122
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Protective behavioral strategies as a protective factor against suicidal ideation among college student drinkers

, MSORCID Icon, , MS, , MS, , BA, , BS & , PhD
Pages 947-956 | Received 13 Apr 2021, Accepted 03 Apr 2022, Published online: 15 Apr 2022
 

Abstract

Objective: Research shows that alcohol use is linked to suicidal ideation (SI), while depression is strongly associated with SI. Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are safe drinking strategies. PBS are broadly protective across alcohol-related problems; however, it is unclear if these effects extend to those at risk for SI. We hypothesized that alcohol use and depressive symptoms would be risk factors for SI, and that these factors would moderate the effects of PBS. PBS was hypothesized to be protective for individuals with elevated depressive symptoms and alcohol use. Participants: College student drinkers (n = 990; M age = 19.97, SD = 3.75) from a Southeastern University. Methods: Participants completed an online survey inquiring about demographics, depressive symptoms, SI, alcohol use, and PBS use. Results: Depressive symptoms were associated with an increased likelihood of SI; however, alcohol use was not. PBS were most protective for individuals with high levels of alcohol use and/or depressive symptoms. Conclusions: PBS may be protective for heavier drinkers who are at heightened risk for SI.

Acknowledgments

All authors have read and approve of the final manuscript. ADL developed the primary hypotheses; conducted the formal analyses; wrote the majority of the introduction, methods, results, and discussion. RS collected the data; wrote a portion of the discussion; assisted with revisions. AVL assisted in writing a portion of the discussion. EKB contributed to the introduction and revisions of the discussion. JLC assisted in writing the abstract and a portion of the discussion. RDD collected the data; supervised the analysis; assisted in writing all sections.

Conflict of interest disclosure

Authors have no conflicts of interest. The authors confirm that the research presented in this article met the ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements, of the United States of America and received approval from the Institutional Review Board of The University of Central Florida.

Funding

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. (2035702) for AVL. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 141.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.