethylene and HLS1 transcription level.Citation71 It can not only protect plants in cold and dehydration, but also play a role in seed development and germination.Citation32

AtERD14 and its homologue AtERD10 are effective chaperones to protect some enzymes,Citation72 such as alcohol dehydrogenase, citrate synthase, lysozyme and firefly luciferase, and prevent the enzymes from loss of activity and aggregation. On the other hand, the accumulating of AtERD10 and AtERD14 help Arabidopsis thaliana in response to high salt, drought and low temperature.Citation29 For example, AtERD14 can accumulate with the increase of hydrogen peroxide content under osmotic stress (, Red line). AtERD14 also belongs to class II LEA proteins (dehydrogenase)Citation73 with K2s domain.Citation43,Citation72 Recombinant HSP90 and AtERD14 can interact in E. coli even at low temperature.Citation29 In addition, AtERD14 has ion binding activity in the phosphorylated state, mainly binding calcium ionsCitation38 and iron ions. Phosphorylation in AtERD14 fragment is involved in the regulation of dehydration subcellular localization in stress response.Citation40 Moreover, AtERD14 may play a role in redox homeostasis during osmotic stress response.

3.5 Other AtERD genes

AtERD3, AtERD4, AtERD5, AtERD6, AtERD7 and AtERD12 are different from other AtERD genes. They have no consistent protein expression and similar homologous structures. So they are listed separately.

AtERD3 encodes an S-adenosyl-L-methionine-dependent methyltransferases protein. The bioinformatic analysis shows that ZmERD3 protein has one specific hit of methyltransferase and a high probability of location in the cytoplasm.Citation19 Furthermore, there are many cis-regulatory elements responsive to light, heat, cold, dehydration, as well as other stresses in ZmERD3 promoter sequence. However, there is only light responsive element in AtERD3.

AtERD4 as a hypertonic gated nonselective cation channel or mechanically sensitive ion channel can convert mechanical stimulation into an ion flow penetrating calcium ions.Citation53,Citation74 Moreover, AtERD4 also interacts with CAS.Citation75 ZmERD4 is constitutively expressed in different tissues and could be induced by drought stress and salt stress. It also responds to abscisic acid treatment, but low temperature does not induce ZmERD4. In addition, compared with wild-type plants, 35S:ZmERD4 transgenic plants show stronger water tolerance and high salt tolerance.Citation53

In addition to ABA and SA pathways, some AtERD genes also have other response processes. AtERD5 encodes methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (a proline oxidase) located in the inner mitochondrial membrane and is described as a negative regulator of ABA signal.Citation22,Citation23 Proline content is one of the most common osmotic indexes in water stressed plants. Its accumulation in dehydrated plants is caused by the activation of proline biosynthesis and the inactivation of proline degradation.Citation22,Citation76 AtERD5 is localized in the mitochondrial intima and is induced by osmotic stress. The sequence analysis shows that the protein encoded by AtERD5 is the same as that of yeast PU7y gene and the drosophila sluggish-A gene.Citation22 They encode the precursor of proline dehydrogenase and are regulated in the mRNA accumulation level of dehydrated and rehydrated plants.Citation22

Plants response of drought also implies the carbon allocation to sink organs and sugar partitioning between different cell compartments, and requires the involvement of sugar transporters (SUTs).Citation77 AtERD6, encodes a putative sugar transporter, is up-regulated by drought and low temperatureCitation24 and is repressed in leaves by high salinity and ABA.Citation78 So far, more researches have been done on early response to dehydration six-like (ESL) than AtERD6. With 19 members in Arabidopsis thaliana, the ESLs form the largest subfamily of monosaccharide transporters (MSTs) and a common feature is their involvement in plant response to abiotic stresses, certainly including the water deficit. For example, AtESL1 (AtERD six-like 1) is a low affinity facilitator, which is able to transport different hexoses (glucose, fructose, galactose, mannose, and xylose) across the tonoplast. Its expression is highly up-regulated by high salinity and ABA in roots and slightly induced by drought.Citation78

