1,451
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Effects of Cd treatment on morphology, chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activity of Elymus nutans Griseb., a native plant in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

, , , , , & show all
Article: 2187561 | Received 07 Feb 2023, Accepted 01 Mar 2023, Published online: 20 Mar 2023

ABSTRACT

Cd pollution is a global environmental problem. However, the response mechanism of the alpine plant Pelagia under Cd stress remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, a native plant(Elymus nutans Griseb.) of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau was used as the material to quantify plant height, leaf number, length of leaf, crown width, root number, biomass, Dry weight malondialdehyde (MDA), free proline, superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate enzyme (APX), catalase (CAT) and chlorophyll contents under different Cd concentrations. The results showed that the growth of Elymus nutans Griseb. was a phenomenon of “low concentration promotes growth, high concentration inhibited growth” under Cd treatment. It meant that 10 mg·L−1 Cd promoted the growth of leaf number, plant height, crown width and tiller number, while 40 mg·L−1 Cd inhibited the growth of root number and biomass of Elymus nutans Griseb. compare with the control. The MDA content, free proline content, SOD activity, APX activity and CAT activity of Elymus nutans Griseb. was increased with the increase of Cd treatment concentration to resist the oxidative damage caused by Cd to the body. At the same time, the accumulation of chlorophyll A, chlorophyll B and chlorophyll AB was decreased with the increase of Cd stress concentration. In addition, the carotenoid content did not change much between the control group and the treatment group, indicating that Cd treatment had little effect on it. The results could provide a reference for the mechanism of heavy metal resistance and the selection and improvement of Cd -resistant varieties of Elymus nutans Griseb.

1. Introduction

Heavy metal pollution is mainly caused by human activities and natural factors, among which Cd is a highly toxic environmental pollutant, which is difficult to degrade and easy to move in soilCitation1,Citation2. In the process of plant growth, Cd is a non-essential element that enters the plant body after being absorbed by plant roots, and has toxic effects on plant roots, stems, and leaves, such as chlorosis, necrosis, and growth inhibitionCitation3. At the same time, Cd enters the food chain and food web through, and accumulates in other organisms, eventually causing harm to the organisms of the entire ecosystem, and human health is also greatly threatenedCitation4. At present, humans use three methods of chemical, physical and biological to repair the environment polluted by heavy metals. Among them, chemical and physical repair have problems, such as high cost, new pollutants introduced, and difficulty in implementing large areasCitation5. On the contrary, bioremediation is an environmentally friendly method, which has the advantages of low cost, no secondary pollution, and large area use. It is a heavy metal pollution remediation method that is worthy of in-depth study and utilization. It has become hot spots of heavy metal pollution remediation technologyCitation6. Phytoremediation technology is an important component of bioremediation technology. At present, there have got a large number of reports on the basic research of plant absorption of Cd. For example, soil Cd has negative consequences for the growth of sassafras. It reduces the net growth of planting height and leaves, branches and rootsCitation7. Cd treatment holds different degrees of inhibition on the radicle length of different varieties of maize, and the maximum degree of inhibition can reach 88.89% of the radicle length of the controlCitation8. In addition, Cd can also have a huge impact on plant physiology, such as reducing respiratory intensity and photosynthetic rate, and the biological toxic process of protein degradationCitation9. Meanwhile, it can also cause high lipid peroxidation and change the activity of antioxidant enzymesCitation10, etc. In Dendrobium officinale seedlings, 14 mg·L−1 Cd treatment significantly increased antioxidant levels and induced the accumulation of malondialdehyde and proline. In addition, metal transporter, sulfate glutathione metabolism, cell wall metabolism and phenylpropanine metabolism played an important role in Cd stress adaptationCitation11. Under Cd stress, the photosynthetic rate and pigment levels, the activities of ascorbate peroxidase (APX), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were inhibited, and the level of malondialdehyde (MDA) was increased of Eruca sativa MillCitation12. For sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.), 0.5 and 1 mM Cd inhibited the plant height, shoot and root growth of beet seedlings to varying degrees. The leaves gradually withered and turned yellow, and the roots turned dark brown. With the increase of Cd concentration, the content of malondialdehyde and the activities of peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and glutathione S-transferase were increased to varying degreesCitation13.

