149
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging to detect cholesteatoma in clinical healthcare

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 26 Feb 2024, Accepted 13 Apr 2024, Published online: 25 Apr 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flow chart of all subject episodes grouped according to the index test and reference standard. Group names are marked in bold.

Figure 1. Flow chart of all subject episodes grouped according to the index test and reference standard. Group names are marked in bold.

Table 1. Contingency table with otosurgery as the reference standard and non-EPI DW MRI as the index test.

Figure 2. Total number of executed non-EPI DW MRI per year separated into each radiological diagnosis. non- EPI DW MRI: Non-Echo Planar Imagining Diffusion Weighed Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Figure 2. Total number of executed non-EPI DW MRI per year separated into each radiological diagnosis. non- EPI DW MRI: Non-Echo Planar Imagining Diffusion Weighed Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Figure 3. Time to otosurgery from the date of non-EPI DW MRI for all operated groups. non- EPI DW MRI: Non-Echo Planar Imagining Diffusion Weighed Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Figure 3. Time to otosurgery from the date of non-EPI DW MRI for all operated groups. non- EPI DW MRI: Non-Echo Planar Imagining Diffusion Weighed Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Table 2. Sex, type of disease and follow-up for all operated groups.

Table 3. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios for non-EPI DW MRI to detect cholesteatoma.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [EK], upon reasonable request.