552
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Communication

The same boat, different storm: stress volatile emissions in response to biotrophic fungal infections in primary and alternate hosts

, & ORCID Icon
Article: 2217030 | Received 16 Mar 2023, Accepted 17 May 2023, Published online: 26 May 2023

ABSTRACT

Rust infection results in stress volatile emissions, but due to the complexity of host-pathogen interaction and variations in innate defense and capacity to induce defense, biochemical responses can vary among host species. Fungal-dependent modifications in volatile emissions have been well documented in numerous host species, but how emission responses vary among host species is poorly understood. Our recent experiments demonstrated that the obligate biotrophic crown rust fungus (P. coronata) differently activated primary and secondary metabolic pathways in its primary host Avena sativa and alternate host Rhamnus frangula. In A. sativa, emissions of methyl jasmonate, short-chained lipoxygenase products, long-chained saturated fatty acid derivatives, mono- and sesquiterpenes, carotenoid breakdown products, and benzenoids were initially elicited in an infection severity-dependent manner, but the emissions decreased under severe infection and photosynthesis was almost completely inhibited. In R. frangula, infection resulted in low-level induction of stress volatile emissions, but surprisingly, in enhanced constitutive isoprene emissions, and even severely-infected leaves maintained a certain photosynthesis rate. Thus, the same pathogen elicited a much stronger response in the primary than in the alternate host. We argue that future work should focus on resolving mechanisms of different fungal tolerance and resilience among primary and secondary hosts.

Introduction

Numerous studies have demonstrated that pathogen attacks negatively impact photosynthesis and activate different hormonal pathways including jasmonic acid (JA) and/or salicylic acid (SA) signaling and alteration of the activity of different secondary metabolic pathwaysCitation1,Citation2. This results in enhanced emissions of various stress marker compounds and defensive metabolites such as short-chained lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway volatiles (also called ’green leaf volatiles’)Citation3,Citation4, mono- and sesquiterpenesCitation5–7, benzenoidsCitation1,Citation8, and carotenoid breakdown products from the geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGDP) pathwayCitation3,Citation9.

Many widespread fungal pathogens such as Melampsora spp. and Puccinia spp. are multi-host (heterecious) pathogens requiring two phylogenetically different hosts, primary and secondary host to complete their life cycleCitation10–12. Most studies looking at quantitative relationships between infection severity by multi-host pathogens and stress volatile emissions have focused on single hosts (Toome et al.,Citation13,Citation14. However, physiological and biochemical responses can vary among host species of multi-host pathogens at different parts of their life cycle. Such variations might result from differences in adaptive responses in different hosts, interspecific differences in host-pathogen interactions and different pathogen pressures on different hostsCitation15,Citation16. In addition, host differences in the expression of constitutive defenses and capacity to induce defense responses can result in divergent elicitation of volatile emissions in different host speciesCitation2. Regarding volatiles, variations in the degree of constitutive isoprene emissions can give rise to differences in the induction of emissions of stress-elicited isoprenoids in different hostsCitation5,Citation7,Citation14,Citation17.

Phylogenetically different hosts also have different ecological requirements, implying that heterecious fungal infections can impact a range of ecosystemsCitation18. Furthermore, many primary hosts are widespread crops, and thus, information on fungal stress responses of different host species is important in developing rust fungus-resistant cropsCitation19,Citation20. This is especially relevant given that heterecious biotrophic fungi are suggested to exert more severe stress on primary hosts than on alternate hosts, as the pathogens only transit the alternate hostCitation21. This evidence collectively suggests that potential differences in the physiological responses of primary hosts and alternate hosts of fungal pathogens need to be carefully scrutinized.

Puccinia coronata infection as a model to study fungal-induced physiological changes in different hosts

We conducted experiments to investigate how a heterecious obligate biotrophic fungus, crown rust (P. coronata) modifies volatile organic compound (VOC) emission profiles at different levels of infection severity in its primary and secondary hostsCitation22. Its primary host, where the asexual reproduction of the fungus takes place, is the annual grass, cultivated oat (Avena sativa L., Gramineae), and the alternate host, where the karyogamy and meiosis of the fungus occur, is the shrub to small tree alder buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula L., syn. Frangula alnus P. Mill., Rhamnaceae). We used P. coronata as the fungal model organism as it is highly virulent with a considerable rise in virulence reported recentlyCitation23Citation24Sowa and Paczos-Grzęda, 2021). Also, the host species of P. coronata have varying degrees of constitutive emissions of isoprene; A. sativa is a weak emitter, whereas R. frangula is a moderately strong emitterCitation22.

