391
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Recent progress of porous geopolymers: nanoporosity regulation toward fundamental applications

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1-13 | Received 08 Nov 2023, Accepted 24 Jan 2024, Published online: 05 Feb 2024

ABSTRACT

Porous geopolymers have been the promising subject over the last decade owing to the functional domains from high surface area, structural stability upon heat and chemists, as well as eco-friendly and economy. Especially, the nano-sized geopolymers are playing a significant role in extensive applications. Here, we summarize recent progress in the development of nanoporous geopolymers in the applications of adsorption as well as catalyst supporter. Generally, microporous geopolymers were synthesized through gas bubbling or combination of zeolite to form partial porous structure, while mesoporous geopolymers were produced by the using of various structure directing agent. However, it remains a challenge to obtain functional materials with narrow porous distribution. Our recent work show that the uses of well-defined template method give rise to finely designed nanoporous geopolymers, which exhibited extremely excellent adsorptivity, solid acidic capacity as well as effective carbon-replication. We discussed well the relationship between nanoporosity regulation and corresponding performances to conclude that just using the bubbling, the compositing of zeolite, or traditional rough template method is difficult to form homogeneous pore structures. By analyzing the connection between the uniform porous structure and its related properties, the well-defined template-method would be recommended to generate emerging nanoporous structures with superior functions.

1. Introduction

A large amount of research have been devoted on geopolymer since Davidovits initially reported on its semi-crystalline 3D aluminosilicate structure in the 1970s [Citation1,Citation2] With the increasing demand for environmental sustainability as well as green energy, geopolymer has been viewed as a potential material to replace cement. Among the various sources, fly ash, and metakaolin have become the most practical ones used to prepare geopolymers. Fly ash is a well-known waste derived from coal-fired electricity generation, providing outstanding commercial utilization [Citation3,Citation4]. While the metakaolin as a recently rising source is considered as a highly efficient one owing to the properties in mechanism and transport field, as well as high compressive strength by excellent filling effect [Citation5–10]. However, these dense counterparts possess high surface energy, resulting in low permeability, dispersivity, and processability [Citation11–14].

Given these trends, porous geopolymer (PG) nowadays has become one of the promising inorganic materials because of the unique combination of structural stability, mechanical properties, as well as eco-friendly and economic process benefiting from the locally available abundant sources [Citation15–17]. The research trend of PGs among the geopolymer research can be seen from the increase in the number of publications on this topic in the last decade. shows the number of peer-reviewed journal papers (journals based on science citation index, conference proceedings, dissertation thesis are excluded) obtained searching Web of Science for publications. Along the increasing of geopolymer-related research, that of porous geopolymer also increases accordingly (see ) and shows a remarkable increase in the last few years (see ).

Figure 1. Trends in the number of publications on geopolymer and porous geopolymer over the past 10 years (a), and number of publications of porous geopolymer in the last few years (b).

Figure 1. Trends in the number of publications on geopolymer and porous geopolymer over the past 10 years (a), and number of publications of porous geopolymer in the last few years (b).

However, there was almost no breakthrough in extending application fields of PGs since the fabrication of PGs are based on air forming, giving rise to macroporous structure, mainly limited to adsorption, filtration, etc [Citation18–24]. For example, Sanguanpak et al. prepared macroporous geopolymer by introducing air foam during the process, which exhibited adsorption capacity for large anions such as NH4+ [Citation25]. Kaewmee et al. carried out modification of air foaming method to generate fundamental macroporous geopolymer with enhanced durability index and high compression strength, recommended a potential material for industrial application [Citation26].

As well known, nanoporous materials possess a high specific surface area compared to macro- ones, which is favorable in providing efficient surface access and diffusion for effective mass transfer [Citation27–29]. In contrast to macropores, mesopores are more conducive to the transport of reactants or solvents, while micropore is beneficial to small molecules. Recently, significant efforts have been devoted to the nanoporosity regulation of geopolymers for a much better replacement and applications [Citation30–35]. Though, most of them failed to obtain nanoporous geopolymer with intense pore size distribution [Citation36–40].

