1,297
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Dendrimer-based posaconazole nanoplatform for antifungal therapy

, , , , &
Pages 2150-2159 | Received 04 Aug 2021, Accepted 20 Sep 2021, Published online: 07 Oct 2021

Abstract

We examined formulating a new antifungal agent, posaconazole (POS) and its derivatives, with different molecular vehicles. Several combinations of drug and carrier molecules were synthesized, and their antifungal activities were evaluated against Aspergillus fumigatus. Posaconazole and four of its derivatives were conjugated to either generation 5 (G5) dendrimers or partially modified G5 dendrimers. The in vitro antifungal activities of these compounds suggest that conjugates with specific chemical linkages showed better fungistatic activity than direct conjugates to POS. In particular, a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-imidazole modified G5 dendrimer demonstrated improved antifungal efficacy relative to the parent G5 molecule. Further studies were then conducted with POS derived molecules coupled to PEG-imidazole modified G5 dendrimers to achieve a highly soluble and active conjugate of POS. This conjugated macromolecule averaged 23 POS molecules per G5 and had a high solubility with 50 mg/mL, which improved the molar solubility of POS from less than 0.03 mg/mL to as high as 16 mg/mL in water. The primary release profile of the drug in human plasma was extended to over 72 h, which is reflected in the in vitro inhibition of A. fumigatus growth of over 96 h. These POS–polymer conjugates appear to be novel and efficient antifungal agents.

1. Introduction

Fungal infections are responsible for millions of human deaths each year (Ikeh et al., Citation2017). Developing new antifungal agents and improving the existing ones remains an important worldwide goal (Filipczak et al., Citation2021). Current antifungal agents, such as amphotericin B (AmB), echinocandins, flucytosine, and triazole antifungals, all have low aqueous solubility. These agents require long-term and high dose treatment, leading to a limited spectrum of activity and problems with toxicity and pharmacokinetics (Campoy & Adrio, Citation2017).

Posaconazole (POS) is a broad-spectrum, second generation, triazole compound. It is a lanosterol 14α-demethylase inhibitor (Munayyer et al., Citation2004; Nagappan & Deresinski, Citation2007) that has been utilized for the treatment and prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections in immunocompromised patients. It is particularly important for treatment of fungal infections found to be refractory to other antifungal therapy. As with other antifungal hydrophobic structures though, POS has poor solubility in water, limited to approximately 0.027 mg/L at 25 °C (United States Enivronmental Protection Agency, Citation2004). Posaconazole oral dosing is recommended to be given with foods or a nutritional supplement to enhance uptake; despite this, there are still issues with inconsistent absorption, metabolism, elimination, and drug–drug interactions of this compound (Greer, Citation2007).

To address these issues, POS has been formulated into an oral suspension, a delayed-release tablet, or an intravenous form (European Medicines Agency, Citation2014). However, the quality of the formulations can vary greatly based on the approach, and stability problems have been observed as well. Additionally, oral formulations have exhibited significant variations in bioavailability in different patients (Tang, Citation2017). Furthermore, achieving high doses is difficult given the drug’s hydrophobic nature and unintended accumulation of POS in various tissues could lead to unexpected toxicity. To improve POS bioavailability, development of a new solubilizing formulation is of particularly importance.

Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers have been extensively utilized in drug formulations due to their well-defined structure, high solubility, and the possession of many reactive surface functional groups (Tomalia et al., Citation1990; Lee et al., Citation2005; Soliman et al., Citation2011), all of which have been found to improve drug delivery (Esfand & Tomalia, Citation2001). Our previous works have utilized the PAMAM generation 5 (G5) dendrimer platform, maximizing G5’s increase in conjugation sites while avoiding filtration issues due to particle size, to create targeted breast cancer image-enhancing nanocompounds for both CT and MR imaging (Otis et al., Citation2016; Chen et al., Citation2020). Furthermore, we also have successfully designed a nanoscale reactor, by the conjugation of partially modified polyethylene glycol (PEG)-imidazole G5 dendrimer with an organophosphate (OP)-reactive α-nucleophile terminal, to inactivate paraoxon-ethyl (POX) for treatment of reactive OP intoxication (Wong et al., Citation2020).

Here, we propose to conjugate POS to G5 dendrimers to enhance its bioavailability. We initially developed four POS derivatives and investigated their efficacy against Aspergillus fumigatus. Next, to improve antifungal activity, both POS and POS derivatives were coupled to G5 dendrimer. Finally, to find the most potent formulation, multiple modifications of G5 dendrimer and POS-conjugation strategies were synthesized and evaluated to identify the lead G5 conjugate (II-5).

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

All solvents and chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and used as received. Phosphate-buffered saline without calcium and magnesium was from Thermo Scientific (Logan, UT). 10,000 MWCO dialysis membrane was from Spectrum Laboratories (Rancho Dominguez, CA). Posaconazole (Noxafil, Schering Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ) was purchased from Biosynth Carbosynth® (catalog no. FP27107). The G5 PAMAM dendrimer was from Dendritech (Midland, MI) and purified by dialysis (10,000 MWCO dialysis membrane) against H2O. The number of terminal amino groups on G5 dendrimer is experimentally 114 (Choi et al., Citation2012; Mukherjee et al., Citation2015).

2.2. Preparation of G5-PEGim

G5 dendrimer was partially modified with PEG-imidazole via carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) coupling chemistry, as done in our previous work (Wong et al., Citation2020); additional methods are also in Supporting Information-2.

