75
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Dispelling the Myth of the “Queen Bee Syndrome”: Assessing Women’s Professional Relationships with Women in Christian Higher Education

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 90-114 | Published online: 23 Feb 2024
 

Abstract

Over the past five decades, a gender stereotype known as “Queen Bee Syndrome” has persisted, portraying some women who have risen to leadership roles in male-normed organizations as being self-preservationist and individualistic, even to the extent of intentionally undermining the professional advancement of other women. Use of this term can be traced to the competitive dynamics among female bees in a colony, with only one emerging and dominating as the “queen.” Yet the researchers who coined this concept in the 1970s later expressed concern that their findings had been misunderstood; Queen Bee behaviors on the part of top-level women are an anomaly rather than the norm. In fact, women’s working relationships with women have received only limited research attention, with the literature reflecting a spectrum of perceptions and experiences. This study examined the reported prevalence of both Queen Bee behaviors and supportive, generative relationships that enhance the prospects for women’s career advancement. Whereas previous studies focused primarily on the corporate context, this study focused on the context of Christian higher education. A hermeneutic phenomenological approach was used to examine the relational experiences and expectations between and among 24 women participants (12 cabinet-level and 12 emerging leaders), drawing on data from two rounds of interviews. Overall, this study found patterns of strong and beneficial professional relationships among women, including support for one another’s leadership aspirations and career advancement. Key findings are summarized in three major themes regarding the experiences and expectations of women within each group and in relation to the other: (a) the centrality of women’s relationships with women; (b) women’s relational experiences versus expectations; and (c) divergent understandings of the Queen Bee Syndrome. Recommendations for relevant programming and policies that can support the advancement of women at all organizational levels, along with suggestions for future related research, are provided.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 155.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.