205
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Voice in an asymmetric federation? The U.S. territories as intergovernmental actors

, , , , , & show all
Pages 63-86 | Published online: 25 Mar 2022
 

ABSTRACT

United States territories—home to more than 3.5 million Americans—are excluded from the safeguards of American federalism. Unlike states, they are subject to the plenary power of the U.S. Congress, lack core legal protections, and are denied meaningful political representation. As such, territories must find alternative approaches to exercising political voice in the American federal system. Yet territorial-federal relations have received virtually no empirical attention from federalism scholars. To address this gap, we examine territories’ efforts to advance their interests within both bottom-up and top-down intergovernmental councils, as well as through territory-specific advocacy. Our analysis of organizational participation, agendas, and policy outcomes suggests that territories—while denied access to traditional mechanisms of shared rule—do participate in intergovernmental relations, through a combination of bottom-up and top-down multilateral intergovernmental councils (IGCs), as well as bilateral intergovernmental lobbying. Challenges to exercising political voice vary across these institutions.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Michaël Tatham and the anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands are heavily dependent on the tourism industry and face economic stagnation and decline. Guam’s location has made it a hub of US military operations, heavily reliant on the federal defence establishment. Export industries in American Samoa and CNMI remain relatively small, with the former relying predominantly on a single StarKist Tuna cannery (CIA Citation2021a, Citation2021b, Citation2021c, Citation2021d, Citation2021e; GAO Citation2020).

2 While non-voting delegates have repeatedly sought to be able to vote in the Committee of the Whole based on their right to vote in legislative committees, this right has only been sporadically enforced. After briefly gaining the right under a Democratic Congress in 1993 and 2007, non-voting delegates lost the right under Republicans in 1995 and 2011. Democrats reinstated this right in 2019 (Davis Citation2015; Wickham Citation2019).

3 Note: our study does not include the 11 U.S. territories with no permanent population (e.g. Jarvis Island, Kingman Reef, and Palmyra Atoll). Nor does it include the three independent countries which have compacts of free association with the United States (including Federated States of Micronesia, Marshall Islands, or Palau).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 287.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.