Publication Cover
Caryologia
International Journal of Cytology, Cytosystematics and Cytogenetics
Volume 71, 2018 - Issue 4
1,020
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Report of chromosome number and karyotype asymmetry in Schizopetalon Sims. and related genera from the South American tribe Schizopetalae (Brassicaceae)

, , , , &
Pages 315-321 | Received 05 Oct 2017, Accepted 24 Apr 2018, Published online: 06 Aug 2018

ABSTRACT

Schizopetalae is one of the representative South American tribes of Brassicaceae, which has remained poorly studied for cytological data. With a single report existing, no additional cytological information is known for the rest of the species and genera of this tribe (Atacama, Mathewsia and Schizopetalon). The present study reports the chromosome number and karyotype asymmetry for five species of Schizopetalon, two for Mathewsia and the only species of the monotypic genus Atacama. While a constant 2= 18 is confirmed in all analysed samples, larger interchromosomal asymmetry levels were found in Schizopetalon than Atacama and Mathewsia. Both results suggest different processes of fixation and recombination in chromosome architecture among genera, probably associated to life history strategies maintaining genetic diversity under extreme and unpredicted environmental conditions. The present study represents the first report of chromosome number in any South American Brassicaceae in the last 30 years, revealing the need of more cytological studies to contextualize the diversification of Schizopetalae and other closely related tribes.

Introduction

Schizopetalae is a South American tribe of Brassicaceae of three genera (Atacama O. Toro, Mort & Al-Shehbaz, Mathewsia Hook. & Arn. and Schizopetalon Sims; ), occurring in the drylands and Mediterranean zone of Chile and the neighbouring areas of Argentina and Peru (Toro-Núñez et al. Citation2013). Most of their species are typically found in coastal and mountain habitats of the Atacama Desert in Chile, which is considered one of the driest deserts in the world (Houston and Hartley Citation2003; Houston Citation2006a, Citation2006b). The taxa of Schizopetalae are characterized by their distinctive flowers with putative moth-mediated pollinator attributes (e.g. aromatic flowers, pollen grains with rough surfaces and negative phototropism behaviour in their petals), making them a distinctive group of plants with interest for ornamental purposes (Al-Shehbaz Citation1989; Toro-Núñez et al. Citation2013).

While patterns of diversification in Schizopetalae have been well characterized with the use of molecular and morphological data (Toro-Núñez et al. Citation2013; Salariato et al. Citation2016), other characters have been explored to a limited extent (Al-Shehbaz Citation1989). Among the available options, cytological data represent a potential valuable source of evolutionary and taxonomic information for this group, as they can provide important evidence of reproductive dynamics across different groups of angiosperms (Stebbins Citation1971; Grant Citation1981; Levin Citation2002). Cytological reports in Schizopetalae exist only in S. walkeri, with a diploid number of 2= 18 (Manton Citation1932) or a haploid number of = 10 (Al-Shehbaz Citation1989). Besides this record, no additional information exists about ploidy number or karyotype variation for its remaining taxa.

Given that cytological attributes tend to exhibit dynamic changes of chromosome number and genome size in Brassicaceae (e.g. Johnston et al. Citation2005; Lysak and Lexer Citation2006; Warwick and Al-Shehbaz Citation2006; Lysak et al. Citation2009), it remains speculative whether cytological data can provide useful evidence for the systematics and taxonomy of Schizopetalae. Hence, the present study aims to report the chromosome number and chromosome asymmetry patterns from several species of Schizopetalon and their sister genera Mathewsia and Atacama.

Materials and methods

Plant material

Seeds from all three genera were collected during 2010 and 2015 field trips. While seeds of Schizopetalon corresponded to the species from the Atacama area (S. biseriatum, S. tenuifolium, S. rupestre and S. arcuatum) and a closely Mediterranean related species (S. brachycarpum; ), the sister genera Atacama and Mathewsia were sampled for one (A. nivea) and two species (M. auriculata, M. foliosa) respectively (). Representative voucher specimens were deposited in the McGregor Herbarium at the University of Kansas (KANU) and the Universidad de Concepcion Herbarium (CONC; ).

Table 1. List of populations, voucher information, number of sampled individuals, chromosome numbers and asymmetry indexes recorded in this study.

Figure 1. Habit and flowers of Atacama (A. nivea), Mathewsia (M. incana), and Schizopetalon (S. tenuifolium).

Figure 1. Habit and flowers of Atacama (A. nivea), Mathewsia (M. incana), and Schizopetalon (S. tenuifolium).

