123
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

New approach methodologies (NAM) to characterize neurotoxic chemicals for use in risk assessment: case study of four neurotoxic pesticides

Pages 1226-1260 | Received 08 May 2023, Accepted 25 Aug 2023, Published online: 25 Sep 2023
 

Abstract

Neurotoxic pesticides: Cyfluthrin (CYF), βCYF, endosulfan (ENDO) and chlorpyrifos-oxon (CPFO) were examined using new approach methodologies (NAM) to assess ToxCast in vitro neurotoxic assay activities (50% concentration–AC50s), chemical-target specificity (Z-Scores) and in vitro to in vivo extrapolation with ToxCast assay AC50s as inputs to calculate human Administered Equivalent Dose (AEDHuman mg/kg) through Integrated Chemical Environment (ICE) models. Fold differences (FD) between AEDHuman NAM predictions and adjusted (animal to human interspecies extrapolation) in vivo regulatory neurotoxicity points of departure (POD) were calculated to assess modeled predictions against measured in vivo data. Interspecies (animal to human) in vivo adjusted PODs were 0.147 mg/kg/d (CYF/βCYF), 0.180 mg/kg/d (ENDO) and 0.106 mg/kg/d (CPFO). ToxCast neurotoxicity assay results supported in vivo observations: CYF, βCYF and CPFO showed depressed neuroactivity, while ENDO showed increased neuroactivity. βCYF is known to have twice the toxicity of CYF in vivo but was less toxic in the in vitro assays. Percent assays with Z-Scores greater than 3 for CYF, βCYF, ENDO and CPFO were 100%, 100%, 67% and 71% respectively. Most AEDHuman were less than 10-FD indicating good predictivity of the in vivo adjusted PODs with ICE models. The NAMs were useful for characterizing the main neurotoxic activities and the ICE models were highly predictive of in vivo PODs to support mechanisms in risk assessment.

Acknowledgments

I want to thank Dr. Eric Kwok Department of Pesticide Regulation, California Environmental Protection Agency for technical support for this project and Dr. Poorni Iyer, PhD, DABT Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency for help reviewing this work.

Authors’ contributions

I am the sole author of this work.

Disclosure statement

The author declares that he has no actual or potential competing conflict of interests.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 358.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.