The High Court Ruling Against Ingonyama Trust: Implications for South Africa’s Land Governance Policy

References

• Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albertyn, Catherine. 2005. ‘Defending and Securing Rights Through Law: Feminism, Law and the Courts in South Africa’. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies 32 (2): 217–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02589340500353474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauder, Harald, and Salvatore Engel-Di Mauro, eds. 2008. Critical Geographies: A Collection of Readings. Praxis (e)Press.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, Daniel. 2007. ‘Ideas and Institutional Change in Social Security: Conversion, Layering and Policy Drift’. Social Science Quarterly 88 (1): 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, Kristina, Janet Cherry, K. George et al. 2006. Baseline Report Longitudinal Study: The Effect of the Legislated Powers of Traditional Authorities on Rural Women’s Rights in South Africa. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Borras, Saturnino, and Jennifer C. Franco. 2010. ‘Contemporary Discourses and Contestations Around Pro-Poor Land Policies and Land Governance’. Journal of Agrarian Change 10 (1): 1–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00243.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, Robert, and Chantal Milne. 2009. ‘Minnowbrook, Mount Grace and the State of the Discipline’. Journal of Public Administration 44 (2): 380–395.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historic Difference. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2008. ‘In Defense of Provincializing Europe: A Response to Carola Dietze’. History and Theory 47 (1): 85–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2008.00438.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipkin, Ivor, and Sarah Meny-Gibert. 2011. ‘Why the Past Matters’. PARI Short Essays, No 1.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, Ben. 2021. ‘What the Landmark Kwazulu-Natal Court Ruling Means for Land Reform in South Africa’. The Conversation, 22 June.
   Google Scholar
• Duda, Thiyane, and Janine Ubink. 2021. ‘Resisting the Imposition of Ubukhosi: Contested Authority-Making in the Former Ciskei’. In: Land, Law and Chiefs in Rural South Africa, edited by William Beinart, Rosalie Kingwill and Gavin Capps, 141–163. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dussel, Enrique. 1977. Filosofía de la Liberacíon. Mexico City, Mexico: Edicol.
   Google Scholar
• Eliadis, Pearl, Margaret M. Hill, and Michael Patrick Howlett, eds. 2005. Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, David. 2016. ‘Freeze-Farming Territory: Time and its Significance in Land Governance’. Space and Polity 20 (2): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, John, and Gregory Smith. 2009. ‘Context, Situations, and Design Agents’. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22 (8): 600–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, Derek. 2004. The Colonial Present. Maldon, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2007. ‘The Epistemic Decolonial Turn’. Cultural Studies, 21 (2-3): 211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker Jacob. 2005. ‘Policy Drift: The Hidden Politics of US Welfare State Retrenchment’. In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, edited by Wolfgang Streeck and Kathleen Thelen, 40–82. Oxford, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Leila M., Eric K. Chu, and Gina Ziervogel. 2018. ‘Negotiated Resilience’. Resilience 6 (3): 196–214. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, Paddy. 2019. ‘Parliament Backs Move to Scrap Ingonyama Trust’. Mail&Guardian, 1 August.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, Paddy. 2021. ‘Didiza Unveils Plan to Reverse Ingonyama Trust Leases’. Mail&Guardian, 25 September.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, Michael Patrick, and Jeremy Rayner. 2013. ‘Patching vs Packaging in Policy Formulation: Assessing Policy Portfolio Design’. Politics and Governance 1(2), 170–182.
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies and Public Affairs Research Institute. 2021. ‘Making Off-Register Rights Visible’. Second land administration workshop webinar, 17 February.
   Google Scholar
• Kepe, Thembela, Ruth Hall, and Ben Cousins. 2008. ‘Land’. In The New South African Key Words, edited by Nick Sheppard and Steven Robins, 143–156. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press; Johannesburg: Jacana Media, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, Jonathan, Frank W. Geels, Florian Kern et al. 2019. ‘An Agenda for Sustainability Transitions Research: State of the Art and Future Directions’. Environmental Innovations and Societal Transitions 31: 1–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land and Accountability Research Centre. 2021. ‘Ingonyama Trust Lease Case: What are the Judgment’s Implications for Tenure Security of Rural South Africans?’. Webinar, University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, Christopher, and Carl Disalvo. 2013. ‘Infrastructuring and the Formation of Publics in Participatory Design’. Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 241–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712471581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Tanya Murray. 2014. ‘What Is Land? Assembling a Resource for Global Investment’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39 (4): 589–602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, David, and Phil Macnaghten. 2019. ‘Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Innovation Governance: A Framework for Responsible and Just Innovation’. Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 26-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1676686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, Christian. 2006. ‘Twilight Institutions: Public Authority and Local Politics in Africa’. Development and Change 37 (4): 685–705. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00497.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynd, Hilary. 2021. ‘The Peace Deal: The Formation of the Ingonyama Trust and the IFP Decision to Join South Africa’s 1994 Elections’. South African Historical Journal 73 (2): 318–360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02582473.2021.1909116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailovich, Claudi. 2019. ‘Land Panel Recommends Ingonyama Trust Act be Scrapped or Reviewed’. Business Day, 28 July 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Manona, Siyabulela S. 2021. ‘The Role of Open Government Data in the Repurposing of Land Administration in the Post-apartheid South Africa: An Exploration’. PhD diss., Rhodes University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Manona, Siyabulela S., and Thembela Kepe. Forthcoming. ‘Contradictions in the Management of Legal Pluralism in Post-Apartheid South Africa’s Land Governance: Policy Dilemmas Explored’. Journal article under review.