We measured photosynthetic characteristics (light-saturated stomatal conductance, gs, and net assimilation rate, A) and emissions of VOC simultaneously in leaves with varying severity of P. coronata infections using a custom-made gas exchange system designed for trace gas sampling, and identified different volatile compounds using gas-chromatography mass-spectrometryCitation22. Additionally, we quantified mineral nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) and carbon contents per leaf dry mass, and leaf dry mass per area (LMA) in the different host species as these variables define the structural and chemical controls on photosynthesis, carbon sink and structural investmentCitation22. In these experiments, the severity of the infection, measured by the total leaf area covered by the classical rust symptoms, chlorosis, and necrosis (total visible damaged leaf area, DA), ranged from 0 (non-infected) to ∼80% in A. sativa and from 0 to ∼60% in R. frangula ( for images of representative infected leaves). In total, 15 leaves of R. frangula (three non-infected control and 12 infected leaves) and 23 leaves of A. sativa cv. ‘Kalle’ (three non-infected control and 20 infected leaves) with varying degrees of infection were measuredCitation22.

Figure 1. Changes in leaf light-saturated net assimilation rate (A) and total volatile emission (B) in the primary host, the annual grass Avena sativa, and the alternate host, the shrub R. frangula, under different severity of the crown rust Puccinia coronata infection. The insets in (B) show the severity-dependent emissions of different volatile groups including short-chained lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway compounds, methyl jasmonate (MeJA), long-chained saturated fatty acid-derived (FAD) compounds, monoterpenes, geranylgeranyl diphosphate pathway (GGDP) compounds and benzenoids in A. sativa and R. frangula. The severity of infection was quantified as the percentage of the total chlorotic and necrotic area of the leaf.

Figure 1. Changes in leaf light-saturated net assimilation rate (A) and total volatile emission (B) in the primary host, the annual grass Avena sativa, and the alternate host, the shrub R. frangula, under different severity of the crown rust Puccinia coronata infection. The insets in (B) show the severity-dependent emissions of different volatile groups including short-chained lipoxygenase (LOX) pathway compounds, methyl jasmonate (MeJA), long-chained saturated fatty acid-derived (FAD) compounds, monoterpenes, geranylgeranyl diphosphate pathway (GGDP) compounds and benzenoids in A. sativa and R. frangula. The severity of infection was quantified as the percentage of the total chlorotic and necrotic area of the leaf.

Figure 2. A generalized model of P. coronata infection severity-dependent responses of photosynthetic traits and stress volatile emissions in the primary host A. sativa and alternate host R. frangula. This model shows that the rate of photosynthesis (A) in the primary host is reduced due to stomatal limitations (decreases in stomatal conductance, gs, and intercellular concentrations of CO2, Ci). Reductions in photosynthetic activity are escalated by fungal absorption of limiting mineral nutrients and loss of photosynthetic biomass, indicated by decreases in leaf dry mass per unit area (LMA), due to fungal consumption of leaf biomass. Loss of photosynthetic function is accompanied by accumulation of carbon-rich secondary metabolites e.g. phenolics such as lignin in cell walls that enhances leaf mechanical robustness and reduces cell wall diffusion conductance for CO2. in the alternate host, decreases in photosynthesis are due to reductions in photosynthetic capacity. In the primary host, fungal-induced damages and hypersensitive responses trigger a burst of lipoxygenase (LOX) volatiles and the activation of defense signaling associated with jasmonic acid (JA) accumulation. This leads to the induction of emissions of stress volatiles including mono- and sesquiterpenes from chloroplastic and cytosolic terpene synthesis pathways and benzenoids from the shikimate pathway. Additionally, fungal-induced oxidative stress enhances the release of long-chained saturated fatty acid (FAD) derivatives and geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGDP) pathway volatiles (carotenoid breakdown products). The emissions of volatiles increase with increasing severity of fungal infection, however, under severe infections, the induction of stress volatiles decreases due to substrate limitation that occurs as a result of inhibition of photosynthesis and cessations of physiological activities in necrotic leaf regions. In the resistant alternate host, due to low oxidative stress, LOX emissions are only elicited to a minor degree. Differently from the enhancement of terpene emissions in A. sativa, in R. frangula, constitutive emissions of isoprene are enhanced upon rust infection, differently from pathogen responses observed in other constitutive isoprene emitters.

