Abstract
The field of technology education in the United States has evolved from manual training, manual arts, industrial arts, technology education, to the current technology and engineering education. This historical review examines how the purposes of these approaches to K-12 STEM education in the United States have changed over time. In this paper, several key initiatives, including national learning standards for technology education, are identified, and the impacts of each milestone on current US technology and engineering education are investigated. Finally, the way in which the field of technology and engineering education has embraced and integrated other fields of study, as well as the current position of ‘T’ (Technology) and ‘E’ (Engineering) in STEM, is explored. This review will provide K-12 STEM educators with insights into the American historical development of problem- and project-based learning in technology and engineering education, helping them better understand how the contemporary integrated STEM education movement has evolved into its current state.
ARTICLE HISTORY:
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), 34–42.; N. Mustafa et al., ‘A meta-analysis on effective strategies for integrated STEM education,’ Advanced Science Letters, 22, no. 12 (2016), pp. 4225–4228.
2 T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), 34.
3 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020).
4 T. Loveland et al., ‘Jackson’s Mill to Chinsegut: the journey to STEL,’ Technology and Engineering Teacher, 79, no. 5 (2020), pp. 8–13.
5 International Technology Education Association [ITEA], Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology, 3rd ed. (Reston, VA: ITEA, 2007); International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020); T. R. Kelley and J. G. Knowles, ‘A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education,’ International Journal of STEM Education, 3, no. 1 (2016), pp. 1–11.
6 J. R. Johnson, Technology: Report of the Project 2061 Phase I Technology Panel (AAAS Books, 1989), p. 4.
7 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020), p. 162.
8 W. E. Dugger, ‘Evolution of STEM in the United States,’ in 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research in Australia (2010, December); T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012).
9 D. Smith, ‘Industrial arts founded,’ in An interpretive history of industrial arts. 30th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by R. Wright and R. Barella (Bloomington, IL: McKnight, 1981), pp. 165–204.
10 C. A. Bennett, History of Manual and Industrial Education, 1870 to 1917 (Illinois: Charles A. Bennett Company, 1937).
11 C. A. Bennett, History of Manual and Industrial Education, 1870 to 1917 (Illinois: Charles A. Bennett Company, 1937), pp. 46–47.
12 C. A. Bennett, History of Manual and Industrial Education, 1870 to 1917 (Illinois: Charles A. Bennett Company, 1937).
13 C. A. Bennett, History of Manual and Industrial Education, 1870 to 1917 (Illinois: Charles A. Bennett Company, 1937), p. 47.
14 D. Smith, ‘Industrial arts founded,’ in An interpretive history of industrial arts. 30th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by R. Wright and R. Barella (Bloomington, IL: McKnight, 1981), p.183.
15 D. Smith, ‘Industrial arts founded,’ in An interpretive history of industrial arts. 30th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by R. Wright and R. Barella (Bloomington, IL: McKnight, 1981).
16 D. Smith, ‘Industrial arts founded,’ in An interpretive history of industrial arts. 30th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by R. Wright and R. Barella (Bloomington, IL: McKnight, 1981).
17 F. G. Bonser and L. C. Mossman, Industrial arts for elementary schools (Macmillan, 1923).G. O. Wilber, Industrial arts in general education (Scranton, PA: International Textbook Co., 1948), p. 5.
18 D. Smith, ‘Industrial arts founded,’ in An interpretive history of industrial arts. 30th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by R. Wright and R. Barella (Bloomington, IL: McKnight, 1981).
19 G. O. Wilber, Industrial arts in general education (Scranton, PA: International Textbook Co., 1948), p. 2.
20 K. F. Zuga, ‘An analysis of technology education in the United States based upon an historical overview and review of contemporary curriculum research,’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, no. 3 (1997), pp. 203–217.
21 N. Frantz, (1982). ‘Industrial Arts and Its Contribution to Vocational Education,’ in The Contributions of Industrial Arts to Selected Areas of Education. 31st Yearbook, ed. by D. Maley and K. N. Starkweather (Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International, 1982), p. 131.
22 W. E. Dugger, ‘Evolution of STEM in the United States,’ in 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research in Australia (2010, December); T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), p. 3.