In this review, recent progress of nanoporous geopolymers are reviewed from the review of micro- and mesopore regulation, followed by corresponding applications. Micropores were introduced through gas bubbling or by combining zeolite to increase adsorptivities [Citation41–48]. Mesopores were derived using various structure directing agents to produce high porosity for catalytic performance [Citation33,Citation49–52]. We fabricate ordered nanoporous geopolymers through well-defined template method [Citation53–55]. The finely ordered pore structures exhibited effective carbon-replication. Furthermore, we summarized how the geopolymer engender nanoporosity associated with diverse applications, hoping to provide a novel sustainable strategy for multi-functionalized highly porous materials. Against this backdrop, an aspiring idea was emerged that PGs could be fabricated into functionalized materials, which could be a charming candidate for the current porous materials including silicas, zeolites, MOFs, et al.

2. Geopolymers and their porous structures

Geopolymers are a class of aluminosilicate-based amorphous inorganic materials consisting of a polymeric Si-O-Al framework. The strong dipole moment between Si, Al, and O induces strong interactions with water, which accelerate the gel formation. The gels could be condensed with air, zeolites, or small organic molecules to form porous precursor, resulting micro- or mesoporous structures. In the other case, the polar chemical bond from the Si-O-Al framework can be partially dissolved in strong alkaline solution. The leached small fragments provide an opportunity to connect with pre-organized micelles, which gave rise to ordered pores upon removal of the micelle templates.

2.1. Microporosity regulation

Microporous materials with their superb textural properties and structural diversity have the potential to achieve new applications in many fields, including low-energy separation processes, adsorptions, catalysts, and so on, yet these materials are facing practical challenges in scale-up synthesis [Citation56]. Especially, microporous geopolymer is an important consideration in thermal conductivity. According to the Knudsen effect, thermal conductivity is strongly related to microporous architecture [Citation57]. Normally, geopolymers possess relatively low microporosity compared to meso- and macroporosity for the stacking of the micro-sized cages during the gel formation. Recently, micropores were developed based on the frustration of cage stacking through generating gas bubbles in situ reactions trapped in the slurry [Citation41]. The bubbles were also introduced by rapid stirring of the mixture of surfactants and geopolymer gels [Citation42]. However, the pore formation from above methods usually accompanied macroporous structure, which is difficult to control pore size distribution, resulting in irregular porosity.

Another effective method for microporous geopolymer is developed by the combination of zeolite into geopolymer gel. Recently, Han and coworkers have realized the preparation of zeolite X/foam geopolymer composites using fly ash (FGX is short of zeolite X accreted with coal Fly ash-based Geopolymer), and zeolite was in-situ conversed by foam geopolymer gel through maintaining alkali concentration inside the samples to enhance the zeolite content [Citation45]. FGX exhibited high porosity with the BET surface area (SA) of 579.69 m2/g, which is comparable with the commercial zeolite (Commercial Zeolite X is abbreviated as CZX) (SA is about 339.59 m2/g). As shown in (), CZX and FGX showed type I (P/P0 <0.1) and type IV isotherms with a type H4 hysteresis loop (P/P0 >0.1), indicating the existence of narrow fissure holes including some cracks that inevitably formed in CZX, along with many voids on the pore walls of FGX, resulting hierarchical pore connectivity which was beneficial in gas adsorption applications [Citation46]. The pore size distribution diagram () showed that FGX had a higher micropore volume than CZX, owing to the porous geopolymer supporter. The advances was exhibited from the CO2 adsorption. It exhibited a maximum CO2 equilibrium adsorption capacity of 7.91 mmol/g, much better than 5.61 mmol/g of CZX. The higher adsorption capacity under different dynamic adsorption was possibly due to the larger contact area between CO2 and FGX due to more adsorbent in the packed-bed column, which significantly prolonged the breakthrough time. In addition, it showed good re-generation and cyclic properties.

Figure 2. The Ar isotherms of the CZX (a) and FGX (b) samples and the pore size distributions of the CZX (c) and FGX (d) samples. Reproduced from ref [Citation45]. With permission. Copyright 2022 elsevier.

Figure 2. The Ar isotherms of the CZX (a) and FGX (b) samples and the pore size distributions of the CZX (c) and FGX (d) samples. Reproduced from ref [Citation45]. With permission. Copyright 2022 elsevier.