Figure 2. A generalized model of P. coronata infection severity-dependent responses of photosynthetic traits and stress volatile emissions in the primary host A. sativa and alternate host R. frangula. This model shows that the rate of photosynthesis (A) in the primary host is reduced due to stomatal limitations (decreases in stomatal conductance, gs, and intercellular concentrations of CO2, Ci). Reductions in photosynthetic activity are escalated by fungal absorption of limiting mineral nutrients and loss of photosynthetic biomass, indicated by decreases in leaf dry mass per unit area (LMA), due to fungal consumption of leaf biomass. Loss of photosynthetic function is accompanied by accumulation of carbon-rich secondary metabolites e.g. phenolics such as lignin in cell walls that enhances leaf mechanical robustness and reduces cell wall diffusion conductance for CO2. in the alternate host, decreases in photosynthesis are due to reductions in photosynthetic capacity. In the primary host, fungal-induced damages and hypersensitive responses trigger a burst of lipoxygenase (LOX) volatiles and the activation of defense signaling associated with jasmonic acid (JA) accumulation. This leads to the induction of emissions of stress volatiles including mono- and sesquiterpenes from chloroplastic and cytosolic terpene synthesis pathways and benzenoids from the shikimate pathway. Additionally, fungal-induced oxidative stress enhances the release of long-chained saturated fatty acid (FAD) derivatives and geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGDP) pathway volatiles (carotenoid breakdown products). The emissions of volatiles increase with increasing severity of fungal infection, however, under severe infections, the induction of stress volatiles decreases due to substrate limitation that occurs as a result of inhibition of photosynthesis and cessations of physiological activities in necrotic leaf regions. In the resistant alternate host, due to low oxidative stress, LOX emissions are only elicited to a minor degree. Differently from the enhancement of terpene emissions in A. sativa, in R. frangula, constitutive emissions of isoprene are enhanced upon rust infection, differently from pathogen responses observed in other constitutive isoprene emitters.

In R. frangula, A decreased with increasing severity of the infection and the reductions were primarily due to limitations of photosynthetic capacity (;Citation22. In A. sativa, fungal-induced stomatal limitations resulted in decreases in photosynthetic activity at all levels of infections (). However, under severe infection, gs relative to A increased, indicating a certain reduction of photosynthetic capacityCitation22. We observed that in A. sativa, but not in R. frangula, the reduction in photosynthetic activity was associated with decreases in rate limiting nutrients (N and P) and loss of photosynthetic biomass (), reflecting fungal consumption of leaf nutrient. Given that a large fraction of leaf nitrogen is invested in Rubisco, a decrease in nitrogen content typically results in a drastic reduction in photosynthetic capacityCitation25. In addition, in A. sativa, the infection resulted in increases in the C contents of leaves (), suggesting the accumulation of the shikimic acid pathway-produced carbon-rich compounds such as lignin that promote defense against pathogensCitation26.

Differences in fungal activation of volatile synthesis pathways in different host species