The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is about 2 500 kilometers long from east to west, and about 1,000 kilometers wide from north to south. It occupies about 2% of the Earth’s land surface. It is under a high altitude and a cold climate (26°N-40°N). It is called the “Asian Water Tower” due to its large amount of dense water and “Third Pole”Citation14. Studies have demonstrated that heavy metal pollution such as Cr, Cu, Cd, Pb, Zn has gradually appeared in the northeastern part of the Qinghai-Tibet PlateauCitation15. This area has become a high-risk area for cancer, and industry is the primary source of pollutionCitation16. However, there are few reports on Cd pollution remediation by native plants on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Therefore, this study selected the Qinghai-Tibet plateau native plants with Elymus nutans Griseb.(En) as the research material, research it under the biological toxicity and root length, plant height and biomass growth and free proline, malondialdehyde, antioxidant enzymes and the change of physiological indexes such as chlorophyll of leaf of Cd treatment, in order to provide a certain reference phytoremediation of Cd pollution of the Qinghai-tibet plateau.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Glasshouse culture

The cultivated Elymus nutans Griseb.(En) seeds were provided by Tongde Ranch in Qinghai Province, China (35°15′N, 100°38′E, Xiaolong Quan et al. 2021). The mature and full eldrine seeds were selected, soaked in distilled water for 12 hours. The disinfect with 10% H2O2 for 30 min, and finally rinse with distilled water for at least three times, and use filter paper to accommodate the excess water on the surface of the seed for useCitation17. Sow treated seed in a 90 mm diameter pewter dishes. Before sowing the seed, the petri dish is spread with about 0.2 cm diameter vermiculite and soaked with distilled water. The petri dishes seeded with En seeds were carefully cultured in an AI climate incubator. The cultural condition is 14 h light (intensity 5000 lX) 25 ± 2°C humidity 80%, 10 h dark treatment, 20 ± 2°C growth.

We transplanted the cultivated En. after 15 days of cultivation, select En condenses seedlings with basically the seedlings into a cylindrical glass culture tank (the size of the culture tank is 10 cm high and 5 cm in diameter), and the treatment test was carried out after 7 days of cultivation with Hoagland nutrient solution. This helped the transplanted En seedlings adapt to the new environment. The stress test set up four treatments, Cd concentration gradient of 0, 10, 20, 40 mg·L−1Citation18, Cd reagent in the form of CdCl2·2.5 H2O, and the stress solution used in the test was configured with Hoagland nutrient solution, in order to ensure sufficient nutrients for plant growth. There were 3 replicates in each treatment, and 20 seedlings were transplanted in each replicate. After the stress solution was added for the first time, Cd free plant nutrient solution was added regularly to ensure the normal growth of plants. The simulated outdoor growth conditions were 25 ± 2°C and 14 h illumination in the greenhouse during the day. At night, the greenhouse was 20 ± 2°C and dark for 10 h. After 28 days of stress culture, the plants were harvested. The plant picture is shown in .

Figure 1. Plant graphs of different concentration gradients after cadmium treatment.

Figure 1. Plant graphs of different concentration gradients after cadmium treatment.

2.2 Assay method

We measured plant height, leaf length and crown width with a ruler, and recorded the number of leaves and tillers at the same time. The measurement time cycle was measured once every 2 days. After harvest, root length and plants hight were measured with a tape measure, and Electronic analytical balance is a tool for measuring biomass. Plant materials were stored in a refrigerator at −80°CCitation19. Referring to previous studies, plant physiological indexes were determinedCitation20–22. The malondialdehyde (MDA) content was measured by thiobarbituric acid colorimetric method, and the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) of antioxidant enzyme system was measured by NBT photoreduction colorimetric method, SOD activity unit is 50% of the inhibition of NBT photochemical reduction as one enzyme activity unit (U). Catalase (CAT) and ascorbate catalase (APX) activities were detected by UV spectrophotometry, CAT and APX enzyme activities were reduced by 0.01 OD value per minute for 1 enzyme activity unit (U). Free proline was determined by acid ninhydrin colorimetry. The chlorophyll of plant leaves was extracted by acetone. The absorption values at 663 nm, 645 nm and 652 nm were determined, and the contents of chlorophyll A, chlorophyll B, chlorophyll AB and carotene were calculated.