Shao and coworkers developed composited geopolymer to obtain a novel nano-filtration material (NFM) ZM@SCS [Citation47]. The zeolite/geopolymer composite was synthesized from curing and hydrothermal treatment of amorphous geopolymer. ZM contains 25 vol. % micropores (see ). The strong crystallization of zeolite within composited system induced larger cavities or channels, which is beneficial for NFM as organic pollutants filter. It was used for water treatment toward various organic pollution. It exhibited ultra-fast permeability with a high water flux of 340–440 L/(m2·h·MPa), rejection rate above 95% and good reusability, owing to the structural features (see ). It was found that alkaline activator during the process is the key to control the channel formation for the system. The low-cost and high-performance zeolite/geopolymer composite (see ) is hoped to be developed in other filtration area.

Figure 3. (a) pore diameter distribution of the ZM sample. (b) Cyclic filtration performance of MB solution through ZM@SCS. (c) Proposed mechanism for the filtration removal of organic pollutants by the ANA-ZM@SCS. Reproduced from ref [Citation47]. With permission. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.

Figure 3. (a) pore diameter distribution of the ZM sample. (b) Cyclic filtration performance of MB solution through ZM@SCS. (c) Proposed mechanism for the filtration removal of organic pollutants by the ANA-ZM@SCS. Reproduced from ref [Citation47]. With permission. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.

Feng and coworkers have developed co-crystallization to obtain geopolymer-type zeolite-like microporous catalytic material GC-WIFA (GC-WIFA is an abbreviation of Geopolymer Catalyst from Waste Incineration Fly Ash) as shown in [Citation48]. The co-crystal could be easily loaded with nickel to form Ni/NiO-GC-WIFA catalyst, which exhibited the isotherm adsorption-desorption curves closer to the type I, denoting that the typical microporous structure was remained. It performed efficient hydrogenation of levulinic acid, with 100% conversion and 94% yield (see ). In addition, the catalyst revealed high stability (see ). Upon five recycling, it remained above 98% activity, which is expected to be used in various high-value fields.

Figure 4. Catalytic behaviors using Ni – GC – MK7 (a) and Ni/NiO – GC – MK7 (c), respectively; catalytic behaviors of Ni (b) and Ni/NiO (d) derived from WIFA, SPS and PFPS solid wastes; (e) schematic illustration of the fabrication steps of Ni/NiO-GC-WIFA catalyst. Reproduced from ref [Citation48]. With permission. Copyright 2022 MDPI.

Figure 4. Catalytic behaviors using Ni – GC – MK7 (a) and Ni/NiO – GC – MK7 (c), respectively; catalytic behaviors of Ni (b) and Ni/NiO (d) derived from WIFA, SPS and PFPS solid wastes; (e) schematic illustration of the fabrication steps of Ni/NiO-GC-WIFA catalyst. Reproduced from ref [Citation48]. With permission. Copyright 2022 MDPI.

2.2. Mesoporosity regulation

Owing to the high specific surface area, mesopores are more conducive to the transport of reactants or solvents. Despite the intrinsic mesoporosity of geopolymers, the densely packed particles limited the permeation as well as applications [Citation50]. Recently, Seo and coworkers have purposed the pore directing method with paraffin oil into geopolymer gel. After extracting the oil, it formed mesoporous geopolymer with large pore size, exhibiting good adsorption and removal efficiency for large adsorbates including proteins, toxins, and cells [Citation58]. Furthermore, the pore directing method has been optimized by the modification of agent structures. In 2018, Barbosa et al. fabricated uniform mesoporous geopolymer using soybean oil as structure-directing agent [Citation49]. The curve of adsorption equilibrium for methyl violet 10B fitted the Freundlich and Sips models, exhibiting fast kinetics, with the adsorption capacity of 276.9 mg/g at 328 K.

In 2020, Bouna et al. substituted the oils with organic surfactant of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) to synthesize mesopores [Citation33]. Such surfactant could be easily aggregated into micelles at geopolymer surface, which is beneficial to form mesopore structure (see ). The reaction condition was optimized at 70°C retaining the molar formulation ratios of H2O/Na2O = 15, Si/Al = 2 and Na/Al = 1.5, giving rise to specific surface area up to 128 m2/g and pore volume about 0.14 cm3/g. These materials have performed in the retention of cationic dyes. For example, the retention for methylene blue was up to 183 mg/g (see ).