Pathogens induce hypersensitive responses that trigger the activation of different hormonal signaling pathways, particularly SA and JA pathways that regulate local and systemic defense/stress responsesCitation27,Citation28. Often, the hormonal pathway activated during pathogen infection depends on the pathogen type and its interaction with the hostsCitation28. Typically, biotrophic fungi activate the SA pathway, whereas the JA pathway is activated by necrotrophic pathogensCitation29,Citation30,Citation31. Research over the past decades has established that these pathways interact antagonistically in response to certain pathogens, in such a way that the activation of one pathway suppresses the other Citation32(Kunkel and Brooks 2022). However, recent evidence has also demonstrated synergistic interactions between SA and JA pathways in response to different pathogen attacksCitation33,Citation34,Citation35. In particular, rust infection is associated with enhanced SA and JA accumulation due to the positive interaction of JA and SA signalingCitation34,Citation35. In this study, fungal infections induced the emissions of methyl jasmonate (MeJA) in A. sativa (;Citation22. Given that A. sativa emitted benzenoids (), synthesis of which via the shikimate pathway is regulated by SA accumulationCitation2,Citation8, simultaneous emissions of MeJA and benzenoids reflect the synergistic activities of JA and SA pathways. In R. frangula, low-level MeJA emissions were constitutiveCitation22, suggesting constitutive expression of JA-dependent systemic responses that improve stress toleranceCitation27,Citation36.

In A. sativa, the induction of MeJA emission was accompanied by bursts of different LOX pathway volatiles (). Emissions of LOX pathway derivatives indicate cellular damage and generation of an oxidative burstCitation37,Citation38,Citation39. In the case of R. frangula, emissions of LOX volatiles were only enhanced to a minor degree (), suggesting much lower oxidative stress. In A. sativa, emissions of LOX volatiles were accompanied by emissions of long-chain saturated fatty acid (FAD) derivatives (), further indicating a stronger loss of membrane integrity in the primary host.

Terpenoid emissions were also differently enhanced in the primary and alternate hosts (), further underscoring the differences in stress severity experienced by plants as well as the differential regulation of terpenoid pathway genes. In A. sativa, P. coronata enhanced the emissions of mono- and sesquiterpenes, but suppressed the emission of the oxygenated isoprene derivative methacrolein (,Citation22. In general, biotic stresses induce mono- and sesquiterpene emissions but decrease constitutive emissions of isoprene as observed in primary isoprene-emitting hosts infected by Melampsora spp.Citation13,Citation14,Citation40. Surprisingly, in R. frangula, the impact of P. coronata on mono- and sesquiterpenes was minor, but the emissions of isoprene were enhanced (). This might indicate both the overall upregulation of the chloroplastic methyl-D-erythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway for isoprenoid synthesis or isoprene synthase activityCitation7,Citation17,Citation41,Citation42. Apparently, the stress threshold for elicitation of terpene synthesis was not exceeded in the alternate host, or R. frangula has an overall low capacity for induction of terpene emissions. Although emissions of specialized metabolites can enhance local and systemic defense responses, in some cases, low emissions of these volatiles can reflect enhanced defenseCitation3,Citation38,Citation43,Citation44, as observed in R. frangula ().

Altogether the different responsiveness of volatile formation pathways in the two hosts led to distinguished volatile fingerprints (;Citation22. In particular, in the primary host, the bouquet of volatile emissions was much richer (,Citation22, including indicators of oxidative damage such as 2-ethyl-hexanol and (E)-2-hexenal, indicators of enhanced activation of terpenoid synthesis pathwaysCitation4Kännaste et al.,Citation3 and shikimic acid pathways such as β-pinene, β-farnesene, benzaldehyde, and benzothiazoleCitation1,Citation8, and indicators of carotenoid breakdown such as geranyl acetoneCitation3;Citation9. As other studies of volatile emission responses upon infection of heterecious fungi have looked at primary hosts, whether the observation of lower complexity of volatile profiles in infected alternate hosts is a general pattern requires further investigation.

Scaling of volatile emissions with the severity of P. coronata infection

In A. sativa, emissions of stress volatiles increased with the severity of infection from 0 to 40% (), suggesting stress severity-dependent elicitation of volatiles. Several previous studies have demonstrated that fungal-dependent emissions scale with the severity of infectionCitation13,Citation40, implying that stress volatiles are increasingly elicited with increasing tissue damage. However, the late stages of P. coronata infection were characterized by expansions of necrosis, resembling hemi-biotrophy, that can lead to the inhibition of photosynthesis and overall physiological activities including volatile emissionsCitation22,Citation45). We could not discriminate emissions from infected and non-infected regions of the leaf, however, it has been noted that for chronic infection, scaling of stress VOC with the severity of infection reflects emissions from damaged areas and immediate impact sitesCitation2,Citation5. We observed that in severely infected A. sativa, photosynthesis was almost completely inhibited due to both stomatal limitation and inhibition of Rubisco activity (). In addition to the spread of necrotic surface area, decreased photosynthesis of still functional leaf parts might have resulted in a shortage of substrates for volatile synthesisCitation46;Citation22. Correspondingly, in A. sativa, the elicitations of volatile emissions declined under severe infections, from 40 to ~ 80% severity of infection (). Previously, such abolishing of volatile emissions has only been observed for necrotrophic infectionsCitation1,Citation47,Citation48.

Conclusion

It has been suggested that heterecious biotrophic fungi exert more severe stress on primary hosts than on alternate hosts, as the pathogens mainly require the alternate host for transit before infecting the primary hostCitation21, but the experimental evidence has been limited. We demonstrated that P. coronata infection impacted photosynthesis and activated biochemical pathways differently in the primary host and the alternate host. The difference in the physiological responses of the different host species demonstrates differences in the fungal stress sensitivity of the different host species. In the sensitive host, A. sativa, photosynthesis was almost completely inhibited under extreme infection, resulting in a major decline in the biosynthesis of volatilesCitation22. The scaling of defense responses with increasing severity of infection in the primary host was characterized by an optimum, indicating that above a certain infection threshold, the defenses of the host were exhausted, resulting in escalated tissue damage and cell death.

We found a surprising increase in isoprene emissions in the infected alternate host R. frangula. This is different from other studies with constitutive isoprene emitters infected by heterecious fungal pathogensCitation5,Citation14,Citation40, but in these studies, the constitutive emitters were the primary hosts. Overall, the fungal-dependent changes in photosynthetic traits and volatile emissions were greater in the primary host than in the alternate host, reflecting variations in the sensitivity of the physiological activities of the different hosts. A profound understanding of how different host species respond to heterecious biotrophic pathogens is relevant to predict fungal spread in both natural ecosystems and crops. We suggest that future assessments of the severity of infections of heterecious fungi should consider both primary and alternate hosts. Furthermore, comparisons of responses of different host species to the same pathogen can help identify promising plant molecular responses to pathogen infection as a breeding strategy for the enhancement of disease resilience in crop species and cultivarsCitation49,Citation50,Citation51.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the European Commission through the European Research Council (advanced grant 322603, SIP-VOL+), the EU Regional Development Fund within the framework of the Centre of Excellence EcolChange (2014-2020.4.01.15-0002), and the Estonian University of Life Sciences (base funding P190259PKTT). The equipment used in the study was partly purchased from funding by the EU Regional Development Fund (AnaEE Estonia, 2014-2020.4.01.20-0285, and the project “Plant Biology Infrastructure-TAIM”, 2014-2020.4.01.20-0282) and Estonian Research Council (“Plant Biology Infrastructure – TAIM”, TT5).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported by theby the European Commission through the European Research Council (advanced grant 322603, SIP-VOL+), the EU Regional Development Fund within the framework of the Centre of Excellence EcolChange (2014-2020.4.01.15-0002), and the Estonian University of Life Sciences (base funding P190259PKTT). The equipment used in the study was partly purchased from funding by the EU Regional Development Fund (AnaEE Estonia, 2014-2020.4.01.20-0285, and the project “Plant Biology Infrastructure-TAIM”, 2014-2020.4.01.20-0282) and Estonian Research Council (“Plant Biology Infrastructure – TAIM”, TT5).

References

  • Huang J, Cardoza YJ, Schmelz EA, Raina R, Engelberth J, Tumlinson JH. Differential volatile emissions and salicylic acid levels from tobacco plants in response to different strains of Pseudomonas syringae. Planta. 2003;217(5):767–6. doi:10.1007/s00425-003-1039-y.
  • Niinemets Ü, Kännaste A, Copolovici L. Quantitative patterns between plant volatile emissions induced by biotic stresses and the degree of damage. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4. doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00262.
  • Kännaste A, Jürisoo L, Runno-Paurson E, Kask K, Talts E, Pärlist P, Drenkhan R, Niinemets Ü. Impacts of Dutch elm disease–causing fungi on foliage photosynthetic characteristics and volatiles in Ulmus species with different pathogen resistance. Tree Physiol. 2023;43(1):57–74. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpac108.
  • Matsui K, Engelberth J. Green leaf volatiles—the forefront of plant responses against biotic attack. Plant Cell Physiol. 2022;63(10):1378–1390. doi:10.1093/pcp/pcac117.
  • Jiang Y, Ye J, Li S, Niinemets Ü. Methyl jasmonate-induced emission of biogenic volatiles is biphasic in cucumber: a high-resolution analysis of dose dependence. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(16):4679–4694. doi:10.1093/jxb/erx244.
  • Niinemets Ü, Hauff K, Bertin N, Tenhunen JD, Steinbrecher R, Seufert G. Monoterpene emissions in relation to foliar photosynthetic and structural variables in Mediterranean evergreen Quercus species. New Phytol. 2002;153(2):243–256. doi:10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00323.x.
  • Niinemets Ü, Rasulov B, Talts E. CO2 -responsiveness of leaf isoprene emission: why do species differ? Plant, Cell & Environment. 2021;44(9):3049–3063. doi:10.1111/pce.14131.
  • Misztal P, Hewitt C, Wildt J, Blande JD, Eller ASD, Fares S, Gentner DR, Gilman JB, Graus M, Greenberg J. et al. Atmospheric benzenoid emissions from plants rival those from fossil fuels. null. 2015;5(1):1–10. doi:10.1038/srep12064.
  • Zhang J, He L, Dong J, Zhao C, Wang Y, Tang R, Wang W, Ji Z, Cao Q, Xie H. et al. Integrated metabolic and transcriptional analysis reveals the role of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase 4 (IbCCD4) in carotenoid accumulation in sweetpotato tuberous roots. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2023;16(1):1645. doi:10.1186/s13068-023-02299-y.
  • Barrett LG, Thrall PH, Burdon JJ, Nicotra AB, Linde CC. Population structure and diversity in sexual and asexual populations of the pathogenic fungus Melampsora lini. Mol Ecol. 2008;17(14):3401–3415. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03843.x.
  • Bayon C, Pei MH, Ruiz C, Hunter T, Karp A, Tubby I. Genetic structure and population dynamics of a heteroecious plant pathogen Melampsora larici‐epitea in short‐rotation coppice willow plantations. Mol Ecol. 2009;18(14):3006–3019. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04255.x.
  • Huang S, Zuo S, Zheng D, Liu Y, Du Z, Kang Z, Zhao J. Three formae speciales of Puccinia striiformis were identified as heteroecious rusts based on completion of sexual cycle on Berberis spp. under artificial inoculation. Phytopathology Research. 2019;1(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/s42483-019-0021-y.
  • Jiang Y, Ye J, Veromann LL, Niinemets Ü, Schnitzler J-P. Scaling of photosynthesis and constitutive and induced volatile emissions with severity of leaf infection by rust fungus (Melampsora larici-populina) in Populus balsamifera var. suaveolens. Tree Physiol. 2016;36(7):856–872. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpw035.
  • Toome M, Randjärv P, Copolovici L, Niinemets UÜ, Heinsoo K, Luik A, Steffen, MN. Leaf rust induced volatile organic compounds signalling in willow during the infection. Planta. 2010;232(1):235–243. doi:10.1007/s00425-010-1169-y.
  • Eberl F, Hammerbacher A, Gershenzon J, Unsicker SB. Leaf rust infection reduces herbivore-induced volatile emission in black poplar and attracts a generalist herbivore. New Phytol. 2018;220(3):760–772. doi:10.1111/nph.14565.
  • Grimmer MK, John Foulkes M, Paveley ND. Foliar pathogenesis and plant water relations: a review. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(12):4321–4331. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers143.
  • Sharkey TD, Wiberley AE, Donohue AR. Isoprene emission from plants: why and how. Annal Of Botany. 2008;101(1):5–18. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm240.
  • Liu M, Hambleton S. Laying the foundation for a taxonomic review of Puccinia coronata s.L. in a phylogenetic context. Mycol Progress. 2013;12(1):63–89. doi:10.1007/s11557-012-0814-1.
  • Fei W, Liu Y. Biotrophic fungal pathogens: a critical overview. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2023;195(1):1–16. doi:10.1007/s12010-022-04087-0.
  • Jain A, Sarsaiya S, Wu Q, Lu Y, Shi J. A review of plant leaf fungal diseases and its environment speciation. Bioengineered. 2019;10(1):409–424. doi:10.1080/21655979.2019.1649520.
  • Bettgenhaeuser J, Gilbert B, Ayliffe M, Moscou MJ. Nonhost resistance to rust pathogens – a continuation of continua. Frontiers Of Plant Science. 2014;5:664. doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00664.
  • Sulaiman HY, Runno-Paurson E, Kaurilind E, Niinemets Ü, Lunn J. Differential impact of crown rust (Puccinia coronata) infection on photosynthesis and volatile emissions in the primary host Avena sativa and the alternate host Rhamnus frangula. J Exp Bot. 2023;74(6):2029–2046. doi:10.1093/jxb/erad001.
  • Menzies JG, Xue A, Gruenke J, Dueck R, Deceuninck S, Chen Y. Virulence of Puccinia coronata var avenae f. sp. avenae (oat crown rust) in Canada during 2010 to 2015. Canadian Journal Of Plant Pathology. 2019;41(3):379–391. doi:10.1080/07060661.2019.1577300.
  • Sowa S and Paczos-Grzęda E. (2021). Virulence Structure of Puccinia coronata f. sp. avenae and Effectiveness of Pc Resistance Genes in Poland During 2017–2019. Phytopathology®, 111(7), 1158–1165. 10.1094/PHYTO-10-20-0457-R
  • Luo X, Keenan TF, Chen JM, Croft H, Colin Prentice I, Smith NG, Walker AP, Wang H, Wang R, Xu C. et al. Global variation in the fraction of leaf nitrogen allocated to photosynthesis. null. 2021;12(1):4866. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25163-9.
  • Rajashekar CB. Elevated CO2 levels affect phytochemicals and nutritional quality of food crops. American Journal Of Plant Sciences. 2018;9(2):150–162. doi:10.4236/ajps.2018.92013.
  • Turner JG, Ellis C, Devoto A. The Jasmonate Signal Pathway. Plant Cell. 2002;14(suppl 1):s153–64. doi:10.1105/tpc.000679.
  • Zeilinger S, Gupta VK, Dahms TES, Silva RN, Singh HB, Upadhyay RS, Gomes EV, Tsui C-M, Nayak SC, van der Meer JR. Friends or foes? Emerging insights from fungal interactions with plants. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2016;40(2):182–207. doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv045.
  • Bruinsma M, Posthumus MA, Mumm R, Mueller MJ, van Loon JJA, Dicke M. Jasmonic acid-induced volatiles of Brassica oleracea attract parasitoids: effects of time and dose, and comparison with induction by herbivores. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(9):2575–2587. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp101.
  • Crampton BG, Hein I, Berger DK. Salicylic acid confers resistance to a biotrophic rust pathogen, Puccinia substriata, in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Mol Plant Pathol. 2009;10(2):291–304. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00532.x.
  • Li N, Han X, Feng D, Yuan D, Huang LJ. Signaling crosstalk between salicylic acid and ethylene/jasmonate in plant defense: do we understand what they are whispering? International Journal Of Molecular Science. 2019;20(3):E671. doi:10.3390/ijms20030671.
  • Kunkel B N and Brooks D M. (2002). Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 5(4), 325–331. 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00275-3
  • Mur LA, Kenton P, Atzorn R, Miersch O, Wasternack C. The outcomes of concentration-specific interactions between salicylate and jasmonate signaling include synergy, antagonism, and oxidative stress leading to cell death. Plant Physiol. 2006;140(1):249–262. doi:10.1104/pp.105.072348.
