Article title: Variation in foraging strategies of New Zealand albatross species within a dominance hierarchy
Authors: Basham E, Briskie JV, Martin P
Journal: New Zealand Journal of Zoology
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2022.2137534
When this article was first published online the second author’s name was incorrectly listed. It should have appeared as James V. Briskie.
There was an error in the caption for Figure 4B. It should have appeared as below.
Figure 4. Success of obtaining fish among focal species. A, Percentage of success at obtaining fish across the focal albatross species. Albatross species are as in Figure 2. Black points represent mean values with 95% confidence limits as error bars. Asterisks represent evidence for differences among the species at the ends of the horizontal lines. Moderate evidence = P < 0.05, strong evidence = P <0.01, and very strong evidence = P < 0.001 are indicated by a system of asterisks (*, **, and ***, respectively). B, Percentage of amounts of fish obtained across the focal albatross species. Albatross species are presented as in Figure 2. We found no evidence for differences in the amount of fish each species obtained. Sample sizes for both figures are given in Table 1.
Figure 5 was missing the letters above the bars on the plots that designate statistical significance. should have appeared as below.
Figure 5. Behaviours of focal species towards fish. Percent frequency of behaviours towards fish of focal albatross species. Albatross species are presented as in Figure 2. Sample sizes are given in Table 1. Distinct letters above bars denote evidence of differences in behaviours among species; species that share a letter do not show evidence of differing in their frequency of a behaviour within a behavioural category.
This article has also been corrected with some other minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.