AtERD7 is expressed in lipid droplets (LDs) and cytosol. AtERD7 belongs to a six-member family, which is separated into two distinct subfamilies. Lipid droplets existing in all kinds of life are neutral-lipid-containing organelles and coated with proteins that carry out a vast array of functions.Citation26 AtERD7, locating on the LD surface, may be involved in functional aspects of plant stress response.Citation26 It plays a role in membrane lipid remodeling during cold stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Under the normal growth conditions, although the role of AtERD7 in stress-induced LD dynamics is not excluded, its expression shows no significant changes in the number or morphology of LD.Citation27 AtERD7 and other stress response genes including COR47,Citation35 LEA6,Citation79–81 RAS1 and two hormone signal transduction related genes (JAZ7 and PYL5) are identified as the possible target genes of ZAT18, a nuclear C2H2 zinc finger protein transcriptionally induced by dehydration stress. ZAT18 overexpression can improve the drought tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana, and its mutation leads to the reduction of plant tolerance.Citation82

AtERD12 encodes a protein similar to allene oxide cyclase and has been poorly studied.Citation83 It is one of four genes that encode this enzyme in Arabidopsis thaliana and its expression is induced during senescence that involving JA signaling pathway.

4 Conclusion

Early dehydration-induced gene expression activation in plants subjected to sudden drought stressCitation52,Citation84 reflects the stress response of plants during sudden dehydration. The sequences of these 16 AtERD genes do not have consistent conserved sequences, and they play roles in different pathways (). According to their promoter analysis results, the cis-acting elements are relatively more ABA and photoresponsive elements. For example, AtERD1 and AtERD15, coding transcription factors associate with drought, have no drought-related elements (). This suggests that ERD genes are not first-order messengers of drought response,Citation48 and they are induced by other related genes ().

As research continues, the study of ERD genes had made progress and verified the function of different plant ERD genes members, such as Vitis amurensis,Citation52 Glycine max,Citation85,Citation86 Zea mays,Citation19 Betula platyphylla.Citation14 However, there is still a lack of systematic research and specific regulatory network mechanisms about ERD genes. In the whole signal pathway, the accurate role of each gene to the other of a pair is not clear, such as ERD9 and ERD13, ERD10 and ERD7, ERD14 and ERD7, ERD15 and ERD4, ERD15 and ERD12 and other interacting genes (). According to previous studies, they are speculated that they may have regulatory role between AtERD genes. But they need further exploration whether they are positive or negative regulation and whether they are direct or indirect regulation. Furthermore, more functions of plant ERD members will be explored to realize regulatory network and functional verification of ERD genes in various physiological processes.

Notes on Contributions

Author contributions: writing, Nongfu Tian; data analysis, Fawen She and Aohua Cao; review and editing, Guofan Wu; funding acquisition, Wangze Wu (No. 31860113) and Ning Yang (No.31960061); paper inspection, Sheng Zheng. All authors read and agree to publish version of the manuscript.

Declarations

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the reviewers, editors for their comments and suggestions.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research is funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31860113), (No.31960061).