2.3 Statistical method

Data were statistically analyzed using Statistical Product Service Solutions(SPSS) 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) version software. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the variability and validity of the results, and Duncan’s Multiple Range test (DMRT) was used to determine the significance between treatments. Correlation analysis was carried out on all data about Cd content changes or parameters, and normality test was performed before data processing in each group marked in the corresponding position, where * means p < 0.05, ** means p < 0.01, *** means p < 0.001Citation23.

3. Results

3.1 Effects of Cd treatment on the growth of En

With the increase of Cd treatment concentration, the number of En leaf first increased and then decreased, and was the highest in 10 mg·L−1 treatment group (, p < 0.001). Leaf length also increased first and then decreased, and was the highest in the 20 mg·L−1 treatment group (, p < 0.001). In terms of plant height growth, the plant height of all treatment groups was basically the same and higher than that of the control group (, p < 0.001). The change in crown width of En was the same as the change in the number of leaves. The 10 mg·L−1 treatment group reached the highest (, p < 0.001), and the number of roots also reached the highest in the 10 mg·L−1 treatment group (, p < 0.001). The number of tillers fluctuates to a certain extent, which first increases and then decreases and then increases. Among them, the 10 mg·L−1 treatment group reached the highest (, p < 0.001). In addition, the dry weight of En showed no difference between the control group and the treatment group (, p < 0.001), while the dry weight of it increased first and then decreased with the increase of Cd treatment concentration, and reached the highest in the 10 mg·L−1 treatment group, which had a significant promoting effect (, p < 0.001). In general, 10 mg·L−1 Cd treatment promoted the growth of leaf number, plant height, crown width and tiller number, while 40 mg·L−1 Cd treatment inhibited the growth of root number and biomass of En.

Figure 2. Effects of Cd treatment on the growth. (a) represents the number of leaves, F=2.347***; (b) represents leaf length, F=5.283***; (c) plant height, F=9.891***; (d) for crown width, F=25.924***; (e) the case that represents the number of roots, F=2.971***; (f) represents tiller number, f =3.838***; (g) represents dry weight, F=3.445***; (h) represents biomass, F=3.445***.

Figure 2. Effects of Cd treatment on the growth. (a) represents the number of leaves, F=2.347***; (b) represents leaf length, F=5.283***; (c) plant height, F=9.891***; (d) for crown width, F=25.924***; (e) the case that represents the number of roots, F=2.971***; (f) represents tiller number, f =3.838***; (g) represents dry weight, F=3.445***; (h) represents biomass, F=3.445***.

3.2 Effects of Cd treatment on physiology of En

With the increase of Cd treatment concentration, MDA content (, p < 0.001), free proline content (, p < 0.001), SOD activity (, p < 0.001), APX activity (, p < 0.001) and CAT activity (, p < 0.001) all showed an increasing trend. At the same time, under Cd treatment, the contents of chlorophyll A(p<0.001), chlorophyll B (p<0.001) and chlorophyll AB (p<0.001) in En leaves decreased with the increase of Cd stress concentration, indicating that Cd stress inhibits chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthesis damage in it. The carotenoid content of all treatment groups was basically similar, indicating that Cd treatment had little effect on them (, p < 0.001).

Figure 3. Effects of Cd treatment on physiology of En. (a) represents the change of MDA, F=734.298***; (b) represents the change of free proline, F=940.261***; (c) SOD change, t=21.346***; (d) represents APX change, t=5.969***; (e) represents CAT change, t=11.697**; (f) represents the change of chlorophyll, wherein, chlorophyll A, F=3998.610***, chlorophyll B, F=2935.059***, chlorophyll AB, F=7653.933***, carotene, F=305.473***.

Figure 3. Effects of Cd treatment on physiology of En. (a) represents the change of MDA, F=734.298***; (b) represents the change of free proline, F=940.261***; (c) SOD change, t=21.346***; (d) represents APX change, t=5.969***; (e) represents CAT change, t=11.697**; (f) represents the change of chlorophyll, wherein, chlorophyll A, F=3998.610***, chlorophyll B, F=2935.059***, chlorophyll AB, F=7653.933***, carotene, F=305.473***.

3.3. Cluster analysis of growth and physiology of En treated by Cd

We used systematic cluster analysis to analyze the growth index, chlorophyll content, MDA, free proline, SOD, APX and CAT of Elymus elymus under Cd treatment. This study showed that different concentrations of heavy metals treated Elymus nutans Griseb. Although they can be clustered into three categories, the growth indexes were clustered at 0, 10, 20–40 mg·L−1, while the chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activity were clustered at 0–10, 20, 40 mg·L−1 and 0, 10–20, 40 mg·L−1, respectively. It indicating that they are sensitive to different concentrations of Cd ().

