Abstract
The objective of this essay is to propose a hermeneutic socio-semiotic model that helps build an interdisciplinary photographic critique based on theoretical foundations. How to carry out a photographic review? How to use and map theoretical-methodological perspectives about photography? The contemporary socio-technical context of images has placed photography in a complex sociocultural, technological and discursive scenario, which requires an epistemological map to help guide the construction of a critical-theoretical discourse for it to be understood. In this way, a model with two purposes is suggested, to serve as a chart for navigating the ocean of perspectives and theoretical references of the critical discourses of photography; and to serve as a starting point to build a hermeneutic and interdisciplinary socio-semiotic critique. The application of the model is exemplified by the analysis of Max Siedentopf’s production, How to Survive a Deadly Global Virus, 2020. The proposed experimental model has a hermeneutic, flexible, open, non-exclusive or limiting character, which contributes to the construction of a theoretically grounded critique of photographic images.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes
1. Marien, Photography and its Critics a Cultural History.
2. The following authors have made comprehensive reviews of the main critics and theorists of modern, postmodern and digital age photography: Wells, Photography: A Critical Introduction; Gattinoni and Vigouroux, Histoire de la critique photographique; Linfield, S. A Little History of Photography Criticism; La Grange, Basic Critical Theory for Photographers; Ribalta, Jorge, Efecto real [Real Effect].
3. Ribalta, Efecto real [Real Effect], 13; Wells, Photography: A Critical Introduction.
4. Some prominent pioneering authors of modern European and Anglo-Saxon criticism of photography are represented by photographers such as Daguerre, Niépce, Fox Talbot, Peach Robinson and Le Gay; writers such as Poe, Baudelaire and Mumford; historians such as Eastlake, Wey, Root, Cecil, Ruskin, Meyer, Person, Newhall and Szarkowski; philosophers and art critics such as Benjamin, Barthes, Berger and Sontag; and writers like Guibert, Scott, Singh and Russell. The most influential modern photography theorists are Berger, Sontag, Barthes and Didi-Huberman, influenced by Benjamin, Kracauer, Brecht and the theorists of the Frankfurt School.
5. Ribalta, Efecto Real [Real Effect], 11.
6. Some of the most influential authors of postmodern photography criticism are Rosler, Solomon-Godeau, Crimp, Tagg, Grundberg, Squiers, Sekula, Buchloh, Burgin, Phillips, Wall, Spence, Coleman, Krauss, Michelson and Owens, who built a fierce critique against the modern conceptualization of formalist and documentary photography begun by Newhall in 1937 and continued by Szarkovsky around 1966.
7. Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism.
8. The following authors delve into issues related to the post-human image, non-human vision and computational image: Zylinska, Joanna. Nonhuman Photography; Raskar and Tumblin. Computational photography; Celis, Economía de la atención … [Economy of attention …]; Celis, Notas sobre el estatuto político de la imagen [Notes on the political status of the image].
9. Lotman, La semiosfera I. [The semiosphere]; Verón, La semiosis social.
10. Gadamer, Truth and Method.
11. Lizarazo, Trazos para una hermenéutica comunicativa [Strokes for a communicative hermeneutic.
12. Greimas and Courtés, Semiótica. Diccionario razonado [Semiotics. Reasoned]; Greimas and Courtés, En torno al sentido. Ensayos semióticos [Around the meaning. Semiotic essays]; Abbagnano, Diccionario de filosofía. [Philosophy Dictionary]; Lyons, John. Semántica [Semantics]; Morris, Fundamentos de la teoría de los signos [Theory of signs fundamentals]; Gadamer, Truth and Method.
13. From a historical-techno-aesthetic perspective (art history, aesthetics), the contributions of Szarkowski (Citation1966), Ades (Citation1976), Gernsheim (Citation1983), Newhall (Citation1983), Freund (Citation1993), Debray (Citation1994), Krauss (Citation2002), Fontcuberta (Citation2003), Cartier-Bresson (Citation2003), Ribalta (Citation2004), Debrois (Citation2005), Chevrier (Citation2007), Chéraux (Citation2009), Frizot (Citation2009a, Citation2009c, Citation2009b, Citation1999), López (Citation2008, Citation2005b, Citation2005a), Dyer (Citation2010), Sougez (Citation2011, Citation2009), Casanova (Citation2005), Mraz (Citation2018, Citation2009), Durand (Citation2012) are fundamental.
