1,325
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

The recent relationship between ultraviolet-B radiation and biotic resistance in plants: a novel non-chemical strategy for managing biotic stresses

ORCID Icon
Article: 2191463 | Received 02 Feb 2023, Accepted 11 Mar 2023, Published online: 19 Mar 2023

ABSTRACT

Ultraviolet-B radiation (UVB; 280–315 nm) is a significant environmental factor that alters plant development, changes interactions between species, and reduces the prevalence of pests and diseases. While UVB radiation has negative effects on plant growth and performance at higher doses, at lower and ambient doses, UVB radiation acts as a non-chemical method for managing biotic stresses by having positive effects on disease resistance and genes that protect plants from pests. Understanding the recent relationship between UVB radiation and plants’ biotic stresses is crucial for the development of crops that are resistant to UVB and biotic stresses. However, little is known about the recent interactions between UVB radiation and biotic stresses in plants. This review discusses the most recent connections between UVB radiation and biotic stresses in crops, including how UVB radiation affects a plant’s resistance to disease and pests. The interaction of UVB radiation with pathogens and herbivores has been the subject of the most extensive research of these. This review also discusses additional potential strategies for conferring multiple UVB-biotic stress resistance in crop plants, such as controlling growth inhibition, miRNA 396 and 398 modulations, and MAP kinase. This study provides crucial knowledge and methods for scientists looking to develop multiple resistant crops that will improve global food security.

This article is part of the following collections:
Responses of Crop Plants to Climate Change and Environmental Stresses

1. Background

Since photosynthesis depends on sunlight, plants are constantly exposed to ultraviolet-B radiation (UVB; 280–315 nm) from the sun. UVB prevents photosynthesis and protein synthesis, which reduces growth and productivity in plants. According to their wavelength, solar UV light falls into one of three categories: UVC (200–280 nm), UVB (280–315 nm), and UVA (315–400 nm)Citation1. Even though UVB radiation makes up only 1.5% of all radiationCitation2,Citation3, it is of utmost importance because it has damaging effects on DNA that have an impact on a plant’s growth and development. UVB damages the photosynthesis machinery and DNA of nuclear, chloroplasts, and mitochondriaCitation4–7, increases the production of phenolic compoundsCitation8, and increases oxidative pressures in plantsCitation9. A decrease in PSII proteins D1 and D2 in photosystem II (PSII) can cause UVB radiation to have an impact on the primary photosynthesis machineryCitation10. Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and (6–4) pyrimidinone photoproducts (6–4 PPs) are the two main UVB-induced DNA lesions; CPDs account for 75% of the lesions and 6–4 PPs for the remaining portionCitation11,Citation12. The performance and productivity of crops may be affected by these DNA lesions, especially those grown in tropical regions where UVB radiation levels are high.

UVB light can stimulate the UV-B photoreceptor UVR8 (UV-B RESISTANCE 8), which alters the expression of several genes important for UV-light stress acclimation including DNA repair enzymesCitation13. Plants have developed several defense mechanisms to prevent UVB-induced lesioning, including DNA repair mechanisms by nucleotide excision repair (NER) and photoreactivation by the photolyase enzymes. The enzyme photolyases mediate photoreactivation (photorepair), which is the most efficient and practical method for plants to repair DNA lesions caused by UVB radiationCitation14,Citation15. The activity of the CPD photolyase enzyme has a significant impact on the UVB sensitivity of crops like riceCitation6,Citation7,Citation16,Citation17. In some studiesCitation18–20, transgenic rice plants with improved CPD photolyase activity due to overexpressing the CPD photolyase gene have higher UVB resistance mechanisms than their parental lines (PLs) plants. Additionally, mutation of even a single amino acid in the CPD photolyase gene led to highly UVB-sensitive phenotypesCitation6,Citation7. According to these studies, CPD photolyase activity is beneficial for plants to establish UVB resistance mechanisms. In other mechanisms, chloroplasts may be moved into various positions to reduce the amount of high light and UVB they absorb, restricting PSII damageCitation21–23. The ability of plant phenolics, such as flavonoids and phenolic acids, to act as UVB screens and reduce the amount of radiation that reaches the mesophyll cell has also been demonstrated to lessen the oxidative stress brought on by UVB radiationCitation24,Citation25. UV light has significant effects on a plant’s general growth and development, including the direct harm it causes to plant pathogens and the improvement of disease resistanceCitation26,Citation27. For instance, Mmbando et al. recently showed how UVB radiation enhanced resistance to the UVB-sensitive line A-S of the Magnaporthe oryzae, a rice blast fungusCitation28. Their findings suggested that there may be a cross-tolerance between how plants react to UVB radiation and other biotic stresses like fungi. Knowing how these two factors interact makes it more likely to create crops that can withstand UVB and other biotic stresses. However, there haven’t been a lot of recent studies on how UVB radiation interacts with other biotic stresses.

The need for the development of UVB-resistant crops is urged by the significantly higher level of UVB radiation penetration in recent years due to ozone layer depletion as a result of increased contamination of the atmosphere by pollutants like chlorofluorocarbonsCitation29–31. According to Germ et al., this increase in UVB radiation can also change community dynamics and ecosystem processes via many pathways, including species competition, carbon budgets, and biogeochemical cyclesCitation32. It can also have an impact on a plant’s defense-related secondary metabolite biosynthesisCitation33. Surprisingly, tropical regions with higher levels of UVB radiation, such as Bengal and Africa, have domesticated high UVB-sensitive cultivars, such as African rice (O. glaberrima) and Surjamkhi (O. sativa L. ssp. indica)Citation6,Citation7,Citation34. The maintenance of immune defenses as a result of an immune challenge and defense against high UVB-induced DNA damage due to ozone layer depletion are both energy-intensive processesCitation35. The trade-off between competing demands for limited energy resources could lead to less than ideal performance in one or both processesCitation35. For instance, plants in tropical areas with high biotic stresses might decide to redirect their energy into immunity for fending off biotic stresses, leaving them without any energy for repairing UVB damage. As an alternative, the high sensitivity to UVB sensitivity may also lead to a compromise in the allocation of carbon in order to repair UVB stress while leaving less carbon for pests and pathogens that feed on plants, hence decrease disease severity. Because plants can tolerate some accumulation of UV damage such as CPDs, it has been hypothesized that high UVB sensitivity traits may be useful in protecting these crops from other biotic stresses like pathogens through trade-off mechanisms, even though the reasons for cultivating high UVB-sensitive cultivars in tropical regions are not yet knownCitation34,Citation36. This idea was recently supported by a study by Mmbando et al., which showed that transgenic lines and cultivars with high UVB sensitivity and low UVB tolerance improved their resistance mechanisms to M. oryzaeCitation28. Plants have developed a network of interactions as a result of being subjected to multiple stresses at once, including crosstalk with different signals that determine how well stress tolerance genes functionCitation37. One stress promotes cross-tolerance to other stresses (). In elements similar to those brought on by pathogen attack, UVB radiation has been shown to act through a downstream pathwayCitation38,Citation39. For instance, the increased level of sinapates (sinapoyl malate and sinapoyl glucose) in Arabidopsis following UVB irradiation was responsible for the plant’s increased resistance to Botrytis cinerea Citation40,Citation41. Additionally, earlier research has suggested that excluding UVB from natural sunlight increases the severity of the powdery mildew diseaseCitation42. As a result, it is thought that the ambient UVB level affected biological processes such as morphological change, herbivores, and microbial pathogen resistance, and change in biochemical compositionCitation39,Citation43,Citation44. Cross-tolerance knowledge and an understanding of the recent relationships between UVB radiation and other biotic stresses may open doors for the creation of multiple resistant crops for raising yield productivity in the face of shifting global climatic conditions. There is, however, a paucity of current data on the interaction between UVB radiation and other biotic stresses.