Figure 5. (a) Schematic preparation of geopolymers samples. (b) Mechanism of adsorption of MB on porous and surface of geopolymer matrix. Reproduced from ref [Citation33]. With permission. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.

Figure 5. (a) Schematic preparation of geopolymers samples. (b) Mechanism of adsorption of MB on porous and surface of geopolymer matrix. Reproduced from ref [Citation33]. With permission. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.

Dong and coworkers purposed activation of geopolymer using alkalic defecting method. The calcination together with Na2CO3 resulted mesoporous surface arounded by Na+ and Ca2+, which give rise to the opportunity to be ion-exchanged as shown in . It was applied for water purification exhibiting efficient adsorption rate of Cd (II) up to 97.84% [Citation51]. It was noted that the most suitable secondary kinetic model (R2 = 0.9936) illustrates that the Cd (II) adsorption process was led by chemisorption, accompanied by physical adsorption, safeguarding public health.

Figure 6. Schematic diagram for the adsorption mechanism for Cd (II). Reproduced from ref [Citation51]. With permission. Copyright 2023 Elsevier.

Figure 6. Schematic diagram for the adsorption mechanism for Cd (II). Reproduced from ref [Citation51]. With permission. Copyright 2023 Elsevier.

In addition, efforts have been devoted to developing multi-functioned fragments. Upadhyay and coworkers have prepared geopolymer gels containing copper (II) ions, which further condensed into CuO/geopolymer framework [Citation52]. It showed comparable or better activity than the copper oxide heterogeneous catalysts since geopolymer supporter reduced the activation barriers based on the charge transfer effect. Although the BET surface area decreased from 413 m2/g to 180 m2/g as shown in ), it exhibited efficient catalytic activity of 67% conversion for the oxidation of aldehydes as shown in .

Figure 7. (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, (b) BJH pore size distribution of the geopolymer and CuO/Geo. (c) A schematic of the proposed reaction mechanism for the oxidation of benzaldehyde to benzoic acid over CuO/Geo. Reproduced from ref [Citation52]. With permission. Copyright 2023 Elsevier.

Figure 7. (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms, (b) BJH pore size distribution of the geopolymer and CuO/Geo. (c) A schematic of the proposed reaction mechanism for the oxidation of benzaldehyde to benzoic acid over CuO/Geo. Reproduced from ref [Citation52]. With permission. Copyright 2023 Elsevier.

The above extensive research on the mesopore regulation were mainly focused on modifying directing agent structure. However, the modification of small directing agent could difficultly control the huge geopolymer system.

2.3. Ordered Mesoporous Geopolymer

To solve the limitation of directing agent, it needs to set the penetration point at the fundamental framework of geopolymer. We proposed an innovative idea that if kaolinite is activated by strong alkali to generate homogeneous small fragments, which could provide transient state enabling the efficient functionalization with directing agents. It might result in regularly arranged pore structures after condensation closely around micelles. In addition, the fabricated porous geopolymer should be more competitive than commercial porous materials owing to the low cost of kaolinite clay.

Recently, we carried out a novel activating method based on reversible cycles between covalent bonding of polarized Si-O-Al upon alkali and condensation [Citation53–55]. Upon dehydroxylation of kaolinite, meta-kaolin was prepared. It was further degraded into regular small fragments after activating with KOH solution as described in . While, we also modified aggregation of CTAB to form positively charged micelles with the diameter of ~3 nm, which could easily absorb negatively charged fragments to be condensed around micelles [Citation54]. Removal of directing agent (CTAB micelles) gave rise to the hexagonally arranged uniform mesopores (EPG-2, EPG is short of Ewha Porous Geopolymer), in which the regularity of pores could be controlled from the CTAB concentration see .

Figure 8. (a) Schematic routes to obtain porous geopolymer from kaolinite and porous carbon replication from porous geopolymer. TEM images of porous geopolymers (b, c) and porous carbon (d). Reproduced from ref [54]. With permission. Copyright 2020 the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 8. (a) Schematic routes to obtain porous geopolymer from kaolinite and porous carbon replication from porous geopolymer. TEM images of porous geopolymers (b, c) and porous carbon (d). Reproduced from ref [54]. With permission. Copyright 2020 the Royal Society of Chemistry.