References

  • Karim S. Exploring plant tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae. 2007;58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276161893_Exploring_plant_tolerance_to_biotic_and_abiotic_stresses
  • Ma Q, Xu X, Xie Y, Huang T, Wang W, Zhao L, Ma D. Comparative metabolomic analysis of the metabolism pathways under drought stress in alfalfa leaves. Environ Exp Bot. 2021;183:104329. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104329.
  • Sprenger H, Kurowsky C, Horn R, Erban A, Seddig S, Rudack K, Fischer A, Walther D, Zuther E, Köhl K, et al. The drought response of potato reference cultivars with contrasting tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2016;39(11):2370–8. doi:10.1111/pce.12780.
  • Wang N, Liu Y, Cai Y, Tang J, Li Y, Gai J. The soybean U-box gene GmPUB6 regulates drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2020;155:284–296. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.07.016.
  • Shamsunnaher S, Chen X, Zhang -X-X, Wu X, Huang X, Song W-Y. Rice immune sensor XA21 differentially enhances plant growth and survival under distinct levels of drought. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):16938. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73128-7.
  • Zhang X, Zhai P, Huang J, Zhao X, Dong K, Hui D. Responses of ecosystem water use efficiency to spring snow and summer water addition with or without nitrogen addition in a temperate steppe. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194198. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194198.
  • Gupta A, Rico-Medina A, Caño-Delgado AI. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science. 2020;368(6488):266–269. doi:10.1126/science.aaz7614.
  • Di Mambro R, Dello Ioio R. Root stem cells: how to establish and maintain the eternal youth. Rend Lincei. 2020;31(2):223–230. doi:10.1007/s12210-020-00893-y.
  • Chai C, Shankar R, Jain M, Subudhi PK. Genome-wide discovery of DNA polymorphisms by whole genome sequencing differentiates weedy and cultivated rice. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14218. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32513-z.
  • Pecoraro A, Carotenuto P, Russo G, Russo A. Ribosomal protein uL3 targets E2F1 and Cyclin D1 in cancer cell response to nucleolar stress. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):15431. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-51723-7.
  • Zhou B, Zhang L, Ullah A, Jin X, Yang X, Zhang X, Fang DD. Identification of multiple stress responsive genes by sequencing a normalized cDNA library from sea-land cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.). PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0152927. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152927.
  • Alves MS, Reis PAB, Dadalto SP, Faria JAQA, Fontes EPB, Fietto LG. A novel transcription factor, ERD15 (early responsive to Dehydration 15), connects endoplasmic reticulum stress with an osmotic stress-induced cell death signal. J Biol Chem. 2011b;286(22):20020–20030. doi:10.1074/jbc.M111.233494.
  • Kiyosue T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. ERD15, a cDNA for a dehydration-induced gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1994b;106(4):1707. doi:10.1104/pp.106.4.1707.
  • Lv K, Wei H, Jiang J. Overexpression of BplERD15 enhances drought tolerance in Betula platyphylla suk. Forests. 2020;11(9):978. doi:10.3390/f11090978.
  • Taji T, Seki M, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Kamada H, Giraudat J, Shinozaki K. Mapping of 25 drought-inducible genes, RD and ERD, in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 1999;40(1):119–123. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029469.
  • Nakashima K, Kiyosue T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. A nuclear gene, erd1, encoding a chloroplast-targeted Clp protease regulatory subunit homolog is not only induced by water stress but also developmentally up-regulated during senescence in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1997;12(4):851–861. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.12040851.x.
  • Dunkley TPJ, Hester S, Shadforth IP, Runions J, Weimar T, Hanton SL, Griffin JL, Bessant C, Brandizzi F, Hawes C, et al. Mapping the Arabidopsis organelle proteome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(17):6518–6523. doi:10.1073/pnas.0506958103.