Figure 1. The current strategies for generating UVB and biotic resistance crops.

UVB radiation and biotic stresses both have an impact on plants grown in a typical environment. The induction of defense-responsive genes, hormones, and secondary metabolites with biotic resistance properties is made possible by targeting micro-RNA 396 and 398 as well as growth-regulating and transcription factors, which control the downstream targets of UVB-induced growth retardation. This will produce plants that are UVB-primed biotic resistance, with enhanced biotic resistance mechanisms.
Figure 1. The current strategies for generating UVB and biotic resistance crops.

Plants may experience direct or indirect effects from UVB radiation, depending on the doseCitation45. For instance, the employ of UV-screening filters had direct effects on the Blister Blight disease of Camellia sinensis (tea), which is caused by the fungus Exobasidium vexans. Such effects showed that the UVB components of solar radiation reduced the germination rates and survival of the affected plants, which ultimately resulted in a decrease in the diseaseCitation46. Additionally, according to Kunz et al., UV exposure to plants could activate defense mechanisms without the need for Avr recognition by R proteinCitation47,Citation48. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that UVB activates genes such as ß-1, 3-glucanase, chalcone synthase, chitinase, lipoxygenase, stilbene synthase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), and PR proteins that are essential for pathogen resistance in plantsCitation49–57. Besides this, it has been demonstrated that UVB acts through downstream signaling pathways containing elements related to those for pathogen defense, such as mitogen-activated protein kinasesCitation58, calciumCitation59, jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid, and ethyleneCitation39, ROS, and nitric oxideCitation60; and Tomatoes’ ability to resist herbivores can be regulated by UVB radiation exposure by signaling through JACitation61. Furthermore, UV-B strengthens plant defenses against numerous plant species as well as lepidopteran insects through a mechanism that depends on JACitation62. All of these findings indicated that UVB radiation has a significant impact on biotic stress, particularly on pathogen resistance. It has been hypothesized that domesticating high UVB-sensitive cultivars in tropical regions with high UVB stress helps those plants survive other biotic stressesCitation36. Future research will focus heavily on figuring out the molecular mechanisms underlying the trade-off between pathogen resistance and UVB sensitivity. We need to figure out the best way to create multiple resistant crops because of the rise in UVB radiation brought on by ozone layer loss and the appearance of new plant pathogens as a result of climate change and global warming. This is crucial for agricultural production, especially in tropical areas where crops are under intense pressure from UVB rays and biotic stresses at the same time. Understanding the key players in the relationship between UVB radiation stress and biotic stresses will be crucial to provide information on developing crops that are resistant to both UVB and biotic stresses because it has been demonstrated that UVB radiation influences various biotic stresses. Consequently, UVB radiation could be used in agriculture as a non-chemical and best approach to control biotic plant stresses, thereby reducing the need for pesticides that are bad for human health and the environment. Additionally, supplementing UVB radiation as a “treatment” has no residual effects, in contrast to the long-lasting effects of chemical plant growth regulators that take effect once the plant absorbs themCitation1. However, there is not much information on the recent interaction between UVB radiation due to ozone layer depletion and biotic stresses.

The most recent studies on the connection between UVB radiation and resistance to biotic stresses were the main focus of this review. Given that plants are currently under numerous stresses as a result of climate change, the knowledge presented here will be useful in identifying strategies for developing multiple resistance crops. The results of this study will be used to create non-chemical, environmentally responsible strategies for biotic stress management. The relationship between biotic stress and UVB provided here might be improved. The relationship between UVB and biotic stress that has been established here may enhance food security, particularly in tropical regions where pathogens are a major source of biotic stress and UVB exposure is high.

2. UVB radiation and plant disease resistance

For improving the disease resistance mechanism in plants, various UVB doses have been used in various studies, and the daily doses have been shown to vary between 0.2 and 32 kJ−2 Citation40. Finding a specific dose that will activate a defense response while not harming the crop is very difficult. For instance, sunflower cotyledons can withstand daily doses of 30 kJ m−2 while broccoli florets can show signs of phototoxicity at a daily dose of 2.2 kJ m−2 Citation63. Therefore, scientists need to select an appropriate UVB dose that is specific to plants; otherwise, different pathways might be activated that either causes stress or light acclimatization reactions. However, plants’ perception of UVB radiation triggers the production of several metabolites, which are essential for adapting to UVB radiation. This acclimatization could be accomplished by either increasing antioxidant capacity or by directly applying sunscreen to reduce the absorption of excessive UVB radiationCitation64. Phenolic compounds, alkaloids, glucosinolates, and some hormones like JA and salicylic acids (SA) are examples of specialized metabolites induced by UVB radiation that may strengthen plants’ defensesCitation40; there is also evidence that secondary metabolites contribute to UVB-induced pathogen resistanceCitation41.

