Natural Plant Extract – Loganin: A Hypothesis for Psoriasis Treatment Through Inhibiting Oxidative Stress and Equilibrating Immunity via Regulation of Macrophage Polarization

Abstract

Psoriasis, a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease, influences approximately 2–3% of the world’s population. At present, the etiology of psoriasis remains unclear and there is still no causal treatment available. Recent studies indicate that oxidative stress (OS) and T cells dysregulation may participate in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, among which M1-dominant macrophage polarization is a crucial contributor. Macrophages mainly polarize into two different subsets, ie, classically activated macrophage (M1) and alternatively activated macrophage (M2). M1 polarization tends to exacerbate psoriasis via producing substantial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inflammatory mediators, to encourage OS invasion and T cells dysregulation. Thus, targeting M1 polarization can be a possible therapeutic alternative for psoriasis. Loganin, belonging to iridoid glycosides, is a pharmaceutically active ingredient originated from Cornus officinalis, exerting multiple biological activities, eg, immunomodulation, antioxidation, anti-inflammation, etc. More importantly, it could effectively suppress M1 polarization, thereby arresting OS aggression and T cells’ dysregulation. Numerous studies have confirmed that loganin is quite reliable for diseases treatment via suppressing M1 polarization. Nevertheless, reports about loganin treating psoriasis have seldom appeared so far. Accordingly, we hold a hypothesis that loganin would availably manage psoriasis through preventing M1 polarization. Data from previous studies guarantee the potential of loganin in control of psoriasis.

Keywords:

• loganin
• psoriasis
• macrophage polarization
• oxidative stress
• T cells

Introduction

Psoriasis is a chronic and systemic, immune-mediated inflammatory disorder, histologically featuring as abnormal keratinocytes (KCs) proliferation/differentiation, angiogenesis, and immune/inflammatory cells’ infiltration^1–3 It passively affects about 2–3% of the global individuals involving their mental and physical health, but few satisfactory treatments exist until now.⁴ Currently, therapeutic strategies for psoriasis are varied covering topical medications (emollients, topical corticosteroids, retinoid derivatives, synthetic vitamin D analogues, calcineurin inhibitors and keratolytics), systemic agents (methotrexate, cyclosporine, retinoids, and even the biological agents) and phototherapy; their application, however, unfolds a certain limitation due to their short efficacy, easy recurrence, serious side effects, and high costs^5–7 Consequently, it would be helpful to develop a novel pharmaceutical product for psoriasis.

Figure 1 The specific process of M1 and M2 macrophage polarization. In the process of macrophage polarization, a series of crucial signaling pathways and factors are implicated. Under the mediation of pivotal factors, the binding between receptors and ligands facilitates multiple signaling pathways activation, ultimately resulting in M0 macrophages polarization towards M1 or M2. However, M1/M2 always keeps in dynamic balance.

Abbreviations: IFN-γ, interferon gamma; IFN-γR, interferon gamma receptor; JAK1/2/3, Janus kinase 1/2/3; STAT1/3/6, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1/3/6; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; TLR4, Toll-like receptor-4; MyD88, myeloid differentiation factor 88; TRIF, TIR domain-containing adaptor protein inducing IFNβ; IRF-3, interferon regulatory factor 3; IL, interleukin; TRAF-6, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B.

Since the specific pathogenesis of psoriasis remains somewhat unknown, oxidative stress (OS), T cells dysregulation, and M1 macrophage polarization could make a significant contribution to this part^8,9 In general, macrophages roughly differentiate into two different subsets, namely classically activated macrophage (M1) and alternatively activated macrophage (M2)¹⁰; this is so-called macrophage polarization. Increasing evidence has confirmed that M1-dominated macrophage polarization positively works in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and the enhancement of M1 is proportional to the severity of psoriasis.¹¹ Numerous studies, meanwhile, demonstrate that M1 polarization closely goes together with the aberrant expression of keratin in KCs and the formation of keratosis, erythema, and scales.¹² Moreover, through generation of excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inflammatory factors, M1 polarization facilitates OS occurrence and T cells dysregulation further to aggravate psoriasis. Therefore, it would be promising for psoriasis treatment by targeting macrophage polarization.

