![Sample our Behavioral Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110801/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Behavioral-Sciences.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Many activities, from cooking a meal to climbing, entail – or at least benefit from – the planning of a number of actions before the first action can be executed. In this paper we explored the hypothesis that experienced climbers, because of their extensive training in visualising and mentally simulating the entire sequence of moves required to complete a route before they start climbing, may be more competent in planning ahead. We tested this hypothesis in two maze spatial-navigation tasks, arguably closer to the climbers’ embodied-planning experience, and one question-asking task, to further test the generalisability of their hypothesised advantage over non-climbers. We found that climbers were as accurate, but much faster than non-climbers at finding the correct path out of a maze, but did not outperform non-climbers in identifying the most informative question to ask. We discuss the role of different cognitive abilities and strategies that might underpin the climbers’ superior maze-navigation performance.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Contribution statement
AR ideated and designed the study. OS and CV contributed to the design of the study. AR and OS performed the statistical analysis. AR wrote the first draft of the manuscript. OS and CV wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Data availability statement
The data are publicly available at https://osf.io/7e4gq/?view_only = 8a595f5a1090479bb8f5fb6178a8a15a