2.3. Synthesis of posaconazole derivatives

2.3.1. Activation of posaconazole with 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate

To a solution of POS (0.245 g, 0.35 mmol) dissolved in dry dichloromethane (20 mL) were added 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP) (0.513 g, 4.2 mmol) and 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate (0.846 g, 4.2 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room for overnight. White precipitate was filtered off and washed with DCM (10 mL). The filtrates were combined, washed with sat. NaHCO3 (20 mL), 10% KHSO4 (20 mL), and brine (20 mL), and then dried over Na2SO4. After concentration, the residue was purified by flash column chromatography by eluting with 5% methanol in dichloromethane. The compound I, POS nitrophenyl carbonate was obtained as an off-white fluffy solid (0.278 g, yield 92%). Rf (5:100 methanol/dichloromethane)=0.38. ESI-MS m/z: 866.3422 [M + H]+ C44H45F2N9O8 (865.3359). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.06–8.05 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H (nitrophenyl)), 7.98 (s, 1H), 7.71 (s, 1H), 7.50 (s, 1H), 7.27–7.18 (m, 3H), 6.93–6.92 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H (nitrophenyl)), 6.95–6.79 (m, 3H), 6.73–6.64 (m, 3H), 4.99–4.96 (m, 1H, (pos)CH–O(C=O)), 4.08–4.04 (m, 1H), 3.94–3.90 (m, 2H), 3.66–3.61 (m, 2H), 3.56–3.53 (m, 2H), 3.20–3.18 (m, 4H), 3.05–3.03 (m, 4H), 2.42–2.32 (m, 2H), 2.20–1.94 (m, 1H), 1.82–1.75 (m, 1H), 1.69–1.66 (m, 1H), 1.28–1.27 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3H)), 0.74–0.71 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm.

2.3.2. Synthesis of derivative A–D

Active compound I (1 equivalent) was dissolved in minimum methanol and added to cooled aqueous pH 10 solution containing N-terminal small molecules (2 equivalent) (100 mg/mL) (glycine for A; serine for B; ethanolamine for C; 2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethanol for D). After TLC showed I was consumed completely, the reaction mixture was adjusted to pH 7 with 0.2 M HCl and then extracted twice with DCM (equal volume with reaction solution). The DCM layers were combined, dried over Na2SO4, then concentrated and purified by flash column chromatography using methanol in DCM as eluting solution.

Derivative A: Concentrated and purified on a column eluting with 10% methanol in dichloromethane. Yield 59%. Rf (20% methanol in dichloromethane)=0.45. HPLC analysis: RT = 8.975 min (purity ≥95%). ESI-MS m/z: 802.3487 [M + H]+; 800.3320 [M–H] C40H45F2N9O7 (801.3410). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.14 (s, 1H), 7.81 (s, 1H), 7.71 (s, 1H), 7.41–7.37 (m, 3H), 7.00–6.98 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H), 6.98 (br, 2H), 6.88–6.82 (m, 2H), 6.79–6.77 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H), 5.94 (br s, 1H, –NH–(C=O)–O–), 5.06–5.03 (m, 1H, (pos)CH–O(C=O)), 4.66–4.63 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 4.52–4.49 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (br, 1H), 4.12–4.10 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.94–3.84 (m, 2H (glycine)), 3.79–3.76 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.71–3.68 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.62–3.59 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 1H), 3.71–3.69 (m, 1H), 3.37 (br s, 4H), 3.25 (br s, 4H), 2.64–2.53 (m, 2H), 2.10–2.06 (m, 1H), 1.93–1.87 (m, 1H), 1.80–1.78 (m, 1H), 1.33–1.32 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3H), 0.91–0.88 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C (500 MHz, CDCl3): 171.84, 160.05, 155.74, 153.79,150.90, 144.56, 135.26, 128.61, 125.19, 124.23, 118.71, 116.51, 115.21, 111.43, 111.29, 104.87, 104.66, 104.46, 84.02, 71.94, 70.76, 68.97, 60.73, 55.98, 50.78, 48.92, 42.69, 38.86, 37.42, 22.60, 17.91, and 10.42 ppm.

Derivative B: Concentration and purified on a column eluting with 20% methanol/dichloromethane. Yield 62%. Rf (30% methanol in dichloromethane)=0.30. HPLC analysis: RT = 8.816 min (purity ≥95%). ESI-MS m/z: 832.3585 [M + H]+; 854.3392 [M + Na]+ C42H51F2N9O7 (831.3516). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): 8.38 (s, 1H), 8.09 (s, 1H), 7.77 (s, 1H), 7.46–7.44 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H), 7.41–7.36 (m, 1H), 7.13–7.11 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H), 7.01–6.98 (m, 3H), 6.89–6.86 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 6.83–6.81 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H), 5.06–5.03 (m, 1H, (pos)CH–O(C=O)), 4.67 (s, 2H), 4.14–4.11 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.86–3.83 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.79–3.76 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.73–3.70 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.57–3.17 (m, 9H(POS) and 3H(serine)), 2.69–2.52 (m, 2H), 2.22–2.17 (m, 1H), 1.94 (br m, 1H), 1.83 (br m, 1H), 1.30–1.29 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3H), 0.89–0.86 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ 154.91, 152.41, 147.08, 137.29, 129.92, 126.65, 125.32, 119.85, 117.52, 116.23, 112.15, 111.95, 105.37, 105.15, 85.18, 73.09, 71.57, 70.11, 62.36, 57.15, 52.10, 50.14, 40.33, 38.91, 23.24, 17.95, and 10.78 ppm.

Derivative C: Concentrated and purified on a column eluting with 5% methanol in dichloromethane. Yield 88%. Rf (5:100 methanol/dichloromethane)=0.40. HPLC analysis: RT = 8.933 min (purity ≥95%). ESI-MS m/z: 788.3678 [M + H]+ C40H47F2N9O6 (787.3617). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 8.11 (s, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.63 (s, 1H), 7.43–7.36 (m, 3H), 7.03–7.01 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H), 6.93 (br s, 2H), 6.87–6.77 (m, 4H), 5.35 (br s, 1H, –NH–(C=O)–O–), 5.10–5.08 (m, 1H, (pos)CH–O(C=O)), 4.66–4.63 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 4.52–4.49 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 4.16–4.10 (m, 2H), 3.79–3.76 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.71–3.69 (m, 1H), 3.62–3.59 (m, 3H, 1H-POS and CH2–N (ethanolamine), 3.37 (br s, 4H), 3.25 (br s, 6H, 4H-POS and CH2–O (ethanolamine)), 2.64–2.53 (m, 2H), 2.10–2.06 (m, 1H), 1.98–1.92 (m, 1H), 1.80–1.79 (m, 1H), 1.32–1.31 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3H), 0.91–0.88 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 156.62, 153.29, 151.13, 144.57, 134.43, 128.61, 123.49, 118.48, 116.63, 115.20, 111.42, 111.26, 104.84, 104.64, 104.43, 84.08, 84.05, 72.05, 70.75, 68.95, 62.14, 60.91, 55.95, 50.64, 49.09, 43.39, 38.84, 37.43, 22.26, 17.74, and 10.51 ppm.