14. From a philosophical-sociocultural perspective (philosophy, structuralism, sociology), the contributions of Benjamin (Citation2007b), Barthes (Citation1980), Flusser (Citation2004, Citation2011), Sontag (Citation1973, Citation2003), Berger (Citation1972 and Berger Citation2015), Debord (Citation1967), Mitchell (Citation1992), Chalfen (Citation1997), Bourdieu (Citation2004), Mirzoeff (Citation2003), Lipkin (Citation2005), Latour (Citation2005), Marzo (Citation2006), Green (Citation2007), Bauman (Citation2007), Rancière (Citation2009, Citation2007, Citation2009), Azoulay (Citation2008), Ritchin (Citation2009), Fontcuberta (Citation1997, Citation2008, Citation2010, Citation2016), Didi-Huberman (Citation2012), Farocki (Citation2014), Gunthert (Citation2015) are essential.
15. From a media-technological perspective, it is possible to find the concepts and theories developed by Jenkins (Citation2008); Scolari (Citation2013), Manovich (Citation2005, Citation2009), Lister (Citation1997, Citation2007), Kember (Citation1995, 1998), Hayles (Citation1999), Kemp and Wallace (Citation2000), Bate (Citation2016), Larsen and Sandbye (Citation2020) Zylinska (Citation2017), Celis (Citation2017, Citation2019).
17. From a semiotic perspective of image and photography, the fundamentals lie in the contributions of Saussure (Citation1945), Peirce (Citation1931, Citation1986), Barthes and de la Imagen (Citation1986), Lotman (Citation1976, Citation1979, Citation1998), Panofsky (Citation1989), Morris (Citation1985), Dubois (Citation1986), Eco (Citation2014), Grupo µ (Citation1993), Floch (Citation1986), Zunzunegui (Citation1992), Joly (Citation1994), Greimas (Citation1973, Citation1982), Gauthier (Citation1996), Merrel (Citation1998), Marzal (Citation2008a, Citation2008b, Citation2007, Citation2001).
20. Dynel, “COVID-19 memes going viral.
21. Latour, Reassembling the Social.
22. Barthes. La cámara lúcida [The Lucid Camera].
23. Flusser, Hacia una filosofía de la fotografía [Towards a philosophy of photography]; Flusser, Hacia el universo de las imágenes técnicas. [Towards the universe of technical images].
24. Gunthert, L´ímage partagée [The Shared Image]; Azoulay, Ariella. The Civil Contract of Photography.
25. Rancière, El reparto de lo sensible. Estética y política. [The distribution of the sensible. Aesthetics and politics].
