77
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Improving the ecological validity of isokinetic knee tests at different hip angles: reciprocal concentric-eccentric movements as a suitable alternative for discrete tests

, , , , &
Received 03 May 2023, Accepted 08 Nov 2023, Published online: 12 Dec 2023
 

ABSTRACT

Isokinetic knee tests mostly evaluate reciprocal concentric-concentric flexor-extensor movements in a seated position. Discrete tests generate higher moments, but time requirements impede their widespread implementation. This study examined if hip angle (flexed vs. extended) and test modality (discrete vs. reciprocal) affect camera-based data (100 fps). Sixteen healthy males performed concentric (con) and eccentric (ecc) isokinetic knee flexor (H) and extensor (Q) movements (60°/s). Peak moments and contractional work of discrete and reciprocal tests (QconQecc, HconHecc) strongly correlated for extended (Q:91%≥R2≥71%; H:95%≥R2≥87%) and flexed hip (Q:88%≥R2≥70%; H:81%≥R2≥75%) without significant differences (p>0.05) between test modalities. Discrete and “traditional” seated QconHcon-tests revealed substantially lower correlations for extended (Q:44%≥R2≥43%; H:55%≥R2≥54%) and flexed hip (Q:81%≥R2≥77%; H:48%≥R2≥47%). Although most mean values did not significantly differ, moderate correlations were predominant and the respective limits of agreement demonstrated considerable effects of hip angle and test modality. These insights assist practitioners in interpreting isokinetic data of different test procedures. If time constraints prevent discrete knee tests (gold standard), concentric-eccentric movements provide highly correlated outcomes, independent of the hip angle.

Acknowledgements

The present study was not funded. The authors would like to thank all participants who volunteered to take part in this experiment and demonstrated great motivation and commitment. Dr. Werner Groß-Alt deserves our sincere gratitude because his skills in informatics made these insights possible.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was not supported by any funding.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 713.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.