The ordered meso-channels could replicate porous carbon rods as shown in , which exhibited high CO2 adsorption capacity owing to the high specific surface area. EPG-2 was also used as stable drug carrier after wrapping with Tween 60 by the strong charge interaction (see ) [Citation55]. The meso-channels could effectively capture ammonia since the pore frameworks exhibited controllable acidic sites (see ). Therefore, niclosamide (NIC), an anthelmintic drug could be stably loaded inside the pores through interattraction between acid and base, increasing solubility of NIC. The composite was used for the in-vivo oral administration and exhibited both improved Tmax and t1/2, suggesting better formulation than MCM-41 and SBA-15. Based on the current topic that nano-clays could be a potential pseudo-antibodies for COVID-19, ordered mesoporous geopolymers are expected to be important candidates in targeting therapy [Citation59].

Figure 9. (a) Schematic diagrams showing the synthesis of NIC nanohybrid coated with tween 60 via a simple physical coating method. (b) The types of intra-pore interaction models depending on structural properties of NIC-PG, NIC-MCM-41, and NIC-SBA-15 nanohybrid. Reproduced from ref [Citation55]. With permission. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.

Figure 9. (a) Schematic diagrams showing the synthesis of NIC nanohybrid coated with tween 60 via a simple physical coating method. (b) The types of intra-pore interaction models depending on structural properties of NIC-PG, NIC-MCM-41, and NIC-SBA-15 nanohybrid. Reproduced from ref [Citation55]. With permission. Copyright 2021 Elsevier.

In order to enhance pore stability by thermal, as well as expand the application of geopolymer, the directing agent of CTAB was substituted by polymeric agent. Polymeric agent composed of hydrophobic block and hydrophilic section could self-assemble into micelles through phase separation in aqueous solution [Citation60]. Compared to the cationic micelles from CTAB, P123 as amphiphilic polymeric agent is easily aggregated into uniform micelles surrounded by numerous hydrophilic groups, which could sufficiently attract the geopolymer fragments for further condensation (see ).

Figure 10. Synthesis strategy toward EPG-1 (a) from kaolin and EPC-1 (b) using EPG-1 as the template. Reproduced from ref [Citation53]. With permission. Copyright 2019 the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 10. Synthesis strategy toward EPG-1 (a) from kaolin and EPC-1 (b) using EPG-1 as the template. Reproduced from ref [Citation53]. With permission. Copyright 2019 the Royal Society of Chemistry.

The condensation came out not only on the surface of the micelles but also thick polyethylene glycol layer, giving rise to stable framework of EPG-1. Hexagonal type uniform mesopores of ~7.20 nm were extricated upon removal of P123 [Citation53]. The well-ordered large meso-channels could effectively replicate porous carbon wires of EPC-1 as shown in . The well-ordered large meso-channels (red lines) could effectively replicate porous carbon wires (purple arrows) of EPC-1 as shown in . In addition, there were small intrawall pores (yellow arrows) resulted from phase coincidence between the micelles and fragments, contributing to high porosity.

Figure 11. LVHR-SEM images of EPG-1 (a) and EPC-1 (b), respectively. Pore size distribution (c) and CO2 adsorption isotherm (d) for EPC-1 at 273 K. Reproduced from ref [Citation53]. With permission. Copyright 2019 the Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 11. LVHR-SEM images of EPG-1 (a) and EPC-1 (b), respectively. Pore size distribution (c) and CO2 adsorption isotherm (d) for EPC-1 at 273 K. Reproduced from ref [Citation53]. With permission. Copyright 2019 the Royal Society of Chemistry.

It showed inverse structure and size compared to the template channels, suggesting thermal stability of the pore geopolymer structures (see ). The specific surface area was up to 711 m2/g and mesopore volume was 0.56 cm3/g from BJH analysis of EPG-1, and replicated EPC-1 with high porosity. EPC-1 performed high CO2 adsorption capacity up to 26.30 mmol/g as shown in , which turns out to be better than any commercial carbon materials as well as those from porous silica. The excellent performance of EPC-1 could recommend the advantages of geopolymer, indicating it as a prospective material in future.

Based on these advantages, the above method to generate homogeneous small fragments can be recommended to produce highly ordered mesoporous geopolymers in combination with directing agents. They exhibited outstanding performance as solid acid, adsorbents, and templates, indicating contest ability owing to the low cost.

