745
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Identifying the AI-based solutions proposed for restricting Money Laundering in Financial Sectors: Systematic Mapping

ORCID Icon, &
Article: 2344415 | Received 15 Dec 2022, Accepted 24 Feb 2024, Published online: 22 Apr 2024

ABSTRACT

Money laundering (ML) is a critical source of extracting the money illegally from the financial system. It is linked to various types of crimes, including corruption, exploitation of a specific community, drug use, and many others. Detection of ML operations is a difficult task on a global scale due to the large volume of financial transactions. However, it also allows criminals to use financial systems to carry out fraudulent transactions. It mainly concern minimizing the potentially risks associated with money laundering. Anti-money laundering-(AML) tools based on AI-driven applications are now tracking transactions to overcome this challenge. A total of 112 research papers are assessed to identify the literature’s gaps and suggest new directions for the research area accordingly. The findings of this systemic literature review work will not only open new paths for the research community, but will also assist the state agencies in developing an optimal AML system to counter these major issues and provide a healthy environment for their residents. This article seeks to assess the existing situation from various angles and open up new pathways for future research directions to investigate and build high levels of authenticity and security in the financial industry using artificial intelligence (AI).

Introduction

The capacity of AI to automate operations that are sometimes thought of as “tedious” produces enormous benefits, such as freeing up time for individuals looking to collect money to conduct essential donor networking and strategy. Although they may sound like generic buzzwords, AI, data analytics, and machine learning (ML) are being integrated into organization technology systems as creative solutions to problems with risk management, human resources and compliance. Every year many industries lose millions of dollars in fraud including banking and financial institutes, insurance companies, government agencies, telecommunication industries, and law enforcement (Jamshidi and Reza Hashemi Citation2012). We live in a culture where criminal cases involving senior persons are steadily growing. Due to the rise in the number of dangers and incursions in society, people desperately need a security system to ensure their well-being and safety. As the innovation in technology changes, the contrary, global effect in the shape of cyber threats (Suresh et al. Citation2020). Criminal activities, such as smuggling, bribery and drug trafficking, may be highly profitable. Before illegally obtained funds may be freely spent, they must be made to appear genuine (Wang and Yang Citation2007). The identification of fraud is a prominent topic in the data mining community. A high level of sophistication frequently marks fraudulent transactions. They are incredibly unusual among the millions of daily transactions, and their manipulators are well planned and thought out (Kunlin Citation2018). Fraud detection has become a challenging task for many companies. Hackers have more accessibility to the personal information and advanced password decoding tools, making it easier for them to commit online fraud. Customers lose billions of dollars each year due to online transaction fraud (Song Citation2020). Due to the harm caused to banks and their clients, fraud detection and prevention technologies have become essential. AI and machine learning techniques are increasing employed in fraud detection systems (Erdoğan et al. Citation2020; Guevara, Garcia-Bedoya, and Granados Citation2020).

Money laundering is repurposing unlawfully obtained funds to give them the appearance of legality (Hamid Citation2017). It is the terminology used to describe attempting to legitimize illegal gains so that they may be re-injected into the legitimate economy or used to fund more criminal activity (Ketenci et al. Citation2021). Changing dirty money to clean money is referred to as money laundering. For example, the money derives from illicit sources such as human trafficking, kidnapping, extortion contract, killing, bribes, tax evasion, and drug dealing. An organization or individual cannot deposit money straight into a bank since the bank identifies anomalous transaction activity, and the user cannot reveal the money’s source. This money is known as “black money” and has a significant detrimental impact on the economy. As a result, anti-money laundering legislation is quite severe in both emerging and wealthy countries (Samanta et al. Citation2019). ML is a method of making unlawful income look legitimate and used by criminals to disguise the natural source and ownership of the profits of their criminal activities. It is becoming a severe danger to financial institutions and the entire country. This illegal activity is growing increasingly sophisticated, and it appears to have evolved beyond the stereotype of smuggling of drugs to include funding terrorist organizations and, of course, personal gain. Money laundering is the practice of criminals attempting to transform illicitly obtained funds using of a legal medium such as huge investment or pension funds or investment in banking products (Le Khac, Markos, and Kechadi Citation2010). Money laundering is a large-scale societal issue, and detecting unlawful financial purchases using ML applications is difficult and time-consuming. However, most evaluated current anti-money laundering (AML) system operations use link analysis, networking analysis, risk scoring categorization and outlier detection to detect doubtful transactions (Thi et al. Citation2020).

A criminal analysis is a complex operation that necessitates processing massive volumes of data from many sources, such as billings and bank account activities, gathering information helpful to an investigator (Dreżewski, Sepielak, and Filipkowski Citation2015). A Financial organizations like banks and other credit-granting organizations use AML systems to combat money laundering by detecting risks, transactions, and possible money launderers (Han et al. Citation2020). The AI System (FAIS) of the American Financial Crime Enforcement Network combined clever human intelligence and software agents to recognize suspected ML over a vast data area. Using an AI computer analysis system may considerably improve work productivity and is a critical approach for AML (Wang and Yang Citation2007). AI, a term frequently used in science fiction, is becoming more generally recognized as it becomes more integrated into our daily lives. Transportation, Healthcare, retail, and finance are among the areas that are fast changing. A terminology AI drive as a computer having the capacity to execute a range of human cognitive activities, like as learning, interactive, thinking, and solving issues in 1955 by John McCarthy. In today’s culture, AI applications have been applied to develop various businesses (Guan, Mou, and Jiang Citation2020). Since 1970, money laundering has been detected since financial institutions start reporting big transactions to their public department (Soltani et al. Citation2016). Financial institutions, such as banks and other credit-granting institutions, use AML systems to combat ML by detecting risks, transactions, and possible money launderers (Han et al. Citation2020). These papers were evaluated for their ability to:

  • Outline the different tools and channels used for ML in the financial sector;

  • Identify AI-based generic solutions proposed for restricting money laundering;

  • Various components that can determine the risk of money laundering; and

  • Describe the economical and social impacts of ML on society and different financial sectors.

It primarily focuses on reducing the serious dangers connected with ML. Anti-money laundering systems based on AI-driven apps are currently using track transactions to address this issue. Researchers’ main concerns and problems include the financial sector’s security and safety from ML. Embedding security in AI-based applications has been recognized as a way for financial institutions to accomplish their goal.