Derivative D: Concentrated and purified on a column eluting with 5% methanol in dichloromethane. Yield 86%. Rf (10% methanol/dichloromethane)=0.15. HPLC analysis: RT = 8.991 min (purity ≥95%). ESI-MS m/z: 832.4014 [M + H]+; 854.3756 [M + Na]+ C42H51F2N9O7 (831.3880). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): 8.11 (s, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.65 (s, 1H), 7.44–7.36 (m, 3H), 7.04–7.02 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H), 6.93 (br s, 2H), 6.87–6.77 (m, 4H), 5.38 (br s, 1H, –NH–(C=O)–O–), 5.11–5.08 (m, 1H, (pos)CH–O(C=O)), 4.66–4.63 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 4.52–4.49 (d, J = 15.0 Hz, 1H), 4.16–4.09 (m, 2H), 3.79–3.76 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 3.71–3.68 (m, 1H), 3.62–3.59 (m, 3H, 1H-POS and CH2–N (aminoethoxyethanol)), 3.50–3.46 (br m, 4H, –CH2–O–CH2–(aminoethoxyethanol)), 3.36 (br s, 4H), 3.31–3.30 (br m, 2H, –CH2–O(terminal aminoethoxyethanol)), 3.23 (br s, 4H), 2.64–2.49 (m, 2H), 2.10–2.04 (m, 1H), 1.97–1.93 (m, 1H), 1.80–1.61 (m, 1H), 1.30–1.29 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3H), 0.91–0.88 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm. 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDOD3): 156.01, 153.29, 151.14, 144.61, 134.38, 128.67, 128.62, 128.55, 123.53, 118.61, 116.75, 115.24, 111.44, 111.26, 104.86, 104.66, 104.45, 84.10, 84.07, 72.33, 71.77, 70.76, 69.98, 68.97, 61.62, 60.88, 55.93, 50.91, 49.02, 40.81, 38.85, 37.43, 22.28, 17.77, and 10.52 ppm.

2.3.3. Activation of posaconazole derivative D with 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate

To a solution of derivative D (0.135 g, 0.16 mmol) dissolved in dry dichloromethane (5 mL) were added 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine (0.117 g, 0.96 mmol) and 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate (0.193 g, 0.96 mmol). The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. White precipitate was filtered off and washed with DCM (5 mL). The filtrates were combined, washed with sat. NaHCO3 (5 mL), 10% KHSO4 (5 mL), and brine (5 mL), and then dried over Na2SO4. After concentration, the residue was purified by flash column chromatography by eluting with 5% methanol in 1:1 dichloromethane/ethylacetate. The compound II, N-(POS-carbonyl)diglycolamine-nitrophenyl carbonate was obtained as a white fluffy solid (0.278 g, yield 88%). Rf (5% methanol in dichloromethane/ethylacetate)=0.30. ESI-MS m/z: 997.3987 [M + H]+ C49H54F2N10O11 (996.3942). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ 8.38 (s, 1H), 8.28–8.26 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H (nitrophenyl)), 8.09 (s, 1H), 7.77 (s, 1H), 7.44–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.11–7.09 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H (nitrophenyl)), 7.02–6.94 (m, 3H), 6.89–6.80 (m, 3H), 5.03–5.00 (m, 1H, (pos)CH–O(C=O)), 4.67 (m, 1H), 4.34 (m, 1H), 4.14–4.08 (m, 2H), 3.87–3.67 (m, 5H), 3.50–3.44 (m, 2H), 3.35–3.15 (m, 12H), 2.62–2.52 (m, 2H), 2.21–2.17 (m, 1H), 1.93–1.88 (m, 1H), 1.84–1.80 (m, 1H), 1.29–1.28 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3H), and 0.89–0.86 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H) ppm.

2.4. Synthesis of G5 dendrimer posaconazole conjugates: general procedure for conjugation and purification

Active compound I, POS nitrophenyl carbonate or II, N-(POS-carbonyl)diglycolamine-nitrophenyl carbonate was dissolved in a minimal volume of DCM. With the specific molar ratio of POS to dendrimer (non-modified or imidazole-modified) ([activated compound I or II]/[dendrimer] = 10, 20, 30), the solution was added to the rapidly stirred solution of dendrimer dissolved in methanol (5 mg/mL) at 0 °C in the presence of N,N-diisopropylethylamine ([DiPEA]/[dendrimer] = 300). The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight. The reaction mixture was poured into acetonitrile (six times the volume to reaction solution) and cooled to 3–5 °C. After removing the solvents, the residue was diluted with adequate PBS (pH 7.4) (dendrimer/PBS = 5 mg/mL), loaded into cellulose membrane dialysis tubing (MWCO 10 kDa), and dialyzed against deionized water (2×), PBS (2×), deionized water (1×), PBS (1×), and deionized water (4×) over three days. The purified solution in the dialysis bags was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter unit, collected, and lyophilized to afford desired G5-POS conjugates as white fluffy solid.

2.4.1. Class I of G5 dendrimer posaconazole conjugates

I-1 ((POS)6-G5): compound I (8 mg), G5 (25 mg), DiPEA (58 µL), methanol (5 mL). I-1 yield: 29 mg. MALDI-TOF (m/z): 29,731 g mol−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): δ 8.28 (br s), 8.01 (br s), 7.83 (br s), 7.39 (br s), 7.11–6.74 (br m), 4.94 (br),4.15 (br s), 3.53 (br s), 3.35 (br s), 3.17 (br s), 3.16 (br s), 3.02–2.88 (br m), 2.68 (br s), 2.53 (br s), 2.47 (br s), 1.84 (br s), 1.27 (br s, –CH3 (POS)), and 0.79 (br s, –CH3 (POS)) ppm.

