References
- Burn-Murdoch, J. (2013). Why you should never trust data visualisation. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/jul/24/why-you-should-never-trust-a-data-visualisation
- Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read and remember. London: Atlantic books.
- Carroll, A. J., Corlett-Rivera, K., Hackman, T., & Zou, J. (2016). E-book perceptions and use in STEM and non-STEM disciplines: A comparative follow-up study. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 16, 131–162. doi:10.13016/M24Q38
- Chen, G., Cheng, W., Chang, T. W., Zheng, X., & Huang, R. (2014). A comparison of reading comprehension across paper, computer screens, and tablets: Does tablet familiarity matter? Journal of Computers in Education, 1, 213–225. doi:10.1007/s40692-014-0012-z
- Cull, B. (2011). Reading revolutios: Online digital text and implications for reading in academe. First Monday, 16(6). Retrieved from http://pear.accc.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3340/2985
- Daniel, D., & Woody, W. D. (2013). E-textbooks at what cost? Performance and use of electronic v. print texts. Computers & Education, 62, 18–23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.1016
- Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35, 1297–1326. Retrieved from https://ford.ischool.utexas.edu/bitstream/2081/1156/5/Reading.htm10.1080/00140139208967394
- Duran, E. (2013). Investigation on views and attitudes of students in Faculty of Education about reading and writing on screen. Educational Research and Reviews, 8, 203–211.
- Durant, D. M., & Horava, T. (2015). The future of reading and academic libraries. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 15, 5–27. Retrieved from https://muse-jhu.edu.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/v015/15.1.durant.html10.1353/pla.2015.0013
- Garrison, D., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19, 133–148. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
- Gilbert, J., & Fister, B. (2015). The perceived impact of e-books on student reading practices: A local study. College and Research Libraries, 76(4), 469–489. doi:10.5860/crl.76.4.469
- Green, T. D., Perera, R. A., Dance, L. A., & Myers, E. A. (2010). Impact of presentation mode on recall of written text and numerical information: Hard copy versus electronic. North American Journal of Psychology, 12, 233–242.
- Grzeschik, K., Kruppa, Y., Marti, D., & Donner, P. (2011). Reading in 2110 – Reading behaviour and reading devices: A case study. The Electronic Library, 29, 288–302. Retrieved from Emerald.10.1108/02640471111141052
- Hughes, M. (2014). ReadCube desktop. The Charleston Advisor, 16(1). Retrieved from http://www.charlestonco.com
- Herman, P. (2014, September 29). The hidden costs of e-books as university libraries. Times of San Diego. Retrieved from http://timesofsandiego.com/opinion/2014/09/29/hidden-costs-e-books-university-libraries/
- I-Chia, C. (2012). Understanding on-screen reading behaviours in academic contexts: A case study of five graduate English-as-a-second-language students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25, 411–433. doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.597768
- Jabr, F. (2013). The reading brain in the digital age: The science of paper versus screens. Scientific American. Retrieved from www.scientificamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/
- Kol, S., & Schcolnik, M. (2000). Enhancing screen reading strategies. CALICO Journal, 18, 67–80. Retrieved from Emerald.
- Lam, P., Lam, S., & McNaught, C. (2009). Usability and usefulness of eBooks on PPCs: How students’ opinions vary over time. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 30–44. Retrieved from Proquest.
- Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
- Martin, L., & Platt, M. (2001). Printing and screen reading in the medical school curriculum: Guttenberg vs. the cathode ray tube. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20, 143–148. doi:10.1080/01449290110048043
- McKay, D. (2011, November). A jump to the left (and then a step to the right): Reading practices within academic ebooks. Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (pp. 202–210). ACM. Retrieved from http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:24853
- McLure, M., & Hoseth, A. (2012). Patron-driven e-book use and users’ e-book perceptions: A snapshot. Collection Building, 31, 136–147.10.1108/01604951211274043
- Mercieca, P. (2003). E-book acceptance: What will make users read on screen? RMIT Research Bank. Retrieved from https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/eserv/rmit:3208/n2004002718.pdf
- Nielsen, J. (2013). Tablet usability. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/tablet-usability/
- Noyes, J. M., & Garland, K. J. (2003). VDT versus paper-based text: Reply to Mayes, Sims and Koonce. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31, 411–423. doi:10.1016//S0169-8141(03)00027-1
- Payne, S. J., & Reader, W. R. (2006). Constructing structure maps of multiple on-line texts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64, 461–474. Retrieved from ScienceDirect.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.09.003
- Qayyum, A., & Williamson, K. (2014). The online information experiences of news-seeking young adults. Information Research, 20(2). Retrieved from http://www.informationr.net/ir/19-2/paper615.html#.V2p9oaJXJh4
- Richardson, J., & Mahmood, K. (2012). eBook readers: User satisfaction and usability issues. Library Hi Tech, 30, 170–185. doi:10.1108/07378831211213283
- Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students’ learning. Computers and Education, 63, 259–266. doi:10/1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022
- Rose, E. (2011). The phenomenology of on-screen reading: University students’ lived experience of digitised text. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 515–526. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01043.x
- Rothkopf, E. Z. (1971). Incidental memory for location of information in text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 608–613. Retrieved from ScienceDirect.10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80066-X
- Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. (n.d.) Graduate attributes. Retrieved August 2, 2016, from http://www1.rmit.edu.au/browse;ID=fkdiznwj3h
- Sandberg, K. (2011). College student academic online reading: A review of the current literature’ journal of college reading and learning, 42, 89–98. Retrieved from ProQuest.10.1080/10790195.2011.10850350
- Spencer, C. (2006). Research on learners’ preferences for reading from a printed text or from a computer screen. Journal of Distance Education, 21, 33–50. Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/viewFile/70/51?locale=en_US
- Staiger, J. (2012). How e-books are used: A literature review of the e-book studies conducted from 2006–2011. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 51, 355–365. Retrieved from ProQuest. 10.5860/rusq
- Stoop, J., Kreutzer, P., & Kircz, J. (2013). Reading and learning from screen versus print: A study in changing habits; Part 1. New Library World, 114, 284–300. doi:10.1108/NLW-01-2013-0012
- Stoop, J., Kreutzer, P., & Kircz, J. (2013). Reading and learning from screen versus print: A study in changing habits; Part 2. New Library World, 114, 371–383. doi:10.1108/NLW.04-2013-0034
- Sun, S. Y., Chich-Jen, S., & Kai-Ping, H. (2013). A research on comprehension differences between print and screen reading. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 16, 87–101. Retrieved from http://www.sajems.org/index.php/sajems/article/view/640
- The University of Melbourne. (2016). Electronic collection policy. Retrieved August 2, 2016, from http://library.unimelb.edu.au/collections22/collection_development_policy/electronic_collection
- The University of Melbourne. (n.d.) Graduate attributes statement. Retrieved 2 August, 2016, from http://www.qmul.ac.uk/docs/gacep/44631.pdf
- Tuncer, M., & Bahadir, F. (2014). Effect of screen reading and reading from printed out material on student success and permanency in introduction to computer lesson. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13, 44–49. Retrieved from http://www.tojet.net/articles/v13i3/1335.pdf
- Wolf, M., & Barzillai, M. (2009). The importance of deep reading. Educational leadership, 66, 32–37. Retrieved from https://www.mbaea.org/documents/resources/educational_leadership_article_the__d87fe2bc4e7ad.pdf
- Wolf, M. (2010). Our ‘deep reading’ brain: Its digital evolution poses questions. Retrieved January 22, 2016, http://niemanreports.org/articles/our-deep-reading-brain-its-digital-evolution-poses-questions/
- Yoram Eden, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2013). The effect of format on performance: Editing text in print versus digital formats. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 846–856. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01332.x
- Young, J. (2014). A study of print and computer-based reading to measure and compare rates of comprehension and retention. New Library World, 115, 376–393. doi:10.1108/NLW-05-2014-0051