Abstract
In this paper, we set up a mixed duopoly competition model between state-owned and private firms in order to compare specific and ad valorem taxes. Assuming that the total output under specific and ad valorem taxation remains unchanged, we find that if the public firm is completely privatised, the output of the private firm under the two tax schemes will be the same. If the public firm is not completely privatised, the output of the the private firm under specific taxation will be greater than that under ad valorem taxation. If the private firm is a pure local one, the social benefits will be the same under the two tax schemes. However, if the private firm is a joint venture that involves domestic and foreign entities, social welfare under ad valorem taxation will be greater than that under specific taxation.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the editor and the referees of Economic and Political Studies for their constructive suggestions. Leonard F. S. Wang would like to thank the Tiger Fund for sponsoring the research.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
2 See Yang, Zhang, and Wang (Citation2022), Denicolo and Matteuzzi (Citation2000), Anderson, Palma, and Kreider (Citation2001a; Citation2001b), Wang and Zhao (Citation2009), Lapan and Hennessy (Citation2011), Häckner and Herzing (Citation2016), Vetter (Citation2017), and Wang, Chou, and Liang (Citation2018).
3 See Tian and Xia (Citation2017), which investigates the influence of China’s WTO membership on the reform of SOEs.
7 Suits and Musgrave (Citation1953), Yang (1993), Denicolo and Matteuzzi (Citation2000), Anderson, de Palma, and Kreider (Citation2001a; Citation2001b), Collie (Citation2006), Lapan and Hennessy (Citation2011), Vetter (Citation2017), Azacis and Collie (Citation2018), Wang, Chou, and Liang (Citation2018) also assume that the total output under the two tax schemes equals to each other.
12 In the study presented by Lin and Matsumura (Citation2012), foreign investors are also allowed to purchase the share of public enterprises. Therefore, in future studies, we can consider this scenario and explore the advantages of indirect taxation in a mixed oligopoly market with foreign ownership.
Hamilton, Stephen F. 1999. “Tax Incidence under Oligopoly: A Comparison of Policy Approaches.” Journal of Public Economics 71 (2): 233–245. Delipalla, Sophia, and Michael Keen. 1992. “The Comparison between Ad Valorem and Specific Taxation under Imperfect Competition.” Journal of Public Economics 49 (3): 351–367. Skeath, Susan E., and Gregory A. Trandel. 1994. “A Pareto Comparison of Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes in Noncompetitive Environments.” Journal of Public Economics 53 (1): 53–71. Yang, Ya-Po, Qidi Zhang, and Leonard F. S. Wang. 2022. “Tariff Simplification, Privatization, and Welfare Superiority.” Metroeconomica 2022 (1):1–25. Denicolo, Vincenzo, and Massimo Matteuzzi. 2000. “Specific and Ad Valorem Taxation in Asymmetric Cournot Oligopolies.” International Tax and Public Finance 7 (3): 335–342. Anderson, Simon P., Andréde Palma, and Brent Kreider. 2001a. “Tax Incidence in Differentiated Product Oligopoly.” Journal of Public Economics 81 (2): 173–192. Anderson, Simon P., Andréde Palma, and Brent Kreider. 2001b. “The Efficiency of Indirect Taxes under Imperfect Competition.” Journal of Public Economics 81 (2): 231–251. Wang, Xinghe, and Jingang Zhao. 2009. “On the Efficiency of Indirect Taxes in Differentiated Oligopolies with Asymmetric Costs.” Journal of Economics 96 (3): 223–239. Lapan, Harvey E., and David A. Hennessy. 2011. “Unit versus Ad Valorem Taxes in Multiproduct Oligopoly.” Journal of Public Economic Theory 13 (1): 125–138. Häckner, Jonas, and Mathias Herzing. 