Numerous phenolic substances, such as nobiletin, flavones, quercetin, and genistein, exhibit antifungal properties by altering the permeability of the microbe cell wall, either by directly inhibiting fungal growth in the apoplast or by interacting with fungal membrane proteinsCitation65,Citation66. This suggested that the relationship between UVB and improving disease resistance in UVB-treated plants is through the upregulation of these metabolites by UVB radiation. For instance, after being exposed to UVB light, the increased levels of sinapates (sinapoyl glucose and sinapoyl malate), which are mediated by UVR8, increase Arabidopsis’ resistance to the fungus Botrytis cinerea Citation40,Citation41. Additionally, UVB led to increased amounts of isoflavone glycosides and enhanced resistance to herbivores in a variety of soybean cultivars; the only cultivar that was nonresponsive to UVB radiation and without strong isoflavone activation displayed low resistance to the pestsCitation67. A recent study by Fardhani et al. showed that only in the cucumber leaves (Cucumis sativus L.) that had been exposed to UVB radiation did the expression of defense-related genes increase, reducing the severity of powder mildewCitation68. Additionally, UVB radiation can activate hormones that give plants their disease resistance. For example, numerous studies have demonstrated that exposure to UVB light has an impact on the synthesis of plant hormones like JA and SA. While SA is known to be involved in defense responses toward biotrophic organisms, JA is known to be involved in defense responses against necrotrophic pathogens and herbivoresCitation69,Citation70. Although altering the experimental conditions may yield contradictory results for JA accumulations in response to UVB lightCitation40, Arabidopsis plants exposed to UVB radiation showed an upregulation of genes associated with defense and SA without inducing UVB stress, downregulation of genes implying photosynthesis, variation in chlorophyll content, or peroxide and hydrogen peroxide accumulationCitation71. Similar to this, another study showed that tomato plants exposed to UVB light for 11 days did not show any signs of UVB stress but did significantly accumulate salicylic acid beta-glucoside (SAG) and SACitation72. These studies suggested that the improvement in plant resistance to biotic stresses following exposure to UVB radiation is modulated by hormones, particularly JA and SA.

Many plants can produce pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins when exposed to UVB radiationCitation73. For instance, UVB causes the activation of various pathogenesis-related substances, including the PR protein OSMOTIN-LIKE PROTEIN (OLPs), which has antifungal properties in riceCitation40. UVB radiation stimulates ß-1.3-glucanase (PR-2) in strawberries and rice, as well as in response to Magnaporthe oryzae, a rice blast fungusCitation74,Citation75. Similar to this, UVB radiation activates genes related to bacterial and fungal pathogens, including ß-1,3-glucanase and PR-4, which are responsive to JA, and PR-2, SA, and PR-1, which are responsive to SACitation76. Recent research by Mmbando et al. have shown that pretreatment with low doses of UVB reduces the length and number of multicellular infectious hyphae in lesions, which in turn lessens the severity of M. oryzae in UVB-sensitive linesCitation28. Curiously, UVB pretreatment also causes several PR proteins and defense genes to become active in uninoculated plants. According to those findings, UVB radiation may strengthen plants’ defenses even before they become infected by pathogens by activating some defense mechanisms, including PR proteins. A plant may mistake UVB radiation for pathogens and prepare its defense mechanism so that it is ready to defend against actual pathogens when they come into contact with the plant. As the most promising method of using UVB radiation as a non-chemical tool to control biotic stress, this UVB priming phenomenon will need more attention. Finding the right UVB dosage for a specific species is crucial because different plant species have varying rates of tolerance to UVB sensitivity, even though both high and low UVB dosages can increase a plant’s resistance to pathogens and pests. The best method for increasing UVB and pathogen resistance in crops may therefore be to target these metabolites activated by UVB radiation while also managing UVB-induced growth inhibition effects.

3. UVB radiation and herbivore and pests resistance

UVB radiation has been implicated in influencing the performance, survival, and behavior of herbivores and their adversaries, even though high levels may hurt plant performanceCitation77. The reduction in performance and/or preference of herbivorous antibodies in different plant species were shown in UVB supplemental and exclusion studiesCitation41–76Citation78–80. Depending on the types of plants and herbivores, UVB interactions have a wide range of effects on biotic interactions. For instance, both insect herbivores and exposure to solar UVB trigger the partially overlapping phenolic profiles and gene expression in Nicotiana attenuata and Nicotiana longiflora plantsCitation81. Herbivorous arthropods’ behaviors and preferences can change as a result of UVB-mediated changes in plant architecture, chemistry, and/or physiology, particularly when plant defenses are strengthenedCitation82. It has been suggested that UVB-induced cell wall augmentation and/or increased production of UVB-protective secondary metabolites may affect how herbivorous arthropods develop in plantsCitation76,Citation78. There is an overlap between herbivore attacks and plant responses to UVB that may have the same impact on plant defenses, even though an antagonistic relationship between these responses may also happen and reduce plant defensesCitation82. The activation of specific diterpene glycosides, for example, is mediated by UVB and is a key component of N. attenuata defenses against the mirid Tupiocoris notatus. As demonstrated by Mewis et al. on the mediation of stimulation of two different plant defense-related metabolites, glucosinolates, and flavonoids, in broccoli (Brassica oleracea) sprouts, UVB radiation can adjust the production of various plant chemicals that differ in their influence on plants’ resistanceCitation76. The UVB-mediated adjustment of activated plant defenses can be closely related to how much a plant’s chemical alteration activated by UVB contributes to antiherbivore propertiesCitation82.

The thickness of leaf trichomes, which are hairy epidermal structures that shield plants from abiotic stresses like extreme light intensity and UV radiation as well as herbivory resistance, has been shown to increase in response to UVB radiationCitation83–85. Herbivore resistance is significantly mediated by phytohormones. For instance, increased plant resistance to piercing-sucking, some phloem-feeding arthropods, and leaf-chewing is associated with stimulation of JA signalingCitation86. Additionally, pre- and post-herbivory constitutive (i.e., pre-herbivory) jasmonate levels can be increased by UVB radiation, which increases chemical defensesCitation62,Citation87. These studies suggested that the influence of UVB on various phytohormones, including cytokinin, auxin, and gibberellins, which altered the leaf chemistry, is responsible for the improved resistance to herbivoresCitation82. Before using UVB radiation as a stimulus in crop production, these responses must be clarified because while UVB radiation increases plant resistance to herbivores, it can also inhibit growth by inhibiting auxin signalingCitation88,Citation89. Besides, it has been proposed that UVB may have strengthened broccoli plants’ resistance to cabbage aphids by increasing the concentration of flavonoidsCitation79. Furthermore, other studies have demonstrated that UVB radiation can change a plant’s susceptibility to insect chewers. For instance, in contrast to reduced UVB conditions, there was little damage to soybean plants caused by chewing herbivores under ambient UVB radiation in field conditionsCitation80. UVB radiation also helped white clover (Trifolium repens) become more resistant to Spodoptera litura Citation90. Since the JA pathway was shown to increase maize and rice resistance to insects through UVB, some evidence suggests that the JA pathway is involved in the resistance, even though the mechanisms by which UVB affects plant resistance to herbivores are not yet fully understoodCitation62.