I-2 ((POS)5.2-G5-PEGim): compound I (4.4 mg), G5-PEGim (16 mg), DiPEA (29 µL), methanol (3.2 mL). I-2 yield: 17 mg. MALDI-TOF (m/z): 32,009 g mol−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): δ 8.27 (br s), 8.01 (br s), 7.83 (br s), 7.40 (br s), 7.24–6.74 (br m), 4.95 (br), 4.21 (br s, –OCH2– (PEGim)), 4.13 (br, s), 3.71 (br s), 3.55 (br s), 3.48 (br s), 3.35 (br s), 3.19 (br s), 3.18 (br s), 2.89 (br s), 2.69 (br s), 2.54–2.27 (br m), 2.03 (br s, –CH2– (PEGim)), 1.83 (br s), 1.27 (br s, –CH3 (POS)), and 0.77 (br s, –CH3 (POS)) ppm.

2.4.2. Class II of G5 dendrimer posaconazole conjugates

II-1 (G5-(POS)5.6): compound II (12.3 mg), G5 (33 mg), DiPEA (65 µL), methanol (6.6 mL). I-2 yield: 44 mg. MALDI-TOF (m/z): 30,075 g mol−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): δ 8.29 (br s), 8.02 (br s), 7.80 (br s), 7.40 (br s), 7.11–6.76 (br m), 4.95 (br), 4.08 (br, s), 3.71 (br s), 3.53 (br s), 3.52 (br s), 3.34 (br s), 3.16–3.14 (br m), 2.89 (br s), 2.87 (br s), 2.68 (br s), 2.52–2.27 (br m), 1.84 (br s), 1.28 (br s, –CH3 (POS)), and 0.78 (br s, –CH3 (POS)) ppm.

II-2 (G5-PEGim-(POS)6.8): compound II (18.8 mg), G5-PEGim (54.7 mg), DiPEA (99 µL), methanol (11 mL). II-2 yield: 62 mg. MALDI-TOF (m/z): 34,238 g mol−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): δ 8.29 (br), 8.03 (br), 7.80 (br), 7.40 (br s), 7.23–6.66 (br m), 4.22 (br s, –OCH2– (PEGim)), 4.10 (br, s), 3.72 (br s), 3.54 (br s), 3.35 (br s), 3.17 (br s), 2.88 (br s), 2.68 (br s), 2.53 (br s), 2.47 (br s), 2.02 (br s, –CH2– (PEGim), 1.84 (br), 1.27 (br, –CH3 (POS)), and 0.77 (br, –CH3 (POS)) ppm.

II-3 (G5-PEGim-(POS)16): compound II (33 mg), G5-PEGim (48 mg), DiPEA (88 µL), methanol (9.6 mL). II-3 yield: 57 mg. 42,413 g mol−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): δ 8.20 (br), 7.87–7.73 (br m), 7.47 (br), 7.32 (br), 7.16 (br), 6.84 (br), 6.84 (br), 4.30 (br, s), 4.21 (br s), 3.80 (br), 3.61 (br s), 3.42 (br s), 3.24 (br s), 2.96 (br s), 2.76 (br s), 2.61 (br s), 2.55 (br s), 2.11 (br), 1.28 (br, –CH3 (POS)), and 0.79 (br, –CH3 (POS)) ppm.

II-4 (G5-PEGim-(POS)23): compound II (50 mg), G5-PEGim (48 mg), DiPEA (88 µL), methanol (9.6 mL). II-4 yield: 72 mg. MALDI-TOF (m/z): 47,800 g mol−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): δ 8.30–8.07 (br m), 7.84–7.78 (br m), 7.46 (br), 7.31 (br), 7.16 (br), 6.75 (br), 4.48 (br, s), 4.29–4.20 (br m), 3.81–3.79 (br m), 3.63 (br s), 3.42 (br s), 3.24 (br s), 2.95 (br s), 2.76 (br s), 2.60 (br s), 2.54 (br s), 2.10 (br), 1.30 (br, –CH3 (POS)), and 0.80 (br, –CH3 (POS)) ppm.

2.4.3. II-5 (G5-Ac-PEGim-(POS)23)

To II-4 (25 mg) dissolved in methanol (5 mL) was added N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DiPEA) (25 µL), followed by the addition of acetic anhydride (5.5 mg) in methanol (0.1 mL), while rapidly stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. After removal of the organic solvent, the residue was dissolved in water (5 mL) and purified by dialysis against PBS (2×), deionized water (4×) with a membrane dialysis tubing (MWCO 10 kDa). The desired product was lyophilized and produced 20 mg as white fluffy solid. MALDI-TOF (m/z): 49,472 g mol−1. 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): δ 8.18 (br), 7.74 (br), 7.44 (br), 6.75 (br), 4.36–4.09 (br m), 3.97–3.77 (br m), 3.69 (br s), 3.60 (br s), 3.38 (br s), 2.91 (br s), 2.80 (br s), 2.76 (br s), 2.72 (br s), 2.51 (br s, –CH3(Ac)), 2.20 (br), 1.27 (br, –CH3 (POS)), and 0.80 (br, –CH3 (POS)) ppm.

2.5. NMR spectroscopy

A 500 MHz Varian spectrometer tellurium 500 MHz was employed for acquiring 1H and 13C NMR spectra. Chemical shift values (δ) are reported in ppm relative to an internal standard (δ = 0.00 ppm) such as tetramethylsilane (TMS) in CDCl3 or 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulfonate-d6 (DSS) in D2O.

2.6. HPLC

HPLC was employed for analyzing the derivatives and conjugates. It was performed on a Waters Acquity System using a photodiode array detector (Milford, MA) (detection at 265 nm). Each sample solution (3 µL, 0.2–0.5 mg/mL) was injected into a BEH300 C4 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm), and elution was performed at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min with a linear gradient mode using two mobile solvents, eluent A (0.1% TFA/water (v/v)) and B (0.1% TFA/acetonitrile (v/v)). The sample elution began with a mobile phase 1% B (0–2.0 min) which was followed by a linear increase to 80% B (13.4 min), a decrease to 50% B (13.8 min), a decrease to 1% B (14.4 min) and finally an isocratic elution at 1% B (18 min).