Background Study

The word ML is described as separating criminal proceeds from their sources or attempting to make money earned via unlawful means look legal or clean (Bashir et al. Citation2020). It is also defined as “the act of moving unlawfully obtained funds via legitimate individuals or accounts to conceal the source of the funds.” It is a global problem that has led to political unrest and slower economic progress. It is a continual source of concern for many officials in many nations. Several methods can be used to carry out money laundering. The first is the import and export sectors, which are avenues through which money may be transformed into commodities that are then either exported or legally brought back into the nation (Alnasser Mohammed Citation2021). In recent years, the battle against money laundering has nearly taken the top spot on the anti-crime policy priority list (Rusanov and Pudovochkin Citation2021). ML linked human trafficking and drug, bribery, extortion, kidnapping-for-ransom, terrorism financing, tax evasion, and various other acts are all connected by ML (Ketenci et al. Citation2021). Because of its seriousness, it is garnering increasing attention from scholars and governments worldwide. For one reason, ML-related money amounts to a significant portion of global GDP each year (Xie et al. Citation2010). It is impossible to provide an exact rough estimate of the size of such a complex, vast underground market; the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Hunter and Biglaiser Citation2020) estimates that more than two trillion USD is ML annually through financial institutes around the world, making money laundering one of the world’s biggest markets (Ketenci et al. Citation2021). According to the IMF, money laundering is estimated to be worth $3.2 trillion globally, or 3% of global GDP. Money laundering earnings are frequently used to fund criminal activities such as illegal arms sales, drug trafficking, human trafficking and terrorism (Han et al. Citation2020). Financial organizations report suspicious actions to the FIU (Financial Intelligence Unit). FIU gathers information from various financial sectors both inside and beyond the authority, which is then passed on to law enforcement authorities (LEA) as needed (Ketenci et al. Citation2021).

Fraud detection plays an essential role in reducing losses. Fraudsters endure their invasion by outsmarting all current and introducing advanced anti-fraudulent procedures with their devious evasions. Fraud in bank is a federal offense that includes the deception of financial institutions to get a monetary advantage. Every year, fraud costs banks and financial organizations billions of dollars. Bankers are enticed to participate in scams to get financial assets. Fraudsters love to prey on banks and insurance firms. Every year, they successfully seize billions of dollars in financial resources. Credit and debit card fraud, false selling insurance, money laundering, and account fraud are the most frequent kinds of bank fraud (Sarma et al. Citation2020). Terrorists’ increasing use of nonprofit organizations (NPOs) worldwide has prompted a concerted global effort to defend these financial organizations. The FATF (Financial Action Task Force) released Special Recommendation (SR) VIII to help others nations review appropriateness of their present rules and guidelines governing to nonprofit organizations (Molla Imeny et al. Citation2021; Omar, Johari, and Arshad Citation2014; Savona and Riccardi Citation2019). The performance of a country’s financial institution is assessed using the FATF 40 + 90 (Choo Citation2014) guidelines and a full evaluation report; these are the instruments that will help each country design AML rules that are compliant with the system (Young and Woodiwiss Citation2021). In the United States, enhanced due diligence monitors risky and terrorism-related funding, including customer identification in high-risk jurisdictions and big bank transactions. In G20 submission nations are obliged to gather and share information, crypto currency around the world might decontrol banking institutions, thus worldwide AML/CFT has begun to gather and exchange information regarding terrorism funding, particularly in poor areas where banks are constrained (Bashir et al. Citation2020).

Technological advancements in this field have spawned a slew of new challenges that regulators and other officials must address. Economic rationality can compel people to carry out AI acts and legitimacy for AI operations (Gudkov Citation2020). Cybersecurity has become an essential topic due to conventional security breaches and worries about how firms handle personal data obtained from customers or ordinary users. The most obvious argument for cybersecurity in banking transactions is to secure client assets while maintaining a high level of data privacy. AI development poses several obstacles, not just technological but also legal and ethical (Nizioł Citation2021). It is viewed as a danger to jobs since it will eliminate manual work. Financial services are also under pressure (Lee Citation2020). AI and machine learning quickly evolve and transform emerging nations’ political, economic, and social landscapes. As a result, AI-based solutions are predicted to be a game-changer with huge implications for boosting impoverished people’s financial access (Garcia-Bedoya, Granados, and Cardozo Burgos Citation2021; Kshetri Citation2021). It has developed a vital resource for large banks that deal with regulatory changes, increased anti-money laundering (AML) regulations, and susceptible fraud-prone clientele. Internet banking offers both convenience and major concerns (Jullum et al. Citation2020). Meanwhile, Internet banking security has gathered the consideration of people from all walks of life. While everyday money transactions are made using various non-cash payment methods, many instances have involved payment information integrity, accessibility, and confidentiality. These accidents can occur on both the client’s (funds owners) and the bank’s (or outlet’s) sides, additionally during the payment information transmission over communication networks (Plaksiy, Nikiforov, and Miloslavskaya Citation2018).

Research Protocol

SLR is known method for discovering and assessing research output pertinent to a particular topic. By using a rigorous, trustworthy, and auditable method, SLR aims to provide a balanced appraisal of a studied issue (Kitchenham Citation2004). SLR has been published in many different domains, including FinTech, money transfer (Hussain et al. Citation2020) and healthcare systems (Nazir et al. Citation2020). This SLR method aims to summarize the implementation of machine learning and AI in financial businesses to mitigate the risk of money laundering. Below are the major point to elaborate the aim of this SLR:

  • To explore and investigate previous research on this particular technology. The set of questions was created by utilizing AI technology to provide high security and authentication in various business sectors in order to control the threat of ML.

  • To identify technological deficiencies that will lead to more research. These new domain will finally help business sectors and their employees by ensuring superior authentication for security purposes to prevent money laundering.

  • The most suitable research articles were selected from online libraries for this SLR work. Researchers will assess and examine the most important research articles in the AI and ML areas.

The proposed study endeavor implements the SLR technique using the suggested recommendations by Kitchenham et al. (Keele Citation2007; Kitchenham et al. Citation2010). shows the process use in the review methodology of this SLR. The review process consists of seven important steps, as shown in , which describes all of these stages in detail.

Figure 1. Purposed SLR procedure.

Figure 1. Purposed SLR procedure.

