131
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Identification and genotoxicity evaluation of potential impurities in rabeprazole sodium using in silico and in vitro analyses

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 2116-2122 | Received 28 Dec 2020, Accepted 14 Mar 2021, Published online: 08 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

Rabeprazole sodium is a widely used drug for gastrointestinal disorders. Several analytical methods for identifying rabeprazole sodium and its impurities have been reported. However, the genotoxicity of rabeprazole sodium and its impurities is still unclear. Thus, it is necessary to develop analytical methods that can identify the structures of its impurities and evaluate their genotoxicity. Here, we used high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry for identifying the impurities in rabeprazole sodium enteric-coated tablets. Impurities in the samples were matched with synthesized impurities based on the exact mass and secondary mass spectrometry characteristics and then subjected to in silico analysis using the Derek and Sarah software, as well as in vitro genotoxicity evaluations. Our method successfully identified the impurities as 2-[[4-(3-methoxy propane)-3-methyl-N-oxido-2-pyridyl] methyl sulfonyl]-1H-benzimidazole (impurity I), 2-[[4-(3-methoxy propane)-3-methyl-2-pyridyl]methyl sulfonyl]-benzimidazole (impurity II), 2-[[4-(3-methoxy propane)-3-methyl-2-pyridyl] methionyl]-1H-benzimidazole (impurity III), and 2-mercapto benzimidazole (impurity IV). In silico analysis predicted that impurity III demonstrated a structural alert; thus, this impurity was evaluated for in vitro genotoxicity using the Ames test and chromosomal aberration assay. Impurity III at concentrations of 7.5–30 μg/mL had an aberration rate of over 5% with or without S-9 mix. Furthermore, impurity III at concentrations of 40–1000 μg/plate significantly increased the number of mutagenic colonies with or without S-9 mix. These results indicated that impurity III should be regulated to the limit of 0.01%.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Project of the Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission (number 2016-452).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,271.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.