292
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The investment model of commitment: examining asexual and aromantic populations using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 38-53 | Received 07 Nov 2022, Accepted 08 Jun 2023, Published online: 14 Jul 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Past research on the Investment Model of Commitment suggests that satisfaction, quality of alternatives, and investment consistently predict commitment levels in romantic relationships. Previous research examining the Investment Model has focused on allosexual and alloromantic populations – i.e. individuals who experience sexual and romantic attraction, respectively. We extended this research to asexual and aromantic individuals. Asexual and aromantic participants in relationships completed the four Investment Model subscales (i.e. satisfaction, investments, quality of alternatives, commitment). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the model fit to the original Investment Model factors was poor. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed that the investments and quality of alternatives items mostly loaded on the original factors; however, satisfaction items and commitment items mostly loaded on the same factor. These results suggest that asexual and aromantic individuals may not distinguish between relationship satisfaction and commitment, or individuals may have relatively equal amounts of satisfaction and commitment in their relationships. In addition, many asexual and aromantic individuals practice non-monogamous relationships, and have a higher quality of alternatives than those who practice monogamous relationships. Ultimately, the findings could guide practitioners when working with asexual and aromantic individuals as well as future research focusing on these populations.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. Additional Measures that were presented to participants included Relationship Assessment Scale (Hendrick, Citation1988), Relational Maintenance Behavior Measure (Stafford, Citation2011), and Cheating Index (Kruger et al., Citation2013).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.