Research Process Methodology

The SLR highlights the essential pre-review processes, including research question creation, keyword identification, formulating questions, collecting digital libraries available online to collect relevant original articles for the review process, and inclusion/exclusion criteria. As a result of the recent increase in research interest in AIand money laundering, the current systematic review was conducted. A thorough literature review and research in the specific context of AI-based AML systems provide financial sector security and safety.

Identification of Research Question

As already stated, establishing research questions is important for conducting an SLR. Various features of the AI-based platform are assessed and presented critically to define the most suitable research questions. The five research questions listed in was formed as a result. SLR is another method for critically assessing a given situation.

Table 1. Selected research questions and corresponding explanation.

Identification of Keywords

After developing the RQs, the next crucial task was to categorize keywords and built a search query to choose the most suitable papers from the designated online libraries. The finalized keywords are: “SECURITY, SAFETY, RISKS, THREATS, MITIGATE, MINIMIZE, EMBEDDED, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, MONEY LAUNDERING, FRAUD, ORGANIZATION, SECTOR, INSTITUTE, IMPACT, OR EFFECT.” The above keywords are employed in query construction in accordance with database constraints and find out the best outcome in results of fetching suitable articles.

Formulation of Query

After finalizing the research question and keywords formulation from the selected online digital libraries, the following process is to formulate query (“SECURITY” OR “SAFETY” OR “RISKS” OR “THREATS”) AND (“RESTRICT” OR “MINIMIZE”) AND (“MONEY LAUNDERING” OR “FRAUD”) AND (“ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE” OR “MACHINE LEARNING”) AND (“ORGANIZATION” OR “SECTOR” OR “INSTITUTE” OR “IMPACT” OR “EFFECT”). These queries are further modified based on the formulation of keywords from the selected online libraries. Furthermore the query develop on title, abstract, and substance bases of the research article, almost 112 most suitable articles are finalized. The next subsection defines the aggregated research papers in its entirety.

Review Process

The 112 articles are selected based on defined criteria for SLR after screening the designated online libraries for relevant primary articles and executing the inclusion and exclusion procedure. Workshop papers, conference proceedings, book parts, journal pieces, and review/survey articles comprise the final pool of materials. For this phase, a voting method was proposed. If more than half of the writers felt that the paper should be included, it was added to the final list of the most relevant papers; otherwise, it was removed. The four most suitable online digital libraries are selected to gather pertinent research papers for this SLR process, which include Taylor & Francis, IEEE Xplore, Springer Link, and Elsevier. The following is an overview of the whole inclusion procedure in .

Table 2. Selection of articles for final development process.

A total of 112 research articles have been completed for review and assessment. The total number of publications from the designated peer-reviewed digital online libraries which contributed to this final pool is shown in below.

Figure 2. Collection of online libraries for articles.

Figure 2. Collection of online libraries for articles.

shows the total contribution of the chosen online repositories to the published pertinent research publications. The percentage contribution was assessed, and it was determined that IEEE Xplore and Springer link contributed more, showing that the researchers’ interest in publication their work in these libraries.

Figure 3. Contribution percentage for each library.

Figure 3. Contribution percentage for each library.

AI has grown to be exciting and appealing domain for the research community worldwide. The researchers implementation various techniques of AI and machine learning in many sectors, like tracking and navigation, healthcare, internet safety, profitable industries, businesses, organizations, and many others. Keeping in view these smart applications, the aim of researchers is to exploit these models in financial organizations to ensure their employees’ high security and integrity. According to the selected questions, shows the annual contribution of various AI research publications.

Figure 4. Year-wise contribution of selected articles.

Figure 4. Year-wise contribution of selected articles.

After analysis of the outcome presented in , it shows that the number of research papers exponentially increases over time, reflecting researchers’ interest in the proposed field. From 2016, the publications increased abruptly, showing the organization’s interest in AI to prevent the risk of ML enhancing the security and safety of the financial sector.

Quality Assessment

The quality of the papers’ relevancy was evaluated using the SLR protocol’s criteria. Each of the RQs and accompanying criteria stated in the study were examined and scored against relevant papers (Khan, Nazir, and Khan Citation2021). This evaluation guaranteed the quality of each SLR paper. Furthermore, all study topics were given weightage on the below criteria:

  • If a certain research article fully satisfied that research question then it was assigned a weighted value of 1

  • While if an article partially satisfied that research question then it was assigned a weighted value of 0.5, otherwise 0.

The most relevant articles were identified after the quality assessment, as indicated in , where the leaf nodes show weighted values for the associated research topics and the terminal nodes represent the average value of the evaluation procedure. The more important circular representation represents the greatest relevance of a certain research article to the specified research subject to be investigated in this SLR work.

Figure 5. Representation the relevant articles.

Figure 5. Representation the relevant articles.

Analysis and Results

Below each question contains information on each associated research topic posed for the current SLR study.

RQ1) What Are the Different Tools and Channels Utilized for Money Laundering in the Financial Sector?

ML is become one of the major threats for the financial institutions. Banking sectors (Villar and Khan Citation2021) are penalizing customers severely for improperly analyzing ML risk, such as HSBC Bank London, which was plenty about USD $2 billion by a US regulator for failing to prevent Mexican drug criminals from laundering money through banking channel (Isa et al. Citation2015). It can be done in a variety of ways. Criminals might conceal their money’s origins by investing in real estate, casinos, and overvaluing legal invoices. A ML method, in general, consists of three basic steps: layering, integration, and placement (Mahootiha, Golpayegani, and Sadeghian Citation2021; Matanky-Becker and Cockbain Citation2021; Philippson Citation2001; Seymour Citation2008). Governments and corporations globally have adopted legislation and regulations to combat ML for many years. The practice of injecting filthy money into the financial sector is known as placement. However, layering is a technique for carrying out complicated transactions to conceal the source of funding. Finally, integration entails withdrawing funds from a specified bank account. AML instruments are confused when sophisticated layering is used (Soltani et al. Citation2016). The various tools used for ML is briefly explain in the as below.

Table 3. Different tools used for Money Laundering.

RQ2) What Are the Most AI-Based Generic Solutions Proposed for Restricting Money Laundering?

ML is a hazard to the world economy every year. Proceeds from these crimes might be used to fuel more criminal activity and jeopardize the integrity of global financial systems. As a result, money laundering is seen as a severe threat in many countries. This research question suggests different generic solutions proposed in the articles for restricting ML. The primary aim of this research question is to frame the different AI based methods and approaches to limiting money laundering. shows the list of solutions proposed for restricting money laundering.