Figure 4. Cluster analysis of Cd treatment on En growth and physiology. (a) clustering analysis of growth indicators; (b) clustering analysis of chlorophyll; (c) the clustering analysis of MDA, free proline, SOD, APX and CAT.

Figure 4. Cluster analysis of Cd treatment on En growth and physiology. (a) clustering analysis of growth indicators; (b) clustering analysis of chlorophyll; (c) the clustering analysis of MDA, free proline, SOD, APX and CAT.

4. Discussion

The growth index can reflect the Cd toxicity of plants at the individual level, while the physiological index can judge the effects of Cd toxicity at the molecular level of plants and reveal the response of plants to such external stimuli to a certain extent. In this paper, the growth and development response of En under Cd treatment was studied. Compared with control group, 10 mg·L−1 Cd treatment promoted the growth of it leaf number, plant height, crown width and tiller number, while 40 mg·L−1 Cd treatment inhibited the growth of it root number and biomass. This was consistent with the research results that Cd treatment “low concentration promotes growth, high concentration inhibits growth” affects plant growthCitation24. In addition, after the first addition of Cd stress solution, we used Cd-free Hoagland nutrient solution, which may have diluted the Cd concentration in the stressed environment, so that the plant morphological growth was not inhibited, but promoted. In a follow-up study, we found that the morphological growth of plants would be significantly inhibited if Cd-containing nutrient solution was continuously added. This condition may be related to plant growth regulators, which mainly include ababic acid (ABA), auxin, brassin steroid (BR), cytokinin (CK), ethylene (ET), gibberellinic acid (GA3), jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), nitric oxide (NO) and polyamine (PAs)Citation25. Under high cadmium treatment, ABA concentration in plants increases, which can control root tip cell proliferation to limit taproot development. In addition, the combination of ABA and auxin mediates seed dormancy, which is required for seed dormancy, while ABA inhibits seed germination. Plants achieve germination and dormancy by regulating the ratio of the two substances in stressed environmentsCitation26,Citation27. ABA has antagonistic effect with gibberellin (GAs), and is involved in regulating seed germination, seed dormancy, plant growth, flowering and fruit ripeningCitation28. Salicylic acid (SA) plays an important role in plant development. Spraying SA significantly reduced the accumulation of Cd in rice grains and promoted the deposition and fixation of Cd on the cell wall of leaves, thus reducing the transfer of Cd from leaves to grains during the filling stage. At the same time, SA reduced the accumulation of H202 and MDA in rice leaves and increased the chlorophyll content, thus reducing the toxicity to Cd. In addition, spraying SA reduced the inhibitory effect of Cd on plant height of rice seedlings during vegetative growth period, increased the dry weight of seedlings and reduced the transfer of Cd from leaves to grains, thus reducing the Cd content in riceCitation29. Jasmonic acid increased the cell wall regionalization of Cd and inhibited the movement of Cd to protoplasts by promoting the binding of Cd to the root complex soluble pectin of rice (Oryza sativa L.), thus reducing the Cd content in roots and shoots by 30.5% and 53.3%, respectively. Jasmonic acid can reduce the H2O2 content in leaves by increasing the levels of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione (GSH), and reduce the damage of membrane lipid peroxidation induced by Cd, but has no significant effect on the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD)Citation30. Cluster analyses are unsupervised machine-learning algorithms that aim to delineate subgroups in datasets, characterized by discrete differencesCitation31. In this paper, cluster analysis showed that the morphological indexes, antioxidant enzyme activity and chlorophyll content of En were different under cadmium stress, and their change patterns were inconsistent, which may be caused by the metabolic pathway of heavy metal cadmium in plants. Generally, heavy metal first reaches the plant cell wall after being absorbed by plant rootsCitation32, and then crosses the cell membrane to reach the cytoplasm. The heavy metals are then