According to Kuhlmann and Müller., growth under UV irradiation changed the plants’ allure to herbivorous insects like aphids, thrips, and whitefliesCitation91. Thus, UVB radiation has emerged as a light signal with potential applications to increase crop yield and strengthen plant defense against insect pests without the use of pesticidesCitation80. In other words, UVB can be viewed as a “eustress,” a type of stress that has positive effects on plant health and facilitates adaptation to extremely demanding stressful situationsCitation92. In addition to biotic stresses like above-ground arthropod herbivores, UVB has been shown to confer cross-tolerance to abiotic stresses like high temperatures, light stress, and droughtCitation61,Citation87,Citation93,Citation94. The UVB effect on the synthesis of secondary metabolites may also be influenced by other environmental factors. For instance, Arabidopsis plants grown outdoors under conditions of moderate temperature and low daily light integrals did not demonstrate a significant effect of UVB on the production of phenolicsCitation95. Accordingly, variations in climatic conditions, particularly in outdoor and experimental growth chamber experiments, may affect the UVB response to secondary metabolite production, which affects resistance to pathogens and pests. This would account for the wide range of results in various studies on the response to UVB on disease and pests in plants. Because some of the activated specialized metabolites that ward off insects and microorganisms may also be unpleasant for human consumption, such as bitter taste, the beneficial effects of UV on plant resistance must be carefully consideredCitation1.

4. Possible strategies to develop both UVB and pathogen resistance in crops

UVB radiation that reaches the earth’s surface increases as the ozone layer thinsCitation29,Citation30. Similar climatic and global warming changes, such as an increase in UVB, may affect plants’ production of defense-related secondary metabolites, which may increase the frequency and severity of pathogens and pests in some areasCitation96,Citation97. Recently, Mmbando et al. showed a connection between high UVB sensitivity and disease resistance mechanisms in M. oryzae, indicating the significance of UVB radiation for enhancing disease resistance mechanismsCitation28. To increase crop productivity in the current climate, methods for breeding crop plants with multiple resistances will be of utmost importance. It may be possible to create crops that are resistant to pathogens and UVB stresses by investigating the trade-off between disease resistance and UVB sensitivity in cropsCitation36. However, there is little information available regarding potential methods to produce crops that are resilient to biotic and UVB stresses. This could hinder the development of the green revolution, especially in tropical regions with high levels of UVB radiation and pathogen stress, where breeders and biotechnologists might find it difficult to create multiple resistant crop plants. Thus, a method is required that can balance the trade-off mechanism by preventing UVB’s effects on plant growth inhibitionCitation6,Citation7, while allowing the activation of the plant’s defenses without sacrificing growth. Here are some potential strategies for creating crops that are resilient to UVB radiation as well as pathogens, pests, and disease stress.

4.1 controlling the effects of UVB on plant growth inhibition

The number of tillers, plant height, and cell proliferation in proliferating cells are all suppressed by UVB radiationCitation6,Citation7,Citation98. By boosting CPD photolyase activity, plants may be able to withstand this inhibition. However, it has recently been demonstrated that high CPD photolyase activity reduces resistance to M. oryzae; Mmbando et al. suggested that a moderate level of CPDs may be required to activate the disease resistance mechanism in plantsCitation28. Thus, when examining the advantages of UVB radiation on pathogen resistance or even developing UVB-pathogen-resistant plants, controlling the downstream targets of UVB-induced growth inhibition effects in plants is crucial. Growth regulating factors (GRFs), which have been linked to controlling cell proliferation in response to UVB radiationCitation99,Citation100, maybe the downstream targets for UVB-induced growth inhibition effects on plants. Examples of GRFs include GRF1, GRF2, and GRF3 in ArabidopsisCitation99 and possibly GRF1, GRF2, GRF14, and GRF15 in maizeCitation100. Using gene editing methods like clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR-Cas9) may be able to control the miRNAs or GRFs responsible for preventing cell proliferation, preventing the negative effects of UVB radiation while allowing the positive effects of priming disease and pathogen resistance. Although different GRFs may serve different purposes in different species, manipulating the miRNAs or GRFsCitation99,Citation100 that are responsible for preventing cell proliferation using gene editing methods like CRISPR-Cas9Citation101 may prevent the negative effects of UVB radiation on plant growth while favorably influencing the development of disease and pathogen resistance mechanisms in these plants. Another strategy could be to inhibit auxin signaling, which would combine the auxin and UVB signaling pathways. For example, the MYB transcription factors MYB73/77 control lateral root growth by interacting with UVB in roots when UVB is presentCitation102. Therefore, the MYB73/77 transcription factors may be responsible for root growth inhibition in plants exposed to UVB radiation. By adjusting these transcription factors, it may be possible to lessen the effects of growth inhibition while also enhancing resistance mechanisms. This strategy aims to prevent a plant’s growth or cell division from being inhibited while allowing the priming of disease and pathogen resistance effects on plants through UVB-induced changes to plant chemistry.

4.2 modulating miRNA 396 and 398

When exposed to a low dose of UVB treatment (0.4 Wm−2), high UVB-sensitive cultivars showed greater disease resistance against M. oryzae, indicating that UVB-induced accumulation of CPDs is required for the induction of disease resistance mechanismsCitation28. However, the high concentration of CPD accumulations will prevent plant growth at high UVB radiation doses (1.2 Wm−2)Citation7,Citation18,Citation20,Citation103. Therefore, developing multiple resistance plants will require molecular methods of regulating the level of CPDs or controlling the downstream target of CPDs, perhaps through miRNA. According to Jia et al., findings from a filter assay, UVB radiation raised the levels of the miRNAs miR156, miR160, miR165/166, miR167, and miR398 in P. tremula Citation104. Small non-coding RNAs called microRNAsplays several biological roles, such as regulating growth in many plants and responding to abiotic and biotic stresses, and stress responsesCitation105,Citation106. MicroRNAs are essential for the UVB-induced aggregation of bioactive plant componentsCitation107. For instance, UVB treatment in Arabidopsis has been shown to up-regulate 21 microRNA genes in 11 microRNA familiesCitation108. In addition, it has been demonstrated that the microRNA 396‘s suppression of GRFs prevents UVB radiation from causing cell proliferation in Arabidopsis leavesCitation99. By modifying innate immunity without affecting growth, miRNA396 has a significant impact on plants’ immunityCitation109. As a result, miRNA396 may be the link between plant immunity and UVB radiation. Using molecular methods to regulate its expression level or downstream targets GRFs could be a useful strategy for creating UVB-resistant primed disease-resistance plants. Other miRNAs, including miRNA398, have been demonstrated to link the plant stress regulatory network to responses in plants to water shortage, abscisic acid, copper, phosphate, ultraviolet stress, bacterial infections, and higher sucroseCitation110. Therefore, manipulating miRNAs 396 and 398 may hold the key to creating crops resistant to UVB stress and other biotic stresses. However, more research is required to comprehend other miRNAs that interact with disease metabolism and UVB.