Figure 2. Distribution of analyzed species of Atacama, Mathewsia and Schizopetalon.

Figures in gray represent known localities from herbarium records. Figures in black represent sampled populations for the present study. Scale bars represent distances in km.

Figure 2. Distribution of analyzed species of Atacama, Mathewsia and Schizopetalon.Figures in gray represent known localities from herbarium records. Figures in black represent sampled populations for the present study. Scale bars represent distances in km.

Sampling of karyotypes

Root tips were collected from seeds germinated in Petri dishes, kept in the dark for 48–56 h until radicles were elongated enough (2–4 cm length). Cut radicles were pre-treated in 8-hydroquinoline (2 mM) for 24 h at 4°C. Subsequently, samples were fixed with a fresh solution of ethanol/acetic acid (3:1) at 4°C until ready for use. Squash preparations were conducted using an acidic hydrolysis pre-treatment with HCL 0.5 N for 17 min at 45°C. The material was immediately stained with an orcein solution at 1%. Metaphase chromosome plates were photographed using a Zeiss Axioskop microscope system (Oberkochen, West Germany) with a mounted digital camera. Photographs were digitally edited for contrast, light, and sharpness with ImageJ v. 1.54k (Abramoff et al. Citation2004). Additional tuning was conducted to correct focal displacement, by using several serial photographs and obtaining a consensus image with the ImageJ plugging extended-depth-of-field (Forster et al. Citation2004).

Chromosome measurement consisted of recording arm lengths and their respective ratios (Levan et al. Citation1964). Intrachromosomal asymmetry (MCA) and interchromosomal asymmetry (CVCL) indexes were analysed for each population, following Peruzzi and Eroğlu (Citation2013). Additionally, the total haploid length (THL) was included, as a coarse surrogate of genome size (Peruzzi et al. Citation2009). Measurements were obtained using the software KaryoType v2 (Altinordu et al. Citation2016).

Statistical analyses

The stability of asymmetry measurements was tested, in order to detect possible differences taxonomically predictable at genus levels. For this purpose, a Kruskal–Wallis test was conducted in pooled measurements of MCA and CVCL, followed with a Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons. This analysis was implemented with the dunn.test package in the statistical platform R v3.4 (Dinno Citation2017; R Development Core Team Citation2017).

Results

All analysed populations of Atacama, Mathewsia and Schizopetalon revealed 2= 2= 18 chromosomes (). Levels of variation in asymmetry patterns were too variable to distinguish a specific chromosome formula in Schizopetalon, which ranged from five to seven metacentric pairs and from four to two submetacentric pairs (5m + 4sm, 6m + 3sm, and 7m + 2sm; ). On some occasions, a subtelocentric pair was possible to distinguish accompanying other observed formulas (5m + 3sm + 1st or 6m + 2sm + 1st; and ). Despite its potential for cytotaxonomic discrimination, no stability was possible to associate any of these formulas to a particular species or population of Schizopetalon. In Mathewsia, diploid formulas were more stable with a predominance of metacentric chromosomes, with eight metacentric pairs and one submetacentric pair in both M. auriculata and M. foliosa (8m + 1sm; and ). In the case of Atacama, all plates revealed consistent metacentric chromosomes (9m; and ). While stable in their recognition, it was not possible to unequivocally determine the individual asymmetry for each chromosome pair ().

Figure 3. Metaphasic plates.

Mitotic plates observed in each analyzed taxa of this study. A: A. nivea, B: M. auriculata, C: M. foliosa, D: S. arcuatum, E: S. brachycarpum, F: S. biseriatum, G: S. tenuifolium, and H: S. rupestre. Black arrows indicate submetacentric chromosomes in Schizopetalon.

Figure 3. Metaphasic plates.Mitotic plates observed in each analyzed taxa of this study. A: A. nivea, B: M. auriculata, C: M. foliosa, D: S. arcuatum, E: S. brachycarpum, F: S. biseriatum, G: S. tenuifolium, and H: S. rupestre. Black arrows indicate submetacentric chromosomes in Schizopetalon.

Figure 4. Asymmetry scatterplots.

Idiograms calculated using the average from the total number of mitotic plates obtained from each species analyzed of Atacama, Mathewsia and Schizopetalon. Bars in each arm represent standard deviation.

Figure 4. Asymmetry scatterplots.Idiograms calculated using the average from the total number of mitotic plates obtained from each species analyzed of Atacama, Mathewsia and Schizopetalon. Bars in each arm represent standard deviation.