3. Perspective and future

In this review, we focused on the most recent development of nanoporosity regulation of geopolymer including micro- and mesopores, and summarized corresponding performance in diverse applications. The progress are impressive, but also remains challenges. The most emphasizing one is that fine-tuning of detailed interaction between geopolymer fragments and directing agents critically contributed to the pore formation. However, there was an urgent need of application extending since the utilization of ordered PGs are limited in fields of adsorption, separation, supporter, and template. This mini review was looking forward to further promoting nanoporosity regulation. Meanwhile, these innovative routes accelerate the development of porous geopolymers in future applicable in various fields such as enantioselectivity and battery membranes [Citation61,Citation62].

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (YDZJ202301ZYTS297), National Natural Science Foundation of China (21961041, 21562043), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province for Distinguished Young Scholars (2019B151502051) and the Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project (D18012).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  • Davidovits J. Geopolymer chemistry & applications. Saint-Quentin: Institut Géopolymère; 2011. p. 612.
  • Davidovits J. Geopolymers and geopolymeric materials. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1989;35(2):429–441. doi: 10.1007/BF01904446
  • Giergiczny Z. Fly ash and slag. Cement Concr Res. 2019;124:105826. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105826
  • Altıkulaç A, Turhan Ş, Kurnaz AI, et al. Assessment of the enrichment of heavy metals in coal and its combustion residues. ACS Omega. 2022;7(24):21239–21245. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02308
  • Duan P, Yan CJ, Zhou W, et al. An investigation of the microstructure and durability of a fluidized bed fly ash–metakaolin geopolymer after heat and acid exposure. Mater Des. 2015;74:125–137. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.009
  • Kannan V, Ganesan K. Constr. Build Mater. 2014;51:225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.050
  • Keleştemur O, Demirel B. Effect of metakaolin on the corrosion resistance of structural lightweight concrete. Build Mater. 2015;81:172–178. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.049
  • Aziz A, Bellil A, Hassani I-E-EA-E, et al. Geopolymers based on natural perlite and kaolinic clay from Morocco: synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications. Ceram Int. 2021;47(17):24683–24692. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.190
  • Firdous R, Stephan D, Djobo JNY. Natural pozzolan based geopolymers: a review on mechanical, microstructural and durability characteristics. Constr Build Mater. 2018;190:1251–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.191
  • Silva G, Castañeda D, Kim S, et al. Analysis of the production conditions of geopolymer matrices from natural pozzolana and fired clay brick wastes. Construction And Building Materials. 2019;215:633–643. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.247
  • Wang AN, Fang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Green protective geopolymer coatings: interface characterization, modification and life-cycle analysis. Materials. 2022;15(11):3767. doi: 10.3390/ma15113767
  • Planel B, Davy CA, Adler PM, et al. Water permeability of geopolymers emulsified with oil. Cem Concr Res. 2020;135:106108. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106108
  • Liu Y, Yan C, Zhang Z, et al. A facile method for preparation of floatable and permeable fly ash-based geopolymer block. Mater Lett. 2016;185:370–373. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.09.044
  • Tian Z, Zhang Z, Liu H, et al. Interfacial characteristics and mechanical behaviors of geopolymer binder with steel slag aggregate: insights from molecular dynamics. J Clean Prod. 2022;362:132385. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132385
  • Lecomte I, Liégeois M, Rulmont A, et al. Synthesis and characterization of new inorganic polymeric composites based on kaolin or white clay and on ground-granulated blast furnace slag. J Mater Res. 2003;18(11):2571–2579. doi: 10.1557/JMR.2003.0360
  • Hemra K, Aungkavattana P. Effect of cordierite addition on compressive strength and thermal stability of metakaolin based geopolymer. Adv Powder Technol. 2016;27(3):1021–1026. doi: 10.1016/j.apt.2016.04.019
  • Ursu D, Casut C, Miclau M. Elaboration of new materials using hydrothermal methods. Materials. 2022;15(21):7792. doi: 10.3390/ma15217792
