557
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Simulation of new waves in applied sciences via Schrödinger equations

ORCID Icon, , &
Article: 2285082 | Received 31 Jan 2023, Accepted 21 Jul 2023, Published online: 27 Nov 2023

Abstract

The perturbed chiral nonlinear Schrö dinger equation (PCNLSE) reflects the quantum actions such as quantum pictures of Bohm potential and internal self-potential properties. Indeed, this equation introduces the basics of the hidden variable theory in quantum mechanics. Two unified solver methods and exp(φ(ξ))-expansion technique applied to PCNLSE to present many solitonic solutions in an explicit and effective way. The behaviour of these solutions is of qualitatively different structural natures, relying on physical coefficient parameters. The application of three mathematical techniques to our model system provides us with several possible physical property solutions that account for the majority of many phenomena the model under study attempts to depict. The reported bright explosive envelopes, explosive solitons, periodic blow up, bright periodic envelope and huge solitary waves are highly applicable in plasma and nuclear physics, optical communications, electro-magnetic propagations, superfluid and in a lot other applied sciences. The results of this system's solitary structures are consistent with the characteristics of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation systems used to study dispersive modes and higher-order perturbed systems. For more details about the physical dynamical representation of the presented solutions, we have illustrated them with profile pictures using Mathematica and Matlab 18, to obtain complete configurations. The proposed approach can be applied to several equations arising in all applied sciences.

AMS subject classifications::

1. Introduction

Investigation of optical solitons has distinctly acquired momentum in the field of the solitary waves through plasma physics [Citation1, Citation2], bio-mathematics [Citation3], optical fibre [Citation4] and fluid dynamics [Citation5]. Abdelwahed investigated the electron distribution effects on the super periodic wave features for critical plasma densities described by MKP equation [Citation1, Citation2]. Nonlinear structure characteristics for differential equation systems affected by many factors such as fractional, power law nonlinearity and dissipations which control the solitary pictures in these systems [Citation3–5]. Seismic wave attenuation describes the energy losses experienced by the wave as it travels through the subsurface [Citation6–8]. In fibres of dielectric properties, the efficacious balancing between the effects of optical Kerr and dispersions generates optical soliton. Solitons have indeed drawn a lot of attention due to their durable nature and effective uses in optical communications and long-distance transmissions [Citation9–13]. Due to NLSE's rich physical features, optical solitons, namely, complex and hyperbolic solitons, are now the most interesting field of nonlinear wave propagation in deep water, quantum mechanics, super conductivity, electro-magnetic wave propagation, nuclear physics, magneto-static spin waves and optical fibre communications [Citation14–22]. Various physicists and mathematicians proposed and developed significant standing wave stabilities for NLSEs and related forms such as perturbed, Hartree, unstable, resonant and Choquard forms [Citation23–27]. There are recent developments in analytical and numerical techniques for mathematical models [Citation28–30].

The chiral soliton represents a crucial function in the development of quantum mechanics, namely in Hall effect and neuroscience, where chiral solitons are present. The CNLSE was considered for obtaining bright (dark) soltons [Citation31]. Subsequently in 2004, Bohm potentials (BP) presented in various works were measured with new perturbed NLSE where BP was considered as the perturbative term [Citation32, Citation33], given by (1) iψt+aψxx+ib(ψψxψψx)ψ=iαψψxxψ,(1) where ψ and ψ are the complex function and its conjugate, i=1, respectively. a and b denote the coefficients of dispersion and nonlinearity, respectively. The right side denotes the perturbation term, where the coefficient α is BP. Applications of PCNLSE to the advancement of quantum mechanics are outstanding, thus it is so significant to find solutions to PCNLSE for the evolution of quantum mechanics. Various approaches have been applied to extract solutions of the PCNLSE, such as the extended fan sub-equation approach [Citation34], extended modified auxiliary equation mapping approach [Citation35] and many other techniques [Citation36–39].