Levels of asymmetry revealed differences among the analysed samples, specifically when interchromosome asymmetry was compared at genera levels. MCA revealed statistically significant larger values in Schizopetalon than Mathewsia and Atacama (x2MCA = 16.641, df = 2, p < 0.001; , ). Instead, neither CVCL nor THL indicated significant differences among genera (x2CVCL = 0.86434, df = 2, p = 0.6491; x2THL = 1.7993, df = 2, p = 0.4067; , ). These observations were confirmed with the Dunn’s test, which revealed significant differences in observed values in the MCA values of Schizopetalon ().

Table 2. Dunn’s test multiple comparisons for THL, CVCL and MCA indexes. All p-values are adjusted by Bonferroni correction. z:Dunn’s statistic.

Figure 5. Asymmetry indexes.

Figure 5. Asymmetry indexes.

Discussion

Cytology has played an important role in the study of angiosperm evolution, as cytological data provides important evidence to evaluate the impact of genetic divergence among species and populations (Guerra Citation2008). In Brassicaceae, cytology holds a particular place in the study of evolutionary patterns, especially providing understanding for idiosyncratic family-wise patterns of genomic duplication and polyploidization (Lysak and Lexer Citation2006; Barker et al. Citation2009; Franzke et al. Citation2011). Interestingly, while these patterns have been routinely studied in north hemisphere lineages (Europe and North America), other groups have remained mostly unstudied even for the most basic cytological information. Among South American tribes, the very few existing reports are only related to basic chromosome number (Manton Citation1932; Warwick and Al-Shehbaz Citation2006), for which not even the 5% of their total recognized taxa have been scrutinized in the three most diversified and representative tribes (Cremolobeae, Eudemeae and Schizopetalae as consulted in Brassibase by 8/24/2017; Koch et al. Citation2012; Kiefer et al. Citation2014).

Despite the fact that no significant cytotaxonomic evidence was observed for taxonomic discrimination, two important elements could reveal useful information to contextualize pattern diversification in Schizopetalae. First, compared to other tribes, the basic number of chromosomes remains largely stable in Schizopetalae, corroborating the observations of ploidy number made by Manton (Citation1932) in Schizopetalon species and expanding this to Atacama and Mathewsia. This result is surprising, considering the rare condition of constant chromosome number among most Brassicaceae tribes (Manton Citation1932; Warwick and Al-Shehbaz Citation2006). Changes in chromosome number are usually expected in this family, owing to the effects that recurrent events of allopolyploidization and reduction by aneuploidism have represented for the retention of different ploidy numbers of chromosomes within lineages (Lysak Citation2009). While the results of our study might be suggestive of a lack of hybridization or polyploidism in Schizopetalae, further studies are needed given the inherent dynamics controlling chromosome changes in Brassicaeae. For example, mechanisms that preserve small variable genome sizes are typically found in Brassicaceae (Johnston et al. Citation2005; Lysak et al. Citation2009), making questionable the inference of hybridization using referential ploidy numbers as a sole source of evidence (Lysak Citation2009). Another limitation to this hypothesis is the effect that hybrid homoploid speciation presents retaining stable diploid numbers after hybridization events (Soltis and Soltis Citation2009); a process that cannot not be discarded for Brassicaceae (e.g. Cheung et al. Citation2015)

Second, higher levels of interchromosomal asymmetry found in the karyotype of Schizopetalon, in comparison to Atacama and Mathewsia (MCA; ), could be linked to the effect that life history presents on different rates of recombination and fixation. Given the effect that habitat stress presents on plant reproduction systems, high levels of self-pollination should be found in annual plants – like Schizopetalon – subject to hyper aridity in the Atacama Desert area (González and Pérez Citation2010). This type of reproduction should produce high frequency of chromosome recombination, resulting from an adaptive strategy to preserve genetic diversity in the presence of high levels of selfing (e.g. Charlesworth Citation2003; Wright et al. Citation2008). As a result, high levels of karyotype diversity should be rapidly fixed within and among populations, as seed banks promote the retention of individuals with new karyotypes in local populations (Levin Citation2002). The fixation of new karyotypes should be also enhanced from the effects of uneven seedling recruitment under unpredictable environments, a pattern recurrently found in community guilds from the Atacama Desert flora (Vidiella et al. Citation1999). This reproductive adaptation, while also influential, could not represent a determinant factor for the fixation of karyotypes in Atacama and Mathewsia. Instead, their perennial habit with longer periods of survival and more stable generational recruitment should promote more flexibility on selfing reproduction; likely decreasing the chances of positive selection for intense chromosome recombination and fixation.

