Enhancement of SME feasibility through the integration of BMC, functional organization, and SCM

Figures & data

Figure 1. Functional organization of micro industry SME.

Source: Author.

Figure 2. Supply chain system in SME.

Sources: Author.

Figure 3. BMC vs. functional organization vs. SCM.

Source: Author.

Figure 4. Feasibility model for SMEs.

Figure 5. Final model full path diagram.

Table 1. Cross-loading between constructs.

Indicators	Laten variables
	X1	X2	X3	X4	Y
X1.1	0.755	0.073	0.223	−0.079	0.057
X1.3	0.976	0.150	0.145	−0.357	0.220
X2.2	0.133	0.948	−0.381	−0.310	0.828
X2.3	0.135	0.939	−0.263	0.318	0.798
X3.1	0.077	−0.329	0.905	0.463	−0.282
X3.2	0.265	−0.216	0.621	0.157	−0.139
X3.3	0.183	−0.298	0.937	0.336	−0.238
X4.1	−0.363	−0.321	0.190	0.627	−0.234
X4.2	−0.377	−0.293	0.296	0.770	−0.324
X4.3	−0.100	−0.184	0.329	0.699	−0.128
X4.4	−0.086	−0.188	0.377	0.812	−0.155
Y1	0.188	0.866	−0.277	−0.274	0.998
Y2	0.201	0.854	−0.275	−0.306	0.998

Table 2. Fornell-Larcker criterion.

	X1	X2	X3	X4	Y
X1	0.872
X2	0.142	0.944
X3	0.178	−0.343	0.833
X4	−0.313	−0.332	0.414	0.730
Y	0.195	0.862	−0.277	−0.291	0.804

Table 3. Structural model of exogenous latent variable relationship with endogenous latent variables.

Structure	Path	Coefficient	p-Value	R^2	Q^2
I	X1 = > X2	0.142	0.192	0.020	0.011
II	X2 = > X3	−0.343	0.001	0.118	0.076
III	X3 = > X4	0.414	0.003	0.172	0.073
IV	X1 = > Y	0.081	0.230	0.748	0.721
	X2 = > Y	0.855	0.000
	X3 = > Y	−0.006	0.469
	X4 = > Y	0.021	0.405
Indirect	X1 = > X2 = > Y	0.121	0.201
Effect	X1 = > X2 = > X3	−0.049	0.217
	X1 = > X2 = > X3 = > Y	0.000	0.483
	X1 = > X2 = > X3 = > X4	−0.020	0.265
	X1 = > X2 = > X3 = > X4 = > Y	−0.000	0.450
	X2 = > X3 = > X4	−0.142	0.030
	X2 = > X3 = > Y	0.002	0.474
	X2 = > X3 = > X4 = > Y	−0.003	0.427
	X3 = > X4 = > Y	0.009	0.418