925
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Utility of VerifyNow to assess the immediate pharmacodynamic response of chewed and swallowed aspirin: comparison with aggregometry

, , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2298352 | Received 08 Jun 2023, Accepted 18 Dec 2023, Published online: 03 Jan 2024

Abstract

VerifyNow (VN) test is a less laborious method to assess pharmacodynamics (PD) compared to light transmittance aggregometry (LTA). VN assay has not been used to study the immediate PD effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Ten healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to a single 162 or 650 mg dose of chewed and swallowed ASA. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic measurements were performed at baseline and serially up to 60 min after ASA administration. Onset by VN was 20 ± 7 min with 162 mg and 13 ± 7 min with 650 mg ASA (p = .07). Onset by 1 mM AA-induced PA was 13 ± 12 min with 162 mg and 7 ± 3 min with 650 mg ASA (p=NS). VN correlated with AA-induced PA (r = 0.80, p < .001) and serum TxB2 levels (r = 0.76, p < .001). 95% inhibition of serum TxB2 was achieved at 38 ± 22 min and 22 ± 8 min with the 162 and 650 mg ASA, respectively (p = .08). The onset and extent of the antiplatelet effect of 650 mg ASA is numerically faster and greater than the 162 mg dose. VN identifies the onset, extent, and dose response to ASA therapy. The ease of using VN should facilitate multicenter PD investigations of ASA.

Plain Language Summary

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is an important drug widely used to prevent adverse ischemic events in patients with cardiovascular disease. Platelet aggregation and thromboxane B2 levels in blood samples by complex laboratory methods are used to assess platelet response to aspirin. VerifyNow assay is a simple laboratory test that has not been used to assess the immediate effect of aspirin. In this study, conducted in 10 healthy volunteers, we compared the immediate platelet response to aspirin by serially assessing platelet aggregation by aggregometry and VerifyNow assay, and thromboxane B2 levels. We also measured plasma levels of acetylsalicylic acid and salicylic acid. Our study demonstrated that the VerifyNow Aspirin test identifies the onset, extent, and dose-response to aspirin therapy. The ease of using the VerifyNow test should facilitate multicenter pharmacodynamic investigations of aspirin.

Introduction

VerifyNow (VN) and light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) tests are widely used to measure the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of antiplatelet agents and their relation to clinical outcomes in translational research studies.Citation1 The VN Aspirin test is a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) waived point-of-care test that does not require an experienced technician or certified laboratory for processing. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) mandates the measurement of serum thromboxane (Tx)B2 to assess the PD effect of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). A >95% inhibition has been used as the surrogate to indicate clinically effective inhibition.Citation2,Citation3 However, there are controversies regarding the extent of TxB2 inhibition required for thrombosis protection by ASA.Citation4 There have been no PD studies employing serial measurements to assess the immediate effects of ASA administration using VN performed concomitantly with an assessment of pharmacokinetics (PK). The primary aim of the current study was to assess the immediate (within 1 h) PD effects of 162 and 650 mg doses of chewed and swallowed ASA in healthy subjects using the VN Aspirin Test in comparison with other PD assays.

Methods

This was an open-label, single dose, two treatment method comparison exploratory study conducted in 10 healthy ASA and NSAID naïve adult volunteers (5 males and 5 females) aged 18–55 years. The study was approved by the Internal Review Board (IRB) of the LifeBridge Health System. This study was performed in accordance with the principles stated in the Declaration of Helsinki.

After screening and obtaining written informed consent, subjects were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of 162 mg (n = 5) or 650 mg (n = 5) soluble ASA (Bayer Corporation, Whippany, NJ, USA). Venous blood samples were collected using an indwelling intravenous catheter prior to ASA administration (baseline, time 0) and at 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 60 min after administration of ASA for PD and PK measurements. Arachidonic (AA) acid-induced platelet aggregation (PA) was measured using VN assay (Werfen, Bedford, MA, USA) and LTA (Chronolog Corp. Havertown, PA, USA) as previously described.Citation5,Citation6 A predefined cutoff of <550 aspirin reaction units (ARU) by VN assay and ≤20% AA-induced PA by LTA has been used to define ASA therapeutic response and ASA onset.Citation5,Citation6

For serum TxB2 measurements, blood samples were collected in glass tubes (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, Ref 366430) without any anticoagulant and incubated immediately in a 37°C water bath for 60 min. Serum was separated after incubation and stored immediately at −80°C. For PK measurements of ASA and salicylic acid (SA), blood was collected in K2EDTA tubes (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, Ref 367856), processed immediately and plasma samples were stored at −80°C. Both serum and plasma samples were shipped on dry ice (−80°C) to Syneos Health Laboratories (Québec, Canada) for further analysis. Serum TxB2 and plasma concentrations of ASA and SA were also measured by HPLC/MS at Syneos Health Laboratories and calculated by model independent (compartment-free) methods using WinNonlin® software, version 4.1.a. (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA).

Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD and categorical variables were expressed as number and percentages. The change in aggregation from baseline was assessed using a paired t-test; if the normality assumption was not met, a non-parametric (Wilcoxon signed-rank) method was used. The dose groups were compared at each timepoint using an independent t-test. We used polynomial regression analysis to assess the correlation between ARU by VN assay and serum TxB2 and 1 mM AA-induced PA, since it provided a superior fit across the examined relationships. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the relation between PD and PK parameters. p < .05 was considered as statistically significant. MedCalc® Statistical Software version 20.023 was used for statistical analysis (MedCalc Software Ltd, Ostend, Belgium).

Results

Among 11 healthy subjects enrolled in the study, one subject was unable to complete the study due to syncope upon venipuncture. The 10 remaining subjects with complete data were included in the per protocol population for analysis. There were 5 males and the overall mean age was 31 year (18–47) years. All subjects had vital signs and hematologic measurements within normal limits.

Pharmacodynamics

At pre-dose, all subjects were above the 550 ARU threshold indicating that all subjects were ASA naïve prior to dosing. Onset by VN was 20 ± 7 min with 162 mg and 13 ± 7 min with 650 mg ASA (p = .07) (). At pre-dose, mean 1 mM AA-induced maximum platelet aggregation was ~ 76% with both doses indicating that all subjects were ASA naïve prior to dosing. Onset was 13 ± 12 min with 162 mg and 7 ± 3 min with 650 mg ASA (p=NS) (). Numerically, the antiplatelet effect was earlier and greater with the 650 mg dose with both assays but a difference between the groups only reached statistical significance at 40 min with VN assay. Pre-dose TxB2 levels were 261 ± 80 and 364 ± 157 ng/ml in the 162 mg and 650 mg ASA groups, respectively. There was a sequential decrease in serum TxB2 after ASA administration. Mean TxB2 levels were reduced to 20 ± 37 and 0.4 ± 0.2 ng/ml at 60 min with 162 and 650 mg ASA, respectively (p < .001). 95% inhibition of serum TxB2 level (therapeutic ASA response) was achieved at 38 ± 22 min and 22 ± 8 min with the 162 and 650 mg ASA doses, respectively (p=NS). Numerically, the 650 mg dose was associated with faster and greater inhibition. However, differences between groups did not reach statistical significance at any timepoint ().

Figure 1. (a) VerifyNow aspirin test ARU = aspirin reaction units dotted red line indicates therapeutic ASA response. (b) 1 mM-Arachidonic acid-indued platelet aggregation. Dotted red line indicates therapeutic ASA response. (c) Serum thromboxane B2. (d) Plasma acetyl salicylic acid. (e) Plasma salicylic acid.

Figure 1. (a) VerifyNow aspirin test ARU = aspirin reaction units dotted red line indicates therapeutic ASA response. (b) 1 mM-Arachidonic acid-indued platelet aggregation. Dotted red line indicates therapeutic ASA response. (c) Serum thromboxane B2. (d) Plasma acetyl salicylic acid. (e) Plasma salicylic acid.

Pharmacokinetics

There was a sequential increase in plasma exposure to ASA. Mean maximum level of ~2,000 ng/ml ASA was observed at 20 min with 162 mg and ~4,000 ng/ml ASA with 650 mg dose. Similarly, plasma exposure to SA reached mean maximum levels of ~7,500 and ~10,000 ng/ml at 20 min with 162 mg and 650 mg ASA, respectively. Plasma exposure to ASA and SA was numerically faster and greater with the 650 mg dose, but statistically significant differences between groups was observed at 60 min (the latest measured time point for PK and PD assessments) ().