Loganin, a natural plant extract from Cornus officinalis, possesses immunomodulatory, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-proliferative activities with few cytotoxic side effects,^13,14 Growing data support that loganin is quite safe and effective in various diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), atopic dermatitis (AD), osteoarthritis, pancreatitis, neuroinflammation, diabetes, and so on, mainly by inhibiting M1 polarization.^13–19 However, the effect of loganin on psoriasis has scarcely been reported up to now, so we propose the possibility of loganin in psoriasis treatment based on psoriasis pathogenesis and loganin’s function. Hence, we review the potential evidence of loganin in the management of psoriasis.

Possible Pathogenesis of Psoriasis

As a multifactorial disease, psoriasis etiologically keeps complex and unclear, possibly involving genetic (eg, some histocompatibility complexes and susceptibility genes, like HLACw6, HLACw7, IL-12B, IL-23R, TNFAIP3, etc), environmental (bacterial/viral infections, trauma, stress, etc), and immunological factors.²⁰ Studies in increasing numbers have verified that OS and T cells dysregulation are important players in the pathogenesis of psoriasis,^8,9 whereas excessive recruitment and activation of M1 promote ROS accumulation, OS aggression and T cells imbalance, thereby aggravating the uncontrolled psoriatic lesions and inflammation^21–23 Furthermore, the peripheral blood monocytes of psoriasis patients are more inclined to M1 polarization rather than M2 polarization, resulting in a higher proportion of M1/M2 in psoriasis individuals.¹¹ The following section will focus on the relationship between macrophage polarization and OS as well T cells’ dysregulation in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.

Macrophage Polarization and Its Role in Psoriasis

Macrophages, a group of innate immune cells derived from peripheral blood monocytes, functionally mediate in homeostasis maintenance, inflammatory response, angiogenesis, tissue repair, and so on.²⁴ Under the stimulation of microenvironment signals, peripheral blood monocytes tend to differentiate into Naïve macrophages (Mφ, also called M0) and then polarize into two main subtypes: M1 and M2,^25,26 M1, marked by CD86, CD40, and CD80, primarily serves inflammation and cell/tissue injury; while M2, featuring the expression of CD163, CD206, and CD209, has functions of anti-inflammation and tissue repair,^27,28 M1 polarization is largely driven by T helper 1 (Th1) cell-oriented cytokines [especially interferon-γ (IFN-γ)] and microbial products [like lipopolysaccharide (LPS).²⁹ IFN-γ and LPS first bind to the corresponding receptors on the surface of macrophages – IFN-γ receptor (IFN-γR) and Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4). The combination of IFN-γ with IFN-γR inspires Janus kinase 1/2 (JAK1/2) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) phosphorylation, and further triggers M1 polarization.^25,30 On the other side, LPS coupling TLR4 recruits the signals like TIR domain-containing adaptor protein inducing IFNβ (TRIF) and myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), subsequently exciting the downstream-related factors, ie, interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3), TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF-6), STAT1 and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), ultimately initiating M1 polarization.^25,31–36 Instead, M2 polarization occurs in the presence of Th2 cytokines (mostly IL-4/13 and IL-10).³⁷ IL-4/13 and IL-10 in combination with their corresponding receptor (IL4Rα) mainly stimulate the activation of JAK1/2/3, STAT6, and STAT3, thus spurring macrophage polarization towards M2.^38,39 The process of M1 and M2 macrophage polarization is clearly sketched in Figure 1.