Table 4. List of solutions proposed for restricted ML.

RQ3) What Are the Various Components That Can Determine the Risk Money Laundering?

Terrorist organizations rely on money and widespread illegal financing to survive. Terrorist organizations would be unable to handle daily administrative work, sustain their members, or carry out operations if they did not have a continuous and stable source of funding (Fletcher, Larkin, and Corbet Citation2021). Previous researchers have employed various AI techniques to enhance ML capabilities. The advancement of technology has changed the financial sector to minimize the threats of ML. The primary aim of this RQ is to highlight different components that can determine the risk of money laundering. describes the list of various components that determine ML.

Table 5. List of various components that determine ML.

RQ4) Using the Literature As Evidence, How Can We Minimize the Risk Factor of Money Laundering within Financial Sectors?

The US has increased its sensitivity to illegal money flows since the 9/11 terrorist assault in 2001, since officials believe that such money transfers promote worldwide terrorist and criminal operations (Ferwerda et al. Citation2013). The advancement of internet technology has enabled people to conduct financial transactions using various devices, such as mobile phones, PCs, and other similar devices. Any user’s action in gaining access to financial services must pass through a number of intermediary nodes in the network. Such data would be hijacked and manipulated by a network of rogue nodes to conduct fraud (Jayasree and Balan Citation2017). This is particularly true when new kinds of crime, such as cybercrime or new technologies in conventional organized crime, are related to existing information, concepts, and theories in the subject. It’s important to consider what the use of technology means for organized criminal groups as they form and grow (Kruisbergen et al. Citation2019).

Different hybrid AML based systems are now available, however not all deal with actual money and virtual currency. In addition, they frequently issue false-positive alarms, are not connected to other related financial foundations, and rely heavily on the expertise of the analysts (Sobh Citation2020). It’s easy to present an image of the existing international AML standard and its responsibilities (Goldbarsht Citation2020). International organizations play a critical role in driving worldwide adoption of AML legislation (Maguchu Citation2018). A global policy framework implementing complicated anti-money laundering regulations provides comfort and security, but it does not protect us against criminality (Pol Citation2020). As traditional financial services systems change, technology is ushering in a significant shift from human-centered to computer-driven financial services. The progressive change to a computer and data-driven financial system and the fast rise of the financial technology (FinTech) sector are example of industry (Truby, Brown, and Dahdal Citation2020). A corrupt dictatorship’s control over both political and economic concerns is strengthened by access to global financial sectors and the availability of offshore markets, which give the regime a sense of invulnerability both locally and worldwide (Marat Citation2015).

What Are the Economical and Social Impacts of Money Laundering on Society?

For decades, ML has been a worldwide issue that has posed a severe threat to society. Governments, regulatory agencies, and financial institutions are all fighting to outcome this issue, yet billions of dollars in government funds continue to make the news. Money launderers, in particular, hunt for ways to conceal their wealth, which is the fundamental element of the process. As a result, the majority of emerging nations have traits and qualities that money launderers find appealing to carry out their crime. This has an effect on these nations’ political, societal, and economic aspects. Understanding these emerging nations’ economic, social environments and political are crucial to the fight against money laundering. The united nation office on drugs and crime (UNODC) assess that ML accounts for 2 to 5% of world GDP, or $800 billion to $2 trillion per year, and is one of the most severe threats to the world economy and security. To identify suspicious activity, financial sectors have begun to use AI and machine learning technology to automate data and time-intensive processes (Kute et al. Citation2021). The aim of this question is to analyze the social and economic impacts of ML on society and briefly discuss it in .

Table 6. Social and economic impacts of Money Laundering.

Limitations

By examining the methods utilized, this research paper has summarized the 112 most pertinent publications for ensuring protection and security measures to the system in the organization. Furthermore, this SLR work has extracted enriched information about different types of security threats, their influence on economic organizations. Also, this SLR work presented a new research direction by bridging the gaps in the extant and deemed to open new gates for the development of efficient AI-based risk mitigation and high security and authenticity ensuring systems. Besides these critical advantages, some of the cons that prevailed with this SLR work are listed below:

  • Only four online research libraries were chosen for collections and article downloads. Our primary objective was to identify just those libraries that had been thoroughly investigated and evaluated by the majority of researchers.

  • This SLR analysis has been ongoing for 15 years, yet new papers in AI and money laundering are released every day.

  • Only published material is considered for evaluation and analysis. For valuation and analytical purposes, no work-in-progress or work conduct simulation in the experimental labs is done.

  • The papers are gathered by specified search terms, phrases and keywords. As a result, if an article does not have a synonym that matches the keywords, it is skipped throughout the article collection process.

Future Research Directions

According to the analysis of the research questions utilized the majority of the chosen papers did not investigate the potential bias of researchers and effect of results, and there were few comments regarding the limits of the methodologies and instruments employed in the examined studies. The study is seen to be a good resource for anybody interested in anti-money laundering research utilizing information technology and will help spark fresh interests in the sector, even if it cannot be considered to be thorough. The primary study publications were sourced from only four separate most peer-reviewed online digital repositories. For analysis and evaluation, 112 relevant publications, including articles, book portions, conference papers, and survey work, were found. The research will aid companies and practitioners by describing the many consequences of ML on our society and economy, as well as integrating AI in financial institutions. The Institutions can adopt an AI risk mitigation plan to improve the efficiency and security of financial companies. It will identify numerous threats before they arise. This comprehensive analysis of current research will help as knowledge for academics and researchers interested in creating safe and secure AML systems for the financial sector in the future. The assumption of this SLR work is that it will foster a strong relationship between the community and the AML system in the face of new research trends. Future research is advised to broaden the scope of this study by manually searching the references of the articles chosen in this review, as well as in pertinent journals, books, surveys and conferences, using the snowball technique.

Conclusion and Discussion

Over the decade, global interest in the phenomenon of money laundering has grown, and it has become a crime. However, most of the research has emphasized money laundering from the standpoint of industrialized nations. As a result, international legislation, policies, and opinion have all been constructed with developed country requirements as their primary focus to combat money laundering. As technology up degrades by the day, many entities or individuals to generate various other channels and provide platforms to transfer dirty money and illegal foreign exchange. ML has long been regarded as a huge danger to the world’s economy and financial system. It erodes public confidence in the financial system and puts financial industries and the overall financial system’s soundness and stability at risk. Most governments have taken efforts to minimize the occurrence of ML in response to the threat it poses to the worldwide financial system and national economies. Consequently, the expansion of AI applications in the financial sectors is experiencing major difficulties in terms of money laundering and fraudulent activities.