bound by chelates in the plant cytoplasm (such as amides, malic acid and other organic acids) to form nontoxic complexes, which are then transported to vacuoles for storageCitation33. Proline, glutathione, protein and plant hormones are closely related to plant resistance to heavy metals, and are involved in regulating the physiological phenomenon of abnormal increase of plant ROSCitation33–35. To prevent heavy metal-induced Ros damage, plants rely primarily on metabolically mediated natural compounds such as phytochelin (PCs), reduced glutathione (GSH), carotenoids, and tocopherols, as well as enzymatic antioxidant systems, these include catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), peroxidase (POD), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), etc. Increased levels of these metabolic intermediate compounds and antioxidant enzymes lead to increased stress tolerance to heavy metal induced RosCitation36–38. MDA is an indicator of lipid membrane peroxidation intensity and damage degree of membrane system, and the larger the value is, the more serious the damageCitation24. The results of this study show that compared with the control group, MDA content in the treated group increased with the increase of treatment concentration, indicating that in the process of the increase of external Cd concentration, the peroxidation intensity of eldrine lipid membrane and damage degree of membrane system increased continuously, causing oxidative damageCitation39. This was similar to the results of Zhang xiong Han et al., MDA content of Rape (Brassica Napus L.) increased under 0.5 and 6 mg/kg Cd treatmentCitation40. The hydrophobic end of free proline can bind protein and the hydrophilic end can bind water molecules to help protein bind more water molecules and prevent protein from dehydration and denaturement under treatment. In case of heavy metal treatment, the content of free proline increases to protect cell protein from damageCitation9. The content of free proline in En increased with the increase of Cd treatment concentration, indicating that the increase of free proline synthesis in En is one of its Cd detoxification mechanismsCitation41. This was consistent with the results reported by Ertan et al that Cd stress increases free proline in Rocket (Eruca sativa L.)Citation42. SOD, APX and CAT are the main components of antioxidant enzymes, which protect plants from oxidative damage by removing excess reactive oxygen species in plantsCitation43. These enzymes play a crucial role in balancing the production and breakdown of Ros in the organism, and they work collaboratively to remove Ros, as no single enzyme can remove all forms of ROS aloneCitation44. The superoxide anion (O2-·) is reduced by SOD to form molecular oxygen and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which is then reduced to H2O by CAT, or oxidized by GPx to form H2O by two GSH molecules to form glutathione disulfide (GssG), which is reduced by GR at NADPH consumption. GST cleavage glutathione binding to other biomoleculesCitation45. In this study, it was found that the SOD, APX and CAT enzyme activities in En increased with the increase of Cd treatment concentration. This was consistent with the results of Fanwei Dai et al., who reported a significant increase in antioxidant enzyme activity of Morus atropurpurea under Cd stress compared to the control groupCitation46. Meanwhile, Yang et al. also found that Cd stress seriously affected the growth of Elymus dahuricus, induced the production of reactive oxygen species in clover leaves and roots, led to membrane lipid peroxidation, and activated the antioxidant defense systemCitation47. Chlorophyll is an important substance for plants to connect the inorganic environment with their own organic life, and is also a key substance to ensure the energy source of all heterotrophic organisms. The results showed that the contents of chlorophyll A, chlorophyll B and chlorophyll AB decreased with the increase of Cd stress, indicating that Cd stress could cause photosynthesis damage in EnCitation48. This was consistent with the results of Ying et al.‘s study that Cd treatment reduces the chlorophyll content of two Taxodium clonesCitation49. Even for hardy invasive grasses, Cd exposure can cause photosynthetic damageCitation50. In addition, carotene in every little change between treatment group of Cd, it may be less affected by Cd treatment.