Our work is driven by the desire to find novel approaches to the PCNLSE solutions, using the two unified solver methods [Citation40–43] and exp(φ(ξ))-expansion technique [Citation44, Citation45]. The main advantage of utilizing these techniques is to get different families of solutions with free physical parameters. These solutions will be extremely beneficial in many applications such as quantum and nuclear physics, fluid mechanics, plasma physics, nonlinear optics and nanotechnology. Indeed, the proposed solutions are used to study the adiabatic parameter dynamics. The proposed methods are straightforward, sturdy, appropriate and efficient. So, in Section 2 solutions, using the two unified solver techniques and exp(φ(ξ)) method, are presented. Section 3 introduces some physical gained results. Finally, conclusions are given in Section 4.

2. Mathematical analysis

We apply the two unified solver methods [Citation40, Citation43] and exp(φ(ξ))-expansion technique [Citation44, Citation45] to extract a variety of chiral solitons for the PCNLSE, utilizing the wave transformation of the following form [Citation34, Citation35]: (2) ψ(x,t)=ei(kx+wt+θ)Ψ(ζ),ζ=x+vt,(2) k is the wave number, w is the frequency of solitons, while θ is the phase constant. Then the following the steps given in [Citation34] give (3) Γ12Ψ(ζ)ζ2+Γ2Ψ3(ζ)+Γ3Ψ(ζ)=0,(3) where Γ1=a,Γ2=2kb,Γ3=(w+k2a).

For complex equation, we have (v2ak)Ψ(ζ)ζα2Ψ(ζ)ζ2=0,with physical constraints Λ1eξ(v2ak)2α(eξ((v2ak)2+v)αe2akξα(4a3k22a2k((v2ak)22v)+2α2ω+a(v((v2ak)2v)+2α2k2))+12α2bkΛ22eξ((v2ak)2+v)α2akξα)+Λ2(e2ξ((v2ak)2+ak)α)×(eξ((v2ak)2+v)α(4a3k22a2k((v2ak)2+2v)2α2ω+a(v((v2ak)2+v)2α2k2))4α2bkΛ22eξ(3(v2ak)2+v)α)12α2bkΛ2Λ12eξ((v2ak)2+v)α4α2bkΛ13eξvα=0,where Λ1,Λ2 are constants. Equation (Equation3) represents the dynamical system equation with kinetic energy K.E=(12k2+12aω)Ψ2(ζ))+12abkΨ4(ξ).

2.1. Solutions of Equation (1) through solver technique I

The solutions of Equation (Equation3) based on the unified solver approach [Citation40] are as follows:

Rational function solutions: (4) Ψ1,2(x,t)=(kba(x+vt+ϱ))1.(4) Consequently, the solutions of Equation (Equation1) given by (5) ψ1,2(x,t)=ei(kx+wt+θ)(kba(x+vt+ϱ))1.(5) Trigonometric function solutions: (6) Ψ3,4(x,t)=±w+k2a2kb×tan(w+k2a2a(x+vt+ϱ))(6) and (7) Ψ5,6(x,t)=±w+k2a2kb×cot(w+k2a2a(x+vt+ϱ)).(7) Consequently, the solutions of Equation (Equation1) given by (8) ψ3,4(x,t)=±w+k2a2kbei(kx+wt+θ)×tan(w+k2a2a(x+vt+ϱ))(8) and (9) ψ5,6(x,t)=±w+k2a2kbei(kx+wt+θ)×cot(w+k2a2a(x+vt+ϱ)).(9) Hyperbolic function solutions: (10) Ψ7,8(x,t)=±(w+k2a)2kb×tanh((w+k2a)2a(x+vt+ϱ))(10) and (11) Ψ9,10(x,t)=±(w+k2a)2kb×coth((w+k2a)2a(x+vt+ϱ)).(11) Consequently, the solutions of Equation (Equation1) are given by (12) ψ7,8(x,t)=±(w+k2a)2kbei(kx+wt+θ)×tanh((w+k2a)2a(x+vt+ϱ))(12) and (13) ψ9,10(x,t)=±(w+k2a)2kbei(kx+wt+θ)×coth((w+k2a)2a(x+vt+ϱ)).(13) Here ϱ is an arbitrary constant.