Financial organizations and banking sectors are spending a huge budget to secure their system. AI can play a vital role in controlling ML/CTF. Technology adoption and AI application need to collaborate with each sector nationwide. By using different features and techniques of AI like ANN, machine learning, deep learning, and intelligent robotics, etc., in the existing system to counter the risk of ML/CTF. Organizations need to develop an AI-based AML system to secure money from laundering. It is necessary to check an ongoing process by the government and regulatory bodies to monitor at each level to maintain sustainable economic growth. Anti-money laundering legislation is supposed to improve financial sectors and the worldwide financial system’s reputations, as well as customer confidence and trust. AI technology promotes fast development in the financial sector by assessing and investigating the possible hazards of money laundering at financial companies and institutions. It has shown extraordinary abilities in a multitude of fields, including the financial and regulatory sectors

Globally, FATF plays a significant role in minimizing the risk of ML/CTF. Various countries have committed to submitting different reports to FATF authorities to justify their efforts against AML/CTF. Similarly, the FATF is quite explicit about the revenue and expenditures of some organizations that are being abused in the name of charitable endeavor, such charity. However, the government must have a strong desire and determination to follow through with this instead of unfreezing them as it formerly did. After these precautionary measures by the government and regulatory authorities of various countries still, there are alternative networks adopted by the people to transfer illegal foreign exchange remittance that operates outside of banking channels. This paper aims to examine the existing situation from various perspectives and bring up future research paths to conduct the study and construct high levels of authenticity and security in the financial sector by utilizing AI. In order to resolve this issue, SLR is conducted to analyze for high security, authentication, and safety the most suitable articles accumulated from online peer-reviewed digital libraries.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported by the Qatar National Library [QUHI-CBE-21/22-1].