  • Rosado A, Schapire AL, Bressan RA, Harfouche AL, Hasegawa PM, Valpuesta V, Botella MA. The Arabidopsis tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein TTL1 is required for osmotic stress responses and abscisic acid sensitivity. Plant Physiol. 2006;142(3):1113–1126. doi:10.1104/pp.106.085191.
  • Song X, Weng Q, Zhao Y, Ma H, Song J, Su L, Yuan J, Liu Y. Cloning and expression analysis of ZmERD3 gene from zea mays. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology. 2018;16(2):140–147. doi:10.21859/ijb.1593.
  • Devi K, Prathima PT, Gomathi R, Manimekalai R, Lakshmi K, Selvi A. Gene expression profiling in sugarcane genotypes during drought stress and Rehydration. Sugar Tech. 2019;21(5):717–733. doi:10.1007/s12355-018-0687-y.
  • Nguyen SD, Kang H. Gene cloning and transformation of Arabidopsis plant to study the functions of the early responsive to Dehydration gene (ERD4) in coffee genome. Science and Technology Development Journal. 2016;19(2):53–63. doi:10.32508/stdj.v19i2.789.
  • Kiyosue T, Yoshiba Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. A nuclear gene encoding mitochondrial proline dehydrogenase, an enzyme involved in proline metabolism, is upregulated by proline but downregulated by dehydration in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1996;8(8):1323–1335. doi:10.1105/tpc.8.8.1323.
  • Nakashima K, Satoh R, Kiyosue T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. A gene encoding proline dehydrogenase is not only induced by proline and hypoosmolarity, but is also developmentally regulated in the reproductive organs of arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1998;118(4):1233–1241. doi:10.1104/pp.118.4.1233.
  • Kiyosue T, Abe H, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. ERD6, a cDNA clone for an early dehydration-induced gene of Arabidopsis, encodes a putative sugar transporter. Biochim Biophys Acta - Biomembr. 1998;1370(2):187–191. doi:10.1016/S0005-2736(98)00007-8.
  • Nishio S, Hayashi T, Shirasawa K, Saito T, Terakami S, Takada N, Takeuchi Y, Moriya S, Itai A. Genome-wide association study of individual sugar content in fruit of Japanese pear (Pyrus spp.). BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):378. doi:10.1186/s12870-021-03130-2.
  • Barajas-Lopez JDD, Tiwari A, Zarza X, Shaw MW, Pascual J, Punkkinen M, Bakowska JC, Munnik T, Fujii H. EARLY RESPONSE to DEHYDRATION 7 remodels cell membrane lipid composition during cold stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021;62(1):80–91. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcaa139.
  • Doner NM, Seay D, Mehling M, Sun S, Gidda SK, Schmitt K, Braus GH, Ischebeck T, Chapman KD, Dyer JM, et al. Arabidopsis thaliana EARLY RESPONSIVE TO DEHYDRATION 7 localizes to lipid droplets via its senescence domain. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.658961.
  • Milioni D, Hatzopoulos P. Genomic organization of hsp90 gene family in Arabidopsis. Plant Molecular Biology. 1997;35(6):955–961. doi:10.1023/A:1005874521528.
  • Tantos A, Friedrich P, Tompa P. Cold stability of intrinsically disordered proteins. FEBS Lett. 2009;583(2):465–469. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2008.12.054.
  • Yabe N, Takahashi T, Komeda Y. Analysis of tissue-specific expression of Arabidopsis thaliana HSP90-family gene HSP81. Plant Cell Physiol. 1994;35(8):1207–1219. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078715.
  • Alves MS, Fontes EPB, Fietto LG. EARLY RESPONSIVE to DEHYDRATION 15, a new transcription factor that integrates stress signaling pathways. Plant Signal Behav. 2011a;6(12):1993–1996. doi:10.4161/psb.6.12.18268.
  • Kim SY, Nam KH. Physiological roles of ERD10 in abiotic stresses and seed germination of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2010;29(2):203–209. doi:10.1007/s00299-009-0813-0.
  • Gupta K, Jha B, Agarwal PK. A Dehydration-Responsive Element Binding (DREB) transcription factor from the succulent halophyte salicornia brachiata enhances abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Tobacco. Mar Biotechnol. 2014;16(6):657–673. doi:10.1007/s10126-014-9582-z.
  • Kovacs D, Kalmar E, Torok Z, Tompa P. Chaperone activity of ERD10 and ERD14, two disordered stress-related plant proteins. Plant Physiol. 2008;147(1):381–390. doi:10.1104/pp.108.118208.
  • Lu Y, Sun X, Yao J, Chai Y, Zhao X, Zhang L, Song J, Pang YZ, Wu W, Tang K. Isolation and expression of cold-regulated cDNA from Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis). DNA Seq - J DNA Seq Mapp. 2003;14(3):219–222. doi:10.1080/1042517031000095381.