Numerous studies have revealed that M1-dominated polarization acts as a vital player in psoriasis.^10,11 M1-polarized macrophages could generate excessive ROS and inflammatory factors in the persistence of psoriatic inflammatory stimulation.^9,40 The activation of M1 provokes a variety of inflammatory mediators release, such as antigen-presenting molecules (MHC-II), chemokines (CXCL8-11, NO, ROS), and inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-12, IL-17, IL-23, IL-27, etc).,^41,42 further triggering OS occurrence and T cells dysregulation (Th1/Th17 cells overactivation) as well as Th1/Th17-derived cytokines hypersecretion (mainly IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-22, and IL-23).⁴³ Moreover, substantial M1-produced ROS induces oxidative damage that aggravates psoriatic complaint.^11,40 Through production of superfluous ROS, M1 could exacerbate OS damage and inflammatory response.^44,45 As a result, aggressive OS and activated Th1/Th17 cells encourage the initiation and progression of skin inflammation via secreting the above inflammatory cytokines, thus accelerating the tissue damage in psoriasis patients^8,9,46,47 Along with the relative inhibition of M2 in psoriasis, on the contrary, M2-secreted chemokines (such as CCL17, CCL18, CCL22, and CCL24) and anti-inflammatory cytokines [like transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), IL-10 and IL-4] decrease remarkably, which are unfavorable for tissue repair and immunosuppression.^34,48,49 At present, numerous studies have demonstrated that macrophage polarization critically serves in immune, inflammatory or tumor diseases, eg, psoriasis, IBD, AD, Behcet’s disease (BD), atherosclerosis (AS), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SS), infantile hemangioma (IH), etc.^{9,10,14,16,27,50} Specifically, based on psoriasis pathogenesis, suppressing M1 and/or shifting M1 towards M2 would be favorable strategies to settle this complaint. Figure 2 shows the mediation of macrophage polarization in psoriasis pathogenesis.

Figure 2 The possible pathogenesis of psoriasis mediated by macrophage polarization. Stimulated by LPS and IFN-γ, M0 tends to differentiate into M1 that presents an enhancement in psoriasis. Through activating related signaling pathways, excited M1 releases various OS /inflammatory mediators (eg ROS, NO, MHC-II, CXCL8-11, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-12, IL-23, IL-27 etc) that further provoke OS damage and T cells abnormality (Th1 and Th17 overactivation). Instead, IL-4/13/10-induced M2 encourages the secretion of related cytokines (like CCL17, CCL18, CCL22, CCL24, TGF-β, IL-10, IL-4, ect), thereby stimulating anti-inflammatory mediators increase and normal angiogenesis, ultimately facilitating anti-inflammation, tissue repair and immunosuppression. M2, nevertheless, remarkably lowers in psoriasis in the absence or inhibition of IL-4/13 and IL-10, thus contributing to the decline of M2-secreted anti-inflammatory mediators, eventually resulting in Th2 and Treg cells reduction. Collectively, above events would trigger OS damage and T cell dysregulation, subsequently inducing skin histopathological impairments like hyperkeratosis, parakeratosis, acanthosis, hypogranulosis and abnormal angiogenesis as well as dermal inflammatory cells infiltration, ultimately initiating psoriasis.

Notes: ⊕ indicates “activation”, ㊀ indicates “inhibition/absence”, ↑↑ indicates “upregulation” and ↓↓ indicates “downregulation”.

Abbreviations: LPS, lipopolysaccharide; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; M1/2, M1/2 macrophage; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NO, nitric oxide; OS, oxidative stress; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL-1β/4/10/12/13/17/23/27, interleukin-1β/4/10/12/13/17/23/27; Th, T helper; Treg, regulatory T cells; CCL17/18/22/24, chemokine (c-c motif) ligand 17/18/22/24; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β.