While our results did not fully support the use of cytological data for taxonomic discrimination in Schizopetalae, differences in asymmetry levels could be also seen as a promising element for – at least – genera discrimination. For example, different karyotype formulas support the separation of Atacama nivea from the rest of Mathewsia, resulting from consistent low levels of asymmetry differences detected among samples of both taxa (9m vs 8m + 1sm; ). This observation is in line with reports of predominant metacentric chromosome organization and limited asymmetry variation in Brassicaceae, which have served useful for the taxonomic characterization of several species and genera (e.g. Yue et al. Citation2004; Zhou et al. Citation2008; Martin et al. Citation2016). Nevertheless, despite this promising use, prospects of using karyotype formula differences for taxonomic discrimination in Atacama and Mathewsia should be considered only tentative, as further scrutiny is necessary to control the effect of asymmetry differences in very small chromosome sizes (< 2µm) obtained from the observation of a limited number of species and populations. Yet, this limitation should not affect our interpretations of overall differences in asymmetry levels, given the consistent statistical differences observed in MCA values of Schizopetalon compared to those of Atacama and Mathewsia ().

More refined approaches will certainly improve the evidence to support or reject the hypotheses made on chromosome changes of this study. Experience with techniques like FISH-GISH staining demonstrates the potential of molecular cytotaxonomy for studying patterns of differentiation in Brassicaceae (Lysak Citation2009). Also, as molecular resources become more extrapolatable from model systems like Arabidopsis thaliana, cytological studies can provide further insight on the study of recombination patterns into other non-model Brassicaceae taxa (Schranz et al. Citation2006; Franzke et al. Citation2011). Keeping those promising approaches in mind, we expect that this study encourages the conduction of more cytological studies in Schizopetalae and other South American lineages, which still remain a largely understudied group of the highly diversified Brassicaceae family (i.e. Expanded Lineage II; Franzke et al. Citation2011).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Forest Corporation of Chile (CONAF), especially to the Atacama Administrative Division and the personal from the Llanos del Challe National Park and Nevado Tres Cruces National Park, for their logisticalassistance and collection permits.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by CONICYT N° 3160453 (Chile); The University of Kansas (US) Fratcher Botany Fellowship Scholarship; Sigma Xi (US) Grants-in-Aid of Research Awards.