2.7. Mass spectrometry

Mass analysis of dendrimer conjugates was conducted by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) in a Tofspec-2E spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA) running in linear mode with the high mass PAD detector and 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) in acetone/water (50:50, v/v) was used as the matrix. Exact molecular mass analysis of small molecules was conducted at a high-resolution VG 70-250-S mass.

2.8. UV–vis spectroscopy

UV–vis absorption spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer Lambda 25 spectrometer (Waltham, MA). Posaconazole standard solutions were accurately prepared with 1:1 methanol/water (1:1) and the calibration curve for determining the number of attached POS was made based on the standard solution’s absorbance at 257 nm. Conjugate solutions for absorbance were also prepared with 1:1 methanol/water (1:1) at 0.1 mg/mL, equivalent to 10–30 µg/mL of POS.

2.9. In vitro posaconazole release

Posaconazole release profiles in human plasma were monitored by measuring an increase in fluorescence intensity. Fluorescent spectra were recorded in a Fluoromax-2 fluorimeter (Horiba Scientific, Piscataway, NJ). To 2.4 mg of conjugate II-5 dissolved in 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) was added 0.5 mL of plasma from human. The mixture was immediately transferred to a dialysis bag (MWCO = 10 kDa). It was immersed in 19 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) in a shaking water bath at 37 °C. At predetermined time points, t = 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h, 1.5 mL of the external buffer was withdrawn and replenished with an equal volume of fresh medium. The amount of released POS was analyzed with fluorescence spectrophotometer with the excitation at 260 nm and detection using emission scan (320–480 nm). Conjugate II-5 in PBS and plasma in PBS were conducted under the same conditions, for comparison.

2.10. In vitro antifungal activity

Primary proliferation testing on fungi was conducted using Aspergillus fumigatus. To prepare A. fumigatus stock (SRRC 2006; ATCC), cultures were grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA; per liter: 4 g potato starch, 20 g dextrose, 15 g agar) plates and incubated at 33 °C for three days. Spores were collected, suspended in sterile PBS, and stored at 4 °C until use. Posaconazole and the candidates were suspended in a 1 mg/mL stock solution in sterile water, respectively. While POS, POS derivative AD, and class I conjugate 1,2 present as suspensions in water, class II conjugate 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were clear solutions. The stock solution was diluted with PDA to equivalent to a concentration of 25 µg/mL POS and then immediately plated on 24-well plates. A. fumigatus was inoculated (4 × 105 CFU/well) and plates were incubated at 33 °C. Growth was observed at days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 after inoculation.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Synthesis of posaconazole derivatives

The active hydroxyl group of POS provides an ideal site for attaching the drug to a G5 dendrimer either directly or through a functional linker. In our initial studies, we conventionally coupled POS directly to G5 dendrimer. However, the outputs showed disappointing antifungal activity. Therefore, we considered attachment of POS through specific linkers to study possible improved fungal inhibition. We designed POS derivatives AD by coupling different functional and biocompatible ligands through the hydroxyl group (Scheme 1). POS was activated with 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate in the presence of 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) to obtain compound I, POS nitrophenyl carbonate, which was purified by flash column chromatography. Purified POS nitrophenyl carbonate was reacted with amino-terminal functional ligands to form POS derivatives, or to be directly coupled to surface primary amino groups on a G5 dendrimer. Glycine, l-serine, ethanolamine, and diglycolamine were used as ligands to synthesize derivative A, N-(POS-carbonyl)glycine; B, N-(POS-carbonyl)l-serine; C, N-(POS-carbonyl)ethanolamine; and D, N-(POS-carbonyl)diglycolamine; respectively. Herein, N-(POS-carbonyl)glycine retains a bare active carboxyl group; N-(POS-carbonyl)ethanolamine and N-(POS-carbonyl)diglycolamine each retain a bare active hydroxyl group, while N-(POS-carbonyl)l-serine retains both an active carboxyl group and hydroxyl group. This led to the potential to couple these POS derivatives to the G5 dendrimer through these active points. Ultimately, derivative D, N-(POS-carbonyl)diglycolamine was activated with 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate to form active compound II, N-(POS-carbonyl)diglycolamine-nitrophenyl carbonate, which can be treated with dendrimer to form the indirect conjugates. Each derivative was fully characterized using standard analytical methods that included 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry (electrospray ionization mode). The purity analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for each derivate was higher than 95% (Supporting Information-1).

Scheme 1. Preparation of POS derivatives AD. Conditions: (1) activation with 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate: DMAP,DCM, 16 h; (2) synthesis reaction of derivatives: methanol/water, pH 10.

Scheme 1. Preparation of POS derivatives A–D. Conditions: (1) activation with 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate: DMAP,DCM, 16 h; (2) synthesis reaction of derivatives: methanol/water, pH 10.

3.2. Antifungal activities of POS derivatives

POS derivatives AD were screened for their preliminary antifungal activity, over a 48 h period in vitro, using A. fumigatus. The results indicated that the introduction of certain ligands to POS, through the carbamate bond, can change the antifungal activity of POS. Derivatives A, N-(POS-carbonyl)glycine and B, N-(POS-carbonyl)l-serine with exposed carboxyl groups, showed no inhibition against A. fumigatus at 24 h; meanwhile, derivatives C, N-(POS-carbonyl)ethanolamine and D, N-(POS-carbonyl)diglycolamine with exposed hydroxyl groups, showed improved antifungal activity. Derivative D presented the best antifungal effects out of the four derivatives and was also comparable with native POS activity out to 48 h with complete inhibition of fungal growth. This encouraged us to compare the two by coupling POS or derivative D with G5 dendrimer to make two classes of conjugates and continue our investigation into their antifungal effects.