4.3 Modification of MAP kinase

It has been demonstrated that MAPK PHOSPHATASE 1 (MKP1) contributes to UV resistance when UVR8-regulated UVB acclimation cannot withstand UVB stressCitation111,Citation112; additionally, the Arabidopsis MKP1 fault mutant mkp1 is more vulnerable to UVB than the wild-typeCitation113 indicating the significance of this system in UVB protection. MPK3 and MPK6 are downstream targets of MKP1 that UVB stress is known to activate; MKP1 functions as a contra-regulator of MPK3 and MP6 activities in plant resilience to UVB and salt stresses, as well as in the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae Citation111,Citation112,Citation114. Controlling the activity of MKP1 or its downstream targets MPK3 and MPK6 may allow the possibility of developing UVB and pathogen or disease-resistant crops because MKP1 is involved in improving resistance to both biotic and abiotic stresses. Hormone synthesis and signaling can be affected by mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). For instance, it has recently been shown that MPK3 and MPK6 are essential for SA priming in ArabidopsisCitation115. Multiple resistant plants can be created by combining all of these tactics, including the hormonal pathways for JA and SA. However, more research is required to determine the ideal UVB dosage for inducing defense mechanisms in a variety of cultivars without affecting growth. Additionally, this is a recent and active research area that calls for more confirmation experimentation. Even so, the study of multiple resistance to UVB and biotic stress is a relatively unexplored but highly intriguing and promising field of study because it presents numerous opportunities for breeding plants that are resilient to multiple stresses. This will be crucial in increasing food production to feed densely populated world, especially in tropical regions that experience multiple stresses instantly.

5. Conclusion

The review’s main focus is on the most recent connection between UVB radiation and biotic stress resistance. Recent studiesCitation28,Citation40,Citation116 have found that UVB radiation affects plant chemistry in a way that makes them more resilient to biotic stresses like pathogens, and pests. Understanding the relationship between these two factors may lead to the development of crops that are resistant to both UVB radiation and biotic stress. Recent research has revealed that low UVB resistance and CPD photolyase activity are required for improving biotic resistance to M. oryzae in riceCitation28, although most studies have focused on increasing UVB resistance by enhancing CPD photolyase activityCitation18–20. Plants may require a sufficient number of CPDs to activate the UVB-mediated biotic resistance mechanism. Thus, the knowledge provided here will expand our understanding of the relationship between UVB sensitivity and disease resistance mechanisms in plants. The molecular mechanism underlying this relationship should be clarified in future studies as it will aid in the development of UVB-resistance primed plants. However, because most laboratory conditions use artificial UVB lighting conditions with unnaturally high or low UVB fluxes and doses, it is necessary to test whether the anticipation made based on controlled laboratory conditions will work well under natural conditions in the field. Field experiments should be carried out before the commercialization of various crop varieties. This study revealed the most recent link between UVB radiation and biotic stress resistance, which provides crucial information for creating multiple resistant crops. The development of multiple resistance crops will offer ways to increase crop productivity, which can end hunger and poverty in the world because many crops are used as both food and for earning income.

Author contribution statement

G.S.M: Conceived, designed, interpreted the data, and wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

The author will like to thank UDOM for providing office space for research write-ups.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Additional information

