275
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using inferences to evaluate the value added of mixed methods research: a content analysis

&
Pages 57-72 | Received 08 Feb 2015, Accepted 04 Dec 2015, Published online: 05 Feb 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Content analysis was used to explore a way to measure the value added of mixed methods research by comparing the quantity and types of inferences drawn by authors of research articles using quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Qualitative coding of a matched sample of 51 articles yielded 473 inferences in 8 categories and 4 clusters. No justification was found to support the argument that the three methods are distinguishable by inferential quality. These results have methodological significance because they challenge the accuracy of distinguishing qualitative research as high inference and quantitative research as low inference.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.