M1 Polarization Exacerbating OS Damage in Psoriasis

ROS are mostly originated from macrophages and crucially serve many inflammatory diseases like psoriasis, vitiligo, SLE, BD, AD, AS, and cancer, psoriasis in particular^14,51–53 As the main contributor to OS, ROS are a collective term covering a series of active oxygen-containing compounds, such as superoxide (O₂⁻), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (OH), lipid hydroperoxide (LOOH), and so on.⁵⁴ High-level ROS on one side enhance the expression of malondialdehyde (MDA) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), on the other side lower the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidases (GSH-px).⁵⁵ It is confirmed that M1 frequently consumes more nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) to promote ROS overproduction and OS initiation.^51,56 More than that, some proinflammatory factors from the microenvironment could drive M1 polarization that further accelerates the excessive formation of ROS.⁴⁴ Meanwhile, increasing evidence supports that M1 from psoriatic skin far exceed those from normal skin, thereby producing substantial ROS as well inflammatory cytokines that further initiate OS and switch on a series of pathogenic events in psoriasis.^9,11,22,23 The excessive and sustained stimulation of ROS in turn encourage the enhancement of intracellular oxidative metabolites and the impairment of antioxidant defense that contribute to more ROS accumulation, the formation of oxidized lipids and denatured protein, and the destruction of nucleic acids, finally resulting in cytotoxicity and damaging cells/tissues^57,58 Moreover, ROS aggressively activate transcription factors in KCs as well as VEGF-independent/VEGF-dependent pathways to facilitate psoriatic KCs hyperproliferation and abnormal angiogenesis in the dermis, contributing to psoriasis progression^59,60 Notably, ROS conversely induce and maintain M1 polarization via activating MAPK and NF-κB signals, which constantly stimulate pro-inflammatory genes expression in macrophages and aggravate OS damage to psoriasis individuals.^44,61

M1 Polarization Facilitating T Cell Dysregulation in Psoriasis

It has been proved that macrophages impact greatly on the proliferation, phenotype, and subtype of T cells. In general, T cells coexist and interact with macrophages at the site of inflammation, correspondingly the direction of macrophage polarization influencing the activation and differentiation of CD4+ T cells^62,63 In the presence of signals from the microenvironment, CD4+ T cells often differentiate into kinds of functional subtypes (eg, Th1/Th17 cells and Th2/Treg cells).⁶⁴ Usually, M1/M2 keeps a dynamic equilibrium; in psoriasis, however, this balance is disturbed, leading to T cells dysregulation.¹¹ Stimulated by uncontrolled and sustained inflammatory signals from the psoriatic microenvironment, macrophages are heavily skewed towards M1; conversely, M2 activation is relatively suppressed.⁹ M1 polarization actively induces the differentiation/activation of Th1 or Th17 phenotype rather than Th2/Treg cells through secreting IL-12 or IL-23 respectively.^65,66 The activation of Th1 and Th17 cells activation further induces neutrophils/NK cells infiltration, KCs hyperproliferation, and epidermal thickening, thereby inciting the development of psoriasis.⁶⁷ On the other hand, M1-produced chemokines, eg, CXCL9-11, attract T cells migration to the inflammatory sites and then arouse T cells-mediated inflammatory response.⁶⁸ In turn, activated Th1/Th17 cells and Th1/Th17-secreted proinflammatory cytokines encourage more M1 polarization to aggravate inflammatory progression and accelerate tissue damage, through releasing diverse inflammatory mediators (IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-12, IL-17, IL-23, etc) ^69–71 These create a vicious circle, thereby accelerating the development of inflammation and the damage of tissue in psoriasis.

All events above contribute to the occurrence and progression of psoriasis. Taken together, M1 polarization serves in psoriasis as a critically promoting factor, thus inhibition of M1 polarization may be a potential target for this disease cure.