3.3. Synthesis of POS conjugates with surface modified G5 dendrimers

Two classes of compounds were developed; those were the modified polymers that were directly conjugated to activated POS (i.e. compound I, POS nitrophenyl carbonate) or those conjugated indirectly to activated POS derivative D (i.e. compound II, N-(POS-carbonyl)diglycolamine-nitrophenyl carbonate). All conjugates were purified by precipitating in acetonitrile, followed by membrane dialysis, against deionized water (2×), phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution (3×), and back to deionized water (2×), with a molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) of 10 kDa. PEG-imidazole modified G5 dendrimer (G5-PEGim) is prepared as described in Supporting Information-2. Briefly, tetra(ethylene glycol) was first activated with one equivalent of 4-nitrophenyl chloroformate in the presence of N,N′-di-isopropyl-N-ethylamine (DIPEA). The mono-activated tetra(ethylene glycol) was then treated with 1-(3-aminopropyl)imidazole to gain tetraglycol-carbonylaminopropyl)imidazole (PEGim), which was activated with carbonyl diimidazole (CDI) and subsequently treated with G5 dendrimer. The number of PEGim residues attached to G5 was determined by increasing molecular weight of G5-PEGim to G5 detected by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry.

The structures and synthesis protocol of both non-modified G5 or G5-PEGim conjugates is illustrated in . In the class II conjugates, increasing the drug load numbers attached on the surface of G5-PEGim was attempted by increasing the ratio of active compound II vs. G5 dendrimer. However, at higher loading ratios precipitation occurred during post-synthesis dialysis; a conjugate solution with 23 POS derivative D per dendrimer appeared to be the maximum allowable drug per dendrimer ratio, as anything over that led to a cloudy solution.

Figure 1. (a) Schematic representation of two classes of conjugates and synthetic targeting conjugate II-5. (b) Synthesis of class I and II of G5 POS conjugates. Conditions: (1) POS coupling reactions and acetylation: DiPEA, MeOH, 0 °C, 2 h; then 16 h, r.t. (2) Imidazole-modification: carbonyl diimidazole (CDI), acetonitrile, 12 h, r.t., and then G5-MeOH, 12 h, r.t. (c) Na: POS molecules attached to a G5 dendrimer determined by increasing molecular weights detected by MALDI-TOF spectrometry. Nb: POS molecules attached to a G5 dendrimer determined by UV–vis spectrometry.

Figure 1. (a) Schematic representation of two classes of conjugates and synthetic targeting conjugate II-5. (b) Synthesis of class I and II of G5 POS conjugates. Conditions: (1) POS coupling reactions and acetylation: DiPEA, MeOH, 0 °C, 2 h; then 16 h, r.t. (2) Imidazole-modification: carbonyl diimidazole (CDI), acetonitrile, 12 h, r.t., and then G5-MeOH, 12 h, r.t. (c) Na: POS molecules attached to a G5 dendrimer determined by increasing molecular weights detected by MALDI-TOF spectrometry. Nb: POS molecules attached to a G5 dendrimer determined by UV–vis spectrometry.

3.4. 1H NMR spectroscopy

1H NMR spectrum was used to analyze the synthetic conjugates. As shown in , compared with G5, G5-PEGim clearly showed three sharp new peaks at 8.0–7.82 ppm, a new set of peaks around 4.0 ppm, and a relatively board peak at about 2.0 ppm, which were all attributed to the attached PEG-imidazole. After direct attachment of POS to dendrimers, both conjugates I-1 and I-2 showed POS’s characteristic peaks in the aromatic region and two peaks at approximately 1.2 and 0.8 ppm, which correspond to two methyl groups in POS. Furthermore, as compared to the I-1 using non-modified G5 for conjugation, the I-2 displayed the PEG-imidazole’s unique peaks at both 4 ppm and 2 ppm.

Figure 2. (a) Comparison of 1HNMR spectra of POS, non-modified G5, PEG-imidazole modified G5 (G5-PEGim), conjugate I-1 and I-2. (b) Comparison of the 1H NMR spectra of conjugate II-1, II-2, II-3, II-4, and II-5.

Figure 2. (a) Comparison of 1HNMR spectra of POS, non-modified G5, PEG-imidazole modified G5 (G5-PEGim), conjugate I-1 and I-2. (b) Comparison of the 1H NMR spectra of conjugate II-1, II-2, II-3, II-4, and II-5.

The overlap of the POS’s characteristic peaks in 1H NMR spectrum of conjugate II-1 to II-5 became increasingly prominent after more molecules were added as shown in . These peaks were so broad that the numbers of the attached POS could not be determined by comparison of the integration at typical areas. Fortunately, the PEG-imidazole peak at 2 ppm was evident in conjugates II-2 to II-5 but absent in conjugate II-1 since the G5 had no PEG-imidazole.

The 1H NMR spectra for the non-acetylated G5 platforms in II-1 to II-4 were similar with significant overlap. However, after acetylation in II-5, the characteristic peaks for dendrimer changed significantly. A sharp and broad peak at 2.5 ppm was now present indicating that the acetyl groups had covered the dendrimer backbone (II-5, the small box above ). Despite this, the number of acetyl groups could not be determined by NMR due to peak broadening and multiple overlaps.

3.5. High-performance liquid chromatography

HPLC has been used as a vital tool to analyze PAMAM dendrimers and their conjugates (Islam et al., Citation2005; Shi et al., Citation2006). In this study, we used HPLC to analyze the synthetic POS derivatives and evaluate the purity and homogeneity of these series of conjugates. Since G5 dendrimers have no UV absorption, after conjugation with POS, which has a maximal UV absorption at approximately 260 nm, the synthetic series of G5 POS conjugates were analyzed by HPLC with detection at 265 nm (). The HPLC analysis suggested that these POS derivatives showed distinguishable retention times (RT) (Supporting Information-3), and the purity of the series of class I G5 POS conjugates was higher than 98%. With the same purification procedure, performed by precipitation in acetonitrile and then dialyzed using a membrane tubing (MWCO = 10 kDa), class II conjugates (POS derivative D) were even purer than class I conjugates.

