273
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Key Paper Evaluation

Grasping at straws: the failure of solanezumab to modify mild Alzheimer’s disease

Pages 1189-1192 | Received 27 Jun 2018, Accepted 29 Oct 2018, Published online: 09 Nov 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The amyloid-beta (Aβ) cascade hypothesis is that reducing Aβ levels in the brain will be beneficial in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Solanezumab is a humanized analog of a murine antibody that selectively targets the central domain of the soluble form of Aβ. In the EXPEDITION 1 and 2 Phase 3 clinical trials, solanezumab was shown to be ineffective in subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease, and to have no effect on brain Aβ burden.

Areas covered: This evaluation considers the secondary analysis of (EXPEDITION 1 and 2), which led to the EXPEDITION 3 trial of solanezumab in subjects with mild Alzheimer’s disease, and the results of EXPEDITION 3.

Expert opinion: The secondary analysis of EXPEDITION 1 and 2 was limited to mild Alzheimer’s disease, and showed improvements on some scales, but not others. This analysis did not report data on Aβ burden. In my opinion, this was a questionable basis to undertake a further phase trial with solanezumab. The EXPEDITION 3 trial of solanezumab in subjects with mild Alzheimer’s disease was terminated early for ineffectiveness. With hindsight, solanezumab should have been discontinued after EXPEDITION 1 and 2, especially as it had not been shown to reduce Aβ burden.

Declaration of interest

The author has no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer Disclosures

One of the reviewers on this article has acted as a chair and project leader for solanezumab trails and has been an author on papers publishing on the drug. Additional peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This article was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 960.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.