References

  • Al Hammadi, A., I. A. Zualkernan, and R. Ahmed. 2007. Impediments to adoption of e-Learning technology in combating anti-money laundering in UAE banks. Paper read at Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007), Niigata, Japan.
  • Alkhalili, M., M. H. Qutqut, and F. Almasalha. 2021. Investigation of applying machine learning for watch-list filtering in anti-money laundering. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Access 9:18481–31.
  • Alnasser Mohammed, S. A. S. 2021. Money laundering in selected emerging economies: Is there a role for banks? Journal of Money Laundering Control 24 (1):102–10.
  • Al-Nuemat, A. A. 2013. Money laundering and banking secrecy in the Jordanian legislation. Journal Information and Communications Technology 34 (9):91–104.
  • Al-Rashidi, K. S. 2021. Indirect method of proof’and the Kuwaiti anti-money laundering law: a lesson from the UK. Paper read at Criminal Law Forum.
  • Bashir, R., R. Rajeev, A. Shatarah, and N. Bashir. 2020. A risk score analysis related to money laundering in financial institutions across nations. Paper read at 2020 8th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO), Noida, India.
  • Butler, S. 2019. Criminal use of cryptocurrencies: A great new threat or is cash still king? Journal of Cyber Policy 4 (3):326–45.
  • Campbell-Verduyn, M. 2018. Bitcoin, crypto-coins, and global anti-money laundering governance. Crime, Law, & Social Change 69 (2):283–305.
  • Canhoto, A. I. 2021. Leveraging machine learning in the global fight against money laundering and terrorism financing: An affordances perspective. Journal of Business Research 131:441–52.
  • Chen, Y., and X. Han. 2021. CatBoost for fraud detection in financial transactions. Paper read at 2021 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics and Computer Engineering (ICCECE), Guangzhou, China.
  • Chen, Z., L. D. Van Khoa, E. N. Teoh, A. Nazir, E. K. Karuppiah, and K. S. Lam. 2018. Machine learning techniques for anti-money laundering (AML) solutions in suspicious transaction detection: A review. Knowledge and Information Systems 57 (2):245–85.
  • Choi, D., and K. Lee. 2018. An AIapproach to financial fraud detection under IoT environment: A survey and implementation. Security and Communication Networks 2018:15.
  • Choo, K.-K. R. 2014. Designated non-financial businesses and professionals: A review and analysis of recent financial action task force on money laundering mutual evaluation reports. Security Journal 27 (1):1–26.
  • Dai, D., and S. Boroomand. 2021. A review of AIto enhance the security of big data systems: state-of-art, methodologies, applications, and challenges. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 29:1–19.
  • Dalla Pellegrina, L., G. Di Maio, D. Masciandaro, and M. Saraceno. 2020. Organized crime, suspicious transaction reporting and anti-money laundering regulation. Regional Studies 54 (12):1761–75.
  • Desmond, D., P. Salmon, and D. Lacey. 2021. Functional systems within cryptolaundering processes: A work domain analysis model of cryptolaundering activities. Journal of Cyber Policy 6 (2):155–76.
  • Dhaya, A., and R. Ravi. 2021. Multi feature behavior approximation model based efficient botnet detection to mitigate financial frauds. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 12 (3):3799–806.
  • Domashova, J., and N. Mikhailina. 2021. Usage of machine learning methods for early detection of money laundering schemes. Procedia Computer Science 190:184–92.
  • Dreżewski, R., G. Dziuban, Ł. Hernik, and M. Pączek. 2015. Comparison of data mining techniques for money laundering detection system. Paper read at 2015 International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech).
  • Dreżewski, R., J. Sepielak, and W. Filipkowski. 2012. System supporting money laundering detection. Digital Investigation 9 (1):8–21.
  • Dreżewski, R., J. Sepielak, and W. Filipkowski. 2015. The application of social network analysis algorithms in a system supporting money laundering detection. Information Sciences 295:18–32.
  • Erdoğan, Í., O. Kurto, A. Kurt, and Ş. Bahtıyar. 2020. A new approach for fraud detection with artificial intelligence. Paper read at 2020 28th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), Gaziantep, Turkey.
  • Ferwerda, J., M. Kattenberg, H.-H. Chang, B. Unger, L. Groot, and J. A. Bikker. 2013. Gravity models of trade-based money laundering. Applied Economics 45 (22):3170–82.
  • Ferwerda, J., and E. R. Kleemans. 2019. Estimating money laundering risks: An application to business sectors in the Netherlands. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 25 (1):45–62.
  • Fletcher, E., C. Larkin, and S. Corbet. 2021. Countering money laundering and terrorist financing: A case for bitcoin regulation. Research in International Business and Finance 56:101387.
  • Gao, S., D. Xu, H. Wang, and Y. Wang. 2006. Intelligent anti-money laundering system. Paper read at 2006 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics, Shanghai, China.
  • Garcia-Bedoya, O., O. Granados, and J. Cardozo Burgos. 2021. AI against money laundering networks: The Colombian case. Journal of Money Laundering Control 24 (1):49–62. doi:10.1108/JMLC-04-2020-0033.
  • Goldbarsht, D. 2020. Am I my corporate’s keeper? Anti-money laundering gatekeeping opportunities of the corporate legal officer. International Journal of the Legal Profession 29:1–20.
  • Gowin, K. D., D. Wang, S. Rakesh Jory, R. Houmes, and T. Ngo. 2021. Impact on the firm value of financial institutions from penalties for violating anti-money laundering and economic sanctions regulations. Finance Research Letters 40:101675.
  • Guan, C., J. Mou, and Z. Jiang. 2020. Artificial intelligence innovation in education: A twenty-year data-driven historical analysis. International Journal of Innovation Studies 4:134–47.
  • Gudkov, A. 2020. On Fiduciary Relationship with AISystems. The Liverpool Law Review 41 (3):251–73.
  • Guevara, J., O. Garcia-Bedoya, and O. Granados. 2020. Machine learning methodologies against money laundering in non-banking correspondents. Paper read at Applied Informatics: Third International Conference, ICAI 2020, Ota, Nigeria, October 29–31, 2020, Proceedings 3.
  • Guzman, A., S. Ishida, E. Choi, and A. Aoyama. 2016. Artificial intelligence improving safety and risk analysis: A comparative analysis for critical infrastructure. Paper read at 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bali, Indonesia.
  • Haffke, L., M. Fromberger, and P. Zimmermann. 2020. Cryptocurrencies and anti-money laundering: The shortcomings of the fifth AML Directive (EU) and how to address them. Journal of Banking Regulation 21 (2):125–38.
  • Hamid, O. H. 2017. Breaking through opacity: A context-aware data-driven conceptual design for a predictive anti money laundering system. Paper read at 2017 9th IEEE-GCC conference and exhibition (GCCCE), Manama, Bahrain.
  • Han, J., Y. Huang, S. Liu, and K. Towey. 2020. Artificial intelligence for anti-money laundering: A review and extension. Digital Finance 2 (3):211–39.
  • Hong, X., H. Liang, Z. Gao, and H. Li. 2017. An adaptive resource allocation model in anti-money laundering system. Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications 10 (2):315–31.
  • Huang, D., D. Mu, L. Yang, and X. Cai. 2018. CoDetect: Financial fraud detection with anomaly feature detection. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Access 6:19161–74.
  • Hunter, L. Y., and G. Biglaiser. 2020. The effects of the international monetary fund on domestic terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 34: 1–25.
  • Hussain, A., S. Nazir, S. Khan, and A. Ullah. 2020. Analysis of PMIPv6 extensions for identifying and assessing the efforts made for solving the issues in the PMIPv6 domain: A systematic review. Computer Networks 179:107366.
  • Imanpour, M., S. Rosenkranz, B. Westbrock, B. Unger, and J. Ferwerda. 2019. A microeconomic foundation for optimal money laundering policies. International Review of Law and Economics 60:105856.
