Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the correlation between M1/M2 macrophages (M1/M2 Mφ) and cell death mode under Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection.
Methods
Raw gene expression profiles were collected from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Genes related to different cell death modes were collected from the KEGG, FerrDb and GSEA databases. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of the gene expression profiles were identified using the limma package in R. The intersection genes of M1/M2 Mφ with different cell death modes were obtained by the VennDiagram package. Hub genes were obtained by constructing the protein–protein interactions (PPI) network and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The expression of cell death modes marker genes and Hub genes were verified by Western Blot and Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR).
Results
Bioinformatics analysis was performed to screen Hub genes of Mtb-infected M1 Mφ and different cell death modes, naming NFKB1, TNF, CFLAR, TBK1, IL6, RELA, SOCS1, AIM2; Hub genes of Mtb-infected M2 Mφ and different cell death modes, naming TNF, BIRC3, MAP1LC3C, DEPTOR, UVRAG, SOCS1. Combined with experimental validation, M1 Mφ under Mtb infection showed higher expression of death (including apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis) genes compared to M2 Mφ and genes such as NFKB1, TNF, CFLAR, TBK1, IL6, RELA, AIM2, BIRC3, DEPTOR show differential expression.
Conclusion
NFKB1, TNF, CFLAR, TBK1, IL6, RELA, AIM2 in Mtb-infected M1 Mφ, and TNF, BIRC3, DEPTOR in Mtb-infected M2 Mφ might be used as potential diagnostic targets for TB. At early stage of Mtb infection, apoptosis, autophagy, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis occurred more significantly in M1 Mφ than that in M2 Mφ, which may contribute to the transition of Mtb-infected Mφ from M1-dominant to M2-dominant and contribute to the immune escape mechanisms of Mtb.
Abbreviations
Mtb, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Mφ, Macrophage; TB, Tuberculosis; IFN-β, Interferon-β; IL-1β, Interleukin-1 β; TNF, Tumor Necrosis Factor; PPI, Protein–Protein Interaction; GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus; DEGs, differentially expressed genes; ROC, Receiver Operating Characteristic; qRT-PCR, Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction; COVID-19, the coronavirus disease 2019; WHO, World Health Organization; DEDRGs, differential expression of death related genes; CC, cellular component; BP, biological process; MF, molecular function; AUC, area under the curve; FBS, fetal bovine serum.
Data Sharing Statement
Data GSE5099, GSE52918, and GSE54992 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/); 701 apoptosis genes were obtained from the KEGG database (https://www.kegg.jp/) and GSEA database (https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/index.jsp); 574 autophagy genes were obtained from KEGG database, GSEA database and human autophagy database (http://www.autophagy.lu/index.html); 502 ferroptosis genes were obtained from the FerrDb database (http://www.zhounan.org/ferrdb/current/); 65 pyroptosis genes were obtained from the GSEA database.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the investigators of the GSE5099, GSE52819, and GSE54992, involved in the present study for sharing the data online and the volunteers involved in the project.
Author Contributions
All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.