2.2. Solutions of Equation (1) through solver technique II

The solutions of Equation (Equation3) based on the unified solver approach [Citation43] are as follows: (14) Ψˆ1,2(x,t)=±(w+k2a)kb×sech(±w+k2aa(x+vt)),(14) and (15) Ψˆ3,4(x,t)=±35(w+k2a)36kb×sech2(±5(w+k2a)12a(x+vt)).(15) Consequently, the solutions of Equation (Equation1) are given by (16) ψˆ1,2(x,t)=±(w+k2a)kbei(kx+wt+θ)×sech(±w+k2aa(x+vt))(16) and (17) ψˆ3,4(x,t)=±35(w+k2a)36kbei(kx+wt+θ)×sech2(±5(w+k2a)12a(x+vt)).(17)

2.3. Solutions of Equation (1) through the exp(φ(ξ))-expansion approach

In view of exp(φ(ξ))-expansion approach [Citation44, Citation45], the solutions of Equation (Equation3) are (18) Ψ=A0+A1exp(φ(ζ)),φφ(ζ)+μeφ(ζ)+λ,(18) A0 and A10 are constants. Superseding Ψ, Ψ, Ψ3 into Equation (Equation3) and putting the coefficients of exp(φ) to zero produce a system of algebraic equations. Solving these equations yields the following: (19) u(ξ)=±a2kb(λ+2exp(φ(ζ))).(19) Then the solutions of Equation (Equation3) are

Case 1. For μ0,L>0, (20) Ψ~1,2(x,t)=±aλ2kb×(λ4μLtanh(L2(x+vt+C))+λ),(20) (21) Ψ~3,4(x,t)=±aλ2kb×(λ4μLcoth(L2(x+vt+C))+λ).(21) Consequently, the solutions of Equation (Equation1) are given by (22) ψ~1,2(x,t)=±aλ2kbei(kx+wt+θ)×(λ4μLtanh(L2(x+vt+C))+λ).(22) (23) ψ~3,4(x,t)=±aλ2kbei(kx+wt+θ)×(λ4μLcoth(L2(x+vt+C))+λ).(23) Case 2. For μ0,L<0, (24) Ψ~5,6(x,t)=±a2kb×(λ+4μLtan(L2(x+vt+C))λ).(24) (25) Ψ~7,8(x,t)=±a2kb×(λ+4μLcot(L2(x+vt+C))λ).(25) Consequently, the solutions of Equation (Equation1) are given by (26) ψ~5,6(x,t)=±a2kbei(kx+wt+θ)×(λ+4μLtan(L2(x+vt+C))λ).(26) (27) ψ~7,8(x,t)=±a2kbei(kx+wt+θ)×(λ+4μLcot(L2(x+vt+C))λ).(27) Case 3. For μ=0,λ0,L>0, (28) Ψ~9,10(x,t)=±a2kb(λ+2λexp(λ(x+vt+C))1).(28) Consequently, the solutions of Equation (Equation1) are given by (29) ψ~9,10(x,t)=±a2kbei(kx+wt+θ)×(λ+2λexp(λ(x+vt+C))1).(29) Case 4. For μ0,λ0,L=0, (30) Ψ~11,12(x,t)=±a2kb(λλ2(ξ+C)λ(x+vt+C)+2).(30) Consequently, the solutions of Equation (Equation1) are given by (31) ψ~11,12(x,t)=±a2kbei(kx+wt+θ)×(λλ2(ξ+C)λ(x+vt+C)+2).(31) Case 5. At μ=0,λ=0,L=0, (32) Ψ~13,14(x,t)=±a2kb(1x+vt+C).(32) Consequently, the solutions of Equation (Equation1) are given by (33) ψ~13,14(x,t)=±a2kbei(kx+wt+θ)(1x+vt+C).(33) Here L=λ24μ and C is constant.