  • Isa, Y. M., Z. Mohd Sanusi, M. Nizal Haniff, and P. A. Barnes. 2015. Money laundering risk: From the bankers’ and regulators perspectives. Procedia Economics and Finance 28:7–13.
  • Jakobi, A. P. 2018. Governing illicit finance in transnational security spaces: The FATF and anti-money laundering. Crime, Law, & Social Change 69 (2):173–90.
  • Jamshidi, S., and M. Reza Hashemi. 2012. An efficient data enrichment scheme for fraud detection using social network analysis. Paper read at 6th International Symposium on Telecommunications (IST), Tehran, Iran.
  • Jayantilal, S., S. Ferreira Jorge, and A. Ferreira. 2017. Portuguese anti-money laundering policy: A game theory approach. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 23 (4):559–74.
  • Jayasree, V., and R. V. Siva Balan. 2017. Money laundering regulatory risk evaluation using bitmap index-based decision tree. Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic & Applied Sciences 23:96–102.
  • Jullum, M., A. Løland, R. Bang Huseby, G. Ånonsen, and J. Lorentzen. 2020. Detecting money laundering transactions with machine learning. Journal of Money Laundering Control 23 (1):173–86.
  • Keele, S. 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. UK: Citeseer.
  • Ketenci, U. G., T. Kurt, S. Önal, C. Erbil, S. Aktürkoǧlu, and H. Şerban İlhan. 2021. A time-frequency based suspicious activity detection for anti-money laundering. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Access 9:59957–67.
  • Khan, S., S. Nazir, and H. Ullah Khan. 2021. Analysis of navigation assistants for blind and visually impaired people: A systematic review. IEEE Access 9:26712–26734. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3052415.
  • Kitchenham, B. 2004. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University 33 (2004):1–26.
  • Kitchenham, B., R. Pretorius, D. Budgen, O. P. Brereton, M. Turner, M. Niazi, and S. Linkman. 2010. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a tertiary study. Information and Software Technology 52 (8):792–805.
  • Kose, U., and P. Vasant. 2017. Fading intelligence theory: A theory on keeping AIsafety for the future. Paper read at 2017 International AIand Data Processing Symposium (IDAP).
  • Kruisbergen, E. W., E. R. Leukfeldt, E. R. Kleemans, and R. A. Roks. 2019. Money talks money laundering choices of organized crime offenders in a digital age. Journal of Crime & Justice 42 (5):569–81.
  • Kshetri, N. 2021. The role of AIin promoting financial inclusion in developing countries. Journal of Global Information Technology Management.
  • Kunlin, Y. 2018. A memory-enhanced framework for financial fraud detection. Paper read at 2018 17th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Orlando, FL, USA.
  • Kurshan, E., H. Shen, and H. Yu. 2020. Financial crime & fraud detection using graph computing: Application considerations & outlook. Paper read at 2020 Second International Conference on Transdisciplinary AI (TransAI).
  • Kute, D. V., B. Pradhan, N. Shukla, and A. Alamri. 2021. Deep learning and explainable AItechniques applied for detecting money laundering–a critical review IEEE Access, Irvine, CA, USA.
  • Lawlor-Forsyth, E., and M. Michelle Gallant. 2018. Financial institutions and money laundering: A threatening relationship? Journal of Banking Regulation 19 (2):131–48.
  • Lee, J. 2020. Access to finance for AIregulation in the financial services industry. European Business Organization Law Review 21 (4):731–57.
  • Le Khac, N. A., S. Markos, and M.-T. Kechadi. 2010. A data mining-based solution for detecting suspicious money laundering cases in an investment bank. Paper read at 2010 Second International Conference on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, and Data Applications, Menuires, France.
  • Link, J., K. Waedt, I. Ben Zid, and X. Lou. 2018. Current Challenges of the Joint Consideration of Functional Safety & Cyber Security, Their Interoperability and Impact on Organizations: How to Manage RAMS+ S (Reliability Availability Maintainability Safety+ Security). Paper read at 2018 12th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability, and Safety (ICRMS), Shanghai, China.
  • Loayza, N., E. Villa, and M. Misas. 2019. Illicit activity and money laundering from an economic growth perspective: A model and an application to Colombia. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 159:442–87.
  • Mabunda, S. 2018. Cryptocurrency: The new face of cyber money laundering. Paper read at 2018 International Conference on Advances in Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (icABCD), Durban, South Africa.
  • Maguchu, P. 2018. Revisiting money-laundering legislation in Zimbabwe and the role of international organisations. African Security Review 27 (3–4):278–90.
  • Mahootiha, M., A. H. Golpayegani, and B. Sadeghian. 2021. Designing a new method for detecting money laundering based on social network analysis. Paper read at 2021 26th International Computer Conference, Tehran, Iran, Computer Society of Iran (CSICC).
  • Marat, E. 2015. Global money laundering and its domestic political consequences in Kyrgyzstan. Central Asian Survey 34 (1):46–56.
  • Matanky-Becker, R., and E. Cockbain. 2021. Behind the criminal economy: Using UK tax fraud investigations to understand money laundering myths and models. Crime, Law, & Social Change 77:1–25.
  • McCarthy, K. J., P. van Santen, and I. Fiedler. 2015. Modeling the money launderer: Microtheoretical arguments on anti-money laundering policy. International Review of Law and Economics 43:148–55.
  • Mikhaylov, A., and R. Frank. 2016. Cards, money and two hacking forums: An analysis of online money laundering schemes. Paper read at 2016 European intelligence and security informatics conference (EISIC), Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Mishra, A., and P. Yadav. 2020. Anomaly-based IDS to detect attack using various AI& machine learning algorithms: A review. Paper read at 2nd International Conference on Data, Engineering and Applications (IDEA), Bhopal, India, February 28–29, 2020.
  • Molla Imeny, V., S. D. Norton, M. Salehi, and M. Moradi. 2021. Perception versus reality: Iranian banks and international anti-money laundering expectations. Journal of Money Laundering Control 24 (1):63–76. doi:10.1108/JMLC-06-2020-0064.
  • Möser, M., R. Böhme, and D. Breuker. 2013. An inquiry into money laundering tools in the Bitcoin ecosystem. Paper read at 2013 APWG eCrime researchers summit.
  • Nazir, S., S. Khan, H. U. Khan, S. Ali, I. García-Magariño, R. Binti Atan, and M. Nawaz. 2020. A comprehensive analysis of healthcare big data management, analytics and scientific programming. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Access 8:95714–33.
  • Nikkel, B. 2020. Fintech forensics: Criminal investigation and digital evidence in financial technologies. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 33:200908.
  • Nizioł, K. 2021. The challenges of consumer protection law connected with the development of AIon the example of financial services (chosen legal aspects. Procedia Computer Science 192:4103–11.
  • Omar, N., Z. Amirah Johari, and R. Arshad. 2014. Money laundering–FATF special recommendation VIII: A review of evaluation reports. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 145:211–25.
  • Omar, N., R. Juhaida Johari, and M. Sathye. 2015. Malaysian DNFBPs’ perceptions on awareness, perceived impact and views on the AML/CFT requirements. Procedia Economics and Finance 31:595–600.
  • Philippson, S. 2001. Money laundering on the internet. Computers & Security 20 (6):485–485.
  • Picard, P. M., and P. Pieretti. 2011. Bank secrecy, illicit money and offshore financial centers. Journal of Public Economics 95 (7–8):942–55.
  • Plachouras, V., and J. L. Leidner. 2015. Information extraction of regulatory enforcement actions: From anti-money laundering compliance to countering terrorism finance. Paper read at Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015, Paris, France.