23 D. Smith, ‘Industrial arts founded,’ in An interpretive history of industrial arts. 30th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by R. Wright and R. Barella (Bloomington, IL: McKnight, 1981), p. 201.
24 D. Smith, ‘Industrial arts founded,’ in An interpretive history of industrial arts. 30th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by R. Wright and R. Barella (Bloomington, IL: McKnight, 1981), p. 201.
25 P. W. De Vore and D. P. Lauda, (1976). ‘Implications for Industrial Arts,’ in Future Alternatives for Industrial Arts. 25th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by L. H. Smalley (Bloomington, IL: McKnight Publishing Company, 1976), p. 145.
26 P. W. De Vore and D. P. Lauda, (1976). ‘Implications for Industrial Arts,’ in Future Alternatives for Industrial Arts. 25th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by L. H. Smalley (Bloomington, IL: McKnight Publishing Company, 1976), p. 144.
27 National Science Foundation. Materials Development, Research, and Informal Science Education Program Announcement. (Washington DC, 1991).
28 R. McCormick, ‘The evolution of current practice in technology education,’ in Integrating advanced technology into technology education, ed. by M. Hacker, A. Gordon and M. de Vries (Berlin, Heidelberg; Springer, 1991), pp. 41–55.
29 International Technology Education Association [ITEA], Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology, 3rd ed. (Reston, VA: ITEA, 2007); T. R. Kelley and J. G. Knowles, ‘A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education,’ International Journal of STEM Education, 3, no. 1 (2016), pp. 1–11.
30 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020), p. 8.
31 A. Buch, (1999). ‘Learning and Construction in Engineering Jobs,’ Roskilde University; J. Han and T. R. Kelley, ‘STEM Integration through shared practices: examining secondary science and engineering technology students’ concurrent think-aloud protocols,’ Journal of Engineering Design, 33, no. 5 (2022), pp. 343–365; J. M. Spector and T. M. Anderson, Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding Complex Domains (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000); M. A. De Miranda, ‘The grounding of a discipline: Cognition and instruction in technology education,’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, no. 1 (2004), pp. 61–77.
32 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020).
33 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020), p. 4.
34 J. R. Johnson, Technology: Report of the Project 2061 Phase I Technology Panel (AAAS Books, 1989); J. R. Pannabecker, ‘For a History of Technology Education: Contexts, Systems, and Narratives,’ Journal of Technology Education, 7, no. 1 (1995), pp. 43–56.
35 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020), p. 4.
36 S. Keirl, ‘Ethical technological literacy as democratic curriculum keystone,’ in Defining Technological Literacy Towards an Epistemological Framework (Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), pp. 81–102.
37 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020).
38 S. Keirl, ‘Ethical technological literacy as democratic curriculum keystone,’ in Defining Technological Literacy Towards an Epistemological Framework (Palgrave Macmillan, 2006), pp. 81–102.
39 R. Kahn and D. Kellner, ‘Reconstructing Technoliteracy: A Multiple Literacies Approach,’ E-learning and Digital Media, 2, no. 3 (2005), pp. 238–251.
40 L. Nadelson and A. Seifert, ‘Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future,’ The Journal of Educational Research: Teaching and Learning Integrated STEM Using Evidence-Based Practices, 110, no. 3 (2017), pp. 221–223; T. Kelley, ‘Staking the Claim for the "T" in STEM,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 36, no. 1 (2010), pp. 2–11.
41 T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), pp. 34–42.
42 International Technology Education Association [ITEA], Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology, 3rd ed. (Reston, VA: ITEA, 2007); International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020); T. R. Kelley and J. G. Knowles, ‘A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education,’ International Journal of STEM Education, 3, no. 1 (2016), pp. 1–11.
43 D. R. Herschbach, ‘From industrial arts to technology education: The eclipse of purpose,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 23, no. 2 (1997).
44 P. W. De Vore and D. P. Lauda, (1976). ‘Implications for Industrial Arts,’ in Future Alternatives for Industrial Arts. 25th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by L. H. Smalley (Bloomington, IL: McKnight Publishing Company, 1976), p 157.
45 P. Foster, ‘Technology Education: AKA Industrial Arts,’ Journal of Technology Education, 5, no. 2 (1994), p. 21.
46 B. M. Cunningham, ‘Technological developments and industrial technology,’ in Industrial technology education, 18th yearbook of the ACIATE, ed. by C. Thomas Dean and Nelson A. Hauer (Luisiana1; Luisiana State University, 1969), p. 28.
47 T. Kelley, ‘Staking the Claim for the "T" in STEM,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 36, no. 1 (2010), pp. 2–11.
48 K. F. Zuga, ‘An analysis of technology education in the United States based upon an historical overview and review of contemporary curriculum research,’ International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, no. 3 (1997), pp. 203–217.
49 T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), pp. 34–42.
50 T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), p. 34.
51 P. Foster, ‘Technology Education: AKA Industrial Arts,’ Journal of Technology Education, 5, no. 2 (1994), pp. 15–30.
52 T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), pp. 34–42.
53 T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), pp. 34–42.
54 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020), p. 158.
55 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020), p. 78.
56 T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), 34–42.
57 W. R. Miller, (1979). ‘Evolution of I.A. in Elementary School Curricular,’in Industrial Arts Education: Retrospect, Prospect. 28th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by G. E. Martin (Bloomington, IL: McKnight Publishing Company, 1979), pp. 43–58.
58 T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), 37.
59 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020).
60 T. Kelley, ‘Staking the Claim for the "T" in STEM,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 36, no. 1 (2010), pp. 2–11; W. E. Dugger, ‘Evolution of STEM in the United States,’ in 6th Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research in Australia (2010, December).
61 K. Sabochik, ‘Changing the Equation in STEM Education,’ https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2010/09/16/changing-equation-stem-education [accessed August 22, 2022].
62 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard [assessed August 22, 2022].
63 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020), p. 17.
64 L. Nadelson and A. Seifert, ‘Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future,’ The Journal of Educational Research: Teaching and Learning Integrated STEM Using Evidence-Based Practices, 110, no. 3 (2017), 221–223; T. Kelley, ‘Staking the Claim for the "T" in STEM,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 36, no. 1 (2010), pp. 2–11.
65 T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), pp. 34–42.
66 T. Kelley, ‘Voices from the Past: Messages for a STEM Future,’ Journal of Technology Studies, 38, no. 1 (2012), p. 34.
67 K. Zuga, ‘Interdisciplinary approach,’ in Instructional strategies for technology education, ed. by W. Kemp and A. Schwaller (Mission Hills, CA: Glencoe, 1988).
68 M. E. Sanders, Integrative STEM education as “best practice” (Queensland, Australia: Griffith Institute for Educational Research, 2012).
69 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020), p. 6.
70 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020).
71 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association [ITEEA], Standards for Technological and Engineering Literacy: Defining the Role of Technology and Engineering in STEM Education (VA: ITEEA, 2020), p. 17.
72 C. A. Bennett, History of Manual and Industrial Education, 1870 to 1917 (Illinois: Charles A. Bennett Company, 1937).
73 C. A. Bennett, History of Manual and Industrial Education, 1870 to 1917 (Illinois: Charles A. Bennett Company, 1937).
74 D. Smith, ‘Industrial arts founded,’ in An interpretive history of industrial arts. 30th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by R. Wright and R. Barella (Bloomington, IL: McKnight, 1981), pp. 165–204.
75 D. Smith, ‘Industrial arts founded,’ in An interpretive history of industrial arts. 30th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by R. Wright and R. Barella (Bloomington, IL: McKnight, 1981), p 185.
76 D. Smith, ‘Industrial arts founded,’ in An interpretive history of industrial arts. 30th Yearbook of the American Council on Industrial Arts Teacher Education, ed. by R. Wright and R. Barella (Bloomington, IL: McKnight, 1981), pp. 165–204.
77 F. G. Bonser and L. C. Mossman, Industrial arts for elementary schools (Macmillan, 1923).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Jung Han
Jung Han, Ph.D., is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Technology Leadership Innovation, Purdue University and can be reached at [email protected].
Correspondence to: Jung Han. Email: [email protected].
Todd Kelley
Todd Kelley, Ph.D., is a professor in the Department of Technology Leadership Innovation, Purdue University. He can be reached at [email protected].
Yunjin Lim
Yunjin Lim, Ph.D., is a associate research fellow in the Department of Digital and Future Education Research, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. He can be reached at [email protected].