603
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Politicizing Memory: Evidence from Ukraine

, , &

Figures & data

Table 1. Expectations for Treatment Primes (In Comparison to the Control Group)

Figure 1. Difference in means in reported historic family loss across control and treatment groups for all respondents (top row) and subset by Western- and Russian-oriented respondents (bottom row).

The figure shows the impact of the experimental treatments on the respondents’ perception of family loss. The x-axes for the plots show the control group, the vilification treatment group, and the glorification treatment group. They y-axes show family loss. The top plot shows the average response for all respondents. There are only minor differences between the groups. In the bottom-left plot, showing Western-oriented respondents, those receiving the vilification prime are noticeably (and statistically significantly) more likely to report family loss. For Russian-oriented respondents, in the bottom-right plot, the differences are less marked, but those receiving the vilification prime are less likely to report family loss than those in the control group, while those receiving the glorification prime are more likely to do so.
Figure 1. Difference in means in reported historic family loss across control and treatment groups for all respondents (top row) and subset by Western- and Russian-oriented respondents (bottom row).

Figure 2. Difference in means in reported historic suffering across control and treatment groups for all respondents (top row) and subset by Western- and Russian-oriented respondents (bottom row).

Figure 2. Difference in means in reported historic suffering across control and treatment groups for all respondents (top row) and subset by Western- and Russian-oriented respondents (bottom row).

Table 2. Results of Survey Experiment Including Demographic Controls. Models Include Robust Standard Errors

Table 3. Opinion on Russia’s Responsibility for Soviet Crimes, Broken Down Per Respondents’ Geopolitical Orientation

Appendix table 1: Subgroup analysis of the experiment.

Appendix table 2: Analysis with imputed data.

Appendix table 3: Main results reported with oblast-level fixed effects.

Appendix table 4: Main results with control for social desirability.

Appendix figure 1: The number of respondents per oblast. Note that the areas shaded in red are not included in the survey. Government-controlled areas of the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts were oversampled.

The figure shows an oblast-level map of Ukriane. Territories not controlled by the Ukrainian government are shown in red. Each oblast shows the number of survey respondents.
Appendix figure 1: The number of respondents per oblast. Note that the areas shaded in red are not included in the survey. Government-controlled areas of the Luhansk and Donetsk oblasts were oversampled.

Appendix figure 2: Plotted interaction effects from main findings reported in in the manuscript. Demographic controls are set at their mean or median.

This is a visualisation of the main model shown in Table 2. The figure visualises the results of the experiment for both dependent variables as a two-by-two of marginal effect plots. For each plot, the y-axis is the dependent variable. Historic suffering is shown in the left column of plots; family loss, in the right. Marginal effects for Russian-oriented respondents are shown in the top panel; Western-oriented respondents, in the bottom. The x-axis in each plot shows whether respondents were coded as Western- or Russian-oriented. The lines are coloured depending on the treatment group: either control, ‘vilification’, or ‘glorification’ groups.
Appendix figure 2: Plotted interaction effects from main findings reported in Table 2 in the manuscript. Demographic controls are set at their mean or median.

Appendix table 5: Breakdown for the survey questions used to build the key independent variable for respondents’ geopolitical orientation. All percentages are for weighted data. The percentages do not include missing values.

Appendix table 6: Respondents’ geopolitical orientations and association with views on the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

Appendix table 7: Respondents’ geopolitical orientations and association with views on historical figures, monuments, and events.

Appendix table 8: Experiment results for reported family loss (as plotted in Figure 1).

Appendix table 9: Experiment results for reported historic suffering (as plotted in Figure 2).

Appendix table 10: Balance tests for experimental set up. The table reports the mean value of each covariate per treatment group and the p-values of the t-test of the covariate compared to the control group. The treatment groups are balanced (none of the p-values <0.05). The balance tests were conducted using the RCT package in R.

Appendix table 11: Missingness reported per key variable included in the analysis. There is no missing data in demographic controls.

Data Availability Statement

The data and materials that support the findings of this study are available here: https://osf.io/aqkwy/.