  • Kiyosue T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Characterization of two cDNAs (ERD11 and ERD13) for dehydration-inducible genes that encode putative glutathione S -transferases in Arabidopsis thaliana L. FEBS Lett. 1993;335(2):189–192. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(93)80727-C.
  • Zybailov B, Rutschow H, Friso G, Rudella A, Emanuelsson O, Sun Q, van Wijk KJ, Koch K-W. Sorting signals, N-Terminal modifications and abundance of the chloroplast proteome. PLoS One. 2008;3(4):e1994. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001994.
  • Alsheikh MK, Heyen BJ, Randall SK. Ion binding properties of the Dehydrin ERD14 are dependent upon phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(42):40882–40889. doi:10.1074/jbc.M307151200.
  • Kiyosue T, Yamaguchi-shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Characterization of two cDNAs (erd10 and ERD14) corresponding to genes that respond rapidly to dehydration stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 1994a;35:225–231.
  • Maszkowska J, Dębski J, Kulik A, Kistowski M, Bucholc M, Lichocka M, Klimecka M, Sztatelman O, Szymańska KP, Dadlez M, et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals that dehydrins ERD10 and ERD14 are phosphorylated by SNF1-related protein kinase 2.10 in response to osmotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2019;42(3):931–946. doi:10.1111/pce.13465.
  • Alhabeeb MJ. Pathogen-induced defense signaling and signal crosstalk in Arabidopsis. Hoboken (NJ, USA): John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2012. 311–329.
  • Simpson SD, Nakashima K, Narusaka Y, Seki M, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Two different novel cis -acting elements of erd1, a clpA homologous Arabidopsis gene function in induction by dehydration stress and dark-induced senescence. Plant J. 2003;33(2):259–270. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01624.x.
  • Kiyosue T, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Cloning of cDNAs for genes that are early-responsive to dehydration stress (ERDs) in Arabidopsis thaliana L.: identification of three ERDs as HSP cognate genes. Plant Mol Biol. 1994c;25(5):791–798. doi:10.1007/BF00028874.
  • Bruch EM, Rosano GL, Ceccarelli EA. Chloroplastic Hsp100 chaperones ClpC2 and ClpD interact in vitro with a transit peptide only when it is located at the N-terminus of a protein. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12(1):57. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-57.
  • Nazari B, Mohammadifar MA, Shojaee-Aliabadi S, Feizollahi E, Mirmoghtadaie L. Effect of ultrasound treatments on functional properties and structure of millet protein concentrate. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2018;41:382–388. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.10.002.
  • Behnam B, Iuchi S, Fujita M, Fujita Y, Takasaki H, Osakabe Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Kobayashi M, Shinozaki K. Characterization of the promoter region of an Arabidopsis gene for 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase involved in dehydration-inducible transcription. DNA Res. 2013;20(4):315–324. doi:10.1093/dnares/dst012.
  • Nakashima K, Takasaki H, Mizoi J, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. NAC transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. 2012;1819(2):97–103. doi:10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.10.005.
  • Dunaeva M, Adamska I. Identification of genes expressed in response to light stress in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana using RNA differential display. Eur J Biochem. 2001;268(21):5521–5529. doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2001.02471.x.
  • Gong B, Yan Y, Wen D, Shi Q. Hydrogen peroxide produced by NADPH oxidase: a novel downstream signaling pathway in melatonin-induced stress tolerance in Solanum lycopersicum. Physiol Plant. 2017;160(4):396–409. doi:10.1111/ppl.12581.
  • Nandini B, Geetha N, Prakash HS, Hariparsad P. Natural uptake of anti-oomycetes Trichoderma produced secondary metabolites from pearl millet seedlings – a new mechanism of biological control of downy mildew disease. Biological Control. 2021;156:104550. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104550.