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

  • Vanhaelewyn L, Van Der Straeten D, De Coninck B, Vandenbussche F. Ultraviolet radiation from a plant perspective: the plant-microorganism context. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1984.
  • Cockell CS, Horneck G. The history of the UV radiation climate of the earth—theoretical and space-based observations. Photochem Photobiol. 2001;73:447–9.
  • Horneck G, Klaus DM, Mancinelli RL. Space microbiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74:121–156.
  • Kataria S, Jajoo A, Guruprasad KN. Impact of increasing ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation on photosynthetic processes. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2014;137:55–66.
  • Takahashi M, Teranishi M, Ishida H, Kawasaki J, Takeuchi A, Yamaya T, Watanabe M, Makino A, Hidema J. Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) photolyase repairs ultraviolet-B-induced CPDs in rice chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA. Plant J. 2011;66:433–442.
  • Hidema J, Teranishi M, Iwamatsu Y, Hirouchi T, Ueda T, Sato T, Burr B, Sutherland BM, Yamamoto K, Kumagai T. Spontaneously occurring mutations in the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer photolyase gene cause different sensitivities to ultraviolet-B in rice. Plant J. 2005;43:57–67.
  • Mmbando GS, Teranishi M, Hidema J. Very high sensitivity of African rice to artificial ultraviolet-B radiation caused by genotype and quantity of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer photolyase. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–14.
  • Holopainen JK, Virjamo V, Ghimire RP, Blande JD, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Kivimäenpää M. Climate change effects on secondary compounds of forest trees in the northern hemisphere. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1445.
  • Hideg É, Jansen MAK, Strid Å. UV-B exposure, ROS, and stress: inseparable companions or loosely linked associates? Trends Plant Sci. 2013;18:107–115.
  • Takahashi S, Milward SE, Yamori W, Evans JR, Hillier W, Badger MR. The solar action spectrum of photosystem II damage. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:988–993.
  • Mitchell DL, Nairn RS. The biology of the (6–4) photoproduct. Photochem Photobiol. 1989;49:805–819.
  • Britt AB. DNA damage and repair in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 1996;47:75–100.
  • Li N, Teranishi M, Yamaguchi H, Matsushita T, Watahiki MK, Tsuge T, Li SS, Hidema J. UV-B-induced CPD photolyase gene expression is regulated by UVR8-dependent and-independent pathways in arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56:2014–2023.
  • Dany AL, Douki T, Triantaphylides C, Cadet J. Repair of the main UV-induced thymine dimeric lesions within Arabidopsis thaliana DNA: evidence for the major involvement of photoreactivation pathways. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2001;65:127–135.
  • Britt AB. Repair of DNA damage induced by solar UV. Photosynth Res. 2004;81:105–112.
  • Hidema J, Kumagai T. Sensitivity of rice to ultraviolet-B radiation. Ann Bot. 2006;97:933–942.
  • Teranishi M, Iwamatsu Y, Hidema J, Kumagai T. Ultraviolet-B sensitivities in Japanese lowland rice cultivars: cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer photolyase activity and gene mutation. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004;45:1848–1856.
  • Hidema J, Taguchi T, Ono T, Teranishi M, Yamamoto K, Kumagai T. Increase in CPD photolyase activity functions effectively to prevent growth inhibition caused by UVB radiation. Plant J. 2007;50:70–79.
  • Teranishi M, Taguchi T, Ono T, Hidema J. Augmentation of CPD photolyase activity in japonica and indica rice increases their UVB resistance but still leaves the difference in their sensitivities. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2012;11:812–820.
  • Mmbando GS, Teranishi M, Hidema J. Transgenic rice Oryza glaberrima with higher CPD photolyase activity alleviates UVB-caused growth inhibition. GM Crop Food. 2021;12:435–448.
  • Wada M, Kagawa T, Sato Y. Chloroplast movement. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:455–468.
  • Iwabuchi K, Hidema J, Tamura K, Takagi S, Hara-Nishimura I. Plant nuclei move to escape ultraviolet-induced DNA damage and cell death. Plant Physiol. 2016;170:678–685.
  • Hermanowicz P, Banaś AK, Sztatelman O, Gabryś H, Łabuz J. UV-B induces chloroplast movements in a phototropin-dependent manner. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1279.
  • Bidel LPR, Meyer S, Goulas Y, Cadot Y, Cerovic ZG. Responses of epidermal phenolic compounds to light acclimation: in vivo qualitative and quantitative assessment using chlorophyll fluorescence excitation spectra in leaves of three woody species. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2007;88:163–179.
  • Hernandez L, Alegre F, Munné-Bosch VBS. How relevant are flavonoids as antioxidants in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14:125–132.
  • Janisiewicz WJ, Takeda F, Nichols B, Glenn DM, Jurick IW, Camp MJ. Use of low-dose UV-C irradiation to control powdery mildew caused by podosphaera aphanis on strawberry plants. Can J Plant Pathol. 2016;38:430–439.
  • Escalona VH, Aguayo E, Martínez-Hernández GB, Artés F. UV-C doses to reduce pathogen and spoilage bacterial growth in vitro and in baby spinach. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2010;56:223–231.
  • Mmbando GS, Ando S, Takahashi H, Hidema J. High ultraviolet ‑ B sensitivity due to lower CPD photolyase activity is needed for biotic stress response to the rice blast fungus, magnaporthe oryzae. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2023;1–3.
  • Barnes PW, Williamson CE, Lucas RM, Robinson SA, Madronich S, Paul ND, Bornman JF, Bais AF, Sulzberger B, Wilson SR, et al. Ozone depletion, ultraviolet radiation, climate change and prospects for a sustainable future. Nat Sustain. 2019;2:569–579.
  • Neale RE, Barnes PW, Robson TM, Neale PJ, Williamson CE, Zepp RG, Wilson SR, Madronich S, Andrady AL, Heikkilä AM, et al. Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation, and interactions with climate change: UNEP environmental effects assessment panel, update 2020. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2021;20:1–67.
  • Taalas P, Kaurola J, Kylling A, Shindell D, Sausen R, Dameris M, Grewe V, Herman J, Damski J, Steil B. The impact of greenhouse gases and halogenated species on future solar UV radiation doses. Geophys Res Lett. 2000;27:1127–1130.
  • Germ M, Spahić I, Gaberščik A. Morphological, biochemical and physiological responses of Indian cress (Tropaeolum majus) to elevated UV-B radiation. Period Biol. 2016;2:3.
  • Caldwell MM, Teramura AH, Tevini M. The changing solar ultraviolet climate and the ecological consequences for higher plants. Trends Ecol Evol. 1989;4:363–367.
  • Ueda T, Nakamura C. Ultraviolet-defense mechanisms in higher plants. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2011;25:2177–2182.
  • Cramp RL, Ohmer MEB, Franklin CE, Cooke S. UV exposure causes energy trade-offs leading to increased chytrid fungus susceptibility in green tree frog larvae. Conserv Physiol. 2022;10:coac038.
  • Mmbando GS, Hidema J. The trade-off between UVB sensitivity and tolerance against other stresses in African rice species. Turk J Botany. 2021;45:601–612.
  • Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shuman J, Shulaev V, Davletova S, Mittler R. When defense pathways collide. The response of Arabidopsis to a combination of drought and heat stress. Plant Physiol. 2004;134:1683–1696.
  • Nawrath C, Heck S, Parinthawong N, Métraux JP. EDS5, an essential component of salicylic acid-dependent signaling for disease resistance in Arabidopsis, is a member of the MATE transporter family. Plant Cell. 2002;14:275–286.
