1,014
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Drug Evaluations

Combination immune checkpoint blockade with ipilimumab and nivolumab in the management of advanced melanoma

&
Pages 389-396 | Received 25 Nov 2015, Accepted 08 Jan 2016, Published online: 01 Feb 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of advanced melanoma has evolved beyond monotherapies such as ipilimumab and nivolumab to combination strategies involving both. This combination approach results in response rates around 60% and superior progression-free survival compared with ipilimumab monotherapy (median 11.5 versus 2.9 months).

Areas covered: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken including search terms of ‘ipilimumab and nivolumab’ and ‘combination immune checkpoint therapy’. Relevant information contained in abstracts and conference presentations was included. This article summarizes the mechanism of action, efficacy and safety of combination ipilimumab and nivolumab across Phase I, II and III clinical trials. It also describes the place of combination therapy in the current market of advanced melanoma treatment options.

Expert Opinion: Efficacy for the combination approach is seen across a wide array of subgroups and occurs regardless of BRAF mutation status. Counterbalancing the apparent advantages, combination ipilimumab with nivolumab is associated with a high rate (55%) of grade 3/4 adverse events leading to discontinuation in a third of those treated. Most of these are manageable and do not appear to compromise durability of response. Overall survival information is currently immature but appears promising.

Declaration of Interest

J Larkin has participated in non-renumerated consultancy for Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Meyers-Squibb, MSD and Roche/Genetech and has received institutional research support from Pfizer, Bristol Meyers-Squibb, Novartis and MSD. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.