255
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Revisiting the linkage between engineered ecosystem function and the microbial community: A review from ecological perspectives

, , & ORCID Icon
Published online: 03 Apr 2024
 

Abstract

Biological waste treatment technology is currently the world’s largest application process, and its functional achievement mainly relies on complex microbial communities. However, the microbial system in such engineered ecosystems has been considered a “black box.” Over the past decade, with the development of molecular biotechnology and next-generation sequencing technologies, the exploration of such “black boxes” has gradually deepened. In particular, the role of ecological forces in uncovering and regulating microbial communities has been largely recognized and has provided novel insights into the link between microbial communities and engineering objectives. However, the study of community ecology in engineered ecosystems is still in its early infancy and faces grand challenges in bridging engineering principles with microbial ecology theory. In this review, we discuss recent advances in the understanding of microbial community behavior in biological waste treatment systems, including biodiversity and its influencing factors, the role of neglected rare species, microbial interactions, and community assembly mechanisms. We emphasize the importance of these ecological perspectives in revealing and regulating microbial communities and functions, such as the enhancement of contaminant removal and operational stability in engineered ecosystems. In particular, cross-validation of the microbial community analysis results is necessary to yield valid real information to guide the improvement and stability of engineering ecosystem performance. Multi-omics approaches and synthetic community biology are preferred ways to link ecological theory and engineering objectives.

Graphical abstract

HANDLING EDITOR:

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52170114); Projects of Science and Technology, Tianjin (21JCJQJC00080); and Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province-Key Project (B2021208033).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 652.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.