328
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Resistance and Molecular Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus

, , , , , & show all
Pages 379-388 | Received 10 Oct 2022, Accepted 10 Jan 2023, Published online: 23 Jan 2023
 

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) isolated from patients in the Yellow River Delta region and to construct antibiotic resistance profiles in different genetic backgrounds.

Methods

Antibiotics susceptibility testing, staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing and accessory gene regulator (agr) typing were performed for all the 204 strains. Isolates with the positive mecA gene and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) were subjected to multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and Staphylococcal chromosomal cassettes mec (SCCmec) typing.

Results

Thirty-nine MRSA strains were identified by mecA gene. Twenty-two hVISA isolates including 9 MRSA and 13 methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) strains were confirmed, the rest isolates (n = 182) were vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus (VSSA). 94.9% of MRSA and 63.6% of hVISA belonged to agrI. Fifty-seven distinct spa types including 5 novel types were mainly t309 (30.9%), t078 (11.8%) and t437 (11.8%). Fourteen sequence types (STs) containing 3 new STs were classified into 3 clone complexes (CCs) and 7 singletons among MRSA and hVISA isolates. Most MRSA isolates (87.2%) belonged to type Ⅳ SCCmec.

Conclusion

The predominant genotype among MRSA population was ST59-t437-agrI-IVa (53.8%), followed by ST72-t2431-agrI-IVF (15.4%). ST72 and CC5 (ST5/965/7197) were the most common hVISA clones. Both CC59 (ST59/7437) and ST72 clones were resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin among MRSA population. Strains of MSSA with phenotypic hVISA (MS-hVISA) exhibited a striking genetic diversity accompanied by the diversification of drug resistance patterns.

Ethical Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Board of Binzhou Medical University Hospital (KYLL-2022-47).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Binzhou Medical University Hospital for their assistance in our study. We also thank the curators of the University of Würzburg, Germany for assigning new alleles, profiles and spa- types.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this work.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (project no. ZR2020MH309).