5. Conclusions

In this study, Elymus nutans Griseb, an excellent alpine forage with tolerance to cold, cold and salt and alkali, was used. As experimental materials, to explore its morphological growth, chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activity under different cadmium concentrations, and to provide new insights for the species selection of cadmium pollution remediation in alpine regions (mines, farmland and urban landfills, etc.). At the same time, it also provides reference for the cadmium stress mechanism of plants growing in cold and high altitude climate environment. In the results of our study, under heavy metal treatment, 10 mg·L−1 treatment can promote the growth of En leaf number, plant height, crown width and tiller number. In addition, En could resist the damage caused by Cd by increasing the content of MDA, free proline and antioxidant enzyme. Contrary to the changes of antioxidant enzymes, Cd stress reduced the chlorophyll content of En and caused photosynthetic damage.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the college of Life Science, Qinghai Normal University for providing the experimental equipment and site for this study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-8943.

Additional information

Funding

This research and APC was funded by Qinghai Major Ecological Protection Monitoring Projects in 2021- Monitoring Special Project of Forest, Wetland and Desertification Land in Qinghai Lake Basin, grant number 2021-013. Special for the Commissioner of Science and technology of Qinghai Province, with a grant number of 2022-NK-KTP38.

References

  • Meng Y, Jing H, Huang J, Shen R, Zhu X. 2022. The role of nitric oxide signaling in plant responses to cadmium stress. Int J Mol Sci. 23:6901. doi:10.3390/ijms23136901.
  • Ramana S, Tripathi AK, Kumar A, Dey P, Saha JK, Patra AK. Evaluation of Furcraea foetida (L.)haw. for phytoremediation of cadmium contaminated soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021; 28:14177–8. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-12534-4.
  • Bansal R, Priya S, Dikshit HK, Jacob SR, Rao M, Bana RS, Kumari J, Tripathi K, Kumar A, Kumar S, et al. Growth and antioxidant responses in iron-biofortified lentil under cadmium stress. Toxics. 2021; 9(8):182. doi:10.3390/toxics9080182.
  • Jiang N, Li Z, Yang J, Zu Y. Responses of antioxidant enzymes and key resistant substances in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) to cadmium and arsenic stresses. BMC Plant Biol. 2022; 22:145. doi:10.1186/s12870-022-03475-2.
  • Eissa MA, Abeed AHA. Growth and biochemical changes in quail bush (Atriplex lentiformis (Torr.) S.Wats) under Cd stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019; 26:628–635. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3627-1.
  • Eissa MA, Almaroai YA. Phytoremediation capacity of some forage plants grown on a metals-contaminated Soil. Soil Sed Conta Int J. 2019; 28:569–581. doi:10.1080/15320383.2019.1634674.
  • Li Y, Wang Y, Khan MA, Luo W, Xiang Z, Xu W, Zhong B, Ma J, Ye Z, Zhu Y, et al. Effect of plant extracts and citric acid on phytoremediation of metal-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2021; 211:111902. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111902.
  • Zhao H, Guan J, Liang Q, Zhang X, Hu H, Zhang J. Effects of cadmium stress on growth and physiological characteristics of sassafras seedlings. Sci Rep. 2021; 11:9913. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-89322-0.
  • Karalija E, Selovic A. The effect of hydro and proline seed priming on growth, proline and sugar content, and antioxidant activity of maize under cadmium stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018; 25:33370–33380. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3220-7.
  • Qu B, Zhang Y, Kang S, Sillanpaa M. Water quality in the Tibetan Plateau: major ions and trace elements in rivers of the “Water Tower of Asia”. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 649:571–581. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.316.
  • Jiang W, Wu Z, Wang T, Mantri N, Huang H, Li H, Tao Z, Guo Q. Physiological and transcriptomic analyses of cadmium stress response in Dendrobium officinale seedling. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020; 148:152–165. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.010.
  • Waheed A, Haxim Y, Islam W, Ahmad M, Ali S, Wen X, Khan KA, Ghramh HA, Zhang Z, Zhang D. Impact of Cadmium Stress on Growth and Physio-Biochemical Attributes of Eruca sativa Mill. Plants (Basel). 2022; 11. doi:10.3390/plants11212981.
  • Liu D, Gao Z, Li J, Yao Q, Tan W, Xing W, Lu Z. Effects of cadmium stress on the morphology, physiology, cellular ultrastructure, and BvHIPP24 gene expression of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Int J Phytoremediation. 2022; 1–11. doi:10.1080/15226514.2022.2090496.