  • Plaksiy, K., A. Nikiforov, and N. Miloslavskaya. 2018. Applying big data technologies to detect cases of money laundering and counter financing of terrorism. Paper read at 2018 6th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops (FiCloudW), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Pol, R. F. 2020. Anti-money laundering: The world’s least effective policy experiment? Together, we can fix it. Policy Design and Practice 3 (1):73–94.
  • Pourhabibi, T., K.-L. Ong, B. H. Kam, and Y. Ling Boo. 2020. Fraud detection: A systematic literature review of graph-based anomaly detection approaches. Decision Support Systems 133:113303.
  • Premti, A., M. Jafarinejad, and H. Balani. 2021. The impact of the Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive on the valuation of EU banks. Research in International Business and Finance 57:101397.
  • Rindell, K., and J. Holvitie. 2019. Security risk assessment and management as technical debt. Paper read at 2019 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security), Oxford, UK, June 3–4, 2019.
  • Romero, V. 2020. Bloody investment: Misaligned incentives, money laundering and violence. Trends in Organized Crime 25:1–29.
  • Rudner, M. 2010. Hizbullah terrorism finance: Fund-raising and money-laundering. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 33 (8):700–15.
  • Rusanov, G., and Y. Pudovochkin. 2021. Money laundering in the modern crime system. Journal of Money Laundering Control 24 (4):860–68.
  • Samanta, S., B. Kumar Mohanta, S. Prasad Pati, and D. Jena. 2019. A framework to build user profile on cryptocurrency data for detection of money laundering activities. Paper read at 2019 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT).
  • Sarma, D., W. Alam, I. Saha, M. Nazmul Alam, M. J. Alam, and S. Hossain. 2020. Bank fraud detection using community detection algorithm. Paper read at 2020 Second International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA), Coimbatore, India.
  • Savona, E. U., and M. Riccardi. 2019. Assessing the risk of money laundering: Research challenges and implications for practitioners. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 25 (1):1–4.
  • Seymour, B. 2008. Global money laundering. Journal of Applied Security Research 3 (3–4):373–87.
  • Shaikh, A. K., M. Al-Shamli, and A. Nazir. 2021. Designing a relational model to identify relationships between suspicious customers in anti-money laundering (AML) using social network analysis (SNA). Journal of Big Data 8 (1):1–22.
  • Shehu, A. Y. 2012. Promoting financial inclusion for effective anti-money laundering and counter financing of terrorism (AML/CFT). Crime, Law, & Social Change 57 (3):305–23.
  • Shen, Y., T. C. Sharkey, B. K. Szymanski, and W. Al Wallace. 2021. Interdicting interdependent contraband smuggling, money and money laundering networks. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 78:101068.
  • Shu, F., S. Chen, F. Li, J. Zhang, and J. Chen. 2020. Research and implementation of network attack and defense countermeasure technology based on AItechnology. Paper read at 2020 IEEE 5th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), Chongqing, China.
  • Singh, K., and P. Best. 2019. Anti-money laundering: Using data visualization to identify suspicious activity. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 34:100418.
  • Singla, J. 2021. Comparing ROC curve based thresholding methods in online transactions fraud detection system using deep learning. Paper read at 2021 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS).
  • Sittlington, S., and J. Harvey. 2018. Prevention of money laundering and the role of asset recovery. Crime, Law, & Social Change 70 (4):421–41.
  • Sobh, T. S. 2020. An intelligent and secure framework for anti-money laundering. Journal of Applied Security Research 15 (4):517–46.
  • Soltani, R., U. Trang Nguyen, Y. Yang, M. Faghani, A. Yagoub, and A. An. 2016. A new algorithm for money laundering detection based on structural similarity. Paper read at 2016 IEEE 7th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON), New York, NY, USA.
  • Song, Z. 2020. A data mining based fraud detection hybrid algorithm in E-bank. Paper read at 2020 International Conference on Big Data, AIand Internet of Things Engineering (ICBAIE), Fuzhou, China.
  • Srivastava, S., A. Bisht, and N. Narayan. 2017. Safety and security in smart cities using artificial intelligence—A review. Paper read at 2017 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering-Confluence.
  • Stokes, R. 2012. Virtual money laundering: The case of Bitcoin and the Linden dollar. Information & Communications Technology Law 21 (3):221–36.
  • Suresh, A., A. P. Subeer, A. Mary Philip, J. Shaji Varughese, and J. Mathew. 2020. Comprehensive home security for elderly people using IoT and artificial intelligence. Paper read at 2020 IEEE International Conference for Innovation in Technology (INOCON), Bangluru, India.
  • Tai, C.-H., and T.-J. Kan. 2019. Identifying money laundering accounts. Paper read at 2019 International Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE), Dong Hoi, Vietnam.
  • Thi, M. H., C. Withana, N. Thi Huong Quynh, and N. Tran Quoc Vinh. 2020. A novel solution for anti-money laundering system. Paper read at 2020 5th International Conference on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications (CITISIA), Sydney, Australia.
  • Tropina, T. 2014. Fighting money laundering in the age of online banking, virtual currencies and internet gambling. Paper read at Era Forum.
  • Truby, J., R. Brown, and A. Dahdal. 2020. Banking on AI: Mandating a proactive approach to AI regulation in the financial sector. Law and Financial Markets Review 14 (2):110–20.
  • Turki, M., A. Hamdan, R. Thomas Cummings, A. Sarea, M. Karolak, and M. Anasweh. 2020. The regulatory technology “RegTech” and money laundering prevention in Islamic and conventional banking industry. Heliyon 6 (10):e04949. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04949.
  • Unger, B., and J. Den Hertog. 2012. Water always finds its way: Identifying new forms of money laundering. Crime, Law, & Social Change 57 (3):287–304.
  • Villar, A. S., and N. Khan. 2021. Robotic process automation in banking industry: A case study on Deutsche Bank. Journal of Banking and Financial Technology 5 (1):71–86.
  • Von Solms, J. 2021. Integrating Regulatory Technology (RegTech) into the digital transformation of a bank Treasury. Journal of Banking Regulation 22 (2):152–68.
  • Wang, S.-N., and J.-G. Yang. 2007. A money laundering risk evaluation method based on decision tree. Paper read at 2007 International conference on machine learning and cybernetics.
  • Watkins, R. C., K. M. Reynolds, R. Demara, M. Georgiopoulos, A. Gonzalez, and R. Eaglin. 2003. Tracking dirty proceeds: Exploring data mining technologies as tools to investigate money laundering. Police Practice & Research 4 (2):163–78.
  • Weber, J., and E. W. Kruisbergen. 2019. Criminal markets: The dark web, money laundering and counterstrategies-An overview of the 10th Research Conference on Organized Crime. Trends in Organized Crime 22 (3):346–56.
  • Xia, P., Z. Ni, H. Xiao, X. Zhu, and P. Peng. 2021. A novel spatiotemporal prediction approach based on graph convolution neural networks and long short-term memory for money laundering fraud. Arabian Journal for Science & Engineering 47:1–17.
  • Xie, P., J. H. Li, X. Ou, P. Liu, and R. Levy. 2010. Using Bayesian networks for cyber security analysis. Paper read at 2010 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems & Networks (DSN), Chicago, IL.
  • Young, M. A., and M. Woodiwiss. 2021. A world fit for money laundering: The Atlantic alliance’s undermining of organized crime control. Trends in Organized Crime 24 (1):70–95.
  • Zand, A., J. Orwell, and E. Pfluegel. 2020. A secure framework for anti-money-laundering using machine learning and secret sharing. Paper read at 2020 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security), Dublin, Ireland.
  • Zhang, Y., and P. Trubey. 2019. Machine learning and sampling scheme: An empirical study of money laundering detection. Computational Economics 54 (3):1043–63.