Abstract
Background
Neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR), a new inflammatory marker, has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease. However, limited evidence is available for its role in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Our study aimed at investigating the prognostic value of NPAR for mortality in PD patients.
Patients and Methods
This was a single center retrospective cohort study. A total of 1966 PD patients were enrolled in our study from January 2006 to December 2016 and were followed up until December 2021. Patients were stratified into tertiles according to baseline NPAR levels. The associations between NPAR levels with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare the mortality predictive values of NPAR and other known biomarkers, such as NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), PLR (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio), LHR (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio) and MLR (monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio).
Results
During a median follow-up of 48.1 months, 503 (25.6%) patients died, in which cardiovascular disease (CVD) death dominated 50.3%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the highest NPAR tertile was significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.14–1.98; HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.07–2.31; respectively) compared with tertile 1. The AUC values of NPAR were 0.62 (95% CI 0.60–0.65, P < 0.001) for all-cause mortality and 0.61 (95% CI 0.57–0.65, P < 0.001) for cardiovascular mortality.
Conclusion
Our study showed that higher NPAR levels were independently associated with increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in PD patients. Notably, our results demonstrated that NPAR exhibited superior predictive value for mortality compared to NLR, PLR, MLR, and LHR.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate all the nephrologists and nurses in our PD center for their cooperation.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.