3. Results and discussion

Since the perturbed term in PCNLSE represented the quantum perturbed potential is which known as Bohm potential and introduces the internal self-potentials for quantum properties. So, some new solitary solutions for PCNLSE were derived explicitly by using two solvers and exp(φ(ξ))-expansion techniques. The investigation of PCNLSE performs a crucial way in the evolution of quantum Hall effect, in which chiral excitations are familiar with manifesting [Citation46, Citation47]. The well-obtained structural behaviours of the propagating solutions for Equation (Equation1) being rationals, dark envelopes, periodicals, explosive envelopes, shock-likes, localized solitons, dissipative, localized huge waves, etc., and established on physical parameter contributions in PCNLSE coefficients. For example, at specific wave number values, the wave's attitude changes for critical nodes and stability zones turn into unstable regions [Citation48, Citation49]. Nonlinear dispersive fibres transmit bright and dark solitons. Waves with lower intensities than the background are identified by dark solitons. However, the bright-type has peak intensities that are greater than the background [Citation50]. Here, we introduce 3D selected solution profiles for PCNLSE via physical parameter variations. Figures  represent the dynamical behaviours of some selected solutions using the first solver. It was noted that bright explosive envelope and explosive soliton propagations are obtained for solution (Equation5) in Figures and . In Figure the wave changes periodically in the x axis and extremely quick rapids in the x t plane. For solution (Equation9) a dissipative and periodic blow-up solitary waves are depicted in Figures  and . For second solver outputs, solution (Equation16) represents a bright periodic envelope and stable stationary solitonic structures with constant amplitudes and energies in Figures  and . Also, the solution (Equation17) denotes a huge and soliton waves, as shown in Figures  and . It was noted that these wave structures are conservative dynamic waves with amplitudes depending mainly on the model parameters.

Figure 1. Change of real part of solution (Equation5) with x, t.

Figure 1. Change of real part of solution (Equation5(5) ψ1,2(x,t)=ei(−kx+wt+θ)(∓kba(x+vt+ϱ))−1.(5) ) with x, t.

Figure 2. Change of |ψ1(x,t)| in Equation (Equation5) with x, t.

Figure 2. Change of |ψ1(x,t)| in Equation (Equation5(5) ψ1,2(x,t)=ei(−kx+wt+θ)(∓kba(x+vt+ϱ))−1.(5) ) with x, t.

Figure 3. Change of real part of solution (Equation9) with x, t.

Figure 3. Change of real part of solution (Equation9(9) ψ5,6(x,t)=±w+k2a2kbei(−kx+wt+θ)×cot(w+k2a2a(x+vt+ϱ)).(9) ) with x, t.

Figure 4. Change of |ψ3(x,t)| in Equation (Equation9) with x, t.

Figure 4. Change of |ψ3(x,t)| in Equation (Equation9(9) ψ5,6(x,t)=±w+k2a2kbei(−kx+wt+θ)×cot(w+k2a2a(x+vt+ϱ)).(9) ) with x, t.

Figure 5. Change of real part of solution (Equation16) with x, t.

Figure 5. Change of real part of solution (Equation16(16) ψˆ1,2(x,t)=±(w+k2a)−kbei(−kx+wt+θ)×sech(±w+k2aa(x+vt))(16) ) with x, t.

Figure 6. Change of |ψˆ1(x,t)| in Equation (Equation16) with x, t.

Figure 6. Change of |ψˆ1(x,t)| in Equation (Equation16(16) ψˆ1,2(x,t)=±(w+k2a)−kbei(−kx+wt+θ)×sech(±w+k2aa(x+vt))(16) ) with x, t.

Figure 7. Change of real part of solution (Equation17) with x, t.

Figure 7. Change of real part of solution (Equation17(17) ψˆ3,4(x,t)=±35(w+k2a)−36kbei(−kx+wt+θ)×sech2(±5(w+k2a)12a(x+vt)).(17) ) with x, t.

Figure 8. Change of |ψˆ3(x,t)| in Equation (Equation17) with x, t.

Figure 8. Change of |ψˆ3(x,t)| in Equation (Equation17(17) ψˆ3,4(x,t)=±35(w+k2a)−36kbei(−kx+wt+θ)×sech2(±5(w+k2a)12a(x+vt)).(17) ) with x, t.

The results of exp(φ(ξ))-expansion are shown in Figures . The solution (Equation22) introduces an important dark type envelope solution and new super solitary profile as shown in Figures and . It was remarked for Figure that the wave behaves periodic in the x axis but the critical point depends mainly on time t. The constant amplitude super soliton in Figure introduces a new wave form that constrains soliton energy according to physical parameters. In Figure , a shock like solitary formation is produced from the solution (Equation26). This solution is converted from a solitonic form to a shock dissipative form depending on the parameter values. Finally, bright explosive sharp envelope and explosive solitonic excitations are formed as shown in Figures  and from solution (Equation29). The multiple use of mathematical solutions methods for the same studied the system give us several solutions with different properties that may explain most of the phenomena described by the studied system. Some of the solitary solution results of this system agree with the solution properties of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation system, which describe strong dispersive and higher-order systems [Citation20, Citation51–53].

Figure 9. Change of the real part of solution (Equation22) with x, t.

Figure 9. Change of the real part of solution (Equation22(22) ψ~1,2(x,t)=±aλ2kbei(−kx+wt+θ)×(λ−4μLtanh(L2(x+vt+C))+λ).(22) ) with x, t.

Figure 10. Change of |ψ~1(x,t)| in Equation (Equation22) with x, t.

Figure 10. Change of |ψ~1(x,t)| in Equation (Equation22(22) ψ~1,2(x,t)=±aλ2kbei(−kx+wt+θ)×(λ−4μLtanh(L2(x+vt+C))+λ).(22) ) with x, t.

Figure 11. Change of the real part of solution (Equation26) with x, t.

Figure 11. Change of the real part of solution (Equation26(26) ψ~5,6(x,t)=±a2kbei(−kx+wt+θ)×(λ+4μ−Ltan(−L2(x+vt+C))−λ).(26) ) with x, t.

Figure 12. Change of the real part of solution (Equation29) with x, t.

Figure 12. Change of the real part of solution (Equation29(29) ψ~9,10(x,t)=±a2kbei(−kx+wt+θ)×(λ+2λexp(λ(x+vt+C))−1).(29) ) with x, t.

Figure 13. Change of |ψ~9(x,t)| in Equation (Equation29) with x, t.

Figure 13. Change of |ψ~9(x,t)| in Equation (Equation29(29) ψ~9,10(x,t)=±a2kbei(−kx+wt+θ)×(λ+2λexp(λ(x+vt+C))−1).(29) ) with x, t.

In summary, general and several new obtained solutions may be with vital applications in strong dispersive and higher-order systems of fluid physics, femtoseconds pulse, capillary studies, nuclear engineering, optical fibre communications, superfluids and switching techniques. The described findings indicate that the approaches are simple, reliable and effective for a wide range of solutions with particular features that may explain the majority of the phenomena. Indeed, these methods are powerful tools to consider other complicated nonlinear partial differential equations arising in applied sciences and new physics.

4. Conclusions

We have displayed a rich diversity of solution classes to PCNLSE, using solver methods and exp(φ(ξ))-expansion techniques by physical coefficient parameters. The proposed techniques are not only straightforward but also easy and confer new vital outcomes as explosive solitons, bright explosive envelopes, periodic blow up, bright periodic envelope and freak solitary waves. These Chiral soliton behaviours are so paramount in evolutions of quantum mechanics of Hall effect in view of quantum Bohm potential and interior self-potential through quantum characteristics. A clarified graphical investigation for some selected equation types utilizing mathematical programmes that are valuable to comprehend more distinctly about the dynamic kinetics of solitary formations. Finally, the offered three techniques may be exercised for another quantum equations arising in different applicable fields.