   Google Scholar
• Menga, Filippo, and Erik Swyngedouw. 2018. Water, Technology and the Nation-State. Abington, Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mnwana, Sonwabile. 2018. ‘Private Property? Village Struggles Over Meanings of Land and Mining Revenues on South Africa’s Platinum Belt’. In The Future of Mining in South Africa: Sunset or Sunrise, 205–230. Johannesburg: Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, Seán, and Luvuyo Wotshela. 2005. ‘The State of Archives and Access to Information’. In The State of the Nation: South Africa, edited by John Daniel, Roger Southall and Jessica Lutchman, 313–335. Cape Town: HSRC and Ann Abor: Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mossman, Mary Jane. 1998. ‘Feminism and the Law: Challenges and Choices’. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 10: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Nadasdy, Paul. 2017. Sovereignty’s Entailments: First Nation State Formation in the Yukon. Toronto, London, Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, Cindhamani, ed. 2015. Assessment of the Impact of Decisions of the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court of Appeal on the Transformation of Society. Final Report, prepared for the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, Democracy, Governance and Service Delivery Research Programme of the Human Sciences Research Council in partnership with the Nelson R Mandela School of Law of the University of Fort Hare.
   Google Scholar
• North, Peter. 2011. ‘The Politics of Climate Activism in the UK: A Social Movement Analysis’. Environment and Planning: Economy and Space 43 (7): 1581–1598. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/a43534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahuja, Sundhya. 2013. ‘Laws of Encounter: A Jurisdictional Account of International Law’. London Review of International Law 1 (1): 63–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrt009.
   Google Scholar
• PAPoLRA (Presidential Advisory Panel on Land Reform and Agriculture). 2019. Final Report of the Presidential Advisory Panel on Land Reform and Agriculture. Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament RSA (Parliament Republic of South Africa Parliament). 2017. ‘High Level Panel on the Assessment of Key Legislation and the Acceleration of Fundamental Change’. Speaker’s Forum of Parliament of RSA. https://www.parliament.gov.za/news/high-level-panel-assessment-key-legislation-acceleration-fundamental-change.
   Google Scholar
• Phoenix, Ann, and Pamela Pattynama. 2006. ‘Intersectionality’. European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (3): 187–192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard, Louis A. 2005. The State of the State: Institutional Transformation, Capacity and Political Change in South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, Joanna, and Ayesha Motala. 2021. ‘The Abuse of Interdicts by Traditional Leaders in South Africa’. In Land, Law and Chiefs in Rural South Africa, William Beinart, Rosalie Kingwill and Gavin Capps, 121–140. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rautenbach, Christa, and Jan C. Bekker, eds. 2016. Introduction to Legal Pluralism in South Africa. 4th ed. Pretoria: Lexus and Lexus.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, Ian. 2016. ‘The Politics of Sustainability and Development’. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41: 293–319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-090039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sguazzin Sine, Wesley D., and Brandon H. Lee. ‘Tilting at Windmills? The Environmental Movement and the Emergence of the U.S. Wind Energy Sector’. Administrative Science Quarterly 54 (1): 123–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.123.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Henk, and Wilmien Wicomb. 2014. ‘Customary Law and the Protection of Community Rights to Resources’. Legal Resources Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Staff Writer. 2022. ‘South Africa Starting to Show Signs of a Failing State: Treasury’. BusinessTech, 3 March 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Steyn, Lala. 1994. Closing the Door: The Implications of Implementation of the 1993 Land Legislation. Pretoria: National Land Committee and Surplus People Project.
   Google Scholar
• Swilling, Mark., Josephine Musango, and Jeremy Wakeford. 2016. ‘Developmental States and Sustainability Transitions: Prospects of a Just Transition in South Africa’. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 18 (5): 650–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temper, Leah, Mariana Walter, Iokiñe Rodriguez, Ashish Kothari, and Ethemcan Turhan. 2018. Sustainability Science 13: 747–764. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0543-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, Kathleen. 2003. ‘How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis’. In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer, 208–240. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, Mariana. 2009. ‘Jurisdiction and Scale: Legal “Technicalities” as Resources for Theory’. Social and Legal Studies 18 (2): 139–157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663909103622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, Jeroen. 2010. ‘Short History of Studying Incremental Change: Does Explaining Institutional Change Provide any new Explanations?’ Regulation and Governance 4 (2): 230–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01075.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wyk, Jeannie. 2012. Planning Law. 2nd ed. Cape Town: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Walby, Silvia. 2007. ‘Complexity Theory: Systems Theory and Multiple Intersecting Social Inequalities’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4): 449–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Nicole J. 2019. ‘“Seeing Water Like a State?”: Indigenous Water Governance Through Yukon First Nation Self-Government Agreements’. Geoforum 104: 101–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, Tanja. 2019. ‘Exploring Some of the Complexities of Planning on ‘Communal Land’ in the Former Transkei’. Town and Regional Planning 75: 6–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yende, Sizwe Sama. 2022. ‘Court Dismisses Ingonyama Trust Appeal, Orders it to Refund Residents’. News24, 25 August.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, Hongtao, and Richard C. Feiock. 1974. ‘Policy Tool Interactions and the Adoption of State Renewable Portfolio Standards’. Review of Policy Research 29 (2):193–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00548.x.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Crawford. 2004. ‘The End of the Post-Colonial State in Africa? Reflections on Changing African Political Dynamics’. African Affairs 103 (410): 23-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adh003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelli, Fariborz, Aarti Gupta, and Harro van Asselt. 2012. ‘Horizontal Institutional Interlinkages’. In Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered: New Actors, Mechanisms and Interlinkages, edited by Frank Biermann and Philipp Pattberg, 175–198. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar