References
- Cheon, M. J., Groven, V., & Sabherwal, R. (1993). The evolution of empirical research in IS: A study in IS maturity. Information & Management, 24, 107–119.10.1016/0378-7206(93)90060-7
- Edmonson, A., & McManus, S. (2006). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1246–1264.
- Gable, G. G., Smyth, R., & Gable, A. (2016). The role of the doctoral consortium: An information systems signature pedagogy? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 38, Article 33. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol38/iss1/33
- Keathley, H., Aleu, F. G., Orlandini, P. F. C., Van Aken, E., Deschamps, F., & Leite, L. (2013). Proposed maturity assessment framework for a research field. In A. Krishnamurthy & W. K. V. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2013 industrial and systems engineering research conference (pp. 764–773). San Juan, Puerto Rico.
- Von Krogh, G., Rossi-Lamastra, C., & Haefliger, S. (2012). Phenomenon-based research in management and organisation science: When is it rigorous and does it matter? Long Range Planning, 45, 277–298.10.1016/j.lrp.2012.05.001
- Vos, M. (2015). Maturity of the internet of things research field: Or why choose rigorous keywords. Paper presented at Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Adelaide, Australia. Retrieved from https://acis2015.unisa.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/.../ACIS_2015_paper_147.pdf
- Whitley, R. (2007). Changing governance of the public sciences. In R. Whitley & J. Glaser (Eds.), The changing governance of the sciences (pp. 3–27). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4