On the other hand, the utilization of several mathematical solution techniques for the same investigated system provides us with a sufficient number of solutions with different characteristics that might potentially explain the majority of the phenomena the studied system describes. The nonlinear Schrödinger equation system's solutions qualities, which characterize strong dispersive and higher-order systems and certain of the system's solitary solution results are in agreement.

Supplemental material

Final_version.rar

Download (6.4 MB)

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

All the data are available within the article.

Additional information

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through [project number RI-44-0764].

References

  • Abdelwahed HG. Nonlinearity contributions on critical MKP equation. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2020;14(1):777–782. doi: 10.1080/16583655.2020.1774136
  • Abdelwahed HG. Super electron acoustic propagations in critical plasma density. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2020;14(1):1363–1368. doi: 10.1080/16583655.2020.1822653
  • Sharaf MK, El-Shewy EK, Zahran MA. Fractional anisotropic diffusion equation in cylindrical brush model. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2020;14(1):1416–1420. doi: 10.1080/16583655.2020.1824743
  • Inc M, Aliyu AI, Yusuf A, et al. Optical solitons to the (n + 1)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger's equation with Kerr law and power law nonlinearities using two integration scheme. Mod Phys Lett B. 2019;33(19):1950224. doi: 10.1142/S0217984919502245
  • Abdelrahman MAE, Sohaly MA. On the new wave solutions to the MCH equation. Indian J Phys. 2019;93:903–911. doi: 10.1007/s12648-018-1354-6
  • Bouchaala F, Ali MY, Matsushima J, et al. Estimation of seismic wave attenuation from 3D seismic data: a case study of OBC data acquired in an offshore oilfield. Energies. 2022;15:534. doi: 10.3390/en15020534
  • Bouchaala F, Ali MY, Matsushima J. Compressional and shear wave attenuations from walkway VSP and sonic data in an offshore Abu Dhabi oilfield. C R Géosci. 2021;353:337–354.
  • Matsushima J, Ali MY, Bouchaala F. Propagation of waves with a wide range of frequencies in digital core samples and dynamic strain anomaly detection: carbonate rock as a case study. Geophys J Int. 2021;224(1):340–354. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggaa467
  • Li R, Manafian J, Lafta HA, et al. The nonlinear vibration and dispersive wave systems with cross-kink and solitary wave solutions. Int J Geom Methods Mod Phys. 2022;19(10):2250151. doi: 10.1142/S0219887822501511
  • Raza N, Zubair A. Optical dark and singular solitons of generalized nonlinear Schrödinger's equation with anti-cubic law of nonlinearity. Mod Phys Lett B. 2019;65:1950158. doi: 10.1142/S0217984919501586
  • Raza N, Javid A. Generalization of optical solitons with dual dispersion in the presence of Kerr and quadratic-cubic law nonlinearities. Mod Phys Lett B. 2019;33:1850427. doi: 10.1142/S0217984918504274
  • Chen Z, Manafian J, Raheel M, et al. Extracting the exact solitons of time-fractional three coupled nonlinear Maccari's system with complex form via four different methods. Results Phys. 2022;36:105400. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105400
  • Nakkeeran K. Bright and dark optical solitons in fiber media with higher-order effects. Chaos Solitons Fract. 2002;13:673–679. doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(00)00278-2
  • Triki H, Bensalem C, Biswas A, et al. Self-similar optical solitons with continuous-wave background in a quadratic-cubic non-centrosymmetric waveguide. Opt Commun. 2019;437:392–398. doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2018.12.074
  • Abdelrahman MAE, Sohaly MA. Solitary waves for the nonlinear Schrödinger problem with the probability distribution function in stochastic input case. Eur Phys J Plus. 2017;132:339. doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2017-11607-5
