https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6905-0813
![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
Abstract
Background
The ratio of fibrinogen to prealbumin (FPR) is associated with the prognosis of many cancers. However, the prognostic significance of FPR in resectable gastric cancer has not been clarified.
Methods
A total of 760 patients with resectable gastric cancer participated in this study. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to calculate the optimal cutoff value of each immunonutrition marker. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to confirm the prognostic value of FPR in patients with gastric cancer and to select appropriate variables for the construction of nomogram.
Results
Utilizing ROC analysis, we calculated the optimal cutoff value for FPR and stratified 760 patients into high and low FPR groups. Subsequent examination revealed notable distinctions in baseline characteristics between these groups. For instance, Patients with higher FPR tend to be older and have more lymph node metastasis. Statistical analysis through the chi-square test confirmed the significance of these differences (P < 0.05). In addition, the results of the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicate that the factors related to OS were age (P = 0.001), T stage (P < 0.001), N stage (P < 0.001), radical resection (P < 0.001), and FPR (P < 0.024). The nomogram is composed of the above five variables. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram was 0.859 (95% CI: 0.831–0.887), and the sensitivity and specificity were 77.4% and 82.1%, respectively.
Conclusion
FPR is a potential marker in patients with resectable gastric cancer. The nomogram based on FPR shows good predictive ability, which is helpful for clinicians to judge the prognosis of patients and choose targeted treatment strategies.
Data Sharing Statement
The data involved in this study can be obtained from the correspondents.
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, and the research process was in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. All patients included in this study have signed written informed consent.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors have declared that there is no conflict of interest for this work.