Biological Properties and Applications of Loganin

Loganin, subordinate to iridoid glycoside, is the main active ingredient extracted from Cornus officinalis. It exerts a broad range of biological activities, containing immunomodulation, antioxidation, anti-inflammation, neuroprotection, etc.^13–15,72 As a traditional Chinese herbal medicine, Cornus officinalis covers more than 300 chemical compounds, particularly loganin being notable.⁷³

The convincing proofs as following have manifested that loganin not only prevents M1 polarization but also provokes M2 polarization, thus laying a theoretical and experimental foundation for treating OS and immunoinflammatory-related diseases,^16,74,75 Previous documents proved that loganin effectively inhibited M1 polarization and induced M2 activation, going on to encourage the depletion of ROS, iNOS, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β as well as the elevation of anti-inflammatory cytokines, SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px through blocking the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway.^74–77 Similar reports also showed that loganin remarkably reduced the expression of the pro-inflammatory chemokines/cytokines (including IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β, CXCL10, and COX-2) via modulating M1/M2 polarization, further alleviating the chronic inflammatory disease called ulcerative colitis (UC) on mice.¹⁶ Apart from that, Cui et al discovered that loganin could prevent BV-2 microglia cells from polarizing to M1 phenotype and cut down the production of IL-6, TNF-α, NO, iNOS, partially through jamming TLR4/TRAF6/NF-κB signals.^15,78 Findings from Quah et al showed that the extracts of Cornus officinalis, particularly loganin, were possibly applied in the treatment of AD and could significantly decrease the production of iNOS, NO, and pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α) in LPS-induced macrophage (M1) through down-regulation the activation of NF-κB pathway.¹⁴ A recent study, using network pharmacology combined with laboratory verification, has revealed that loganin could availably regulate T cells differentiation and IL-17-related signaling pathway in the M1-dominated inflammatory model.⁷⁸ Taken together, loganin, as an excellent anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antioxidant herbal medicine, could effectively regulate macrophage polarization to eliminate ROS, mitigate inflammatory factors and equilibrate immune cells. Thus, based on its multiple pharmacological effects, loganin nowadays has become extensively available for various diseases, especially those associated with OS and immune inflammation; however, reports about loganin application in psoriasis scarcely emerge yet. Therefore, on the basis of above studies, we speculate that loganin would potentially control psoriasis through reducing OS and balancing immunity as well preventing inflammation via inhibition of M1 polarization.

Hypothesis for Loganin in the Treatment of Psoriasis

Considering that M1 polarization-mediated OS and immune imbalance critically contribute to psoriasis and loganin has the ability to prevent OS aggression and balance T cells via curbing M1 polarization, we hypothesized that loganin would be a quite promising agent for psoriasis recovery. Here, a series of proofs are provided as follows to support the potential of loganin in treating psoriasis: (1) Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease.^1–3 (2) The pathogenesis of psoriasis mainly involves OS insult and immune inflammation.^51,79 (3) M1 polarization triggers OS damage and T cells imbalance in psoriasis.^14–16,73 (4) Several studies have confirmed that M1 remarkably goes up in psoriasis and M1-dominated polarization is a crucial player in psoriasis, which contribute to the appearance of elevated ROS and unbalanced T cells.^9,21–23 (5) Loganin exerts powerfully immunomodulatory, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties, with few side/toxic effects.^13,14,80 (6) Loganin potently prohibits M1 polarization and shifts M1 towards M2, which is beneficial to the differentiation of T cells to Treg cells, the reduction of ROS and IFN-γ, IL-β, TNFα as well as the amelioration of inflammatory state in KCs.^14,81 (7) Loganin has been employed in controlling numerous OS-related or immune-inflammatory diseases through decreasing M1/M2 ratio, enhancing antioxidant defense, arresting OS damage, and regulating T cells balance.^14,16,27,81

The supposed process of loganin in the management of psoriasis is elaborately framed based on its inhibition of OS, equilibrium of T cells, and suppression of inflammatory factors/pathways via regulating macrophage polarization (shown in Figure 3).

Figure 3 The hypothetical pattern of loganin controlling psoriasis through indirect and direct effects. Loganin effectively curbs M1 polarization and prevents immune inflammation and OS aggression to take control of psoriasis. Loganin also plays a direct therapeutic role in psoriasis through suppressing the abnormal expression of keratin in KCs, inflammatory reaction, and dermal inflammatory cells infiltration. Consequently, loganin would be a potential rescuer for psoriasis healing.