  • Hassan SZ, Abdelrahman MAE. A Riccati–Bernoulli sub-ODE method for some nonlinear evolution equations. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2019;20(3–4):303–313. doi: 10.1515/ijnsns-2018-0045
  • Alharbi YF, Abdelrahman MAE, Sohaly MA, et al. Disturbance solutions for the long-short-wave interaction system using bi-random Riccati–Bernoulli sub-ODE method. J Taibah Univ Sci. 2020;14(1):500–506. doi: 10.1080/16583655.2020.1747242
  • Alharbi YF, Abdelrahman MAE, Sohaly MA, et al. Stochastic treatment of the solutions for the resonant nonlinear Schrödinger equation with spatio-temporal dispersions and inter-modal using beta distribution. Eur Phys J Plus. 2020;135:368. doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00371-2
  • Wang W, Hasanirokh K, Manafian J, et al. Analytical approach for polar magnetooptics in multilayer spin-polarized light emitting diodes based on InAs quantum dots. Opt Quant Electron. 2022;54:137. doi: 10.1007/s11082-021-03461-2
  • Abdelrahman MAE, Abdo NF. On the nonlinear new wave solutions in unstable dispersive environments. Phys Scr. 2020;95(4):045220. doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ab62d7
  • Ismael HF, Baskonus HM, Bulut H, et al. Instability modulation and novel optical soliton solutions to the Gerdjikov–Ivanov equation with M-fractional. Opt Quant Electron. 2023;55:303. doi: 10.1007/s11082-023-04581-7
  • Baskonus HM, Gao W. Investigation of optical solitons to the nonlinear complex Kundu–Eckhaus and Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Benjamin–Bona–Mahony equations in conformable. Opt Quant Electron. 2022;54:388. doi: 10.1007/s11082-022-03774-w
  • Eslami M. Solitary wave solutions for perturbed equation nonlinear Schrödinger's with Kerr law nonlinearity under the DAM. Optik. 2015;126:1312–1317. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.02.075
  • Cazenave T, Lions PL. Orbital stability of standing waves for some nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Commun Math Phys. 1982;85:549–561. doi: 10.1007/BF01403504
  • Feng B, Zhang H. Stability of standing waves for the fractional Schrödinger–Choquard equation. Comput Math Appl. 2018;75:2499–2507. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.12.025
  • Feng B, Zhang H. Stability of standing waves for the fractional Schrödinger–Hartree equation. J Math Anal Appl. 2018;460:352–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.11.060
  • Cazenave T. Semilinear Schrödinger equations. New York; Providence, RI: New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences; American Mathematical Society; 2003. (Courant lecture notes in mathematics; vol. 10).
  • Della Volpe C, Siboni S. From van der Waals equation to acid-base theory of surfaces: a chemical-mathematical journey. Rev Adhes Adhes. 2022;10(1):47–97.
  • Aslanova F. A comparative study of the hardness and force analysis methods used in truss optimization with metaheuristic algorithms and under dynamic loading. J Res Sci Eng Technol. 2020;8(1):25–33. doi: 10.24200/jrset.vol8iss1pp25-33
  • Zhang M, Xie X, Manafian J, et al. Characteristics of the new multiple rogue wave solutions to the fractional generalized CBS-BK equation. J Adv Res. 2022;38:131–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.09.015
  • Nishino A, Umeno Y, Wadati M. Chiral nonlinear Schrodinger equation. Chaos Solitons Fract. 1998;9(7):1063–1069. doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(97)00184-7
  • Biswas A. Perturbation of chiral solitons. Nucl Phys B. 2009;806:457–461. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.05.023
  • Ebadi G, Yildirim A, Biswas A. Chiral solitons with Bohm potential using (G′G) method and exp-function method. Rom Rep Phys. 2012;64:357–366.
  • Younis M, Cheemaa N, Mahmood SA, et al. On optical solitons: the chiral nonlinear Schrödinger equation with perturbation and Bohm potential. Opt Quant Electron. 2016;48:542. doi: 10.1007/s11082-016-0809-2