  • Song Y, Wang C, Linderholm HW, Tian J, Shi Y, Xu J, Liu Y. Agricultural adaptation to global warming in the Tibetan Plateau. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16. doi:10.3390/ijerph16193686.
  • Dai L, Wang L, Liang T, Zhang Y, Li J, Xiao J, Dong L, Zhang H. Geostatistical analyses and co-occurrence correlations of heavy metals distribution with various types of land use within a watershed in eastern QingHai-Tibet Plateau, China. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 653:849–859. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.386.
  • Wu J, Lu J, Li L, Min X, Luo Y. 2018. Pollution, ecological-health risks, and sources of heavy metals in soil of the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Chemosphere. 201:234–242. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.122.
  • Gao MY, Chen XW, Huang WX, Wu L, Yu ZS, Xiang L, Mo CH, Li YW, Cai QY, Wong MH, et al. Cell wall modification induced by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus enhanced cadmium fixation in rice root. J Hazard Mater, 2021; 416:125894. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125894.
  • Qi J, Liu W-H, Hamblin A, Che M. Zinc and cadmium tolerance in different ecotypes of Elymus Nutans from Alpine Grassland of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2022; 53:1158–1175. doi:10.1080/00103624.2022.2043346.
  • Fang Z, Hu Z, Zhao H, Yang L, Ding C, Lou L, Cai Q. Screening for cadmium tolerance of 21 cultivars from Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorumLam) during germination. Grassland Sci. 2017; 63:36–45. doi:10.1111/grs.12138.
  • Ozfidan-Konakci C, Yildiztugay E, Bahtiyar M, Kucukoduk M. The humic acid-induced changes in the water status, chlorophyll fluorescence and antioxidant defense systems of wheat leaves with cadmium stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018; 155:66–75. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.071.
  • Li L, Guo B, Feng C, Liu H, Lin D. Growth, physiological, and temperature characteristics in Chinese cabbage pakchoi as affected by Cd- stressed conditions and identifying its main controlling factors using PLS model. BMC Plant Biol. 2022; 22:571. doi:10.1186/s12870-022-03966-2.
  • Manzoor H, Mehwish Bukhat S, Rehmani S, Rasul MIA, Athar S, Noreen HU, Zafar ZU, Soufan M, Skalicky W, Soufan W, et al. Methyl Jasmonate Alleviated the adverse effects of cadmium stress in Pea (Pisum sativum L.): a Nexus of photosystem II activity and dynamics of Redox balance. Front Plant Sci, 2022; 13:860664. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.860664.
  • Catav SS, Genc TO, Oktay MK, Kucukakyuz K. Cadmium toxicity in wheat: impacts on element contents, antioxidant enzyme activities, oxidative stress, and genotoxicity. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2020; 104:71–77. doi:10.1007/s00128-019-02745-4.
  • Zhu T, Li L, Duan Q, Liu X, Chen M. Progress in our understanding of plant responses to the stress of heavy metal cadmium. Plant Signal Behav. 2021; 16:1836884. doi:10.1080/15592324.2020.1836884.
  • Kumar S, Shah SH, Vimala Y, Jatav HS, Ahmad P, Chen Y, Siddique KHM. Abscisic acid: metabolism, transport, crosstalk with other plant growth regulators, and its role in heavy metal stress mitigation. Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:972856. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.972856.
  • Matilla AJ. Auxin: hormonal signal required for seed development and dormancy. Plants (Basel). 2020; 9. doi:10.3390/plants9060705.
  • Wang L, Hua D, He J, Duan Y, Chen Z, Hong X, Gong Z, Qu L-J. 2011. Auxin response factor2 (ARF2) and its regulated homeodomain gene HB33 mediate abscisic acid response in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002172. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002172.
  • Shu K, Zhou W, Chen F, Luo X, Yang W. Abscisic acid and gibberellins antagonistically mediate plant development and abiotic stress responses. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9:416. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00416.
  • Wang F, Tan H, Huang L, Cai C, Ding Y, Bao H, Chen Z, Zhu C. Application of exogenous salicylic acid reduces Cd toxicity and Cd accumulation in rice. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021; 207:111198. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111198.
  • Li Y, Zhang S, Bao Q, Chu Y, Sun H, Huang Y. Jasmonic acid alleviates cadmium toxicity through regulating the antioxidant response and enhancing the chelation of cadmium in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ Pollut. 2022; 304:119178. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119178.
