ABSTRACT
Accurately determining the favorable areas of geothermal resources and selecting the target positions of exploration wells are extremely important for exploration and efficient development. This study used the Pearson correlation coefficient and Gini gain to analyze five influencing factors related to the presence of economically viable geothermal potential. The evaluation model of the favorable areas was constructed by using different Machine Learning (ML) methods: Bayesian classifier (Bayes), Support Vector Machine, Bootstrap Aggregating (Bagging), BP neural network, Decision Tree and Logistic Regression classification. The quality of each model was verified by statistical evaluation indicators: Accuracy (ACC), F1 score (F1) and Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC curve). The methodology was applied to the case study of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. Due to the results obtained, all ML models showed strong prediction and classification performance on the target area selection of geothermal exploration, as evidenced by each model’s metrics: the ACC was above 80%, the F1 was above 0.8, and the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) was greater than 0.85. The metrics obtained by the Bagging method were the highest. Finally, the results of the six ML models were combined to classify the study area’s geothermal potential, which was consistent with the available information. This study provides a specific basis and technical support for applying the method in further surveys and campaigns.
Disclosure statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Author contribution
Conceptualization, software and methodology, X. C. (Xianggang Cheng); Data analysis and guide, W. Q. (Wei Qiao) and D. H. (Dongqiang Hu); Data collection and curation, D. H. and Z. Q. (Zhilong Qi); Drawing and revise, Peichao Feng (P. F.) and X. C., Supervise, review and revise, W. Q. and F. T. (Francesco Tinti).
Data availability statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Xianggang Cheng
Xianggang Cheng currently studying at the University of Bologna and pursuing as a Ph.D. candidate student at China University of Mining and Technology. He is mainly engaged in energy and engineering geology research such as rock burst, geothermal resource exploration, mining-induced seismicity, in-situ stress inversion and machine learning, etc.
Wei Qiao
Wei Qiao is a professor at China University of Mining and Technology, deputy director of the Geothermal Resources Research Center of CUMT. His interest areas include engineering geology and hydrogeology, and mine water disaster prevention theory and technology, geothermal resource development and exploration, geological disaster intelligent early warning and monitoring, etc.
Dongqiang Hu
Dongqiang Hu is an associate professor at the Xinjiang Institute of Engineering, mainly engaged in research on the mineralization rules and mineralization prediction of mineral resources.
Zhilong Qi
Zhilong Qi is a senior engineer of of the Xinjiang Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Exploration and Development, mainly engaged in research on geothermal resource development and exploration.
Peichao Feng
Peichao Feng is a Ph.D. candidate student at China University of Mining and Technology. He is mainly engaged in research on geothermal resource development and exploration, rock mechanics and engineering geology.
Francesco Tinti
Francesco Tinti is a senior assistant professor (fixed-term) at University of Bologna. He is PhD in Geoengineering, Georesources and Geotechnical Engineering. His main research activity deals with georeosurces and geothermal sectors. He has worked in several projects of international cooperation for the development and use of geothermal energy.