  • Tamaoki D, Seo S, Yamada S, Kano A, Miyamoto A, Shishido H, Miyoshi S, Taniguchi S, Akimitsu K, Gomi K. Jasmonic acid and salicylic acid activate a common defense system in rice. Plant Signal Behav. 2013;8(6):e24260. doi:10.4161/psb.24260.
  • Ullah C, Schmidt A, Reichelt M, Tsai CJ, Gershenzon J. Lack of antagonism between salicylic acid and jasmonate signalling pathways in poplar. New Phytol. 2022;235(2):701–717. doi:10.1111/nph.18148.
  • Mahmud S, Ullah C, Kortz A, Bhattacharyya S, Yu P, Gershenzon J, Vothknecht UC. Constitutive expression of JASMONATE RESISTANT 1 induces molecular changes that prime the plants to better withstand drought. Plant, Cell And& Environment. 2022;45(10):2906–2922. doi:10.1111/pce.14402.
  • Liu B, Zhang L, Rusalepp L, Kaurilind E, Sulaiman HY, Püssa T, Niinemets Ü. Heat priming improved heat tolerance of photosynthesis, enhanced terpenoid and benzenoid emission and phenolics accumulation in Achillea millefolium. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2021;44(7):2365–2385. doi:10.1111/pce.13830.
  • Sulaiman HY, Liu B, Kaurilind E, Niinemets Ü. Phloem-feeding insect infestation antagonizes volatile organic compound emissions and enhances heat stress recovery of photosynthesis in Origanum vulgare. Environ Exp Bot. 2021;189:104551. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104551.
  • Zurbriggen MD, Carrillo N, Hajirezaei MR. ROS signaling in the hypersensitive response. Plant Signal Behav. 2010;5(4):393–396. doi:10.4161/psb.5.4.10793.
  • Copolovici L, Väärtnõu F, Estrada MP, Niinemets Ü. Oak powdery mildew (Erysiphe alphitoides) induced volatile emissions scale with the degree of infection in Quercus robur. Tree Pphysiology. 2014;34(12):1399. doi:10.1093/treephys/tpu091.
  • Magel E, Mayrhofer S, Müller A, Zimmer I, Hampp R, Schnitzler JP. Photosynthesis and substrate supply for isoprene biosynthesis in poplar leaves. Atmos Environ. 2006;40:138–151. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.091.
  • Rasulov B, Bichele I, Laisk A, Niinemets Ü. Competition between isoprene emission and pigment synthesis during leaf development in aspen. Plant, Cell And& Environment. 2014;37(3):724–741. doi:10.1111/pce.12190.
  • Erb M. Volatiles as inducers and suppressors of plant defense and immunity—origins, specificity, perception and signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018;44:117–121. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2018.03.008.
  • Niinemets Ü. Mild versus severe stress and BVOCs: thresholds, priming and consequences. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15(3):145–153. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.008.
  • Divon HH, Fluhr R. Nutrition acquisition strategies during fungal infection of plants. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;266(1):65–74. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00504.x.
  • Aldea M, Hamilton JG, Resti JP, Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR, Frank TD, DeLucia EH. Comparison of photosynthetic damage from arthropod herbivory and pathogen infection in understory hardwood saplings. Oecologia. 2010;149(2):221–232. doi:10.1007/s00442-006-0444-x.
  • Hammond-Kosack KE, Rudd JJ. Plant resistance signalling hijacked by a necrotrophic fungal pathogen. Plant Signaling And& Behavior. 2008;3(11):993–995. doi:10.4161/psb.6292.
  • Vandendriessche T, Keulemans J, Geeraerd A, Nicolai BM, Hertog ML. Evaluation of fast volatile analysis for detection of Botrytis cinerea infections in strawberry. Food Microbiol. 2012;32:406–414.
  • Berger S, Sinha AK, Roitsch T. Plant physiology meets phytopathology: plant primary metabolism and plant–pathogen interactions. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(15–16):4019–4026. doi:10.1093/jxb/erm298.
  • Castelyn HD, Appelgryn JJ, Mafa MS, Pretorius ZA, Visser B. Volatiles emitted by leaf rust infected wheat induce a defence response in exposed uninfected wheat seedlings. Australasian Plant Pathol. 2015;44(2):245–254. doi:10.1007/s13313-014-0336-1.
  • Kunkel BN, Brooks DM. Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002;5(4):325–331. doi:10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00275-3.