Figure 3. (a–c) HPLC chromatogram of series of G5 POS conjugates under UV 265 nm. (d–f) MALDI-TOF mass spectra of G5, imidazole-modified G5 (G5-PEGim), and various G5 POS conjugate I-1, I-2, II-1, II-2, II-3, II-4, and II-5. (g–i) UV–vis spectra of POS at various concentrations and series of G5 POS conjugates at 0.1 mg/mL.

Figure 3. (a–c) HPLC chromatogram of series of G5 POS conjugates under UV 265 nm. (d–f) MALDI-TOF mass spectra of G5, imidazole-modified G5 (G5-PEGim), and various G5 POS conjugate I-1, I-2, II-1, II-2, II-3, II-4, and II-5. (g–i) UV–vis spectra of POS at various concentrations and series of G5 POS conjugates at 0.1 mg/mL.

3.6. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry

As an important technique for characterization of dendrimers and their conjugates, MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry detects the average molecular weight, providing the information about the success of each conjugation reaction and the number of attachments. shows the MALDI-TOF mass spectra of the various G5 POS conjugates. The molecular weights increased through each covalent process due to additional molecular attachments. The average number of POS attached to the dendrimer can be calculated by dividing increasing molecular weights after attachment by the molecular mass of the corresponding POS (for I-1, I-2) or POS derivative D (for II-1, II-2, II-3, II-4) ().

To class I conjugates, POS was reacted with G5 dendrimer or G5-PEGim to make conjugate I-1 or I-2. With the molar ratio of POS/G5 = 10, the mean numbers of POS attached to the dendrimer or G5-PEGim were 6 or 5.2, respectively. To class II conjugates, POS derivative D was reacted with G5 dendrimer or G5-PEGim with varying molar ratios of POS/G5 (10, 20, and 30) to produce various numbers of attachment. After calculation, the mean number of POS attachments for II-1 to II-4 was 5.6, 6.8, 16, and 23, respectively. The final conjugate II-5 was obtained by neutralization of any unreacted primary amines with acetic anhydride. Based on the increasing molecular weights from II-4 to II-5, there were 40 acetyl groups attached to the dendrimer surface. As expected, the acetylation reaction was incomplete due to steric hindrance of the surface amines, which prevents some of the residues from reacting (Maiti et al., Citation2004).

3.7. Ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy

Using the absorption peak of POS at 260 nm in synthetic conjugates, UV–vis spectroscopy () demonstrated the ratio of the conjugation of POS to G5 dendrimer in the conjugates. POS and its derivatives were analyzed in a 50% methanol aqueous solvent; however, given the high solubility, the synthetic G5 POS conjugates were dissolved in 10-fold-concentrated PBS (pH 7.4) for evaluation. Using UV–vis absorption spectra, the average number of attached POS molecules was determined by comparing the maximal absorption of these conjugates with a standard POS solution using a POS calibration curve of absorbance vs. concentration at 260 nm (Supporting Information-4). The numbers were consistent with what was detected by MALDI-TOF spectrometry ().

3.8. Release kinetics of targeting conjugate II-5 in human plasma

The in vitro POS release from G5 dendrimer via hydrolysis was investigated in human plasma. The conjugate II-5 (2.4 mg) was dissolved in 0.5 mL of PBS (pH = 7.4) mixed with 0.5 mL of human plasma, then placed in a dialysis bag, with an MWCO of 10,000, and immersed in 19 mL of PBS. The samples were placed in a bath tank at 37 °C while stirring. The outer media was sampled at predetermined time points by removing 1.5 mL and an equal volume of fresh PBS was replenished. With the 10 kDa membrane, only the small molecule POS released from conjugate II-5 was able to diffuse across the membrane and into the outer buffer, which was then measured by a fluorimeter. As demonstrated in , due to the intermolecular bonds altering the spectral characteristics after excitation at 260 nm, POS showed fluorescent spectra at 365 nm, while its derivative D had a peak at 395 nm and the modified material released from conjugate II-5 peaked at 333 nm. Compared in PBS, conjugate II-5 in plasma released a substance relative to POS continuously over a 72-hour period (). The fluorescence intensity at 333 nm approached its maximal value within several hours and remained relatively stable over a period of 72 h. The readings suggested that about half of POS was released from the conjugate in 24 h and the concentration of released POS reached the highest level at 48 h ().

Figure 4. (a) Representative of the emission spectrum (excited at 260 nm) of POS, POS derivative D and the released substance from conjugative II-5, (b) emission spectrum for outer media of G5 POS conjugate II-5 in PBS and plasma (Pla) in membrane dialysis release studies. (c) In vitro release profile of G5 POS conjugate II-5 in human plasma.

Figure 4. (a) Representative of the emission spectrum (excited at 260 nm) of POS, POS derivative D and the released substance from conjugative II-5, (b) emission spectrum for outer media of G5 POS conjugate II-5 in PBS and plasma (Pla) in membrane dialysis release studies. (c) In vitro release profile of G5 POS conjugate II-5 in human plasma.

3.9. In vitro antifungal activity

All G5 POS conjugates, class I (I-1 to I-2) and class II (II-1 to II-5), were tested on A. fumigatus to determine their antifungal activity as compared to free POS (). The results indicate that: (i) conjugate I-1 and I-2, in which POS molecules were directly coupled to G5 dendrimer, were less effective than conjugates II-1 to II-5, in which the POS derivative D molecules were coupled to G5 dendrimer through spacers; (ii) in comparison with non-modified G5 conjugation (I-1 and II-1), G5-PEGim conjugates (I-2, II-2) showed more effective antifungal activity; (iii) conjugates II-3 and II-4 exhibited even more efficient inhibition of A. fumigatus growth over 96 h than conjugate II-2 due to more POS attachments. Further observations indicated that the conjugate II-5 was able to inhibit the growth of fungi through an entire a week ().

Figure 5. (a) Concentration of POS is 25 µg/mL and concentration of each G5 POS conjugate is equivalent to 25 µg/mL of free POS. (+) indicates the inhibition with the growth of A. fumigatus in the timepoint; (–) indicates no inhibition with the growth of A. fumigatus in the timepoint. (b) Antifungal index against A. fumigatus: posaconazole v G5 POS conjugate II-5.

