135
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Avoidance Coping as a Vulnerability Factor for Negative Drinking Consequences Among Injury Survivors Experiencing PTSD Symptoms:An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

, Ph.DORCID Icon, , Ph.DORCID Icon, , M.D.ORCID Icon & , Ph.DORCID Icon
Pages 234-244 | Received 23 Aug 2022, Accepted 10 Mar 2023, Published online: 09 Apr 2023
 

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to examine the dynamic relationships between daily PTSD symptom severity (PTSS), cognitive and behavioral avoidance coping, and negative drinking consequences following recent injury. Participants consisted of 36 injury survivors (Mage = 34.0, SD = 10.8; 75.0% male; 69.4% White) who completed thrice daily assessments of PTSS, avoidance coping, and negative drinking consequences for 7 days at 6-weeks post-injury. Although hypothesized relationships were not statistically significant in full models with covariates that included alcohol consumption, the confidence intervals associated with focal predictors provided support for predictions. Follow-up analyses without covariates indicated that on occasions when an injury survivor engaged in more avoidance coping and experienced higher levels of PTSS, negative drinking consequences increased by 9% (b = 0.02, SE = 0.01, p = .006). This interaction was primarily driven by cognitive avoidance coping (b = 0.03, SE = 0.01, p = .008). Routine screening of avoidance coping, PTSS, and alcohol consumption in the aftermath of recent injury might assist with identifying survivors at risk for negative drinking consequences. Interventions that address cognitive avoidance coping and drinking among survivors experiencing elevated PTSS may help to prevent the development of this comorbidity.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. Because participants were asked to report on their experiences since the last assessment and because the time lag between assessments could vary between participants due to the protocol schedule, we also tested full models with covariates plus the time lag between assessments. The statistical significance of the main effects associated with PTSS (IRR = 1.06, SE = 0.04, p = .09; IRR = 1.06, SE = 0.04, p = .09), overall avoidance coping (IRR = 1.03, SE = 0.03, p = .20), cognitive avoidance coping (IRR = 1.03, SE = 0.04, p = .45), and behavioral avoidance coping (IRR = 1.04, SE = 0.05, p = .41) were unchanged. The statistical significance of the PTSS-avoidance coping (IRR = 1.01, SE = 0.01, p = .35), PTSS-cognitive avoidance coping (IRR = 1.02, SE = 0.01, p = .06), and PTSS-behavioral avoidance coping (IRR = 0.99, SE = 0.01, p = .39) interactions were also unchanged. Because the inclusion of a time lag variable results in a loss of information (no value can be calculated for the first day, first assessment for each participant), we report models without this variable to utilize all data available.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 94.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.