53
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A Qualitative Exploration of Research-School Partnerships During COVID: How to Better Serve Our Community Partners During Times of Crisis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Published online: 28 Mar 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Most youth access mental health care through their school. As such, research has targeted schools as ideal service settings to reduce disparities in service use among adolescents. The COVID shutdowns were associated with elevated stress and depression across caregivers, teachers, and students, and increased rates of suicide amongst youth. In the virtual space, schools had difficulty maintaining needed supports. Negative impacts were disproportionately experienced by Black communities and urban school settings. The shutdown also disrupted most research efforts occurring in school settings, leaving schools with even fewer supports when most in need. Thus, the current qualitative study aimed to obtain feedback from personnel in an urban high school system on how research-community partnerships could better support schools generally and especially during times of crisis. Our sample consisted of 17 teachers and school-based mental health providers who participated in virtual qualitative interviews or focus groups. Four key themes emerged, calling for reform in how research partners interact with school partners: 1) embed the researcher in the community, 2) utilize the researcher as an allied communicator, 3) empower the researcher to adapt in response to shifting demands, 4) establish the researcher as a long-term partner. Findings call for reform in how community-based research is funded to better allow researchers to develop long-standing, culturally responsive, and mutually beneficial partnerships, particularly in times of crisis.

Acknowledgments

We are forever grateful to our partnering high schools – administration, providers, teachers, families, and support staff – without whom this important work could not have been done. We also acknowledge Lillian Alford, Kendall Abell, and Domonique Fiddemon, who contributed meaningfully to this work by supporting recruitment efforts and transcribing the audio recordings from which these findings emerged. Finally, many thanks to study coordinators (Tricia Triece, MS, Sha Raye Horn, MPS, MBA) and consultants (Nicholas Ialongo, PhD, Steven W. Evans, PhD, Stacy Frazier, PhD) who supported this work through unexpected and changing circumstances.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health under Grant [MH117086].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 116.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.