Abstract
Objective
We examine differences on the Self-Injury Implicit Association Test (SI-IAT) by history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), in a test-retest design, to examine short-term temporal stability of SI-IAT scores.
Method
Treatment-seeking participants (N = 113; 58% female; 89% White; Mage = 30.57) completed the SI-IAT and self-report measures at two time points (MTimeframe = 3.8 days).
Results
Data suggested NSSI (51% of the sample endorsed lifetime NSSI) was related to Time 1 (T1) identity and attitude, and affected stability of scores. T1 and T2 SI-IAT identity and attitude were more strongly related for participants with NSSI history. NSSI characteristics (recency; number of methods) affected stability.
Conclusions
The short-term test-retest reliability of the SI-IAT is strong among those with NSSI history from T1 to T2. However, the SI-IATs use with participants without a history of NSSI was not supported beyond its established ability to differentiate between groups by NSSI history. This test may provide clinically-relevant assessment among those with a history of NSSI.
HIGHLIGHTS
Participants with vs. without NSSI history respond differently on the SI-IAT
Temporal stability of SI-IAT performance is strong in a short timeframe
Results supported the test-retest reliability of the SI-IAT in the target group
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [S.J.S.], upon reasonable request.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Stephanie Jarvi Steele
Stephanie Jarvi Steele, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, USA.
Thröstur Björgvinsson
Thröstur Björgvinsson, Ph.D., ABPP, McLean Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Massachusetts, USA.
Lance P. Swenson
Lance P. Swenson, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.