Notes: ⊕ indicates “activation”, ㊀indicates “inhibition”, ↑↑ indicates “upregulation”, and ↓↓ indicates “downregulation”.

Abbreviations: M1, M1 macrophage; Th, T helper; Treg, regulatory T cells; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NO, nitric oxide; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL-1β, interleukin-1β.

Clinical Significance

As a chronic, recurrent, inflammatory disease that seriously bears upon both people’s mental and physical health, psoriasis has become a highlight in the field of dermatology. Although various therapeutic measures are employed in psoriasis, some disadvantages confine themselves to a long-time application, eg, transient efficacy, easy recurrence, high costs, severe side effects, etc. Hence, a safer, more effective, and economical antipsoriatic drug is urgently required. Loganin, a naturally active compound with diverse bioactivities and few adverse reactions, has been widely used in various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases;^13,15–19 consequently, it is infinitely preferable to psoriasis treatment owing to its antioxidant, immunoregulatory, and anti-inflammatory activities that would be likely to prevent OS damage and equilibrate T cells through inhibiting M1 polarization and shifting M1 towards M2.^10–14

Future Research

To prove this hypothesis and clarify the role of loganin in psoriasis, future research in vivo and in vitro will be performed on animal models and three-dimensional skin models. Psoriasis-associated indicators, meanwhile, need to be inspected containing clinical symptoms/lesions, histopathological changes, cytological, and serological alterations like cutaneous erythema/scales, epidermal parakeratosis/hyperkeratosis, granular layer deficiency, spinous layer hypertrophy, telangiectasia, inflammatory cells infiltration in the dermis, T cells/macrophages quantities and classification, and inflammatory/OS-related indexes levels, regardless of loganin presence or absence. In vivo studies, a well-established psoriasis-like mouse model, as successfully built in our previous study (shown in Figure 4), will be employed to evaluate the effects of loganin; while in vitro experiments, based on psoriasis-like three-dimensional skin models and M1/M2 polarization models, provide a guarantee for exploring the specific mechanism of loganin against psoriasis. The psoriasis-like three-dimensional skin models have also been successfully established in our previous experiments.⁸² Beyond that, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials may offer scientific proofs for the clinical application of loganin.

Figure 4 The well-established psoriasis-like in vivo and in vitro models in our previous experiments. Normal mouse (A), psoriasis-like mouse model (B), normal three-dimensional skin model (C) and psoriasis-like three-dimensional skin model (D).

Conclusions

In conclusion, psoriasis as a complex inflammatory disease tends to recur and impair skin, joints, and other organs, negatively influencing individual health. At present, it has been confirmed that the pathogenesis of psoriasis involves M1-dominated macrophage polarization.²⁰ Hence, a great hope of cure is unfolded for psoriasis by targeting these key points. Currently, the therapies aiming at some crucial pathways or factors or cells have displayed a positive efficacy on psoriasis in practice, but their side effects become obstacles to different extent;^5–7 especially, the recent-year developed biologics are outstanding for psoriasis treatment; for example, the main four-class inhibitors comprising TNF inhibitors (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and certolizumab), IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab), IL-23 inhibitors (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab), and IL-12/23 inhibitor (ustekinumab) are most frequently applied in psoriasis.⁵ Despite the fine effect of biologics, they prevent individuals from using due to their high expenditure, uncertain long-term efficacy and obvious adverse effects. Consequently, safe and cost-effective pharmaceutical products are required. Herein, we elaborate on the pathogenesis of psoriasis and exhibit the activities and applications of loganin. The available cited evidence indicate that loganin would be a suitable alternative for psoriasis treatment and could be applied along with other drugs. Actually, further experiments in vivo and in vitro will be needed to attest the recommended pathogenesis in psoriasis and the improvements in psoriasis parameters following loganin therapy.

Disclosure

Xiaofeng Chen, Qiyan Deng, Xiaolong Li and Li Xian are the co-first authors for this study. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.