Correlation between markers

A good correlation was observed between VN ARU and 1 mM AA-induced platelet aggregation (r = 0.80, p < .001) and serum TxB2 levels (r = 0.76, p < .001) (). ROC curve analysis indicated that a cut point of ≤558 ARU by VN test was associated with >95% inhibition of serum TxB2 (change from pre-dose) with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.912 (specificity = 74.5, sensitivity = 95.7, p < .0001). ARU ≤ 550 was associated with ≤81 ng/ml serum TxB2 with an AUC 0.940 (specificity = 89.7, sensitivity = 90.9 and p < .0001). In the ROC curve analysis, the 686 ng/mL ASA cut off point was associated with ≤ 585 ARU (AUC = 0.936, specificity = 90.48%, sensitivity = 92.68%, p < .001) and 4907 ng/mL SA cut off point was associated with ≤558 ARU (AUC = 0.955, specificity = 81.82%, sensitivity = 96.55%, p < .001).

Figure 2. (a) Correlation between VerifyNow aspirin test and AA-induced platelet aggregation. (b) Correlation between VerifyNow aspirin test and serum thromboxane B2.

Figure 2. (a) Correlation between VerifyNow aspirin test and AA-induced platelet aggregation. (b) Correlation between VerifyNow aspirin test and serum thromboxane B2.

Discussion

The current method comparison study is the first study to assess immediate PD effects of 162 and 650 mg doses of chewed and swallowed soluble ASA using VN test and 1 mM AA-induced platelet aggregation by LTA in healthy subjects and to correlate with serum TxB2. The important findings are: (1) the VN Aspirin test with a threshold level of < 550 ARU can be used to assess the immediate PD response to ASA, (2) the VN Aspirin test correlated with AA- induced platelet aggregation by LTA and Serum TxB2 levels, and (3) ROC curve analysis demonstrated that a cut point of 558 ARU by VN Aspirin test is associated with >95% inhibition of serum TxB2 (clinically relevant response) and ARU ≤550 was associated with ≤81 ng/ml serum TxB2 in the presence of ASA.

The most widely used methods to assess the PD effects of ASA in clinical and translational investigations are AA-induced PA by LTA and inhibition of serum TxB2.Citation1,Citation2 Since these assays are time consuming, cumbersome, expensive and require experienced laboratory personnel, they are challenging to perform in assessing immediate effects of ASA with repeated PD measurements and in multicenter studies assessing antiplatelet effects of ASA in relation to clinical outcomes. Although, the VN aspirin test is available commercially, it has not been employed to assess PD effect immediately after ASA administration. In the current study, we have demonstrated that the VN Aspirin test can be used to assess the immediate antiplatelet effect of ASA as it is correlated with AA-induced PA and serum TxB2 levels. A cutoff of 550 ARU can be used to indicate ASA response based on the conventional cut point of 95% inhibition of serum TxB2. It appears that very early effects (<5 min) of ASA effect are better detected by serum TxB2 and 1 mm AA-induced PA than the VN aspirin test. However, with an increased number of subjects, the VN test would have detected very early effects of ASA. The current study included a total of 560 PD and PK measurements in 10 subjects for comparing VN aspirin test with other PD assays that we believe is sufficient to reach our conclusions.Citation7–9 The current PD and PK measurements were comparable to earlier studies where these measurements were performed repeatedly within 1 h.Citation10,Citation11 Limitations of this exploratory study include the number of subjects may be low for comparison between baseline and on-treatment time points and also to study heavier subjects where response to aspirin dose may be different. In addition, aspirin response may be influenced by comorbidities and co-medications in studies with patients and further studies in patients are required to explore these interactions.

A novel inhaled nanoparticle ASA preparation that can be administered with a dry powder inhaler (Vectura, Inc., New York, NY) is being developed to achieve earlier and greater platelet inhibition than occurs after chewing and swallowing soluble ASA. Immediate inhibition of platelet function is essential to prevent evolving arterial thrombus formation in the early stages of an acute coronary syndrome event. In a pilot study with this novel inhaled nanoparticle ASA, we have previously demonstrated faster and greater platelet inhibition using LTA and serum TxB2 measurements with the inhaled ASA formulation compared to chewed and swallowed ASA.Citation9 The VN Aspirin test is being used in 2 ongoing multicenter center studies to compare the immediate PD effects of inhaled aspirin with chewed and swallowed ASA in healthy volunteers (NCT05625334) and in adult subjects with obstructive or restrictive pulmonary function (NCT05625347). The point-of-care VN test will assist in analyzing the antiplatelet effect of a novel inhaled ASA formulation during multicenter drug development studies and potentially assist in monitoring ASA effects in the future. We feel that our study is novel and provides an important message to the translational researcher, particularly those who are involved in investigations where rapid (within minutes) information on aspirin response is critical- for example in the care of the acute stroke or myocardial infarction patient. In conclusion, the VN Aspirin test identifies the onset, extent, and dose response to ASA therapy. The ease of using VN Aspirin test may facilitate multicenter pharmacodynamic investigations of aspirin.