References

  • Abramoff MD, Maghalaes PJ, Ram SJ. 2004. Image processing with image. J Biophotonics Intern. 11(7):36–42.
  • Al-Shehbaz IA. 1989. Systematics and phylogeny of Schizopetalon (Brassicaceae). Harv Bot. 1(1):10–46.
  • Altinordu F, Peruzzi L, Yu Y, He X. 2016. A tool for analysis of chromosomes: karyotype. Taxon. 65(3):586–592.
  • Barker MS, Vogel H, Schranz ME. 2009. Paleopolyploidy in the Brassicales: analyses of the Cleome transcriptome elucidate the history of genome duplications in Arabidopsis and other Brassicales. Genome Biol Evol. 1:391–399.
  • Charlesworth D. 2003. Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 358:1051–1070.
  • Cheung KW, Razeq FM, Sauder CA, James T, Martin SL. 2015. Bidirectional but asymetrical sexual hybridization between Brassica carinata and Sinapsis arvensis (Brassicaceae). J Plant Res. 128(3):469–480.
  • Dinno A. 2017. dunn.test: dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums. R package version 1.3.4. [accessed 2017 June 1]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dunn.test.
  • Forster B, Van De Ville D, Berent J, Sage D, Unser M. 2004. Complex wavelets for extended depth-of-field: a new method for the fusion of multichannel microscopy images. Microsc Res Tech. 65(1–2):33–42.
  • Franzke A, Lysak MA, Al-Shehbaz IA, Koch MA, Mummenhoff K. 2011. Cabbage family affairs: the evolutionary history of Brassicaceae. Trends Plant Sci. 16(2):108–116.
  • González AV, Pérez F. 2010. Pollen limitation and reproductive assurance in the flora of the coastal Atacama Desert. Int J Plant Sci. 171(6):607–614.
  • Grant V. 1981. Plant speciation. NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Guerra M. 2008. Chromosome numbers inplant cytotaxonomy: concepts and implications. Cytogenet Genome Res. 120:339–350.
  • Houston J. 2006a. Evaporation in the Atacama Desert: an empirical study of spatio-temporal variations and their causes. J Hydrol. 330(3–4):402–412.
  • Houston J. 2006b. Variability of precipitation in the Atacama Desert: its causes and hydrological impact. Int J Climatol. 26:2181–2198.
  • Houston J, Hartley AJ. 2003. The central Andean west-slope rainshadow and its potential contribution to the origin of hyper-aridity in the Atacama Desert. Int J Climatol. 23:1453–1464.
  • Johnston JS, Pepper AE, Hall AE, Chen ZJ, Hodnett G, Drabek J, Lopez R, Price HJ. 2005. Evolution of genome size in Brassicaceae. Ann Bot. 95:229–235.
  • Kiefer M, Schmickl R, German DA, Lysak MA, Al-Shehbaz IA, Franzke A, Mummenhoff K, Stamatakis A, Koch MA. 2014. BrassiBase: introduction to a novel databaase on Brassicaceae evolution. Plant Cell Physiol. 55(1):e3.
  • Koch MA, Kiefer M, German DA, Al-Shehbaz IA, Franzke A, Mummenhoff K, Schmickl R. 2012. Brassibase: tools and biological resources to study characters and traits in the Brassicaceae - version 1.1. Taxon. 61(5):1001–1009.
  • Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg A. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas. 52:201–220.
  • Levin DA. 2002. The role of chromosomal change in plant evolution. NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Lysak MA. 2009. Comparative cytogenetics of wild crucifers (Brassicaceae). In: Gupta SK, editor. Biology and breeding of crucifers. Fl: CRC Press.
  • Lysak MA, Koch MA, Beaulieu JM, Meister A, Leitch IJ. 2009. The dynamic ups and down of genome size evolution in Brassicaceae. Mol Biol Evol. 26(1):85–98.
  • Lysak MA, Lexer C. 2006. Towards the era of comparative evolutionary genomics in Brassicaceae. Plant Syst Evol. 259:175–198.
  • Manton I. 1932. Introduction to the general cytology of the Cruciferae. Ann Bot. 46:509–556.
  • Martin E, Ünal M, Doğan B, Altinordu F, Sefali A, Kaya A. 2016. Karyotype analyses of the genus Matthiola (Brassicaceae) in Turkey. Cytologia. 81(1):53–60.
  • Peruzzi L, Eroğlu HE. 2013. Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure? Comp Cytogenet. 7(1):1–9.
  • Peruzzi L, Leicht IJ, Caparelli KF. 2009. Chromosome diversity and evolution in Liliaceae. Ann Bot. 103:459–475.
  • R Development Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. R Fundation for Statistical Computing. [accessed 2017 June 1]. http://www.R-project.org.
  • Salariato DL, Zuloaga FO, Franzke A, Mummenhoff K, Al-Shehbaz IA. 2016. Diversification patterns in the CES clade (Brassicaceae tribes Cremolobeae, Eudemeae, Schizopetalae) in Andean South America. Bot J Linean Soc. 181(4):543–566.
  • Schranz ME, Lysak MA, Mitchell-Olds T. 2006. The ABC’s of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes. Trends Plant Sci. 11(11):535–542.
  • Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2009. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 60:561–588.
  • Stebbins GL. 1971. Chromosmal Evolution in Higher Plants. UK: Edward Arnold Ltd.
  • Toro-Núñez O, Mort ME, Ruiz-Ponce E, Al-Shehbaz IA. 2013. Phylogenetic relationships of Mathewsia and Schizopetalon (Brassicaceae) inferred from nrDNA and cpDNA regions: taxonomic and evolutionary insights from an Atacama Desert lineage. Taxon. 62(2):343–356.
  • Vidiella PE, Armesto JJ, Gutierrez JR. 1999. Variation changes and sequential flowering after rain in the southern Atacama Desert. J Arid Environ. 43:449–458.
  • Warwick SI, Al-Shehbaz IA. 2006. Brassicaceae: chromosome number index and database on CD-Rom. Plant Syst Evol. 259:237–248.
  • Wright SI, Ness RW, Foxe JP, Barrett SCH. 2008. Genomic consequences of outcrossing and selfing in plants. Int J Plant Sci. 169(1):105–118.
  • Yue J, Gu Z, Al-Shehbaz IA, Sun H. 2004. Cytological studies on the Sino-Himalayan endemic Solm-laubachia (Brassicaceae) and two related genera. Bot J Linn Soc. 145:77–86.
  • Zhou L, Liu Z, Wu J, Wang J, Yang Y, Xufeng L. 2008. Karyotype variation and evolution in populations of the Chinese endemic Orychophragmus violaceus complex (Brassicaceae). Nord J Bot. 26:375–383.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.