Figures & data
Figure 1. Visual depiction of an activity system adapted from Engeström (Engeström, Citation2018).
![Figure 1. Visual depiction of an activity system adapted from Engeström (Engeström, Citation2018).](/cms/asset/fc28b740-4b13-4a6b-9443-5e4937fb40df/ijic_a_2343833_f0001_b.gif)
Table 1. Overview of genre analysis.
Table 2. Meeting details.
Table 3. Excerpt of scripted discourse.
Figure 2. Representation of scripted and unscripted activity systems. Pivotal factors highlighted in bold italics, strong alignment between factors represented by bold lines. Tensions represented by lightning shaped arrows. Tensions were between the subjects and the objective, and the division of labor and the objective of scripted discourse. A tension also existed between the two activity systems (i.e., between scripted discourse and unscripted discourse).
![Figure 2. Representation of scripted and unscripted activity systems. Pivotal factors highlighted in bold italics, strong alignment between factors represented by bold lines. Tensions represented by lightning shaped arrows. Tensions were between the subjects and the objective, and the division of labor and the objective of scripted discourse. A tension also existed between the two activity systems (i.e., between scripted discourse and unscripted discourse).](/cms/asset/e07b7885-a7ba-4201-9e5c-7e89ba6a9ccb/ijic_a_2343833_f0002_b.gif)
Table 4. Excerpt of unscripted discourse.
Table 5. Excerpt of unscripted (bold) and unscripted discourse.