1,074
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Using Screencasts to Enhance Assessment Feedback: Students’ Perceptions and Preferences

&
Pages 583-598 | Received 01 Nov 2011, Accepted 01 Jun 2012, Published online: 29 Nov 2012
 

Abstract

In the UK, assessment and feedback have been regularly highlighted by the National Student Survey as critical aspects that require improvement. An innovative approach to delivering feedback that has proved successful in non-business-related disciplines is the delivery of audio and visual feedback using screencast technology. The feedback on assessments can be recorded into a digital video, together with audio narration, which provides students with personalised comments in an easy-to-follow and comprehensible way. This paper reports the results of an investigation carried out in a UK university, using a mixed-method approach, into whether this type of feedback can be applied in a business and accounting context and whether the students’ perceptions of screencast technology are as positive as those reported in other studies. The findings reveal that students are very positive about the introduction of audio and visual feedback. The implications and limitations of the study and areas for further research are also discussed.

Notes

Dr Marriott is the Guest Editor of this issue, and also an author of this paper. Consequently, the referees were selected independently by AE's Editor, Professor Alan Sangster, all correspondence with them was conducted through him, and the decision to accept the paper was taken by him.

For information only, the NSS questions are provided in the Appendix.

The term ‘module’ is synonymous with the term ‘course’.

The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education is responsible for upholding the quality and standards in UK universities and colleges. They guide and check the quality of teaching, learning, and assessment.

Alternative methods of uploading files are available, such as the use of a video dropbox, see Crook et al., Citation2012.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Pru Marriott

This paper was edited and accepted by Richard M. S. Wilson.

Lim Keong Teoh

This paper was edited and accepted by Richard M. S. Wilson.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 551.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.