26. Jenkins, Convergence Culture; Scolari, Carlos. Narrativas transmedia..
27. Fontcuberta, Por un manifiesto postfotográfico [For a post-photographic manifesto].
28. Belting, Antropología de la imagen [Anthropology of the image], 19–31.
29. Foucault, Naissance de la biopolitique; Agamben, Giorgio. Homo Sacer; Esposito, Bíos. Biopolítica y filosofía..
30. Barthes, Retórica de la imagen. Lo obvio y lo obtuso. Imágenes, Gestos, Voces. [Rhetoric of the image], 36.
31. Peirce, La ciencia de la semiótica [The science of semiotics]; Merrel, Floyd. Semiótica de C. S. Peirce.
Szarkowski, John. The Photographer’s Eye. London: Secker & Warburg, 1966. Ades, Dawn. Photomontage. London: Thames and Hudson, 1976. Gernsheim, Helmut. The Origins of Photography (The History of Photography/Helmut Gernsheim, V. 1). London: Thames and Hudson, 1983. Newhall, Beaumont. Historia de la Fotografía [ History of Photography]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 1983. Freund, Gisèle. La fotografía como documento social [Photography as Social Document]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 1993. Debray, Régis. Vida Y Muerte de la Imagen [Life and Death of the Image]. Barcelona: Paidós, 1994. Krauss, Rosalind. Lo fotográfico. Por una teoría de los desplazamientos [The Photographic. By a Theory of Displacements]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2002. Fontcuberta, Joan. Estética fotográfica [Photographic Aesthetics]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2003. Cartier-Bresson, Henri. Fotografiar Del Natural [Photograph from Nature]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2003. Ribalta, Jorge. Efecto real [ Real effect]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2004. Debrois, Olivier. Fuga mexicana. Un recorrido por la fotografía en México [Mexican fugue. A tour of Mexico´s photography]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2005. Chevrier, Jean-François. La Fotografía Entre Las Bellas Artes Y Los Medios de comunicación [Photography Between the Fine Arts and the Media]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2007. Chéraux, Clément. Breve Historia Del Error Fotográfico [Brief History of the Photographic Error]. México: Ediciones Ve, 2009. Frizot, Michel. El imaginario fotográfico [The Photographic Imaginary]. México: Ediciones Ve, 2009a. Frizot, Michel. Photo Trouvée [Photo Found]. London: Phaidon Press, 2009c. Frizot, Michel. A History of Photography: The Musée d’Orsay Collection 1839-1925. Paris: Flammarion, 2009b. Frizot, Michel. A New History of Photography. Germany: Konemann, 1999. López, Publio. La fotografía como fuente de memoria [Photography as a Source of Memory]. Madrid: Lunwerg, 2008. López, Publio. La Huella de la Mirada [The Trace of the Gace]. Madrid: Lunwerg, 2005b. López, Publio. Historia de la Fotografía En España: Fotografía Y Sociedad Desde Sus Orígenes Hasta el Siglo XXI [History of Photography in Spain: Photography and Society from Its Origins to the 21st Century]. Madrid: Lunwerg, 2005a. Dyer, Geoff. El momento interminable de la fotografía [The Endless Moment of Photography]. México: Ediciones Ve, 2010. Sougez, Marie-Loup. Historia de la fotografía [ History of Photography]. Madrid: Cátedra, 2011. Sougez, Maire-Loup. Diccionario historia de la fotografía [ Photography History Dictionary]. Madrid: Cátedra, 2009. Casanova, Rosa. Imaginarios y fotografía en México 1839-1970 [Imaginaries and Photography in Mexico 1839-1970]. México: Conaculta, 2005. Mraz, John. Historiar fotografías [History photos]. Oaxaca: Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades de la Universidad. Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca, 2018. Mraz, John. Looking for Mexico: Modern Visual Culture and National Identity. North Carolina: Duke University Press, 2009. Durand, Régis. La experiencia fotográfica [The Photographic Experience]. México: SerieVe, 2012. Benjamin, Walter. Sobre la fotografía [On Photography]. Pre-textos: Valencia, 2007b. Barthes, Roland. La cámara lúcida [The Lucid Camera]. Paidós: Barcelona, 1980. Flusser, Vilém. Hacia Una Filosofía de la Fotografía [Towards a Philosophy of Photography]. México: Trillas, 2004. Flusser, Vilém. Hacia el Universo de las Imágenes Técnicas [Towards the Universe of Technical Images]. Ciudad de México: ENAP-UNAM, 2011. Sontag, Susan. Sobre la fotografía [ On photography]. Barcelona: Edhasa, 1973. Sontag, Susan. Ante el dolor de los demás [ Regarding the Pain of Others]. Madrid: Santillana, 2003. Berger, John. Modos de ver [Ways of Seeing]. Londres: Pingüin, 1972. Berger, John. Para Entender la Fotografía [To Understand Photography]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2015. Debord, Guy. La société du Spectacle [The Society of the Spectacle]. París: Buchet-Chastel, 1967. Mitchell, William J. The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post Photographic Era. London: The MIT Press, 1992. Chalfen, Richard. Snapshot Versions of Life. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1997. Bourdieu, Pierre. “Arte medio [Medium art].Editorial Gustavo Gili.” (2004). Mirzoeff, Nicholas. Una introducción a la cultura visual [An introduction to visual culture]. Barcelona: Paidós, 2003. Lipkin, Jonathan. Photography Reborn. Image Making in the Digital Era. New York: Abraham Studio, 2005. Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. Marzo, Jorge. FotografíA Y Activismo [Photography and Activism]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2006. Green, David. ¿qué Ha Sido de la Fotografía? [What Happened to Photography?]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2007. Bauman, Zygmunt. Arte, ¿líquido? [Art, liquid?]. Madrid: Sequitur, 2007. Rancière, Jacques. El reparto de lo sensible. Estética y política [The Distribution of the Sensible. Aesthetics and Politics], 12. Santiago de Chile: LOM Ediciones, 2009. Rancière, Jacques. The Future of the Image. USA: Verso, 2007. Azoulay, Ariella. The Civil Contract of Photography. New York: Zone Books, 2008. Ritchin, Fred. After Photography. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2009. Fontcuberta, Joan. El beso de Judas. Fotografía y verdad [The Judas Kiss. Photography and Truth]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 1997. Fontcuberta, Joan. ¿Soñarán los androides con cámaras fotográficas [Do Androids Dream of Cameras?]. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura, 2008. Fontcuberta, Joan. La cámara de pandora. La fotografia después de la fotografia [Pandora’s camera. The Photograph after the Photograph]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2010. Fontcuberta, Joan. La furia de las imágenes [The images fury]. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg, 2016. Didi-Huberman, Georges. Arde la imagen [The image burns]. México: Ediciones Ve, 2012. Farocki, Harun. Desconfiar de las imágenes [Distrust images]. Argentina: Caja Negra, 2014. Gunthert, André. L´ímage partagée [The shared image]. Paris: Édicions Textuel, 2015. Jenkins, Henry. Convergence Culture. La cultura de la convergencia de los medios de comunicación [Convergence Culture]. Barcelona: Paidós, 2008. Scolari, Carlos. Narrativas transmedia: cuando todos los medios cuentan [ Transmedia narratives: when all media count], 342. Barcelona: Deusto, 2013. Manovich, Lev. El lenguaje de los nuevos medios de comunicación [The language of the new media]. Paidós: Barcelona, 2005. Lister, Martin. La imagen fotográfica en la cultura [The Photographic Image in Digital Culture]. Barcelona: Paidós, 1997. Lister, Martin. “A Sack in the Sand: Photography in the Age of Information.” In Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. Sage, 2007. doi:10.1177/1354856507079176. Kember, Sarah. Virtual Anxiety. Photography, New Technologies and Subjectivity. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995. Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999. Kemp, Martin, and Marina Wallace. Spectacular Bodies: The Art and Science of the Human Body from Leonardo to Now. London: Hayward Gallery Publishing, 2000. Bate, David. “Blowing It: Digital Images and the Real.” DPICT Magazine 7, no. April/May (2016): 22–23. Larsen, Jonas, and Mette Sandbye. Digital Snaps: The New Face of Photography. Routledge, 2020. https://bit.ly/3JJPY3N. Zylinska, Joanna. Nonhuman Photography. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2017. Celis, Claudio. “Economía de la atención y visión maquínica: hacia una semiótica asignificante de la imagen [Economy of Attention and Machinic Vision: Towards a Semiotics Asignificant of the Image].” Hipertextos 5, no. January–June (2017): 41–53. https://bit.ly/2XGxYAh Celis, Claudio. “Notas sobre el estatuto político de la imagen en la era de la visión artificial [Notes on the Political Status of the Image in the Age of Artificial Vision”. Revista Barda 5, no. 8 (2019 May): 89–106. https://bit.ly/3wEws0C Lévi-Strauss, C. Antropología estructural [Structural Anthropology]. España: Siglo XXI, 1995. https://bit.ly/3JsL0s2 Durand, Régis. La experiencia fotográfica [The Photographic Experience]. México: SerieVe, 2012. Belting, Hans. Antropología de la imagen [Anthropology of the Image]. Madrid: Editorial Katz, 2007. Naranjo, Juan. Fotografía, antropología Y Colonialismo (1845-2006) [Photography, Anthropology and Colonialism (1845-2006) [Photography, Anthropology and Colonialism (1845-2006)]. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 2006. Pink, Sarah. “Antropología visual digital: Posibilidades y Desafíos [Digital Visual Anthropology: Possibilities and Challenges].” In M Bancos y J. Ruby, Made to be Seen: Perspectivas sobre la Historia de la Antropología Visual [Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011. Horst, Heather., and D. Daniel Miller. Antropología digital [Digital anthropology].” New York: Routledge, 2012. Mignolo, Walter. “”Primera parte: Lo nuevo y lo decolonial.” Gómez Moreno, Pedro Pablo. Estéticas y opción decolonial/Pedro Pablo Gómez, Walter Mignolo [Aesthetics and decolonial option].” Bogotá: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas (2012): 20–47. Palermo, Walter Mignolo-Zulma. Arte y estética en la encrucijada descolonial [Art and aesthetics at the decolonial crossroads]. Buenos Aires: Ed. del Siglo, 2009. Gómez Moreno, P. “Estéticas fronterizas: diferencia decolonial y opción estética decolonial [Border aesthetics: decolonial difference and decolonial aesthetic option]. Ecuador: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar.” (2015). Saussure, Ferdinand. Lingüística General General Linguistics]. Buenos Aires: Losada, 1945. Peirce, Charles S. Collected Papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1931. Peirce, Charles S. La ciencia de la semiótica [The science of semiotics]. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión, 1986. Barthes, Roland, and Retórica de la Imagen. Lo Obvio Y Lo Obtuso. Imágenes, Gestos, Voces [Rhetoric of the Image. The Obvious and the Obtuse. Images, Gestures, Voices]. Barcelona: Paidós, 1986. Lotman, Iuri. La semiosfera I. Semiótica de la cultura y del texto [Semiotics of Culture and Text], edited by Desideiro Navarro. Universitat de Valencia: Frónesis-Cátedra, 1976. Lotman, Iuri. Semiótica de la Cultura [Culture semiotics]. Madrid: Cátedra, 1979. Lotman, Iuri. La Semiosfera II. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 1998. Panofsky, Ewin. Estudios sobre iconología [Studies on Iconology]. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1989. Morris, Charles W. Fundamentos de la teoría de los signos [Theory of Signs Fundamentals]. Barcelona: Paidós, 1985. Dubois, Philippe. El acto fotográfico. De la representación a la recepción [The Photographic Act. From Representation to Reception]. Barcelona: Paidós, 1986. Eco, Umberto. Tratado de semiótica general [Treaty of General Semiotics]. México: DeBolsillo, 2014. Grupo µ. Tratado Del Signo Visual [Treatise on the Visual Sign]. Madrid: Editorial Cátedra, 1993. Floch, Jean Marie. Les formes de l’empreinte [The Shapes of the Imprint]. Périgueux: Fanlac, 1986. Zunzunegui, Santos. Pensar la imagen [ Think the image]. Madrid: Cátedra, 1992. Joly, Martine. La imagen fija [The Still Image]. Buenos Aires: Editorial La Marca, 1994. Greimas, Algirdas. En torno al sentido. Ensayos semióticos [Around the meaning. Semiotic essays]. Madrid: Fragua, 1973. Greimas, Algirdas J., and Joseph Courtés. Semiótica. “Diccionario razonado de la teoría del lenguaje [Semiotics. Reasoned Dictionary of Language Theory]. trad.” In Enrique Ballón Aguirre y Hermis Campodónico Carrión. Madrid: Gredos, 1982. Gauthier, Guy. Veinte lecciones sobre la imagen y el sentido [Twenty Lessons on Image and Meaning]. Madird: Cátedra, 1996. Merrel, Floyd. Semiótica de C. S. Peirce [Semiotics by C. S. Peirce]. Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo (Venezuela): Colección de Semiótica Latinoamericana 1, 1998. Marzal, Javier. Aproximaciones Metodológicas En el Estudio de la Fotografía [Methodological Approaches in the Study of Photography]. Barcelona: Institut de la Comunicació (InCom-UAB), Universidad, 2008a. Marzal, Javier. “La muerte de la fotografía: la revolución digital y la crisis de identidad del medio fotográfico [The death of photography: the digital revolution and the identity crisis of the photographic medium].” Revista de Occidente, 328, 67–83. Madrid: Fundación José Ortega y Gaset, 2008b. Marzal, Javier. Cómo Se Lee Una fotografía. Interpretaciones de la Mirada [How Do You Read a Photo. Interpretations of the Gaze]. Madrid: Cátedra, 2007. Javier, Marzal, and Francisco J. Gómez. Una Propuesta Metodológica Para el Análisis de la Imagen Fotográfica [A Methodological Proposal for the Analysis of the Photographic Image]. Castellón: Universidad Jaume I, 2001.