Disclosure statement

Dr. Gurbel has received consulting fees and/or honoraria from Bayer, Otitopic/Vectura, Janssen, UpToDate, Cleveland Clinic, Adeno, Wolters Kluwer Pharma, Web MD Medscape, Baron and Budd, North American Thrombosis Forum, Innovative Sciences; institutional research grants from the Haemonetics, Janssen, Bayer, Instrumentation Laboratories, Amgen, Idorsia, Otitopic, Hikari Dx, Novartis, and R-Pharma International; in addition, Dr. Gurbel has two patents, Detection of restenosis risk in patients issued and Assessment of cardiac health and thrombotic risk in a patient. Dr. Gurbel was an expert witness in a lawsuit associated with Plavix.

Additional information

Funding

The study was sponsored by Platelet and Thrombosis Research, LLC and funded by Vectura, Inc (120 Park Avenue, New York, NY, USA).Serum Thromboxane B2, and plasma acetyl salicylic acid and salicylic acid measurements were done at Syneos Health (Syneos Health Clinique inc. 2500, rue Einstein, Québec, Canada).

References

  • Gurbel PA, Becker RC, Mann KG, Steinhubl SR, Michelson AD. Platelet function monitoring in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(19):1822–4. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.051.
  • Hghlights of Prescribing Information. Naprosyn (naproxen) tablets. [accessed 2023 Feb 5]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/017581s115,018164s065,020067s024lbl.pdf.
  • Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Zhu J, Troullos E, Centofanti R, Jarvis S, Venkataraman P, Tantry US. Thromboxane inhibition during concurrent therapy with low-dose aspirin and over-the-counter naproxen sodium. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018;45(1):18–26. doi:10.1007/s11239-017-1593-y.
  • Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Tantry US. Defining platelet response to acetylsalicylic acid: the relation between inhibition of serum thromboxane B2 and agonist-induced platelet aggregation. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021;51(2):260–64. doi:10.1007/s11239-020-02334-x.
  • Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, DiChiara J, Newcomer J, Weng W, Neerchal NK, Gesheff T, Chaganti SK, Etherington A, Tantry US. Evaluation of dose-related effects of aspirin on platelet function: results from the aspirin-induced platelet effect (ASPECT) study. Circulation. 2007;115(25):3156–64. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675587.
  • Tantry US, Bliden KP, Gurbel PA. Overestimation of platelet aspirin resistance detection by thrombelastograph platelet mapping and validation by conventional aggregometry using arachidonic acid stimulation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(9):1705–09. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.090.
  • Linnet K. Necessary sample size for method comparison studies based on regression analysis. Clin Chem. 1999;45(6):882–94. doi:10.1093/clinchem/45.6.882.
  • Lücker PW, Wetzelsberger N, Schettler T, Rogalla K. Pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of a new chewable, buffered acetylsalicylic acid tablet formulation in comparison to a conventional plain tablet. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1992;14:805–11.
  • Volkers A, Löwenberg M, Braad M, Abeling Y, Gecse K, Berkers N, Montazeri N, D’Haens G. Validation study of novel point-of-care tests for infliximab, adalimumab and C-reactive protein in capillary blood and calprotectin in faeces in an ambulatory inflammatory bowel disease care setting. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13:1712. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13101712.
  • Gurbel PA, Bliden KP, Chaudhary R, Tantry US. First in-human experience with inhaled acetylsalicylic acid for immediate platelet inhibition: comparison with chewed and swallowed acetylsalicylic acid. Circulation. 2020;142(13):1305–1307. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047477.
  • Atar D, Sarkar S, Kolev E, Mura C, Brosstad F, Theodorsen L, Westen GI, Stribolt-Halvorsen PE. Randomized, open-label, crossover trial comparing the pharmacokinetic profile of a novel oral aspirin solution and a chewed aspirin tablet. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022;60(10):430–438. doi:10.5414/CP204271.