295
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Efficacy of carbon dioxide for diagnosis and intervention in patients with failing hemodialysis access

, , , , , & show all
Pages 994-1001 | Accepted 06 Aug 2010, Published online: 14 Oct 2010
 

Abstract

Background: Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the only proven safe intravascular contrast agent in renal failure and contrast allergy. The use of CO2 as a contrast agent for the evaluation of failing dialysis fistulas has the potential to preserve residual renal function by eliminating the use of contrast material or decreasing the amount used for fistulograms.

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of fistulography using CO2 for diagnosis and intervention in patients with failing hemodialysis access.

Material and Methods: Dialysis access failure occurred in 94 patients (54 men, 40 women; mean age, 65 years; range, 32–89 years) on 146 occasions. CO2 was used as the first-choice contrast agent for fistulography and PTA. Fistulography was performed with the injection of CO2 in the brachial artery using a power injector.

Results: Interventional treatment was indicated in 141 accesses. In 115 of these 141 cases, intervention was performed using CO2 fistulography alone. When the access flow stopped or decreased very much due to an occlusion and severe stenosis, we could not visualize the access by CO2 fistulography, or could not perform CO2 fistulography. For those cases, iodinated contrast fistulography was performed. When the vascular rupture, dissection, or clot formation occurred during intervention, iodinated contrast fistulography was performed. In three patients with arteriovenous fistula, manual injection of CO2 into the brachial artery resulted in reflux of the gas into the thoracic aorta causing transient loss of consciousness.

Conclusion: CO2 is a useful contrast agent in the diagnosis and intervention of failing hemodialysis access, eliminating or limiting the use of iodinated contrast material. Caution should be exercised to prevent CO2 reflux into the aorta when injecting the gas into the brachial artery.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Prof. Scott O. Trerotola (Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center) for his advice.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.