140
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Is COPD associated with alterations in hearing? A systematic review and meta-analysis

, , , , , & show all
Pages 149-162 | Published online: 28 Dec 2018
 

Abstract

Background and aims

COPD is an irreversible or persistent airflow obstruction, which affects up to 600 million people globally. The primary purpose of this systematic review was to explore the COPD-based alteration in the auditory system function by conducting a quantitative analysis of presently published data.

Materials and methods

We systematically searched seven diverse electronic databases and manual searching of references to identify relevant studies. Data from the selected studies were rated by two investigators independently in a blinded fashion. Meta-analysis was done on pooled data using Cochrane’s Review Manager 5.3.

Results

Sixteen articles received suitable scores and were thus included for further processes. Hearing loss (HL) was defined as a change in pure tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds, auditory brainstem response (ABR), and auditory P300 parameters. ABR wave was significantly elongated in patients with COPD than in controls (standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.27, 95% CI: 0.05–0.48, P=0.02). PTA was significantly higher in patients with COPD when compared with controls (SMD=1.76, 95% CI: 0.43–3.08, P=0.0004). We found that patients with COPD had a significantly higher latency than controls (SMD=1.30, 95% CI: 0.79–1.80, P=0.0001).

Conclusion

COPD patients had considerably greater incidence of HL when compared with controls. Interestingly, although the mean PTA thresholds at every frequency for COPD patients were higher than those for controls, these values were still in the slight to mild HL ranges. Prolonged ABR wave latencies in the COPD patients suggest retro-cochlear involvement. Thus, COPD most frequently clusters with HL, but it is worth noting that alteration in hearing is not always recognized by medical experts as a frequent comorbidity associated with COPD.

Supplementary material

Figure S1 Potential sources of bias in this meta-analysis, funnel plots of comparison in both group and sub-group analysis (AD).

Abbreviations: ABR, auditory brainstem response; PTA, pure tone audiometry; SE, standard error; SMD, standardized mean difference.

Figure S1 Potential sources of bias in this meta-analysis, funnel plots of comparison in both group and sub-group analysis (A–D).Abbreviations: ABR, auditory brainstem response; PTA, pure tone audiometry; SE, standard error; SMD, standardized mean difference.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.