  • Ziaf K, Loukehaich R, Gong P, Liu H, Han Q, Wang T, Li H, Ye Z. A multiple stress-responsive gene ERD15 from Solanum pennellii confers stress tolerance in tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52(6):1055–1067. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcr057.
  • Yu D, Zhang L, Zhao K, Niu R, Zhai H, Zhang J. VaERD15, a transcription factor gene associated with cold-tolerance in Chinese wild Vitis amurensis. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00297.
  • Liu Y, Li H, Shi Y, Song Y, Wang T, Li Y. A maize early responsive to dehydration gene, ZmERD4, provides enhanced drought and salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2009;27(4):542–548. doi:10.1007/s11105-009-0119-y.
  • Wenhong Fu. Expression of Ms ERD15 and construction of expression vector in Alfalfa. Henan Agricultural University; 2017. https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD201801&filename=1017279017.nh
  • Linh TM, Mai NC, Hoe PT, Lien LQ, Ban NK, Hien LTT, Chau NH, Van NT. Metal-based nanoparticles enhance drought tolerance in soybean. J Nanomater. 2020;2020:1–13. doi:10.1155/2020/4056563.
  • Divya K, Kavi Kishor PB, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Singam P, Sharma KK, Vadez V, Reddy PS. Isolation and functional characterization of three abiotic stress-inducible (Apx, Dhn and Hsc70) promoters from pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). Mol Biol Rep. 2019;46(6):6039–6052. doi:10.1007/s11033-019-05039-4.
  • Lindquist S, Craig EA. THE HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS. Annual Review of Genetics. 1988;22(1):631–677. doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.003215.
  • Wang W, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9(5):244–252. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2004.03.006.
  • Kummari D, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Sharma KK, Vadez V, Palakolanu SR. Functional characterization of the promoter of pearl millet heat shock protein 10 (PgHsp10) in response to abiotic stresses in transgenic tobacco plants. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;156:103–110. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.069.
  • Blomberg A. Global changes in protein synthesis during adaptation of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to 0.7 M NaCl. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(12):3563–3572. doi:10.1128/jb.177.12.3563-3572.1995.
  • Cho EK, Hong CB. Over-expression of tobacco NtHSP70-1 contributes to drought-stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2006;25(4):349–358. doi:10.1007/s00299-005-0093-2.
  • Song J, Weng Q, Ma H, Yuan J, Wang L, Liu Y. Cloning and expression analysis of the Hsp70 gene ZmERD2 in Zea mays. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 2016;30(2):219–226. doi:10.1080/13102818.2015.1131625.
  • Kimura M, Yamamoto YY, Seki M, Sakurai T, Sato M, Abe T, Yoshida S, Manabe K, Shinozaki K, Matsui M. Identification of Arabidopsis genes regulated by high light–stress using cDNA microarray¶. Photochem Photobiol. 2003;77(2):226. doi:10.1562/0031-8655(2003)077<0226:ioagrb>2.0.co;2.
  • Khamis G, Winkelmann T, Schaarschmidt F, Papenbrock J. Establishment of an in vitro propagation and transformation system of Balanites aegyptiaca. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2016;125(3):457–470. doi:10.1007/s11240-016-0961-1.
  • Hernández-Sánchez IE, Maruri-López I, Graether SP, Jiménez-Bremont JF. In vivo evidence for homo- and heterodimeric interactions of Arabidopsis thaliana dehydrins AtCOR47, AtERD10, and AtRAB18. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17036. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-15986-2.
  • Bokor M, Csizmók V, Kovács D, Bánki P, Friedrich P, Tompa P, Tompa K. NMR relaxation studies on the hydrate layer of intrinsically unstructured proteins. Biophys J. 2005;88(3):2030–2037. doi:10.1529/biophysj.104.051912.
  • Tompa P, Bánki P, Bokor M, Kamasa P, Kovács D, Lasanda G, Tompa K. Protein-water and protein-buffer interactions in the aqueous solution of an intrinsically unstructured plant dehydrin: NMR intensity and DSC aspects. Biophysical Journal. 2006;91(6):2243–2249. doi:10.1529/biophysj.106.084723.
  • Wu J, Folta KM, Xie Y, Jiang W, Lu J, Zhang Y. Overexpression of Muscadinia rotundifolia CBF2 gene enhances biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Protoplasma. 2017;254(1):239–251. doi:10.1007/s00709-015-0939-6.
  • Wuebbles DJ, Kunkel K, Wehner M, Zobel Z. Severe weather in United States under a changing climate. Eos (Washington DC). 2014;95:149–150.