  • Wen N, Zhao Y, Yu Z, et al. A sludge and modified rice husk ash-based geopolymer: synthesis and characterization analysis. J Clean Prod. 2019;226:805–814. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.045
  • Thakur N, Weatherly C, Wimalasinghe R, et al. Fabrication of interconnected macroporosity in geopolymers via inverse suspension polymerization. J Am Ceram Soc. 2019;102(8):4405–4409. doi: 10.1111/jace.16437
  • Xu J, Li M, Zhao D, et al. Research and application progress of geopolymers in adsorption: a review. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(17):3002. doi: 10.3390/nano12173002
  • Pan Y, Bai Y, Chen C, et al. Effect of calcination temperature on geopolymer for the adsorption of cesium. Mater Lett. 2023;330:133355. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.133355
  • Jin H, Zhang Y, Zhang X, et al. 3D printed geopolymer adsorption sieve for removal of methylene blue and adsorption mechanism. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2022;648:129235. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129235
  • Siyal AA, Shamsuddin MR, Khan MI, et al. A review on geopolymers as emerging materials for the adsorption of heavy metals and dyes. J Environ Manage. 2018;224:327–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.046
  • Wang X, Su J, Chu X, et al. Adsorption and desorption characteristics of total flavonoids from acanthopanax senticosus on macroporous adsorption resins. Molecules. 2021;26(14):4162. doi: 10.3390/molecules26144162
  • Sanguanpak S, Wannagon A, Saengam C, et al. Porous metakaolin-based geopolymer granules for removal of ammonium in aqueous solution and anaerobically pretreated piggery wastewater. J Clean Prod. 2021;297:126643. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126643
  • Kaewmee P, Song M, Iwanami M, et al. Porous and reusable potassium-activated geopolymer adsorbent with high compressive strength fabricated from coal fly ash wastes. J Clean Prod. 2020;272:122617. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122617
  • Lan K, Zhao D. Functional ordered mesoporous materials: present and future. Nano Lett. 2022;22(8):3177–3179. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c00902
  • Zhang E, Casco ME, Xu F, et al. On the origin of mesopore collapse in functionalized porous carbons. Carbon. 2019;149:743–749. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.116
  • Xi X, Wu D, Han L, et al. Highly uniform carbon sheets with orientation-adjustable ordered Mesopores. ACS Nano. 2018;12(6):5436–5444. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.8b00576
  • Chen H, Dong S, Zhang Y, et al. Robust structure regulation of geopolymer as novel efficient amine support to prepare high-efficiency CO2 capture solid sorbent. Chem Eng J. 2022;427:131577. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131577
  • Ahmad M, Rashid K. Novel approach to synthesize clay-based geopolymer brick: optimizing molding pressure and precursors’ proportioning. Build Mater. 2022;322:126472. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126472
  • Marsh A, Heath A, Patureau P, et al. Alkali activation behaviour of un-calcined montmorillonite and illite clay minerals. Appl Clay Sci. 2018;166:250–261. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.09.011
  • Bouna L, Fakir AAE, Benlhachemi A, et al. Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous geopolymer based on Moroccan kaolinite rich clay. Appl Clay Sci. 2020;196:105764. doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2020.105764
  • El-Naggar KAM, Amin SK, El-Sherbiny SA, et al. Preparation of geopolymer insulating bricks from waste raw materials. Construction And Building Materials. 2019;222:699–705. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.182
  • Zawrah MF, Sadek HEH, Ngida REA, et al. Effect of low-rate firing on physico-mechanical properties of unfoamed and foamed geopolymers prepared from waste clays. Ceram Int. 2022;48(8):11330–11337. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.356
  • Singh B, Ishwarya G, Gupta M, et al. Geopolymer concrete: a review of some recent developments. Construction And Building Materials. 2015;85:78–90. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.036
  • Lemougna PN, Wang K, Tang Q, et al. Recent developments on inorganic polymers synthesis and applications. Ceram Int. 2016;42(14):15142–15159. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.07.027
  • Khale D, Chaudhary R. Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review. J Mater Sci. 2007;42(3):729–746. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0401-4
  • Liew YM, Heah CY, Mohd Mustafa AB. Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: a review. Mater Sci. 2016;83:595–629. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.08.002