  • Brosché M, Strid Å. Molecular events following perception of ultraviolet-b radiation by plants. Physiol Plant. 2003;117:1–10.
  • Meyer P, Van de Poel B, De Coninck B. UV-B light and its application potential to reduce disease and pest incidence in crops. Hortic Res. 2021;8:8.
  • Demkura PV, Ballaré CL. UVR8 mediates UV-B-induced Arabidopsis defense responses against botrytis cinerea by controlling sinapate accumulation. Mol Plant. 2012;5:642–652.
  • Keller M, Rogiers SY, Schultz HR. Nitrogen and ultraviolet radiation modify grapevines’ susceptibility to powdery mildew. Vitis. 2003;42:87–94.
  • Frohnmeyer H, Staiger D. Ultraviolet-B radiation-mediated responses in plants. Balancing damage and protection. Plant Physiol. 2003;133:1420–1428.
  • Jenkins GI. Signal transduction in responses to UV-B radiation. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:407–431.
  • Paul ND. Stratospheric ozone depletion, UV-B radiation and crop disease. Environ Pollut. 2000;108:343–355.
  • Gunasekera TS, Paul ND, Ayres PG. The effects of ultraviolet-b (UV-B: 290–320 nm) radiation on blister blight disease of tea (camellia sinensis). null. 1997;46:179–185.
  • Kunz BA, Cahill DM, Mohr PG, Osmond MJ, Vonarx EJ. Plant responses to UV radiation and links to pathogen resistance. Int Rev Cytol. 2006;255:1–40.
  • Kunz BA, Dando PK, Grice DM, Mohr PG, Schenk PM, Cahill DM. UV-induced DNA damage promotes resistance to the biotrophic pathogen hyaloperonospora parasitica in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008;148:1021–1031.
  • Mackerness AH, Surplus SL, Blake P, John CF, Buchanan-Wollaston V, Jordan BR, Thomas B. Ultraviolet-B-induced stress and changes in gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana: role of signalling pathways controlled by jasmonic acid, ethylene and reactive oxygen species. Plant Cell Environ. 1999;22:1413–1423.
  • Bonomelli A, Mercier L, Franchel J, Baillieul F, Benizri É, Mauro MC. Response of grapevine defenses to UV—C exposure. null. 2004;55:51–59.
  • Borie B, Jeandet P, Parize A, Bessis R, Adrian M. Resveratrol and stilbene synthase mRNA production in grapevine leaves treated with biotic and abiotic phytoalexin elicitors. null. 2004;55:60–64.
  • Brederode FT, Linthorst HJM, Bol JF. Differential induction of acquired resistance and PR gene expression in tobacco by virus infection, ethephon treatment, UV light and wounding. Plant Mol Biol. 1991;17:1117–1125.
  • Choi JJ, Klosterman SJ, Hadwiger LA. A comparison of the effects of DNA-damaging agents and biotic elicitors on the induction of plant defense genes, nuclear distortion, and cell death. Plant Physiol. 2001;125:752–762.
  • Conconi A, Miquel M, Ryan CA. Intracellular levels of free linolenic and linoleic acids increase in tomato leaves in response to wounding. Plant Physiol. 1996;111:797–803.
  • El Ghaouth A, Wilson CL, Callahan AM. Induction of chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase in peach fruit by UV-C treatment. Phytopathology. 2003;93:349–355.
  • Green R, Fluhr R. UV-B-induced PR-1 accumulation is mediated by active oxygen species. Plant Cell. 1995;7:203–212.
  • Sävenstrand H, Brosché M, Ängehagen M, Strid Å. Molecular markers for ozone stress isolated by suppression subtractive hybridization: specificity of gene expression and identification of a novel stress-regulated gene. Plant Cell Environ. 2000;23:689–700.
  • Ulm R, Ichimura K, Mizoguchi T, Peck SC, Zhu T, Wang X, Shinozaki K, Paszkowski J. Distinct regulation of salinity and genotoxic stress responses by Arabidopsis MAP kinase phosphatase 1. Embo J. 2001;21:6483–6493.
  • Frohnmeyer H, Loyall L, Blatt MR, Grabov A. Millisecond UV-B irradiation evokes prolonged elevation of cytosolic-free Ca2+ and stimulates gene expression in transgenic parsley cell cultures. Plant J. 1999;20:109–117.
  • Mackerness SAH, John CF, Jordan B, Thomas B. Early signaling components in ultraviolet-B responses: distinct roles for different reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide. FEBS Lett. 2001;489:237–242.
  • Escobar-Bravo R, Chen G, Kim HK, Grosser K, van Dam NM, Leiss KA, Klinkhamer PGL. Ultraviolet radiation exposure time and intensity modulate tomato resistance to herbivory through activation of jasmonic acid signaling. J Exp Bot. 2019;70:315–327.
  • Qi J, Zhang M, Lu C, Hettenhausen C, Tan Q, Cao G, Zhu X, Wu G, Wu J. Ultraviolet-B enhances the resistance of multiple plant species to lepidopteran insect herbivory through the jasmonic acid pathway. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–9.
  • Topcu Y, Dogan A, Sahin-Nadeem H, Polat E, Kasimoglu Z, Erkan M. Morphological and biochemical responses of broccoli florets to supplemental ultraviolet-B illumination. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2018;259:1–10.
  • Takshak S, Agrawal SB. Defense potential of secondary metabolites in medicinal plants under UV-B stress. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2019;193:51–88.
  • Zaynab M, Fatima M, Abbas S, Sharif Y, Umair M, Zafar MH, Bahadar K. Role of secondary metabolites in plant defense against pathogens. Microb Pathog. 2018;124:198–202.
  • Arif T, Bhosale JD, Kumar N, Mandal TK, Bendre RS, Lavekar GS, Dabur R. Natural products–antifungal agents derived from plants. J Asian Nat Prod Res. 2009;11:621–638.
  • Zavala JA, Mazza CA, Dillon FM, Chludil HD, Ballare CL. Soybean resistance to stink bugs (N ezara viridula and P iezodorus guildinii) increases with exposure to solar UV-B radiation and correlates with isoflavonoid content in pods under field conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38:920–928.
  • Fardhani DM, Kharisma AD, Kobayashi T, Arofatullah NA, Yamada M, Tanabata S, Yokoda Y, Widiastuti A, Sato T. Ultraviolet-B irradiation induces resistance against powdery mildew in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) through a different mechanism than that of heat shock-induced resistance. Agron. 2022;12:12.
  • Bari R, Jones JDG. Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;69:473–488.
  • Smith JL, De Moraes CM, Mescher MC. Jasmonate-and salicylate-mediated plant defense responses to insect herbivores, pathogens and parasitic plants. Pest Manag Sci Former Pestic Sci. 2009;65:497–503.
  • Vandenbussche F, Yu N, Li W, Vanhaelewyn L, Hamshou M, Van Der Straeten D, Smagghe G. An ultraviolet B condition that affects growth and defense in arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2018;268:54–63.
  • Mannucci A, Mariotti L, Castagna A, Santin M, Trivellini A, Reyes TH, Mensuali-Sodi A, Ranieri A, Quartacci MF. Hormone profile changes occur in roots and leaves of micro-tom tomato plants when exposing the aerial part to low doses of UV-B radiation. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;148:291–301.
  • Vanhaelewyn L, Prinsen E, Van Der Straeten D, Vandenbussche F. Hormone-controlled UV-B responses in plants. J Exp Bot. 2016;67:4469–4482.
  • He Y, Li X, Zhan F, Xie C, Zu Y, Li Y, Yue M. Resistance-related physiological response of rice leaves to the compound stress of enhanced UV-B radiation and magnaporthe oryzae. J Plant Interact. 2018;13:321–328.
  • Kanto T, Matsuura K, Yamada M, Usami T, Amemiya Y. UV-B radiation for control of strawberry powdery mildew. Acta Hortic. 2009;842:359–362.
  • Mewis I, Schreiner M, Nguyen CN, Krumbein A, Ulrichs C, Lohse M, Zrenner R. UV-B irradiation changes specifically the secondary metabolite profile in broccoli sprouts: induced signaling overlaps with defense response to biotic stressors. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012;53:1546–1560.
  • Kuhlmann F, Müller C. Impacts of ultraviolet radiation on interactions between plants and herbivorous insects: a chemo-ecological perspective. Prog Bot. 2011;72:305–347.