  • Dalmaijer ES, Nord CL, Astle DE. Statistical power for cluster analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2022; 23:205. doi:10.1186/s12859-022-04675-1.
  • Zhang H, Heal K, Zhu X, Tigabu M, Xue Y, Zhou C. Tolerance and detoxification mechanisms to cadmium stress by hyperaccumulator Erigeron annuus include molecule synthesis in root exudate. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021; 219:112359. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112359.
  • Viehweger K. How plants cope with heavy metals. Bot Stud. 2014; 55:35. doi:10.1186/1999-3110-55-35.
  • Fryzova R, Pohanka M, Martinkova P, Cihlarova H, Brtnicky M, Hladky J, Kynicky J. Oxidative stress and heavy metals in plants. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2018; 245:129–156. doi:10.1007/398_2017_7.
  • Emamverdian A, Ding Y, Mokhberdoran F, Xie Y. Heavy metal stress and some mechanisms of plant defense response. ScientificWorldjournal. 2015; 2015:756120. doi:10.1155/2015/756120.
  • Shahid M, Pourrut B, Dumat C, Nadeem M, Aslam M, Pinelli E. Heavy-metal-induced reactive oxygen species: phytotoxicity and physicochemical changes in plants. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014; 232:1–44. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06746-9_1.
  • Riyazuddin R, Nisha N, Ejaz B, Khan MIR, Kumar M, Ramteke PW, Gupta R. A comprehensive review on the heavy metal toxicity and sequestration in plants. Biomolecules. 2021; 12. doi:10.3390/biom12010043.
  • Sharma A, Kapoor D, Gautam S, Landi M, Kandhol N, Araniti F, Ramakrishnan M, Satish L, Singh VP, Sharma P, et al. Heavy metal induced regulation of plant biology: recent insights. Physiol Plant, 2022; 174:e13688. doi:10.1111/ppl.13688.
  • Chen YP, Li R, He JM. Magnetic field can alleviate toxicological effect induced by cadmium in mungbean seedlings. Ecotoxicology. 2011; 20:760–769. doi:10.1007/s10646-011-0620-6.
  • Han Z, Wei X, Wan D, He W, Wang X, Xiong Y. 2020. Effect of molybdenum on plant physiology and cadmium uptake and translocation in rape (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of cadmium stress. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17:2355. doi:10.3390/ijerph17072355.
  • Zaid A, Mohammad F, Fariduddin Q. Plant growth regulators improve growth, photosynthesis, mineral nutrient and antioxidant system under cadmium stress in menthol mint (Mentha arvensis L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2020; 26:25–39. doi:10.1007/s12298-019-00715-y.
  • Yildirim E, Ekinci M, Turan M, Agar G, Örs S, Dursun A, Kul R, Balci T. Ağır Metal Stresinin Rokada (Eruca sativa L.) Bitki Büyümesi ve Fizyolojisi Üzerine Etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi. 2019. doi:10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.548626.
  • Mihaličová Malčovská S, Dučaiová Z, Maslaňáková I, Bačkor M. Effect of silicon on growth, photosynthesis, oxidative status and phenolic compounds of maize (Zea mays L.) grown in cadmium excess. Water Air Soil Pollu. 2014; 225. doi:10.1007/s11270-014-2056-0.
  • Bela K, Horvath E, Galle A, Szabados L, Tari I, Csiszar J. Plant glutathione peroxidases: emerging role of the antioxidant enzymes in plant development and stress responses. J Plant Physiol. 2015; 176:192–201. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2014.12.014.
  • Yan F, Mu Y, Yan G, Liu J, Shen J, Luo G. Antioxidant enzyme mimics with synergism. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2010; 10:342–356. doi:10.2174/138955710791330972.
  • Dai F, Luo G, Li Z, Wei X, Wang Z, Lin S, Tang C. Physiological and transcriptomic analyses of mulberry (Morus atropurpurea) response to cadmium stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020; 205:111298. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111298.
  • Yang Z, Xue B, Song G, Shi S. Effects of citric acid on antioxidant system and carbon-nitrogen metabolism of Elymus dahuricus under Cd stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022; 233:113321. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113321.
  • Ci D, Jiang D, Wollenweber B, Dai T, Jing Q, Cao W. Cadmium stress in wheat seedlings: growth, cadmium accumulation and photosynthesis. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2009; 32:365–373. doi:10.1007/s11738-009-0414-0.
  • Ma YL, Wang HF, Wang P, Yu CG, Luo SQ, Zhang YF, Xie YF. Effects of cadmium stress on the antioxidant system and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of two Taxodium clones. Plant Cell Rep. 2018; 37:1547–1555. doi:10.1007/s00299-018-2327-0.
  • Ilyas M, Shah S, Lai YW, Sher J, Bai T, Zaman F, Bibi F, Koul M, Wani SH, Majrashi A, et al. Leaf functional traits of invasive grasses conferring high-cadmium adaptation over natives. Front Plant Sci, 2022; 13:869072. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.869072.