  • Baia C, Colombo P. Processing, properties and applications of highly porous geopolymers: a review. Ceram Int. 2018;44(14):16103–16118. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.05.219
  • Novais RM, Pullar RC, Labrincha JA. Geopolymer foams: an overview of recent advancements. Pro Mater Sci. 2020;109:100621. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100621
  • Zhang Z, Provis JL, Reid A, et al. Constr. Build Mater. 2014;56:113–127. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.081
  • Shao Z, Wang J, Jiang Y, et al. The performance of micropore-foamed geopolymers produced from industrial wastes. Constr Build Mater. 2021;304:124636. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124636
  • Ke X, Baki VA. Assessing the suitability of alkali-activated metakaolin geopolymer for thermochemical heat storage. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021;325:111329. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111329
  • Han L, Wang X, Wu B, et al. In-situ synthesis of zeolite X in foam geopolymer as a CO2 adsorbent. J Clean Prod. 2022;372:133591. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133591
  • Sing KS. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (recommendations 1984). Chem. 1985;57(4):603–619. doi: 10.1351/pac198557040603
  • Shao N, Tang S, Li S, et al. Defective analcime/geopolymer composite membrane derived from fly ash for ultrafast and highly efficient filtration of organic pollutants. J Hazard Mater. 2020;388:121736. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121736
  • Feng W, Lu X, Xiong J, et al. Solid–waste–derived geopolymer–type zeolite–like high functional catalytic materials catalyze efficient hydrogenation of levulinic acid. Catalysts. 2022;12(11):1361. doi: 10.3390/catal12111361
  • Barbosa TR, Foletto EL, Dotto GL, et al. Preparation of mesoporous geopolymer using metakaolin and rice husk ash as synthesis precursors and its use as potential adsorbent to remove organic dye from aqueous solutions. Ceram Int. 2018;44(1):416–423. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.193
  • Kriven WM, Bell JL, Gordon M. Microstructure and microchemistry of fully-reacted geopolymers and geopolymer matrix composites. Ceram Trans. 1997;53:227–250.
  • Dong C, Zhou N, Zhang J, et al. Optimized preparation of gangue waste-based geopolymer adsorbent based on improved response surface methodology for Cd(II) removal from wastewater. Environ Res. 2023;221:115246. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115246
  • Upadhyay J, Misra SP, Irusta S, et al. Oxidation of aldehydes to carboxylic acids over geopolymer supported CuO. Mol Catal. 2023;536:112911. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2022.112911
  • Pei Y-R, Choi G, Asahina S, et al. A novel geopolymer route to porous carbon: high CO 2 adsorption capacity. Chem Comm. 2019;55(22):3266–3269. doi: 10.1039/C9CC00232D
  • Pei Y-R, Yang J-H, Choi G, et al. A geopolymer route to micro- and meso-porous carbon. RSC Adv. 2020;10(12):6814–6821. doi: 10.1039/C9RA09698A
  • Piao H, Rejinold NS, Choi G, et al. Niclosamide encapsulated in mesoporous silica and geopolymer: a potential oral formulation for COVID-19. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021;326:111394. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111394
  • Lee YH, Jeong J, Kim K, et al. Microporous materials in scalable shapes: fiber sorbents. Chem Mater. 2020;32(17):7081–7104. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00183
  • Jelle BP, Gustavsen A, Baetens R. The path to the high performance thermal building insulation materials and solutions of tomorrow. J Build Phys. 2010;34(2):99–123. doi: 10.1177/1744259110372782
  • Popovich J, Chen S, Iannuzo N, et al. Synthesized geopolymers adsorb bacterial proteins, toxins, and cells. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:527. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00527
  • Abduljauwad SN, Habib T, Ahmed H-U-R. Nano-clays as potential pseudo-antibodies for COVID-19. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2020;15(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s11671-020-03403-z
  • Zhao H-Y, Gou X, Pei Y-R, et al. Chirality amplification over the morphology control of the rod-coil molecules with lateral methyl groups. Langmuir. 2023;39(25):8824–8832. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00864
  • Xu L, Guo M, Hung C-T, et al. Chiral skeletons of mesoporous silica nanospheres to mitigate Alzheimer’s β-Amyloid Aggregation. J Am Chem Soc. 2023;145(14):7810–7819. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c12214
  • Wang J, Liu Y, Cai Q, et al. Hierarchically porous silica membrane as separator for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater. 2022;34(3):2107957. doi: 10.1002/adma.202107957