  • Mazza CA, Zavala J, Scopel AL, Ballaré CL. Perception of solar UVB radiation by phytophagous insects: behavioral responses and ecosystem implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999;96:980–985.
  • Kuhlmann F, Müller C. UV-B impact on aphid performance mediated by plant quality and plant changes induced by aphids. Plant Biol. 2010;12:676–684.
  • Mazza CA, Giménez PI, Kantolic AG, Ballaré CL. Beneficial effects of solar UV-B radiation on soybean yield mediated by reduced insect herbivory under field conditions. Physiol Plant. 2013;147:307–315.
  • Izaguirre MM, Mazza CA, Svatoš A, Baldwin IT, Ballaré CL. Solar ultraviolet-B radiation and insect herbivory trigger partially overlapping phenolic responses in nicotiana attenuata and nicotiana longiflora. Ann Bot. 2007;99:103–109.
  • Escobar-Bravo R, Klinkhamer PGL, Leiss KA. Interactive effects of UV-B light with abiotic factors on plant growth and chemistry, and their consequences for defense against arthropod herbivores. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:278.
  • Barnes JD, Percy KE, Paul ND, Jones P, McLaughlin CK, Mullineaux PM, Creissen G, Wellburn AR. The influence of UV-B radiation on the physicochemical nature of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) leaf surfaces. J Exp Bot. 1996;47:99–109.
  • Yan A, Pan J, An L, Gan Y, Feng H. The responses of trichome mutants to enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2012;113:29–35.
  • Glas JJ, Schimmel BCJ, Alba JM, Escobar-Bravo R, Schuurink RC, Kant MR. Plant glandular trichomes as targets for breeding or engineering of resistance to herbivores. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:17077–17103.
  • Howe GA, Jander G. Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:41–66.
  • Đinh SN, Galis I, Baldwin IT. UVB radiation and 17-hydroxygeranyllinalool diterpene glycosides provide durable resistance against mirid (tupiocoris notatus) attack in field-grown Nicotiana attenuata plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2013;36:590–606.
  • Hayes S, Velanis CN, Jenkins GI, Franklin KA. UV-B detected by the UVR8 photoreceptor antagonizes auxin signaling and plant shade avoidance. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:11894–11899.
  • Hectors K, van Oevelen S, Guisez Y, Prinsen E, Jansen MAK. The phytohormone auxin is a component of the regulatory system that controls UV-mediated accumulation of flavonoids and UV-induced morphogenesis. Physiol Plant. 2012;145:594–603.
  • Lindroth RL, Hofman RW, Campbell BD, McNabb WC, Hunt DY. Population differences in Trifolium repens L. response to ultraviolet-B radiation: foliar chemistry and consequences for two lepidopteran herbivores. Oecologia. 2000;122:20–28.
  • Kuhlmann F, Müller C. Development-dependent effects of UV radiation exposure on broccoli plants and interactions with herbivorous insects. Environ Exp Bot. 2009;66:61–68.
  • Wargent JJ, Jordan BR. From ozone depletion to agriculture: understanding the role of UV radiation in sustainable crop production. New Phytol. 2013;197:1058–1076.
  • Wargent JJ, Nelson BCW, McGhie TK, Barnes PW. Acclimation to UV-B radiation and visible light in L actuca sativa involves up-regulation of photosynthetic performance and orchestration of metabolome-wide responses. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38:929–940.
  • Robson TM, Hartikainen SM, Aphalo PJ. How does solar ultraviolet-B radiation improve drought tolerance of silver birch (Betula pendulaRoth.) seedlings? Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38:953–967.
  • Coffey A, Prinsen E, Jansen MAK, Conway J. The UVB photoreceptor UVR8 mediates accumulation of UV-absorbing pigments, but not changes in plant morphology, under outdoor conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2017;40:2250–2260.
  • Jones RAC, Naidu RA. Global dimensions of plant virus diseases: current status and future perspectives. Annu Rev Virol. 2019;6:387–409.
  • Bebber DP, Ramotowski MAT, Gurr SJ. Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nat Clim Chang. 2013;3:985–988.
  • Iwamatsu Y, Aoki C, Takahashi M, Teranishi M, Ding Y, Sun C, Kumagai T, Hidema J. UVB sensitivity and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) photolyase genotypes in cultivated and wild rice species. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2008;7:311–320.
  • Casadevall R, Rodriguez RE, Debernardi JM, Palatnik JF, Casati P. Repression of growth regulating factors by the microRNA396 inhibits cell proliferation by UV-B radiation in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell. 2013;25:3570–3583.
  • Fina J, Casadevall R, AbdElgawad H, Prinsen E, Markakis MN, Beemster GTS, Casati P. UV-B inhibits leaf growth through changes in growth regulating factors and gibberellin levels. Plant Physiol. 2017;174:1110–1126.
  • Jaganathan D, Ramasamy K, Sellamuthu G, Jayabalan S, Venkataraman G. CRISPR for crop improvement: an update review. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1–17.
  • Yadav A, Singh D, Lingwan M, Yadukrishnan P, Masakapalli SK, Datta S. Light signaling and UV-B-mediated plant growth regulation. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020;62:1270–1292.
  • Hidema J, Kumagai T, Sutherland BM. UV radiation-sensitive Norin 1 rice contains defective cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer photolyase. Plant Cell. 2000;12:1569–1578.
  • Jia X, Ren L, Chen QJ, Li R, Tang G. UV-B-responsive microRnas in populus tremula. J Plant Physiol. 2009;166:2046–2057.
  • Mallory AC, Vaucheret H. Functions of microRnas and related small RNAs in plants. Nat Genet. 2006;38:S31–36.
  • Vidal EA, Moyano TC, Krouk G, Katari MS, Tanurdzic M, McCombie WR, Coruzzi GM, Gutiérrez RA. Integrated RNA-seq and sRNA-seq analysis identifies novel nitrate-responsive genes in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:1–15.
  • Yang Y, Guo J, Cheng J, Jiang Z, Xu N, An X, Chen Z, Hao J, Yang S, Xu Z. Identification of UV-B radiation responsive microRnas and their target genes in chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat) using high-throughput sequencing. Ind Crops Prod. 2020;151:112484.
  • Zhou X, Wang G, Zhang W. UV-B responsive microRNA genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:103.
  • Soto-Suárez M, Baldrich P, Weigel D, Rubio-Somoza I, San Segundo B. The Arabidopsis miR396 mediates pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immune responses against fungal pathogens. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–14.
  • Zhu C, Ding Y, Liu H. MiR398 and plant stress responses. Physiol Plant. 2011;143:1–9.
  • Ulm R. Molecular genetics of genotoxic stress signalling in plants. In: Hirt H, Shinozaki K, editors. Plant responses to abiotic stress. Berlin, Heildelberg: Springer; 2003. p. 217–240.
  • González Besteiro MA, Bartels S, Albert A, Ulm R. Arabidopsis MAP kinase phosphatase 1 and its target MAP kinases 3 and 6 antagonistically determine UV-B stress tolerance, independent of the UVR8 photoreceptor pathway. Plant J. 2011;68:727–737.
  • Shi C, Liu H. How plants protect themselves from ultraviolet-B radiation stress. Plant Physiol. 2021;187:1096–1103.
  • Anderson JC, Bartels S, Besteiro MAG, Shahollari B, Ulm R, Peck SC. Arabidopsis MAP kinase phosphatase 1 (AtMKP1) negatively regulates MPK6-mediated PAMP responses and resistance against bacteria. Plant J. 2011;67:258–268.
  • Beckers GJM, Jaskiewicz M, Liu Y, Underwood WR, He SY, Zhang S, Conrath U. Mitogen-activated protein kinases 3 and 6 are required for full priming of stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2009;21:944–953.
  • Escobar-Bravo R, Nederpel C, Naranjo S, Kim HK, Rodríguez-López MJ, Chen G, Glauser G, Leiss KA, Klinkhamer PGL. Ultraviolet radiation modulates both constitutive and inducible plant defenses against thrips but is dose and plant genotype dependent. J Pest Sci. 2004;2021:69–81.