Article title: Reciprocal Relationships between Positive Expectancies and Positive Emotions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Lagged Panel Study
Authors: Petronela Predatu, Daniel David, Irving Kirsch, Stelian Florean and Razvan Predatu
Journal: Psychology & Health
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2024.2341874
When this article was originally published online, Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 were misplaced. The figures with appropriate image and captions are provided below.
Figure 1. Model 1 with its pats for short time (T1-T2): auto-regressive paths and cross lagged paths.
Note. RE = Response Expectancy for positive emotions; RH = Response Hope for positive emotions; OPT = Optimism; and PE = Positive emotions; All outcomes are controlled for using covariates from the propensity model; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.01.
Figure 2. Model 2 with its pats for long time (T1-T3): auto-regressive paths and cross lagged paths.
Note. RE = Response Expectancy for positive emotions; RH = Response Hope for positive emotions; OPT = Optimism; and PE = Positive emotions; All outcomes are controlled for using covariates from the propensity model; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.01.
Figure 3. Model 3 with its pats for short time (T1-T2): auto-regressive paths and cross lagged paths.
Note. DIS = Discrepancy Score: Response Hope - Response Expectancy; OPT = Optimism; and PE = Positive emotions; All outcomes are controlled for using covariates from the propensity model; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.01.
Figure 4. Model 4 with its pats for long time (T1-T3): auto-regressive paths and cross lagged paths.
Note. DIS = Discrepancy Score: Response Hope - Response Expectancy; OPT = Optimism; and PE = Positive emotions; All outcomes are controlled for using covariates from the propensity model; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.01.
