147
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Assessment of heavy metals in infused tea marketed in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry: human health risk assessment

, &
Pages 1685-1697 | Received 09 Dec 2021, Accepted 09 Feb 2022, Published online: 01 Mar 2022
 

ABSTRACT

The present study aims to investigate the levels of some heavy metals: Arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb) and mercury (Hg) in infused tea consumed in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and their potential health risk. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used to assay the concentration of heavy metals in tea samples, after microwave acid digestion. This study was carried out on 25 brands of tea purchased from Riyadh city supermarkets. The validation of the proposed method was developed by measuring different parameters e.g. accuracy, precision, linearity, the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), the lower limit of detection (LLOD). The method was examined for the determination of As, Cd, Pb and Hg in spiking samples with good accuracy and precision. The average daily intake (ADI), the hazard quotient (HQ), the total hazard quotations (THQs), and hazard index (HI) of the investigated metals were used for the assessment of health risks associated with the intake of metals. The mean concentration of heavy metals in infused tea were found in the range of 0.008–0.445, 0.0097–0.044, 0.012–2.379 and 0.0053–0.044 mg/kg for As, Cd, Pb and Hg, respectively. The results revealed that the concentration of As, Cd and Hg metals in all samples of infused tea was considered in the standard range, whereas the concentration of Pb exceeded the maximum concentration limit presented by World Health Organization (WHO). Therefore, the continuous monitoring of the concentration of heavy metals in tea is essential on a regular basis.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project, King Saud University for funding this work through the grant no. RSP-2021/353.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the King Saud University [RSP-2021/353]; Researchers Supporting Project, King Saud University for funding this work [RSP-2021/353].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,223.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.