Figure 5. (a) Concentration of POS is 25 µg/mL and concentration of each G5 POS conjugate is equivalent to 25 µg/mL of free POS. (+) indicates the inhibition with the growth of A. fumigatus in the timepoint; (–) indicates no inhibition with the growth of A. fumigatus in the timepoint. (b) Antifungal index against A. fumigatus: posaconazole v G5 POS conjugate II-5.

3.10. Stability in PBS solution

POS and its derivative A, B, C, and D were dissolved in small volumes of methanol and then diluted with 10-fold-concentrated PBS (pH 7.4) for a 0.1 mg/mL solution. G5 POS conjugate I-1, I-2, II-1, II-2, II-3, II-4, and II-5 were dissolved in PBS for a final concentration of 0.5 mg/mL. The resulting solutions were incubated at 33 °C for a total of 1 week. A sample was taken every 24 hours for HPLC analysis (Supporting Information-5). The HPLC analysis showed that the synthetic POS derivatives and G5 POS conjugates demonstrated incredible stability. After one week incubation at 33 °C, the HPLC spectrums for these synthesized compounds did not show any major peak changes. However, a reduction in peak area was seen over time, particularly in derivative C from time 0 to 24 h; these reductions might be due to the evaporation of methanol from the PBS buffer solution decreasing the solubility of POS and its derivatives which causes a loss in concentration. Loss of peak area does not occur in conjugates I-1, I-2, II-1, II-2, II-3, II-4, and II-5 as the PBS solutions because these conjugates are highly soluble in PBS. The results demonstrated that both the synthetic POS derivatives and conjugates were stable in PBS.

4. Conclusions

Several of the POS derivatives and a series of G5 dendrimer POS conjugates have been synthesized and analyzed. POS has been coupled to dendrimer either directly or through a short linker by carbamate bond. Further, conjugates were prepared with two types of G5 dendrimer: standard amine terminated G5 and PEG-imidazole modified G5. Our antifungal studies have shown that conjugates using PEG-imidazole modified G5 as a platform were most effective when compared with conjugates with non-modified G5. Furthermore, indirect conjugates, where POS was coupled through diglycolamine spacers, show greater antifungal activity than direct conjugates. With 23 molecules of POS coupled to G5-PEGim, conjugate II-5 shows antifungal activity over a period of 96 hours to 1 week, which corresponds to its release behavior in human plasma.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Additional information

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of The Michigan Nanotechnology Institute for Medicine and Biological Sciences.

References

  • Campoy S, Adrio JL. (2017). Antifungals. Biochem Pharmacol 133:86–96.
  • Chen JS, Chen J, Bhattacharjee S, et al. (2020). Functionalized nanoparticles with targeted antibody to enhance imaging of breast cancer in vivo. J Nanobiotechnol 18:135.
  • Choi SK, Thomas TP, Leroueil PR, et al. (2012). Specific and cooperative interactions between oximes and PAMAM dendrimers as demonstrated by 1H NMR study. J Phys Chem B 116:10387–97.
  • Esfand R, Tomalia DA. (2001). Poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers: from biomimicry to drug delivery and biomedical application. Drug Discov Today 6:427–36.
  • European Medicines Agency. (2014). Assessment report EMA/CHMP/75051/2015.
  • Filipczak N, Yalamarty SSK, Li X, et al. (2021). Developments in treatment methodologies using dendrimers for infectious diseases. Molecules 26:3304.
  • Greer ND. (2007). Posaconazole (Noxafil): a new triazole antifungal agent. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 20:188–96.
  • Ikeh M, Ahmed Y, Quinn J. (2017). Phosphate acquisition and virulence in human fungal pathogens. Microorganisms 5:48.
  • Islam MT, Majoros IJ, Baker JRJ. (2005). HPLC analysis of PAMAM dendrimer based multifunctional devices. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 822:21–6.
  • Lee CC, MacKay JA, Frechet JMJ, Szoka FC. (2005). Designing dendrimers for biological applications. Nat Biotechnol 23:1517–26.
  • Maiti PK, Çaǧın T, Wang G, Goddard WA. (2004). Structure of PAMAM dendrimers: generations 1 through 11. Macromolecules 37:6236–54.
  • Mukherjee J, Wong PT, Tang S, et al. (2015). Mechanism of cooperativity and nonlinear release kinetics in multivalent dendrimer-atropine complexes. Mol Pharm 12:4498–508.
  • Munayyer HK, Mann PA, Chau AS, et al. (2004). Posaconazole is a potent inhibitor of sterol 14alpha-demethylation in yeasts and molds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3690–6.
  • Nagappan V, Deresinski S. (2007). Reviews of anti-infective agents: posaconazole: a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal agent. Clin Infect Dis 45:1610–7.
  • Otis JB, Zong H, Kotylar A, et al. (2016). Dendrimer antibody conjugate to target and image HER-2 overexpressing cancer cells. Oncotarget 7:36002–13.
  • Shi XY, Bi XD, Ganser TR, et al. (2006). HPLC analysis of functionalized poly(amidoamine) dendrimers and the interaction between a folate–dendrimer conjugate and folate binding protein. Analyst 131:842–8.
  • Soliman GM, Sharma A, Maysinger D, Kakkar A. (2011). Dendrimers and miktoarm polymers based multivalent nanocarriers for efficient and targeted drug delivery. Chem Commun 47:9572–87.
  • Tang PH. (2017). Determination of posaconazole in plasma/serum by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Separations 4:16.
  • Tomalia DA, Naylor AM, Goddard WA. (1990). Starburst dendrimers: molecular-level control of size, shape, surface chemistry, topology, and flexibility from atoms to macroscopic matter. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 29:138–75.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2004). Estimation Program Interface (EPI) Suite. Ver.3.12. Washington, DC.
  • Wong PT, Tang S, Cannon J, et al. (2020). Shielded α-nucleophile nanoreactor for topical decontamination of reactive organophosphate. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 12:33500–15.