  • Hsieh EJ, Cheng MC, Lin TP. Functional characterization of an abiotic stress-inducible transcription factor AtERF53 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 2013;82(3):223–237. doi:10.1007/s11103-013-0054-z.
  • Sun S, Yu J-P, Chen F, Zhao T-J, Fang X-H, Li Y-Q, Sui S-F. TINY, a dehydration-responsive element (DRE)-binding protein-like transcription factor connecting the DRE- and ethylene-responsive element-mediated signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008;283(10):6261–6271. doi:10.1074/jbc.M706800200.
  • Nguyen PN, Tossounian M-A, Kovacs DS, Thu TT, Stijlemans B, Vertommen D, Pauwels J, Gevaert K, Angenon G, Messens J, et al. Dehydrin ERD14 activates glutathione transferase Phi9 in Arabidopsis thaliana under osmotic stress. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects. 2020;1864(3):129506. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.129506.
  • Vinet L, Zhedanov A. A ‘missing’ family of classical orthogonal polynomials. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 2011;44(8):085201. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201.
  • Gong Z, Xiong L, Shi H, Yang S, Herrera-Estrella LR, Xu G, Chao DY, Li J, Wang PY, Qin F, et al. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Sci China Life Sci. 2020;63(5):635–674. doi:10.1007/s11427-020-1683-x.
  • Jones AM, Xuan Y, Xu M, Wang R-S, Ho C-H, Lalonde S, You CH, Sardi MI, Parsa SA, Smith-Valle E, et al. Border Control—A Membrane-Linked Interactome of Arabidopsis. Science. 2014;344(6185):711–716. doi:10.1126/science.1251358.
  • Paul S, Roychoudhury A. Transcript analysis of abscisic acid-inducible genes in response to different abiotic disturbances in two indica rice varieties. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology. 2019;31(1):249–272. doi:10.1007/s40626-018-0131-4.
  • Slawinski L, Israel A, Paillot C, Thibault F, Cordaux R, Atanassova R, Dédaldéchamp F, Laloi M. Early response to dehydration six-like transporter family: early origin in streptophytes and evolution in land plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.681929.
  • Yamada M, Hamatani T, Akutsu H, Chikazawa N, Kuji N, Yoshimura Y, Umezawa A. Involvement of a novel preimplantation-specific gene encoding the high mobility group box protein Hmgpi in early embryonic development. Human Molecular Genetics. 2010;19(3):480–493. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddp512.
  • Jia F, Qi S, Li H, Liu P, Li P, Wu C, Zheng C, Huang J. Overexpression of late embryogenesis Abundant 14 enhances Arabidopsis salt stress tolerance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;454(4):505–511. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.10.136.
  • Thomann EB, Sollinger J, White C, Rivin CJ. Accumulation of group 3 late embryogenesis abundant proteins in zea mays embryos. Plant Physiol. 1992;99(2):607–614. doi:10.1104/pp.99.2.607.
  • Tiburcio AF, Wollenweber B, Zilberstein A, Koncz C. Abiotic stress tolerance. Plant Sci. 2012;182:1–2. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.09.005.
  • Yin M, Wang Y, Zhang L, Li J, Quan W, Yang L, Wang Q, Chan Z. The Arabidopsis Cys2/His2 zinc finger transcription factor ZAT18 is a positive regulator of plant tolerance to drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2017;68(11):2991–3005. doi:10.1093/jxb/erx157.
  • Gutiérrez RA, Green PJ, Keegstra K, Ohlrogge JB. Phylogenetic profiling of the Arabidopsis thaliana proteome: what proteins distinguish plants from other organisms? Genome Biol. 2004;5(8):R53. doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-8-r53.
  • Xiong H, Li J, Liu P, Duan J, Zhao Y, Guo X, Li Y, Zhang H, Ali J, Li Z. Overexpression of OsMYB48-1, a novel MYB-related transcription factor, enhances drought and salinity tolerance in rice. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e92913. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092913.
  • Hua L, Challa GS, Subramanian S, Gu X, Li W. Genome-Wide Identification of drought response genes in soybean seedlings and development of biomarkers for early diagnoses. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2018;36(2):350–362. doi:10.1007/s11105-018-1085-z.
  • Hussain RM, Ali M, Feng X, Li X. The essence of NAC gene family to the cultivation of drought-resistant soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) cultivars. BMC Plant Biol. 2017;17(1):55. doi:10.1186/s12870-017-1001-y.