2016. “Welfare Effects of Taxation in Oligopolistic Markets.” Journal of Economic Theory 163 (2): 141–166. Vetter, Henrik. 2017. “Commodity Taxes and Welfare under Endogenous Conduct.” Journal of Economics 122 (2): 137–154. Wang, Kuang-Cheng Andy, Ping-Yao Chou, and Wen-Jung Liang. 2018. “Specific versus Ad Valorem Taxes in the Presence of Cost and Quality Differences.” International Tax and Public Finance 25 (5): 1197–1214. Tian, Ye, and Min Xia. 2017. “WTO, Credible Commitments, and China’s Reform of State-owned Enterprises.” Economic and Political Studies 5 (2): 158–178. Wang, Leonard F. S., and Tai-Liang Chen. 2011. “Mixed Oligopoly, Optimal Privatization, and Foreign Penetration.” Economic Modelling 28 (4): 1465–1470. Cato, Susumu, and Toshihiro Matsumura. 2012. “Long-run Effects of Foreign Penetration on Privatization Policies.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 168 (3): 444–454. Lin, Ming Hsin, and Toshihiro Matsumura. 2012. “Presence of Foreign Investors in Privatized Firms and Privatization Policy.” Journal of Economics 107 (1): 71–80. Wang, Leonard F. S., and Yoshihiro Tomaru. 2015. “The Feasibility of Privatization and Foreign Penetration.” International Review of Economics & Finance 39: 36–46. Wu, Shih-Jye, Yang-Ming Chang, and Hung-Yi Chen. 2016. “Imported Inputs and Privatization in Downstream Mixed Oligopoly with Foreign Ownership.” Canadian Journal of Economics 49 (3): 1179–1207. Bárcena-Ruiz, Juan Carlos. 2012. “Privatisation When the Public Firm Is as Efficient as Private Firms.” Economic Modelling 29 (4): 1019–1023. Wang, Leonard F. S., and Tien-Der Han. 2015. “Better Governance Matters Optimal Privatization Policy.” Eurasian Economic Review 5 (2): 189–206. Etro, Federico. 2006. “Aggressive Leaders.” The RAND Journal of Economics 37 (1): 146–154. Suits, Daniel B., and Richard A. Musgrave. 1953. “Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes Compared.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 67 (4): 598–604. Denicolo, Vincenzo, and Massimo Matteuzzi. 2000. “Specific and Ad Valorem Taxation in Asymmetric Cournot Oligopolies.” International Tax and Public Finance 7 (3): 335–342. Anderson, Simon P., Andréde Palma, and Brent Kreider. 2001a. “Tax Incidence in Differentiated Product Oligopoly.” Journal of Public Economics 81 (2): 173–192. Anderson, Simon P., Andréde Palma, and Brent Kreider. 2001b. “The Efficiency of Indirect Taxes under Imperfect Competition.” Journal of Public Economics 81 (2): 231–251. Collie, David. R. 2006. “Tariffs and Subsidies under Asymmetric Oligopoly: Ad Valorem versus Specific Instruments.” The Manchester School, 74 (3):314. Lapan, Harvey E., and David A. Hennessy. 2011. “Unit versus Ad Valorem Taxes in Multiproduct Oligopoly.” Journal of Public Economic Theory 13 (1): 125–138. Vetter, Henrik. 2017. “Commodity Taxes and Welfare under Endogenous Conduct.” Journal of Economics 122 (2): 137–154. Azacis, Helmuts, and David R. Collie. 2018. “Taxation and the Sustainability of Collusion: Ad Valorem versus Specific Taxes.” Journal of Economics 125 (2): 173–188. Wang, Kuang-Cheng Andy, Ping-Yao Chou, and Wen-Jung Liang. 2018. “Specific versus Ad Valorem Taxes in the Presence of Cost and Quality Differences.” International Tax and Public Finance 25 (5): 1197–1214. Lin, Ming Hsin, and Toshihiro Matsumura. 2012. “Presence of Foreign Investors in Privatized Firms and Privatization Policy.” Journal of Economics 107 (1): 71–80. Additional information
Funding
This research is supported by the Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province of China [Grant No. 2019D037] and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [Grant No. 310823153013].