  • Cheemaa N, Chen S, Seadawy AR. Chiral soliton solutions of perturbed chiral nonlinear Schrödinger equation with its applications in mathematical physics. Int J Mod Phys B. 2020;34(31):2050301. doi: 10.1142/S0217979220503014
  • Torres-Silva H, Zamorano M. Chiral effects on optical solitons. Math Comput Simul. 2003;62:149–161. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4754(02)00177-5
  • Nandy S. Inverse scattering approach to coupled higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation and N-soliton solutions. Nucl Phys B. 2004;679:647–659. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.12.018
  • Biswas A, Mirzazadeh M, Eslami M. Soliton solution of generalized chiral nonlinear Schrödingers equation with time-dependent coefficients. Acta Phys Polon B. 2014;45:849–866. doi: 10.5506/APhysPolB.45.849
  • Ismail MS, Al-Basyouni KS, Aydin A. Conservative finite difference schemes for the chiral nonlinear, Schrödinger equation. Bound Value Probl. 2015;2015:89. doi: 10.1186/s13661-015-0350-4
  • Abdelrahman MAE, AlKhidhr H. A robust and accurate solver for some nonlinear partial differential equations and tow applications. Phys Scr. 2020;95:065212. doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ab80e7
  • Abdelwahed HG, Abdelrahman MAE. New nonlinear periodic, solitonic, dissipative waveforms for modified-Kadomstev–Petviashvili-equation in nonthermal positron plasma. Results Phys. 2020;19:103393. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103393
  • Abdelrahman MAE, AlKhidhr H. Closed-form solutions to the conformable space-time fractional simplified MCH equation and time fractional Phi-4 equation. Results Phys. 2020;18:103294. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103294
  • Inc M, Hassan SZ, Abdelrahman MAE, et al. Fundamental solutions for the long-short-wave interaction system. Open Phys. 2020;18(1):1093–1099. doi: 10.1515/phys-2020-0220
  • He JH, Wu XH. Exp-function method for nonlinear wave equations. Chaos Solitons Fract. 2006;30:700–708. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.020
  • Aminikhad H, Moosaei H, Hajipour M. Exact solutions for nonlinear partial differential equations via Exp-function method. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ. 2009;26:1427–1433.
  • Griguolo L, Seminara D. Chiral solitons from dimensional reduction of Chern–Simons gauged nonlinear Schrodinger equation: classical and quantum aspects. Nucl Phys B. 1998;516(12):467–498. doi: 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00810-9
  • Lee JH, Lin CK, Pashev OK. Shock waves, chiral solitons and semi-classical limit of one-dimensional anyons. Chaos Solitons Fract. 2004;19(1):109–128. doi: 10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00084-5
  • Ikezi H, Schwarzenegger K, Simsons AL, et al. Nonlinear self-modulation of ion-acoustic waves. Phys Fluids. 1978;21:239–248. doi: 10.1063/1.862198
  • Zakharov VE, Ostrovsky LA. Modulation instability: the beginning. Physica D. 2009;238(5):540–548. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2008.12.002
  • Scott AC. Encyclopedia of nonlinear science. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group; 2005.
  • Alomair RA, Hassan SZ, Abdelrahman MAE, et al. New solitary optical solutions for the NLSE with δ-potential through Brownian process. Results Phys. 2022;40:105814. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105814
  • Arshed S, Raza N, Javid A, et al. Chiral solitons of (2 + 1)-dimensional stochastic chiral nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Int J Geom Methods Mod Phys. 2022;19(10):2250149. doi: 10.1142/S0219887822501493
  • Raza N, Javid A, Butt AR, et al. Optical solitons and stability regions of the higher order nonlinear Schrödinger's equation in an inhomogeneous fiber. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2021. doi: 10.1515/ijnsns-2021-0165 .